I have a std::set container whose elements are objects of the following class:
class LaneConnector {
public:
const Lane* getLaneFrom() const {
return From;
}
const Lane* getLaneTo() const {
return To;
}
private:
Lane* From;
Lane* To;
}
and my comparator function is as follows:
struct MyLaneConectorSorter {
bool operator() (LaneConnector * c, LaneConnector * d)
{
Lane* a = const_cast<Lane*>(c->getLaneFrom());
Lane* b = const_cast<Lane*>(d->getLaneFrom());
return (a->getLaneID() < b->getLaneID());
}
} myLaneConnectorSorter;
Now when I try to sort the elements in the set with:
//dont panic, the container just came through a const_iterator of a std::map :)
const std::set<LaneConnector*> & tempLC = (*it_cnn).second;
std::sort(tempLC.begin(), tempLC.end(), myLaneConnectorSorter);
I get a frenzy of errors starting with the following lines, Appreciate if you help me solve this problem.
Thanks:
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_algo.h: In function ‘void std::sort(_RAIter, _RAIter, _Compare) [with _RAIter = std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<LaneConnector*>, _Compare = {anonymous}::MyLaneConectorSorter]’:
/home/.../dev/Basic/shared/conf/simpleconf.cpp:1104:65: instantiated from here
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_algo.h:5368:4: error: no match for ‘operator-’ in ‘__last - __first’
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_algo.h:5368:4: note: candidates are:
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_iterator.h:321:5: note: template<class _Iterator> typename std::reverse_iterator::difference_type std::operator-(const std::reverse_iterator<_Iterator>&, const std::reverse_iterator<_Iterator>&)
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_iterator.h:378:5: note: template<class _IteratorL, class _IteratorR> typename std::reverse_iterator<_IteratorL>::difference_type std::operator-(const std::reverse_iterator<_IteratorL>&, const std::reverse_iterator<_IteratorR>&)
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_bvector.h:181:3: note: std::ptrdiff_t std::operator-(const std::_Bit_iterator_base&, const std::_Bit_iterator_base&)
/usr/include/c++/4.6/bits/stl_bvector.h:181:3: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<LaneConnector*>’ to ‘const std::_Bit_iterator_base&’
First, you cannot sort an std::set. It is a sorted structure, sorting happens upon construction or insertion.
Second, you can construct an std::set with your own sorting functor, and you can avoid unnecessary const_casts by making it take const pointers:
struct MyLaneConectorSorter {
bool operator() (const LaneConnector* lhs, const LaneConnector* rhs) const
{
// you may want to put some null pointer checks in here
const Lane* a = lhs->getLaneFrom();
const Lane* b = rhs->getLaneFrom();
return a->getLaneID() < b->getLaneID();
}
};
and instantiate the set like this:
std::set<LaneConnector*, MyLaneConectorSorter> s(MyLaneConectorSorter());
or, if you want to construct it from a different set, with a different ordering,
std::set<LaneConnector*> orig = ..... ;
....
std::set<LaneConnector*, MyLaneConectorSorter> s(orig.begin(), orig.end(), MyLaneConectorSorter());
Related
I've got a template class containing a priority queue of other classes, I need to use the priority overloader to call the individual class overloaders to compare based on the individual classes preferences (in this case it's age, in another class it could be price.
I've got absolutely no doubt that I've implemented the operator overloading incorrect so would appreciate the advice.
For example
#include <iostream>
#include <queue>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
class Animal {
public:
Animal();
Animal(string t, int a);
int get_age()const;
bool operator< ( Animal& b) const;
void display()const;
private:
string type;
double age;
};
void Animal::display() const
{
cout << "Type: " << type << " Age: " << age;
}
int Animal::get_age() const
{
return age;
}
Animal::Animal(){}
Animal::Animal(string t, int a)
{
type = t;
age = a;
}
bool Animal::operator< ( Animal& b) const
{
return b.get_age();
}
template<typename T>
class Collection {
public:
Collection();
Collection(string n, string d);
void add_item(const T& c);
private:
priority_queue <T> pets;
string name; // Name of the collection
string description; // Descriptions of the collection
};
template<typename T>
Collection<T>::Collection(){}
template<typename T>
Collection<T>::Collection(string n, string d)
{
name = n;
description = d;
}
template<typename T>
bool operator<(const T& one, const T& two)
{
return one.operator<(two);
}
template<typename T>
void Collection<T>::add_item(const T& c)
{
pets.push(c);
}
int main(){
Animal p1("Dog", 10);
Animal p2("Cat", 5);
Animal p3("Turtle", 24);
Collection<Animal> P("Pets", "My Pets");
P.add_item(p1);
P.add_item(p2);
P.add_item(p3);
cout << endl;
return 0;
}
I get this error and I'm not sure what I need to do to fix it. I've got to keep the class overloader as the single variable (Animal& b).
