I have "Hello World" code that uses function fhi from another hi.cpp file that has it's header.
Correct my if my understanding is wrong according following:
I can do include cpp file like #include "c:\c\hi.cpp" instead of using header without any problems except that fact that it looks more readable in header file.
If I include header like sample in my main program hi.h, must hi.h include hi.cpp, or it is done automatically according the same file name hi. I'm wondering how compiler knows where is function fhi body.
Is it possible to have different names for header and cpp files?
Programm:
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "c:\c\hi.h"
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
fhi(1);
return 0;
}
hi.h
#include <cstdlib>
#include <iostream>
int var;
int fhi(int f);
hi.cpp
#include <cstdlib>
#include <iostream>
int fhi(int f)
{
return 0;
}
must hi.h include hi.cpp
No. hi.h contains only declarations, that can be other by other .cpp files.
I'm wondering how compiler knows where is function fhi body.
It doesn't. You need to compile all *.cpp files into the object files. In your case, you will have two object files: program.o and hi.o. The linker can now take these two object files, and spit out the executable. References to other functions(in this case the actual definition of fhi(..)) is resolved in this stage.
Also why are you using absolute paths in #includes? It will break when you move the "c" directory around.
What normally happens is that the build system compiles the .cpp files into object files, that then are used to build the main executable. The means to tell this to the build system vary greatly.
One important point is that your hi.cpp must include hi.h. You should also put an include guard in hi.h, to make it safe to be included more than once in a translation unit.
I can do include cpp file like #include "c:\c\hi.cpp" instead of using
header without any problems except that fact that it looks more
readable in header file.
yes, you can do so but it is not recommended, one of the problems is encapsulation; you are not hiding implementation details. readability as you mention is also a concern, a header is easier to read since it clearly shows what methods are public.
If I include header like sample in my main program hi.h, must hi.h
include hi.cpp, or it is done automatically according the same file
name hi. I'm wondering how compiler knows where is function fhi body.
the header needs to be explicitly included in hi.cpp and any .cpp file that use the class defined in the header.
Is it possible to have different names for header and cpp files?
yes but it is not recommended, it makes it more difficult to find things.
as a general rule: think about that other programmers may want to look in your code so you need to structure it so that it is easy to read and understand as well as making it easier for you 2 years down the road to remember where things are.
In Visual Studio all CPP files included in the project will be compiled to produce OBJ files. These OBJ files will be linked together to form the EXE or DLL.
Including files are similar to pasting the contents of the file at that location. The only difference is that this pasting is done by the pre-compiler during compilation.
Finding out where a function body resides is done by the either the compiler if the function is inline or by the linker when the final binary is created.
First, if the header file is in the same directory as the source file including it, you can use just
#include "hi.h"
In other words, you don't have to use a full path. (See e.g. the inclusion of "stdafx.h".)
Second, in your header file you don't need to include other header files, unless you need types from those. In your header file you don't have anything that needed from the header files you include.
Third, you should protect header files header files from being included more than once in the same source file, this can be done with a so called include guard, on in some compiler via a special directive called #pragma once.
Fourth, in your header file you define a global variable var. This variable will then be defined in every source file you include the header file in, which will lead to errors. You need to declare the variable as extern:
extern int var;
Then in one source file you define the variable like you do now.
Fifth, you should never include source files in header file (with some special exceptions that you don't have to think about yet). Instead you add all source files to the project (I assume you are in MS VisualStudio) and it they will all be built and linked together automatically.
Sixth, since you seem to be using VisualC++, then you are probably using something called precompiled headers. This is something the compiler uses to speed up compilation. However, for this to work you have to include "stdafx.h" in all source files. That include actually has to be the first non-comment line in each source file.
Related
I have a question about libraries. When I write a library I have 2 files: library.h and library.cpp.
The first one contains the prototypes of the functions and the second one contains the definitions. Well, in library.cpp I include #include "library.h", so they are connected in one way, but what happens with the header? Why don't I have to write #include "library.cpp" in the header?
When I use the library in the main file, I write #include "library.h", which includes the prototypes, but how does the compiler know where the definitions are?
Explained briefly:
(1) Your library.cpp file is sent to the preprocessor.
