Boost deserialize a derived class to base class pointer - c++

Please help me deserialize a derived class to base-class pointer. I attach the complete source code example.
request.hpp (no pair cpp file)
#ifndef REQUEST_HPP
#define REQUEST_HPP
#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <boost/archive/xml_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/xml_iarchive.hpp>
namespace demo {
namespace common {
class request {
public:
static const int INVALID_ID = -42;
request()
: id_(INVALID_ID), timestamp_(0), source_ip_("unknown") {};
request(int id, long timestamp, const std::string& source_ip)
: id_(id), timestamp_(timestamp), source_ip_(source_ip) {};
virtual ~request() {};
int id() const { return id_; }
long timestamp() const { return timestamp_; }
std::string source_ip() const { return source_ip_; }
protected:
int id_;
long timestamp_;
std::string source_ip_;
private:
friend class boost::serialization::access;
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive& ar, const unsigned version) {
ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(id_);
ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(timestamp_);
ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(source_ip_);
}
};
typedef std::shared_ptr<request> request_ptr;
}
};
#endif
command.hpp (derived class)
#ifndef COMMAND_HPP
#define COMMAND_HPP
#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <boost/serialization/export.hpp>
#include <demo/common/request.hpp>
namespace demo {
namespace common {
class command : public request {
public:
command(): name_("untitled") {};
explicit command(const std::string& name) : name_(name) {};
virtual ~command() {};
virtual void execute();
std::string name() const { return name_; }
protected:
std::string name_;
private:
friend class boost::serialization::access;
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive& ar, const unsigned version) {
ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_BASE_OBJECT_NVP(request);
ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(name_);
}
};
typedef std::shared_ptr<command> command_ptr;
}
};
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_KEY(demo::common::command)
#endif
command.cpp
#include "command.hpp"
#include <iostream>
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_IMPLEMENT(demo::common::command)
namespace demo {
namespace common {
void command::execute() {
std::cout << " I am '" + name_ +"' and I am executing..." << std::endl;
}
}
};
serializer.hpp
#ifndef SERIALIZER_HPP
#define SERIALIZER_HPP
#include <sstream>
#include <string>
/* classes to serialize */
#include <demo/common/request.hpp>
#include <demo/common/command.hpp>
namespace demo {
namespace common {
class serializer {
public:
serializer() : {};
template<typename T>
std::string serialize(const T& t){
std::stringstream stream;
boost::archive::xml_oarchive archive(stream);
archive << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(t);
std::string serialized = stream.str();
return serialized;
}
template<typename T>
void deserialize(const std::string& serialized, T& t) {
std::stringstream stream(serialized);
boost::archive::xml_iarchive archive(stream);
archive >> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(t);
}
};
}
}
#endif
sample usage
#include <iostream>
#include <demo/common/serializer.hpp>
#include <demo/common/command.hpp>
using namespace std;
using namespace demo::common;
int main(){
serializer serializer_;
command r("123"); // <-- (1) my desired way of declaring
//request* r = new command("123"); <-- (2) replacing with this makes all work!
//command* r = new command("123"); <-- (3) replacing with this crashes the app, like (1)
std::string s = serializer_.serialize(r);
std::cout << s << std::endl;
request* rr = nullptr;
serializer_.deserialize(s, rr); //this throws an exception
command* rrr = dynamic_cast<command*>(rr);
rrr->execute();
}
I thought I did everything that needs to be done, archives included before any class export, all default constructors initialize members..
Note that the serializable classes and the serializer are compiled to a lib file. Then that lib is used in two sub-projects that have access to the headers and have that lib linked. They use those classes to communicate with each other, they send serialized objects over network.
Why can't I deserialize a derived class to a base class pointer?
I am using Boost 1.51 and VC11.