task.cpp: In instantiation of 'bool operator<(const T&, const T&)
[with T = Animal]':
c:\mingw-4.7.1\bin../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.7.1/include/c++/bits/stl_function.h:237:22:
required from 'bool std::less<_Tp>::operator()(const _Tp&, const _Tp&)
const [with _Tp = Animal]'
c:\mingw-4.7.1\bin../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.7.1/include/c++/bits/stl_heap.h:310:4: required from 'void std::__adjust_heap(_RandomAccessIterator,
_Distance, _Distance, _Tp, _Compare) [with _RandomAccessIterator = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator > >; _Distance = int; _Tp = Animal; _Compare =
std::less]'
c:\mingw-4.7.1\bin../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.7.1/include/c++/bits/stl_heap.h:442:4: required from 'void std::make_heap(_RandomAccessIterator,
_RandomAccessIterator, _Compare) [with _RandomAccessIterator = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator > >; _Compare = std::less]'
c:\mingw-4.7.1\bin../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.7.1/include/c++/bits/stl_queue.h:393:9: required from 'std::priority_queue<_Tp, _Sequence,
_Compare>::priority_queue(const _Compare&, const _Sequence&) [with _Tp = Animal; _Sequence = std::vector >; _Compare = std::less]' task.cpp:57:45: required from 'Collection::Collection(std::string, std::string) [with T = Animal;
std::string = std::basic_string]' task.cpp:79:43: required
from here task.cpp:66:30: error: no matching function for call to
'Animal::operator<(const Animal&) const' task.cpp:66:30: note:
candidate is: task.cpp:36:6: note: bool Animal::operator<(Animal&)
const task.cpp:36:6: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from
'const Animal' to 'Animal&' task.cpp: In function 'bool
operator<(const T&, const T&) [with T = Animal]':
Your comparison
bool Animal::operator< ( Animal& b) const
{
return b.get_age(); // returns true always unless age == 0
}
is no comparison and it should take a const parameter. You should have something like
bool Animal::operator< (const Animal& b) const
// ^----------------------- const !
{
return get_age() < b.get_age();
}
Btw you dont need to use a member operator< for the priority queue. Especially if you want to sort objects in different ways I would recommend to not use it, but pass a lambda to the priority_queue. See eg here for an example.
Both of your overloads of < are problematic
bool Animal::operator< ( Animal& b) const
the Animal should also be const. You also need to compare both parameters, otherwise things (such as your priority_queue) that expect < to provide an ordering will have undefined behaviour.
You don't use anything non-public from Animal, so I suggest you change it to
bool operator< (const Animal & lhs, const Animal & rhs)
{ return lhs.get_age() < rhs.get_age(); }
This has the benefit of treating both sides identically, rather than one being implicit.
template<typename T>
bool operator<(const T& one, const T& two)
{
return one.operator<(two);
}
This template matches all types and is entirely superfluous. a < b can call either a member or a free operator <. Just delete this template.
