I have the following in Django models.py (models are stripped down to only necessary fields)
class Product(BaseProduct):
price = models.IntegerField()
productfoto = models.ManyToManyField("ProductFoto", related_name="%(app_label)s_%(class)s_related")
class Meta:
abstract = True
ordering = ['name']
# Inherits Product class
class ConsumerProduct(Product):
categorie= models.ForeignKey(Categorie)
class Meta:
verbose_name_plural = "ConsumerProducten"
class ProductFoto(models.Model):
myimage= FileBrowseField("Image", max_length=200, directory='producten')
and this in admins.py:
class ProductFotoInline(admin.TabularInline):
extra = 1
model = Product.productfoto.through
class ConsumerProductAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
prepopulated_fields = {"slug": ("name",)}
inlines= [ProductFotoInline]
admin.site.register(ConsumerProduct, ConsumerProductAdmin)
Please take note of following:
Product class is abstract
ConsumerProduct inherits Product
I would say this should work, however I'm getting the following ImproperlyConfigured error when trying to add a new ConsumerProduct:
'model' is a required attribute of 'ConsumerProductAdmin.inlines[0]'.
Any help is appreciated
I've decided to make my Product class non-abstract. By removing the registration of this class with the admin (removing the line admin.site.register(Product))
You will not see it in the backend, however in your database, it will be a bit more messy, because you will have both a Product and a ConsumerProduct table
Related
I have an model which is for mapping book(item) to categories(tag),
it shows like this in the django admin page.
id item_uid tag_uid
407 Food Recipe
but in django swagger page, when I try to GET this mapping api with ID 407, it returned like this:
"id": 407,
"item_uid": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/237/";
"tag_uid": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tags/361/"
as you can see, it mapped together correctly, but the response body showed the object url and it's object id, which is not readable for human users. I wonder that if there is anyway to make them like this:
"id": 407,
"item_uid": "Food";
"tag_uid": "Recipe"
edit: codes,
#models.py
class Map_item_tag(models.Model):
item_uid = models.ForeignKey(items, on_delete=models.CASCADE, verbose_name='Item UID')
tag_uid = models.ForeignKey(tags, on_delete=models.CASCADE, verbose_name='Tag UID')
#admin.py
#admin.register(Map_item_tag)
class map_item_tag_admin(ImportExportModelAdmin):
resource_class = map_item_tag_Resource
readonly_fields = ('id',)
list_display = ['id','item_uid','tag_uid']
#serializers.py
class Map_item_tag_Serializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Map_item_tag
fields = ['id','item_uid','tag_uid']
#views.py
class Map_item_tag_ViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = Map_item_tag.objects.all().order_by('item_uid')
serializer_class = Map_item_tag_Serializer
parser_classes = (FormParser, MultiPartParser)
permission_classes = [permissions.IsAuthenticated]
thank you for answering!
It seems you are using a HyperlinkedModelSerializer instead of a regular ModelSerializer
Try changing the serializer class to a ModelSerializer:
class ItemSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Item
fields = [] # list of fields you want to include in your Item serializer
class Map_item_tag_Serializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
item_uid = ItemSerializer()
class Meta:
model = Map_item_tag
fields = ['id','item_uid','tag_uid']
In addition, I would advise you to use CamelCase notation for all your classes. For example: instead of using Map_item_tag_Serializer, change the name to MapItemTagSerializer. The same goes for all your other classes.
I would also avoid using using the _uuid suffix when using ForeignKey relationships. In the MapItemTag model, the ForeignKey relationship inherently means that the field will point to an object Item of Tag object. Hence, no need to specify the _uuid part again.
For example, the following changes would make the model a lot more readable:
class MapItemTag(models.Model):
item = models.ForeignKey(Item, on_delete=models.CASCADE, verbose_name='map_item')
tag = models.ForeignKey(Tag, on_delete=models.CASCADE, verbose_name='map_tag')
I am trying to update one of my models (which is a nested model - three level actually as you can see below) and I am getting the following error:
AssertionError: The .update() method does not support writable nestedfields by default. Write an explicit .update() method for serializer SystemSettingsSerializer, or set read_only=True on nested serializer fields.
All day I have been reading about nested models and nested serializers, trying to add update and create methods setting fields as read_only=True but no matter what I did, it just didn't work :( :(
These are my models:
class SystemSettings(models.Model):
# ... some fields
class Components(models.Model):
settings = models.ForeignKey(SystemSettings, related_name="Components")
class SysComponent(models.Model):
class Meta:
abstarct = True
index = models.PositiveIntegerField(primery_key=True)
is_active = models.BooleanField(default=False)
component = NotImplemented
class Foo(SysComponent):
component = models.ForeignKey(Components, related_name="Foo")
class Bar(SysComponent):
component = models.ForeignKey(Components, related_name="Bar")
task_id = models.PositiveIntegerField(default=0)
and serializers:
class SystemSettingsSerializer(ModelSerializer):
Components = ComponentsSerializer(many=True)
class Meta:
model = SystemSettings
fields = [# some fields,
Components]
class ComponentsSerializer(ModelSerializer):
Foo = FooSerializer(many=True)
Bar = BarSerializer(many=True)
class Meta:
model = Components
fields = ['Foo',
'Bar']
class FooSerializer(ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Foo
class BarSerializer(ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Bar
My logic is the following:
I am fetching the SystemSettings via GET and display it in a form.
