I have a many-to-many field called categories and I would like to get distinct values stored in that field.
The following is my model:
class Book (models.Model):
categories=models.ManyToManyField(Category, related_name = 'categories', blank = True, null=True)
Here is my Category model:
class Category (MPTTModel):
category = models.CharField(max_length=250)
parent = TreeForeignKey('self', blank=True, null=True, related_name='children')
I'd like to get every single one of the categories related to a book. How would I do this?
If you want to get categories related to one instance of book, do book_inst.category_set.all(). There will not be duplicates.
But I think, you want to get all Categories which are related to any Book, you can do:
Category.objects.filter(categories__in=[Book.objects.all()]).distinct()
Basically, you need a reverse lookup from the category side to check if there is book for that category if yes, add to the resultant query set. Since, the related_name argument in the Book is 'categories', your reverse lookup would look something like this.
Category.objects.filter(categories__in = Book.objects.all())
Related
I got pretty much the same problem as in Django - reverse query name clash.
for the following code:
class Category(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
featured_product = models.ForeignKey(
'Product', on_delete=models.SET_NULL, null=True)
class Product(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
price = models.DecimalField(max_digits=6, decimal_places=2)
category = models.ForeignKey(Category, on_delete=models.PROTECT)
There will be an error saying:
store.Category.featured_product: (fields.E303) Reverse query name for 'store.Category.featured_product' clashes with field name 'store.Product.category'.
I know it the featured_productin Category should addrelated_name="+" to avoid this error. But since this is a many-to-one case, and I think the reverse query name for store.Category.featured_productinProductclass should be store.Product.category_set so it shouldn't have a conflict with store.Product.category.
Even if there weren't outright clashes (with the snippet you have, the generated reverse accessors should be Product.category_set and Category.product_set), I'd say Django is trying to be helpful so you don't make mistakes regarding the reverse accessors down the line.
As you noted, you can set related_name='+' to not create the reverse accessor at all, but I'd probably name the reverse accessor something like related_name='featured_product_for_categories'.
After all, your data model does make it possible for a product to be featured in multiple categories, and even categories it isn't part of.
Good day.
I wish to annotate my model with information from a different table.
class CompetitionTeam(models.Model):
competition_id = models.ForeignKey('Competition', on_delete=models.CASCADE, to_field='id', db_column='competition_id')
team_id = models.ForeignKey('Team', on_delete=models.CASCADE, to_field='id', null=True, db_column='team_id')
...
class Team(models.Model):
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
teamleader_id = models.ForeignKey('User', on_delete=models.CASCADE, to_field='id', db_column='teamleader_id')
...
class Competition(models.Model):
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
...
Looping through my competitions, I wish to retrieve the list of competitionteam objects to be displayed with the relevant team's name. I tried:
CompetitionTeam.objects.filter(competition_id=_competition.id).filter(team_id__in=joined_team_ids).annotate(name=...)
-where instead of the ellipses I put Subquery expressions in. However, I'm unsure of how to match the team_id variable. eg.
*.anotate(name=Subquery(Team.objects.filter(id=competitionteam.team_id)).values('name'))
Related is the question: Django annotate field value from another model but I am unsure of how to implement that in this case. In that case, in place of mymodel_id, I used team_id but it only had parameters from the Team object, not my competition team object. I didn't really understand OuterRef but here is my attempt that failed:
CompetitionTeam.objects.filter(competition_id=_competition.id).filter(team_id__in=joined_team_ids).annotate(name=Subquery(Team.objects.get(id=OuterRef('team_id'))))
"Error: This queryset contains a reference to an outer query and may only be used in a subquery."
The solution for my question was:
CompetitionTeam.objects.filter(
competition_id=_competition.id,
team_id__in=joined_team_ids
).annotate(
name=Subquery(
Team.objects.filter(
id=OuterRef('team_id')
).values('name')
))
Thanks.
Forgive me if the question does not make sense, trying to teach myself django. I've been trying to search how to do this but i'm not sure if i'm using the right words in my search.
I have the following models.
class Category(models.Model):
code = models.CharField(max_length=10, unique=True)
description = models.CharField(max_length=50)
class UserGroupHeader(models.Model):
code = models.CharField(max_length=10, unique=True)
description = models.CharField(max_length=50)
class UserGroupDetail(models.Model):
usergroupheader = models.ForeignKey(UserGroupHeader, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
category = models.ForeignKey(Category, on_delete=models.PROTECT)
How do i get a query set from the Category model using the UserGroupHeader? so far what i've got is something like this UserGroupHeader.objects.get(pk=9).usergroupdetail_set.all(), now from the result of this how do i get the Category model?