I have the following piece of code, which saves structs into a boost::ptr_vector container. I am trying now to write a simple search function for this container via equal_range. I chose that function because I want a pointer to the element of the sequence (if it is found), or pointers to the lower and upper bound (if the element is not found):
struct COMP
{
bool operator()(const merkle_tree_node &LHS, const std::string& query){
return (LHS.word < query);
}
};
std::pair<boost::ptr_vector<merkle_tree_node>::iterator,
boost::ptr_vector<merkle_tree_node>::iterator>
search_tree(merkle_tree vWords, std::basic_string<char> query, size_t length)
{
return std::equal_range(vWords.begin(), vWords.begin()+(length-1),
query,
COMP());
}
Which I am calling via my main function as such:
std::basic_string<char> QUERY = "SOMETHING";
std::pair<boost::ptr_vector<merkle_tree_node>::iterator,
boost::ptr_vector<merkle_tree_node>::iterator> result =
search_tree(vWords, QUERY, vWords.size());
However, I am getting the following compilation error which I just can't seem to overcome:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8/algorithm:62:0,
from vf-merkle.cpp:3:
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/stl_algo.h: In instantiation of ‘std::pair<_FIter, _FIter> std::equal_range(_FIter, _FIter, const _Tp&, _Compare) [with _FIter = boost::void_ptr_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<void**, std::vector<void*, std::allocator<void*> > >, merkle_tree_node>; _Tp = std::basic_string<char>; _Compare = COMP]’:
vf-merkle.cpp:111:10: required from here
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/stl_algo.h:2668:36: error: no match for call to ‘(COMP) (const std::basic_string<char>&, merkle_tree_node&)’
else if (__comp(__val, *__middle))
^
vf-merkle.cpp:98:8: note: candidate is:
struct COMP
^
vf-merkle.cpp:100:7: note: bool COMP::operator()(const merkle_tree_node&, const string&)
bool operator()(const merkle_tree_node &LHS, const std::string& query){
^
vf-merkle.cpp:100:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘const std::basic_string<char>’ to ‘const merkle_tree_node&’
Any ideas?
The short answer, is you need to provide both overloads for different orderings of the arguments
struct COMP
{
bool operator()(const merkle_tree_node &LHS, const std::string& query){
return (LHS.word < query);
}
bool operator()(const std::string& query,const merkle_tree_node &RHS){
return (query < RHS.word);
}
};
You need to do this because you are calling std::equal_range with the third argument of type string, while the iterators point to merkle_tree_node. This mixed comparison case requires you to provide additional overloads to handle the case where the string is the first argument, or when the string is the second argument. For completeness, you might want to consider adding the case where it's two instances of merkle_tree_node.
You call algorithm std:;equal_range passing to it std:;string as the third argument instead of an iterator, So your using of the algorithm is invalid. Read the description of std::equal_range before using it.
Using fibonacci_heap results in a compilation error:
struct Less: public binary_function<Node*, Node*, bool>
{
bool operator()(const Node*& __x, Node*& __y) const
{ return __x->time < __y->time; }
};
boost::fibonacci_heap<Node*, Less >* m_heap;
then
Less* ls = new Less;
m_heap = new boost::fibonacci_heap<Node*, Less >(1000, (*ls));
Any attempt to run m_heap->push(n) results in
no match for call to ‘(TimeSync::Less) (TimeSync::Node* const&, TimeSync::Node*&)’
UnmanagedUtils/Trading/Simulation/TimeSync.h:50: note: candidates are: bool TimeSync::Less::operator()(const TimeSync::Node*&, TimeSync::Node*&) const
/usr/local/include/boost-1_35/boost/property_map.hpp: In function ‘Reference boost::get(const boost::put_get_helper<Reference, PropertyMap>&, const K&) [with PropertyMap = boost::identity_property_map, Reference = unsigned int, K = TimeSync::Node*]’:
Change the signature to operator()(Node * const &, Node * const &) const.
I wrote a piece of code and used map and vector but it shows me something I can't get. I'll be thankful if someone help me in this way and correct my code or give me some hints.
The code is:
// For each node in N, calculate the reachability, i.e., the
// number of nodes in N2 which are not yet covered by at
// least one node in the MPR set, and which are reachable
// through this 1-hop neighbor
std::map<int, std::vector<const NeighborTuple *> > reachability;
std::set<int> rs;
for (NeighborSet::iterator it = N.begin(); it != N.end(); it++)
{
NeighborTuple const &nb_tuple = *it;
int r = 0;
for (TwoHopNeighborSet::iterator it2 = N2.begin (); it2 != N2.end (); it2++)
{
TwoHopNeighborTuple const &nb2hop_tuple = *it2;
if (nb_tuple.neighborMainAddr == nb2hop_tuple.neighborMainAddr)
r++;
}
rs.insert (r);
reachability[r].push_back (&nb_tuple);
}