(2) The preprocessor reads the line #include "library.h" and goes and finds the file library.h.
(3) The contents of library.h are literally copied into the library.cpp file.
(4) The library.cpp file is compiled and linked with the main file.
Thus, all of the "prototypes" in the header are copied into the top of the implementation file. .cpp files are compiled and linked. The header files themselves are not compiled -- their contents are copied into the .cpp files.
There is a tool called linker which is responsible for link your generated object files. You should look for compilation process to understand it better.
The preprocessor pulls the header file into the CPP file, so the compiler sees the prototypes and the definitions together.
If you were to pull the CPP file into the header file, you would either send the preprocessor into an infinite loop, or by using
#ifndef __FOOBAR__
#define __FOOBAR__
(code file)
#endif
around the header AND source files you would read the file just once.
All the cpp files are compiled seperately and the code is accumulated in a big pile somewhere. The linker collects all the symbols in your code and assigns them an address within this pile. So although your file doesn't see library.cpp directly, it knows the symbols from library.h and the assigned addresses. It can then zoom directly to the required code in the big pile. Not the most technical answer I know..
It was my understanding that when you type #include "library.h" in your code the compiler is set to also load library.cpp. I was taught in school that there isn't really any way to break this connection unless you were to manually compile and link each file either using compiler commands or a makefile appropriate for the system you're using (Windows, *nix, MacOS, etc.)
You have to type #include "library.h" in the library.cpp file because that is where the function prototypes are stored. You can "cheat" and put the function prototypes in the .cpp file and just type #include "library.cpp" but this is bad practice and is generally discouraged in the programming community.
I somehow can't grab the idea and reading the documentation hasn't helped me.
My questions are:
When I include a header file #include "general.h", and in the directory of my project there are two files general.h and general.cpp, does it mean that I the precompiler will find the .cpp file automatically?
Can I include files without extentions: #include "general"?
Can I include a file without any header file: #include "general.cpp"?
Can I include a txt file: #include "general.txt"?
I tried this all in Visual Studio 2010. No syntax errors at least. But I'd like to have an explanation. So, I hope you will be kind and help me.
The standard and the compiler don't really care much about whether a file is .cpp or .h or .monkeyface. The concepts behind structuring your source code into implementation and header files are really just accepted ways to help manage your source. Despite this, not structuring your source in the accepted way is often considered to be incorrect or bad C++.
All #include does is tell the preprocessor to include the contents of the file you specify in the current file. It's like copying and pasting the other file into yours. When you say #include "foo.h", it just includes the contents of foo.h and doesn't care about foo.cpp at all - it doesn't even know that it exists (and there's no reason it has to exist).
Structuring your source code in implementation and header files is extremely useful - it avoids problems with dependencies and multiple definitions, and also improves compilation time somewhat. When your code uses another class, you only need to #include the header file for that class. The reason is because your code doesn't need to care about the implementation of the class, it just needs to know what it looks like (its name, members, base class, etc.). It doesn't concern itself with how exactly the member functions are implemented.
The extensions .cpp and .h are merely conventions. Some people prefer to use .hpp for header files. Some people even use .tpp for template implementations. You can name them however you like - yes, you can even include a .txt file. Your compiler probably tries to infer things about files (for example, which language to compile it as) from the file extension, but that is usually overrideable.
So if your main.cpp includes foo.h because it uses class foo, at what point does foo.cpp get involved? Well, in the compilation of main.cpp, it doesn't get involved at all. main.cpp doesn't need to know about the implementation of the class, as we discussed above. However, when compiling your entire program, you will pass each of your .cpp files to the compiler to be compiled separately. That is, you would do something like g++ main.cpp foo.cpp. When foo.cpp is compiled, it will include the headers that it needs to compile.
After each of your .cpp files has been compiled (which involves including the headers that they depend on), they are then linked together. The use of a member function foo::bar() in main.cpp will at this stage be linked to the implementation of foo::bar() that was given in foo.cpp.
The #include directive tells the preprocessor to read the file. That's all.
The preprocessor simply inserts the whole content of the given file when it encounters a #include directive.