Problems:
The two major things I found finicky and not documented enough about Boost::serialization that caused me issues are as follows:
Serialization / deserialization of objects on the stack mixed with objects on the heap. For example if you serialize from a object on the stack then attempt to deserialize to a pointer (e.g. invoke your load_construct_data<>) an exception may occur. Same with the reverse scenario.
Not having your exports linked in properly. If you create serialization templates/classes and place them in a .lib for example, it seems the exports may not be properly linked in / exposed. This goes for linking in and then using from a shared object/DLL.
Solutions:
For #1, I've found it easiest to make a rule of always serializing/deserializing to/from pointers. Even objects on the stack can use a temporary pointer when serializing to allow for this rule. For example:
// serialize
MyObject myobj;
std::ostringstream oss;
boost::archive::text_oarchive oa(oss);
MyObject* myObjPtr = &myObj;
oa << myObjPtr; // this is different than oa << myObj!!
std::string serialized = oss.str();
// deserialize
MyObject* myNewObjPtr;
std::stringstream iss(serialized);
boost::archive::text_iarchive ia(iss);
ia >> myNewObjPtr; // invokes new, don't forget to delete (or use smart ptrs!!!)
For #2, simply create a .cpp file that contains all of your exports. Link this CPP into your module(s) directly. In other words, you'll have a .cpp with a bunch of BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_IMPLEMENT():
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_IMPLEMENT(MyObject);
// ...
More Complete Example:
Below is a more complete example showing some of the serialization tricks using non-intrusive templates. Intrusive member methods will be very similar:
MyObject.h
// Can be broken into MyObject.h, MyObject.cpp, MyObjectSerialization.h for example as well.
// This stuff can live in your .lib
#include <boost/serialization/export.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp>
// assume this class contains GetSomeMember() returning SomeMemberType
class MyObject { /* ... */ };
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_KEY(MyObject);
namespace boost { namespace serialization {
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive& ar, MyObject& myObj, const unsigned int version)
{
ar & myObj.m_someMember;
}
template<class Archive>
inline void save_construct_data(Archive& ar, const MyObject* myObj, const unsigned int version)
{
ar & boost::serialization::make_nvp("SomeMemberType", static_cast<const SomeMemberType&>(myObj->GetSomeMember()));
}
template<class Archive>
inline void load_construct_data(Archive& ar, MyObject* myObj, const unsigned int version)
{
SomeMemberType t;
ar & boost::serialization::make_nvp("SomeMemberType", t);
::new(myObj)MyObject(t);
}
} } // end boost::serialization ns
MyObjectExports.cpp
// This file must be explicitly linked into your module(s) that use serialization.
// This means your executable or shared module/DLLs
#include <boost/serialization/export.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp>
#include "MyObject.h"
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_IMPLEMENT(MyObject);

You're probably getting an input_stream_error in your demo and unregistered_class exception when using your library. This is caused by the way boost is registering the classes, in your case, automatically.
It appears that the automatic registration process gets confused when you serialize a derived object and deserialize to its base, despite the use of the BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT* macros.
However, you can register the classes explicitly before you perform any i/o operation on the archive:
// ...
boost::archive::xml_iarchive archive(stream);
// register the class(es) with the archive
archive.template register_type<command>();
archive >> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(t);
// ...
Use the same order of registration when serializing. This makes the export macros superfluous.