I'm not sure if I understood exactly what you are trying to do, but in general, while querying, you can follow relations using double underscores. Below are a couple of possible queries:
my_group_header = UserGroupHeader.objects.get(...)
Category.objects.filter(usergroupdetail__usergroupheader=my_group_header) # Gets Category objects related to my_group_header through UserGroupDetail model
Category.objects.filter(usergroupdetail__usergroupheader__code='abc') # Gets Category objects related to UserGroupHeader object with code 'abc' through UserGroupDetail model
UserGroupHeader.objects.filter(usergroupdetail__category__code='abc') # Gets UserGroupHeader objects related to Category object with code 'abc' through UserGroupDetail model
Your query UserGroupHeader.objects.get(pk=9).usergroupdetail_set.all() would return a QuerySet of UserGroupDetail objects. In order to get the category of each UserGroupDetail, you can:
for user_group_detail in UserGroupHeader.objects.get(pk=9).usergroupdetail_set.all():
category = user_group_detail.category
print(category. description)
Or something similar according to your needs
I have models like this:
class Vendor(models.Model):
title = models.CharField()
class Product(models.Model):
...
vendor = models.ForeignKey(Vendor, null=True, blank=True)
stock = models.ManyToManyField(Supplier, through='Stock')
class Stock(models.Model):
in_stock = models.BooleanField(default=True)
supplier = models.ForeignKey('catalog.Supplier', related_name='supplier_stock')
product = models.ForeignKey('catalog.Product', related_name='product_stock')
priority = models.IntegerField(default=0)
I designed models like this, because one Product can be supplied by different suppliers, and I need to know, what supplier exactly has this Product in stock.
So, in my view I want to get all results in values, to reduce number of queries and some specific logic. Also it duplicates me Product row with different Stock, by in python I group them up.
In my view I use:
Product.objects.all().values(
'id', 'title', 'vendor_code', 'vendor__title', 'price',
'product_stock__in_stock', 'stock__title', 'stock__id', 'stock__priority')
Because of INNER JOIN and null=True for Vendor related model, it returns me not all records for Product model. It just returns values where Vendor reference is set.
If I use 'vendor' instead of 'vendor__title' it returns me more results, than previous one, because in vendor field I can get {...'vendor': *id goes here*...} or {...'vendor': None...}, but I need the vendor__title value there. So any suggestions, how to achieve this?
Thanks in advance
Changed from vendor__title to product_stock__product__vendor__title helped me to fix my problem.
Given the following models
class Category(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
class Business(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
category = models.ForeignKey(Category, related_name="businesses")
class Package(models.Model):
business_id = models.ForeignKey(Business)
status = models.CharField(max_length=50)
I have 2 following queries get list of business and categories which the packages are live:
filter_businesses = Business.objects.filter(package__status = 'live')
filter_categories = Category.objects.filter(businesses__package__status = 'live')
Now the questions is, given the related name "businesses" should be equals to category.business_set, why shouldn't the filter in first query be package_set?
Suppose you have two related models: SomeModel and SomeOtherModel, and SomeOtherModel.somemodel is a ForeignKey to SomeModel.
Given any SomeModel instance, the someothermodel_set property is a manager for the related model already filtered. For example:
>>> your_some_model_instance = SomeModel.objects.all()[0]
In this case your_some_model_instance.shomeothermodel_set is equivalent to:
>>> SomeOtherModel.objects.filter(somemodel=your_some_model_instance)
[ update ]
sorry perhaps I didn't explain my questions more clearer, it's complicated to explain... I understand that XX_set and related_name refer to the manager, what I want to ask is in the first query why not use (package_set_status = 'live') given the second working query (businesses_package__status = 'live'), it's confusing because the second query references to the manager(by related_name), but the first query is not...
The filter interface uses the convention relatedmodelname__relatedmodelfield; In your example, related_name was used to give a fancier name to the backreference, but this is not its main purpose; the purpose of the related_name parameter in ForeignKey fields is solving the ambiguity in cases where relatedmodelname clashes with an already existing field at the ForeignKey.