No, the precompiler know nothing about the .cpp file
Yes, if the file has no extensions
You can include any file you want. It doesn't mean you will get anything useful out of it.
See point 3. above.
#include is a simple "insert the contents of the given file here" mechanism, so the preprocessor will include exactly the file you specify. If you include a .h file, neither the preprocessor nor the compiler will know about the corresponding .cpp file - each .cpp file is compiled separately (the purpose of the .h files is to inform the compiler of which functions exist outside of the current .cpp file). After compilation, the linker is invoked, and only then are the compiled results of the different .cpp files combined.
I have a code in which I #include<linux/videodev2.h>. There are three files:
one header file- includes: stdint.h and stdlib.h. Defines a couple of functions, a struct, say abc, and some #define macros. One of the functions is
int func(int, uint32_t, size_t, abc*);
one cpp file with a lot of methods, including definition of the functions in the .h file.
one main.cpp which has main() which has a function call to the method in the .h file (complete file below). This file is only for testing purposes.
#include "head.h"
int main() {
func(5, (uint32_t)5, (size_t)5, 0);
return 0;
}
What is see is a curious case:
If I include linux/videodev2.h only in .h file, uint32_t and other things defined in this header are not accessible by the .cpp files. (erros I get are: uint32_t was not declared in this scope, and uint32_t does not name a type, among others). This happens even if the first line of the .h file is #include<linux/videodev2.h>
If I include the videodev2 header in both the cpp files, it works only if I import it (videodev2) before the .h file.
If I use func(5, (uint32_t)5, (size_t)5, (abc*)0); in the main.cpp file, I get the error that abc is not declared in this scope.
I am compiling using the command: g++ main.cpp head.cpp
I am unable to figure out why is this. I would like to include the videodev2 header in the .h file since, it is almost certain that the code using the .h file will be dependent on it. But it seems that including it in .h file has no effect at all.
I must be honest here. This was C code which I had to convert to C++. I know that I am not conforming to the best practices and standards. But why is this behaviour seen?
Remember that the #include directive indicates to the preprocessor the contents of the specified file should be treated as if they appeared directly in the source file in place of the directive (paraphrased from MSDN).
With that in mind, it seems like you are encountering improper order of #includes and also missing #includes. My guess would be that you are not including your own header file in your .cpp files. This would explain cases one and three. Consider the following files:
// header.h
// #include <linux/videodev2.h> <-- Option 1
class A {
void func(uint32_t var);
};
// header.cpp
void A::func(uint32_t var) {
// implementation
}
// main.cpp
// #include <linux/videodev2.h> <-- Option 2
#include "header.h"
// #include <linux/videodev2.h> <-- Option 3
int main() {
// implementation; something creates an instance of A and calls func
}
Now, Option 1 is not exactly desirable; it's good practice to avoid #includes in header files because they can increase build times and create unwanted dependencies. However, it will ensure that the types header.h requires are there for it to use. The essential bit is that the contents of linux/videodev2.h have to appear before the contents of header.h, anywhere that header.h is #included.
This brings me to Option 2. Option 2 will also compile correctly, because linux/videodev2.h is included before your header, and your header relies on types defined in it. Also important is that both main.cpp and header.cpp must #include "header.h", because they reference symbols declared in it.
If you were to go with Option 3, you would get compilation errors that the type uint32_t is not defined, and the compiler would point to your header file. This is because the contents of the header file appear before the contents of linux/videodev2.h, and so the compiler does not yet understand what the type uint32_t is when it encounters it.
So, given all that, you have choices: include `linux/videodev2.h' before each include of your own header file, or include it directly in your header file. I mentioned earlier that the latter is not good practice, but for your particular case, it might be the better option of the two, in case your header file needs to be included in many .cpps.
I think this would be a good opportunity to dive into precompiled headers, but I'm not as well-versed in them, so I'd leave it to someone who has more experience to explain them.
Hope this helps :)
Found the answer. There was .h.gch file in the directory. I didn't know about precompiled header. Thanks ktodisco for the insight. I still have no idea why that file was there in the first place.
I have always seen people write
class.h
#ifndef CLASS_H
#define CLASS_H
//blah blah blah
#endif
The question is, why don't they also do that for the .cpp file that contain definitions for class functions?