Related

Register a type with no default constructor

I am trying to serialize a derived class that does not have a default constructor. I am using the deserializing constructor pattern. I've read that you have to register the type of a derived class, so I am doing that in the output archive (outputArchive.register_type<Point>();). However, when trying to register the same type with the input archive, I get a compiler error that says Point does not have a default constructor (which it does not). What do we do in this case?
#include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/shared_ptr.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/base_object.hpp>
#include <fstream>
class AbstractPoint
{
public:
virtual ~AbstractPoint(){}
virtual void DoSomething() = 0;
template<class TArchive>
void serialize(TArchive& archive, const unsigned int version)
{
// do nothing
}
};
class Point : public AbstractPoint
{
public:
Point(const double data) : mData(data) {}
void DoSomething(){}
template<class TArchive>
Point(TArchive& archive)
{
archive >> *this;
}
template<class TArchive>
void serialize(TArchive& archive, const unsigned int version)
{
// Without this, we get unregistered void cast
archive & boost::serialization::base_object<AbstractPoint>(*this);
archive & mData;
}
double mData;
};
int main()
{
std::shared_ptr<AbstractPoint> point(new Point(7.4));
std::ofstream outputStream("test.txt");
boost::archive::text_oarchive outputArchive(outputStream);
outputArchive.register_type<Point>();
outputArchive << point;
outputStream.close();
std::ifstream inputStream("test.txt");
boost::archive::text_iarchive inputArchive(inputStream);
//inputArchive.register_type<Point>(); // Compiler error: no Point::Point()
std::shared_ptr<AbstractPoint> pointRead(new Point(inputArchive));
Point* castedPoint = dynamic_cast<Point*>(pointRead.get());
std::cout << "Data: " << castedPoint->mData << std::endl;
return 0;
}
In the case where a type doesn't have a default constructor, you can use save_construct_data and load_construct_data.
Note that these will only ever apply when serializing through pointers (for the obvious reasons).
Examples are here: boost serialization of non-default constructible types and more