The user changes it as much as he want and by clicking submit I send it back via PUT.
As I said I am getting the error above after clicking submit.
Any help would be appreciated.
EDIT: I am using django 1.7.8 by the way
I wonder how to serialize the mutual relation between objects both ways with "djangorestframework". Currently, the relation only shows one way with this:
class MyPolys(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=20)
text = models.TextField()
poly = models.PolygonField()
class MyPages2(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=20)
body = models.TextField()
mypolys = models.ManyToManyField(MyPolys)
# ...
class MyPolysSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = testmodels.MyPolys
class MyPages2Serializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = testmodels.MyPages2
# ...
class MyPolyViewSet(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
queryset = testmodels.MyPolys.objects.all()
serializer_class = srlz.MyPolysSerializer
class MyPages2ViewSet(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
queryset = testmodels.MyPages2.objects.all()
serializer_class = srlz.MyPages2Serializer
The many-to-many relation shows up just fine in the api for MyPages2 but nor for MyPolys. How do I make rest_framework aware that the relation goes both ways and needs to be serialized both ways?
The question also applies to one-to-many relations btw.
So far, from reading the documentation and googling, I can't figure out how do that.
Just do it like this:
class MyPolysSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = testmodels.MyPolys
fields =('id','name','text','poly')
class MyPages2Serializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
mypolys = MyPolysSerializer(many=True,read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = testmodels.MyPages2
fields =('id','name','body','mypolys')
I figured it out! It appears that by adding a mypolys = models.ManyToManyField(MyPolys) to the MyPages2 class, Django has indeed automatically added a similar field called mypages2_set to the MyPolys class, so the serializer looks like this:
class MyPolysSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = testmodels.MyPolys
fields = ('name', 'text', 'id', 'url', 'mypages2_set')
I found out by inspecting an instance of the class in the shell using ./manage.py shell:
pol = testmodels.MyPolys.objects.get(pk=1)
pol. # hit the tab key after '.'
Hitting the tab key after the '.' reveals additional fields and methods including mypages2_set.
I have a scenario in which I want the application to fail at the compile/build time if the child model does not have sub_field_a.
Only models which have sub_field_a should be able to inherit from Base model otherwise the application should fail at compile/build time.
class Base(models.Model):
class Meta:
abstract = True
class SubA(Base):
sub_field_a = models.CharField(max_length=255)
sub_field_c = models.CharField(max_length=255)
class SubB(Base):
sub_field_b = models.CharField(max_length=255)
sub_field_c = models.CharField(max_length=255)
Here, I should get an error because SubB does not have sub_field_a
How can I achieve this? TIA
Assuming you are using Django 1.7 or above, you should be able to use the system check framework; specifically, the field, model and manager checks.
I believe it would look something like this:
from django.core import checks
from django.db import models
class Base(models.Model):
class Meta:
abstract = True
#classmethod
def check(self, **kwargs):
errors = super(Base, self).check(**kwargs)
if not self._meta.abstract and not hasattr(self, 'sub_field_a'):
errors.extend([
checks.Error(
'missing sub_field_a',
hint='Add a field named sub_field_a',
obj=self,
id='myapp.E001',
)
])
return errors
Isn't the whole point of inheritance is to reduce and reuse common code. In this case we know sub_field_a always need to be defined. In that case why not add it to the base model like this:
class Base(models.Model):
sub_field_a = models.CharField(max_length=255)
class Meta:
abstract = True
class SubA(Base):
sub_field_c = models.CharField(max_length=255)
class SubB(Base):
sub_field_b = models.CharField(max_length=255)
sub_field_c = models.CharField(max_length=255)
This totally invalidates the use case that is required here. Hope this helps :)
how do you include related fields in the api?
class Foo(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(...)
class Bar(models.Model):
foo = models.ForeignKey(Foo)
description = models.CharField()
Each Foo has a couple of Bar's related to him, like images or what ever.
How do I get these Bar's displaying in the Foo's resource?
with tastypie its quit simple, im not sure with Django Rest Framework..
I got it working! Shweeet!
Ok this is what I did:
Created serializers, Views and URLS for the Bar object as described in the Quickstart docs of Django REST Framework.
Then in the Foo Serializer I did this:
class FooSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
# note the name bar should be the same than the model Bar
bar = serializers.ManyHyperlinkedRelatedField(
source='bar_set', # this is the model class name (and add set, this is how you call the reverse relation of bar)
view_name='bar-detail' # the name of the URL, required
)
class Meta:
model = Listing
Actualy its real simple, the docs just dont show it well I would say..
These days you can achieve this by just simply adding the reverse relationship to the fields tuple.
In your case:
class FooSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Foo
fields = (
'name',
'bar_set',
)
Now the "bar"-set will be included in your Foo response.
I couldn't get the above working because I have a model called FooSomething.
I found the following worked for me.
# models.py
class FooSomething(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(...)
class Bar(models.Model):
foo = models.ForeignKey(FooSomething, related_name='foosomethings')
description = models.CharField()
# serializer.py
class FooSomethingSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
foosomethings = serializers.StringRelatedField(many=True)
class Meta:
model = FooSomething
fields = (
'name',
'foosomethings',
)