/*******************************************************************************/
//for keepping exposition of a node
std::map<Vector, std::vector<const NeighborTuple *> > position;
std::set<Vector> pos;
for (NeighborSet::iterator it = N.begin(); it != N.end(); it++)
{
NeighborTuple nb_tuple = *it;
Vector exposition;
pos.insert (exposition);
position[exposition].push_back (&nb_tuple);
}
and the errors are for this line: position[exposition].push_back (&nb_tuple);
and the errors are:
/usr/include/c++/4.1.2/bits/stl_function.h: In member function ‘bool std::less<_
Tp>::operator()(const _Tp&, const _Tp&) const [with _Tp = ns3::Vector3D]’:
/usr/include/c++/4.1.2/bits/stl_map.h:347: instantiated from ‘_Tp& std::map<_K
ey, _Tp, _Compare, _Alloc>::operator[](const _Key&) [with _Key = ns3::Vector3D, _Tp = std::vector<const ns3::olsr::NeighborTuple*, std::allocator<const ns3::olsr::NeighborTuple*> >, _Compare = std::less<ns3::Vector3D>, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const ns3::Vector3D, std::vector<const ns3::olsr::NeighborTuple*, std::allocator<const ns3::olsr::NeighborTuple*> > > >]’
../src/routing/olsr/olsr-routing-protocol.cc:853: instantiated from here
/usr/include/c++/4.1.2/bits/stl_function.h:227: error: no match for ‘operator<’ in ‘__x < __y’
debug/ns3/ipv6-address.h:432: note: candidates are: bool ns3::operator<(const ns3::Ipv6Address&, const ns3::Ipv6Address&)
debug/ns3/nstime.h:475: note: bool ns3::operator<(const ns3::Time&, const ns3::Time&)
debug/ns3/ipv4-address.h:305: note: bool ns3::operator<(const ns3::Ipv4Address&, const ns3::Ipv4Address&)
debug/ns3/address.h:231: note: bool ns3::operator<(const ns3::Address&, const ns3::Address&)
debug/ns3/type-id.h:376: note: bool ns3::operator<(ns3::TypeId, ns3::TypeId)
Thanks in advance.
Bahar
std::map is a sorted container of pairs. As such, keys in the map must have operator <() defined. Make sure Vector has the less-than operator defined.
For example:
class Vector {
int len, ang;
friend bool operator<(const Vector&, const Vector&);
};
bool operator<(const Vector& v1, const Vector& v2)
{
return true_if_v1_is_less_than_v2(); // you define what "less than" means
}
Of course, there other ways to do this. You may make operator< a member function. Or you may have the two member data public and the operator a non-member, non-friend function. Or you may define operator< in an anonymous namespace, to enhance information hiding. Or you may use a comparator other than operator<.
You declared the position object as followed : std::map<Vector, std::vector<const NeighborTuple *> > position;
And you are trying to push NeighborTuple * inside...
Try using const NeighborTuple *
I notice that you seem to have a pushback line that compiles and a line that does not.
The difference might be that you have a const in the first case
NeighborTuple const &nb_tuple = *it;
My code is using std::count() on a list of an abstract data type that i have defined. (Sommet or Edge in english). But it doesn't work, although i've overloaded the < and == operators like this :
bool operator< (const Sommet &left, const Sommet &right)
{
if(left.m_id_sommet < right.m_id_sommet)
return true;
return false;
}
bool operator== (const Sommet &left, const Sommet &right)
{
if(left.m_id_sommet == right.m_id_sommet)
return true;
return false;
}
Just notice that this worked using std::sort() and std::unique().
The errors are:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/stl_algo.h: In function 'typename std::iterator_traits<_Iterator>::difference_type std::count(_InputIterator, _InputIterator, const _Tp&) [with _InputIterator = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<Sommet*, std::vector<Sommet, std::allocator<Sommet> > >, _Tp = __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<Sommet*, std::vector<Sommet, std::allocator<Sommet> > >]':
Graphe.cpp:43: instantiated from here
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/bits/stl_algo.h:422: error: no match for 'operator==' in '__first.__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<_Iterator, _Container>::operator* [with _Iterator = Sommet*, _Container = std::vector<Sommet, std::allocator<Sommet> >]() == __value'
Sommet.h:7: note: candidates are: bool operator==(const Sommet&, const Sommet&)
Thanks !
EDIT
This is how i used std::count() :
for(vector<Sommet>::iterator iter = m_sommets.begin();
iter != s_iter_end; iter++)
{
iter->SetNbSuccesseurs(count(m_sommets.begin(), m_sommets.end(), iter));
}
It looks like you are passing in an iterator as the last parameter to std::count whereas you need to pass in a value (by const reference).
Post edit: it looks like I was correct, you are passing iter which is an iterator. You need to dereference it first. Try passing *iter instead.
What you need to pass to count is a value, not an iterator:
iter->SetNbSuccesseurs(count(m_sommets.begin(), m_sommets.end(), *iter));