correct type-cast for boost de-serializations of different derived classes

In my application, there are agents of different types. I am planning to use boost serialization for sending/receiving data between agents.(by sending/receiving, I actually mean writing/reading operation the serialization target file)
A receiving agent may receive data of different data whose type is not known in advance. Suppose the data format has a general structure like this:
class Base
{
public:
int message_type_id;
}
class Derived_1
{
public:
Derived_1(int message_type_id_):message_type_id(message_type_id_){}
struct data_1 {...};
};
class Derived_2
{
public:
Derived_2(int message_type_id_):message_type_id(message_type_id_){}
struct data_2 {...};
};
the sending agent can send(i.e serialize) any of the two derived types. Similarly, the receiving agent can receive(i.e de-serialize) any of the two derived types; while what I can see in the tutorial(Dumping derived classes through base class pointers) is like this:
void save()
{
std::ofstream file("archive.xml"); //target file
boost::archive::xml_oarchive oa(file);
oa.register_type<date>( );// you know what you are sending, so you make proper modifications here to do proper registration
base* b = new date(15, 8, 1947);
oa & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(b);
}
void load()
{
std::ifstream file("archive.xml"); //target file
boost::archive::xml_iarchive ia(file);
ia.register_type<date>( );// I don't know which derived class I am receiving, so I can't do a proper registration
base *dr;
ia >> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(dr);
date* dr2 = dynamic_cast<date*> (dr);
std::cout << dr2;
}
as you can see, xml_oarchive and xml_iarchive do a register_type<date> before serialize/deserialization. so the receiving end will know in advance what to dynamic_cast to.
whereas in my case, since I know what I am sending, I can do proper registration&serialization on case-to-case basis. However, on the receiving end, I dont't know in advance what to register and what to dynamic cast.
Is there a way I can tell the type in advance so that the receiving can do a casting?
thanks
EDIT:
Here is the simplified modification of demo.cpp I save an object, and then restore it.
#include <cstddef> // NULL
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
#include <boost/archive/tmpdir.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/base_object.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/utility.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/list.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/assume_abstract.hpp>
/*
bus_stop is the base class.
bus_stop_corner and bus_stop_destination are derived classes from the above base class.
bus_route has a container that stores pointer to the above derived classes
*/
class bus_stop
{
friend class boost::serialization::access;
virtual std::string description() const = 0;
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version)
{
ar & type;
}
protected:
public:
std::string type;
bus_stop(){type = "Base";}
virtual ~bus_stop(){}
};
BOOST_SERIALIZATION_ASSUME_ABSTRACT(bus_stop)
class bus_stop_corner : public bus_stop
{
friend class boost::serialization::access;
virtual std::string description() const
{
return street1 + " and " + street2;
}
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version)
{
// save/load base class information
ar & boost::serialization::base_object<bus_stop>(*this);
ar & street1 & street2;
}
public:
std::string street1;
std::string street2;
bus_stop_corner(){}
bus_stop_corner(
const std::string & _s1, const std::string & _s2
) :
street1(_s1), street2(_s2)
{
type = "derived_bs_corner";
}
};
class bus_stop_destination : public bus_stop
{
friend class boost::serialization::access;
virtual std::string description() const
{
return name;
}
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version)
{
ar & boost::serialization::base_object<bus_stop>(*this) & name;
}
public:
std::string name;
bus_stop_destination(){}
bus_stop_destination(
const std::string & _name
) :
name(_name)
{
type = "derived_bs_destination";
}
};
class bus_route
{
friend class boost::serialization::access;
typedef bus_stop * bus_stop_pointer;
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version)
{
ar.register_type(static_cast<bus_stop_corner *>(NULL));
ar.register_type(static_cast<bus_stop_destination *>(NULL));
ar & stops;
}
public:
std::list<bus_stop_pointer> stops;
bus_route(){}
void append(bus_stop *_bs)
{
stops.insert(stops.end(), _bs);
}
};
//BOOST_CLASS_VERSION(bus_route, 2)
void save_schedule(const bus_route s, const char * filename){
// make an archive
std::ofstream ofs(filename);
boost::archive::text_oarchive oa(ofs);
oa << s;
}
void
restore_schedule(bus_route &s, const char * filename)
{
// open the archive
std::ifstream ifs(filename);
boost::archive::text_iarchive ia(ifs);
// restore the schedule from the archive
ia >> s;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
bus_stop *bs1 = new bus_stop_corner(
"First St", "Second st"
);
bus_stop *bs2 = new bus_stop_destination(
"myName"
);
// make a routes
bus_route original_route;
original_route.append(bs1);
original_route.append(bs2);
std::string filename1(boost::archive::tmpdir());
filename1 += "/demofile1.txt";
save_schedule(original_route, filename1.c_str());
bus_route new_route ;
restore_schedule(new_route, filename1.c_str());
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
std::string filename2(boost::archive::tmpdir());
filename2 += "/demofile2.txt";
save_schedule(new_route, filename2.c_str());
delete bs1;
delete bs2;
return 0;
}
The old and new objects are not equal coz again saving(serializing) the new object to another file results in a different(empty) content. Can you please let me know how I can fix this code to deserialize the derived classes successfully? many thanks
EDIT-2
There is nothing wrong with the above code now(after a small typo was fixed).
I am answering my own question here coz there is another good approach suggested by someone else.
So the Answer to my first question is like this :
As long as you register the derived types in the main serialization function (in the above case: serialize() in bus_route class) everything should be fine.
thanks for all the help
A solution is to (de-)serialize boost::shared_ptr<Base>. The following code demonstrates it. After deserialization the pDst is an instance of the Derived_1 class. The code complied using an online compiler is available on this link.
#include <boost/serialization/access.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/assume_abstract.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/shared_ptr.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/nvp.hpp>
#include <boost/noncopyable.hpp>
#include <boost/make_shared.hpp>
#include <boost/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.hpp>
class Base {
friend class boost::serialization::access;
public:
Base();
virtual ~Base();
private:
template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version) {}
public:
virtual bool operator ==(const Base &rh) const = 0;
};
BOOST_SERIALIZATION_ASSUME_ABSTRACT(Base)
BOOST_SERIALIZATION_SHARED_PTR(Base)
Base::Base() {
}
Base::~Base() {
}
class Derived_1 : boost::noncopyable, public Base {
friend class boost::serialization::access;
public:
int m_iValue;
public:
Derived_1();
Derived_1(int iValue);
private:
template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version) {
ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_BASE_OBJECT_NVP(Base);
ar & boost::serialization::make_nvp("value", m_iValue);
}
public:
bool operator ==(const Base &rh) const;
};
BOOST_SERIALIZATION_SHARED_PTR(Derived_1)
Derived_1::Derived_1() : m_iValue(0) {
}
Derived_1::Derived_1(int iValue) : m_iValue(iValue) {
}
bool Derived_1::operator==(const Base &rh) const {
const Derived_1 *pRH = dynamic_cast<const Derived_1 *>(&rh);
return pRH != nullptr && pRH->m_iValue == this->m_iValue;
}
#include <boost/serialization/export.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/xml_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/xml_iarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/make_shared.hpp>
#include <sstream>
#include <string>
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_GUID(Base, "base")
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_GUID(Derived_1, "derived_1")
void test(void) {
std::string str;
boost::shared_ptr<Base> pSrc = boost::make_shared<Derived_1>(10);
boost::shared_ptr<Base> pDst;
{
std::ostringstream ofs;
boost::archive::xml_oarchive oa(ofs);
oa << boost::serialization::make_nvp("item", pSrc);
str = ofs.str();
}
{
std::istringstream ifs(str);
boost::archive::xml_iarchive ia(ifs);
ia >> boost::serialization::make_nvp("item", pDst);
}
if (*pSrc == *pDst) {
printf("Success\n");
}
else {
printf("Fail\n");
}
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
test();
}

boost serialization polymorphic issues

Boost serialization of polymorphic classes seems not working ( 1.40+ boost), e.g. with the following code, I believe I followed the rule: of exporting the class and
I tried on both gcc4.4 (ubuntu) and windows VS2010(with boost 1.48):
in following program, I expect both 10 and 100 are printed, but it only print 10, that means it only serialized the base class;
I mostly copied the example from boost's document, yet it still doesn't work; anybody has any idea?
thanks a lot
LS
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include <boost/serialization/base_object.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/serialization.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/export.hpp>
#define NVP(X) X
class base {
public:
friend class boost::serialization::access;
base (){ v1 = 10;}
int v1;
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int file_version)
{
ar & NVP(v1);
}
};
class derived : public base {
public:
friend class boost::serialization::access;
int v2 ;
derived() { v2 = 100;}
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int file_version){
boost::serialization::base_object<base>(* this);
ar & NVP(v2);
}
};
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(base);
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_GUID(derived, "derived");
int main ( )
{
std::stringstream ss;
boost::archive::text_oarchive ar(ss);
base *b = new derived();
ar << NVP(b);
std::cout << ss.str();
}
You forgot
virtual ~base() {}
which is not only required for the polymorphic seriialization to work (without it your class is not polymorphic), but I believe omitting it is a misdemeanor in 48 states. IANAL, so YMMV.
Oh, and it should be ar & boost::serialization::base_object<...>.

Serializing a map of objects to xml using boost::serialization

The serialization example below is from the boost mailing list which is pretty much the same as what I would like to do. However, I have changed the archive so that it will serialize to XML. The compile does not fail if I serialize to binary, but it fails when serializing to xml. The compile fails in basic_xml_oarchive.hpp in the following method:
// boost code where compile fails
template<class T>
void save_override(T & t, BOOST_PFTO int)
{
// If your program fails to compile here, its most likely due to
// not specifying an nvp wrapper around the variable to
// be serialized.
BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((serialization::is_wrapper<T>));
this->detail_common_oarchive::save_override(t, 0);
}
It seems I haven't done enough to allow the std::map<int, CSomeData> object to be serialized, any ideas on how to fix this?
My serialization implementation:
#include <boost/archive/xml_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/xml_iarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/map.hpp>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
#include <map>
using namespace std;
// This is a test class to use as the map data.
class CSomeData {
public:
CSomeData(){};
CSomeData(float f0, string str0)
{
m_f0 = f0;
m_str0 = str0;
}
float m_f0;
string m_str0;
private:
friend class boost::serialization::access;
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version)
{
ar & m_f0;
ar & m_str0;
}
};
// This is the class we really want to try serializing.
class CTest {
public:
CTest(){};
CTest(int nNumber)
{
m_nNumber = nNumber;
// Fill with some dummy data.
m_mTst.insert(make_pair(0, CSomeData(0.23f, "hi hi hi")));
m_mTst.insert(make_pair(1, CSomeData(7.65f, "second one")));
m_mTst.insert(make_pair(2, CSomeData(9.23f, "third one")));
m_mTst.insert(make_pair(3, CSomeData(5.6766, "chosen one")));
}
~CTest(){};
save()
{
std::ofstream ofs("filename");
// Write class instance to archive. Writing seems to work ok.
boost::archive::xml_oarchive oa(ofs);
oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(*this);
}
int m_nNumber;
private:
map<int, CSomeData> m_mTst;
friend class boost::serialization::access;
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version)
{
ar & m_nNumber;
ar & m_mTst;
}
};
I believe you need to tag the members with a name for XML serialisation. This specifies the element name to use in the XML. I.e. use something like:
ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(m_f0);
or (better in this case):
ar & make_nvp("field0", my_f0);
The tags will be ignored for binary serialisation. More details here:
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_43_0/libs/serialization/doc/wrappers.html

c++ boost::serialization setting a fixed class_id for a class

I'mm using boost to serialize and deserialize some classes
Like so:
boost::archive::xml_oarchive xmlArchive(oStringStream);
xmlArchive.register_type(static_cast<BaseMessage *>(NULL));
xmlArchive.register_type(static_cast<IncomingTradeMessage *>(NULL));
xmlArchive.register_type(static_cast<InternalRequestInfo *>(NULL));
xmlArchive.register_type(static_cast<InternalTradeTransInfo *>(NULL));
const BaseMessage* myMessage =message;
xmlArchive << make_nvp("Message", myMessage);
now my clasess get a class_id according to the order used, i dont want that, i want to control the Class_id's
so i can do something like
BOOST_SET_CLASS_ID(1234, BaseMessage);
and everywhere in my project BaseMessage would have class_id of 1234.
How can i do such a thing
Can't you use BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_GUID or similar instead? I.e.
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_GUID(IncomingTradeMessage, "IncomingTradeMessage")
...
It will use some more bandwidth since strings are transmitted rather than integers, but it will solve your problem.
Refer to this and this for more info.
EDIT:
This compile just fine:
#include <fstream>
#include <boost/serialization/export.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp>
class Foo {
friend class boost::serialization::access;
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version)
{
ar & dummy1;
}
int dummy1;
public:
virtual ~Foo() {}
};
class Bar : public Foo {
friend class boost::serialization::access;
template<class Archive>
void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version)
{
// serialize base class information
ar & boost::serialization::base_object<Foo>(*this);
ar & dummy2;
}
int dummy2;
};
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_GUID(Foo, "Foo")
BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_GUID(Bar, "Bar")
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
std::ofstream ofs("filename");
boost::archive::text_oarchive oa(ofs);
Foo *f = new Bar;
oa << f;
return 0;
}
I'm not sure if this is applicable in your case (if your question is specifically seeking mechanisms in boost or not), but how about strings? There's no boost facility like this that I know, but I've apply this kind of solution to our code base:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
template <class T>
const char* my_type_id()
{
return "Unknown";
}
#define REGISTER_TYPE(some_type) \
template <> inline \
const char* my_type_id<some_type>() \
{ \
return #some_type; \
}
REGISTER_TYPE(int)
REGISTER_TYPE(std::string)
int main()
{
// displays "int"
cout << my_type_id<int>() << endl;
// displays "std::string"
cout << my_type_id<string>() << endl;
// displays "Unknown" - we haven't registered char
cout << my_type_id<char>() << endl;
}
It's basically reinventing RTTI which, if you can use for production builds, makes this above solution unnecessary. We couldn't do this as it was for a software development kit and we didn't want to assume that everyone using it would have RTTI enabled.
If you need integers instead of strings, then it's easy enough to adapt this:
template <class T>
int my_type_id()
{
return -1;
}
#define REGISTER_TYPE(some_type, type_code) \
template <> inline \
int my_type_id<some_type>() \
{ \
return type_code; \
}
REGISTER_TYPE(int, 1234)
REGISTER_TYPE(std::string, 4567)
You could even avoid the overhead of a function call and just generate a class that stores these type-associated integral values as an enumerated constant (guaranteed to be an rvalue).