Let's say I have main.cpp, and main.cpp includes class.h. The class.h file does not include anything, so how does main.cpp know what is in the class.cpp?
First, to address your first inquiry:
When you see this in .h file:
#ifndef FILE_H
#define FILE_H
/* ... Declarations etc here ... */
#endif
This is a preprocessor technique of preventing a header file from being included multiple times, which can be problematic for various reasons. During compilation of your project, each .cpp file (usually) is compiled. In simple terms, this means the compiler will take your .cpp file, open any files #included by it, concatenate them all into one massive text file, and then perform syntax analysis and finally it will convert it to some intermediate code, optimize/perform other tasks, and finally generate the assembly output for the target architecture. Because of this, if a file is #included multiple times under one .cpp file, the compiler will append its file contents twice, so if there are definitions within that file, you will get a compiler error telling you that you redefined a variable. When the file is processed by the preprocessor step in the compilation process, the first time its contents are reached the first two lines will check if FILE_H has been defined for the preprocessor. If not, it will define FILE_H and continue processing the code between it and the #endif directive. The next time that file's contents are seen by the preprocessor, the check against FILE_H will be false, so it will immediately scan down to the #endif and continue after it. This prevents redefinition errors.
And to address your second concern:
In C++ programming as a general practice we separate development into two file types. One is with an extension of .h and we call this a "header file." They usually provide a declaration of functions, classes, structs, global variables, typedefs, preprocessing macros and definitions, etc. Basically, they just provide you with information about your code. Then we have the .cpp extension which we call a "code file." This will provide definitions for those functions, class members, any struct members that need definitions, global variables, etc. So the .h file declares code, and the .cpp file implements that declaration. For this reason, we generally during compilation compile each .cpp file into an object and then link those objects (because you almost never see one .cpp file include another .cpp file).
How these externals are resolved is a job for the linker. When your compiler processes main.cpp, it gets declarations for the code in class.cpp by including class.h. It only needs to know what these functions or variables look like (which is what a declaration gives you). So it compiles your main.cpp file into some object file (call it main.obj). Similarly, class.cpp is compiled into a class.obj file. To produce the final executable, a linker is invoked to link those two object files together. For any unresolved external variables or functions, the compiler will place a stub where the access happens. The linker will then take this stub and look for the code or variable in another listed object file, and if it's found, it combines the code from the two object files into an output file and replaces the stub with the final location of the function or variable. This way, your code in main.cpp can call functions and use variables in class.cpp IF AND ONLY IF THEY ARE DECLARED IN class.h.
I hope this was helpful.
The CLASS_H is an include guard; it's used to avoid the same header file being included multiple times (via different routes) within the same CPP file (or, more accurately, the same translation unit), which would lead to multiple-definition errors.
Include guards aren't needed on CPP files because, by definition, the contents of the CPP file are only read once.
You seem to have interpreted the include guards as having the same function as import statements in other languages (such as Java); that's not the case, however. The #include itself is roughly equivalent to the import in other languages.
It doesn't - at least during the compilation phase.
The translation of a c++ program from source code to machine code is performed in three phases:
Preprocessing - The Preprocessor parses all source code for lines beginning with # and executes the directives. In your case, the contents of your file class.h is inserted in place of the line #include "class.h. Since you might be includein your header file in several places, the #ifndef clauses avoid duplicate declaration-errors, since the preprocessor directive is undefined only the first time the header file is included.
Compilation - The Compiler does now translate all preprocessed source code files to binary object files.
Linking - The Linker links (hence the name) together the object files. A reference to your class or one of its methods (which should be declared in class.h and defined in class.cpp) is resolved to the respective offset in one of the object files. I write 'one of your object files' since your class does not need to be defined in a file named class.cpp, it might be in a library which is linked to your project.
In summary, the declarations can be shared through a header file, while the mapping of declarations to definitions is done by the linker.
That's the distinction between declaration and definition. Header files typically include just the declaration, and the source file contains the definition.
In order to use something you only need to know it's declaration not it's definition. Only the linker needs to know the definition.
So this is why you will include a header file inside one or more source files but you won't include a source file inside another.
Also you mean #include and not import.
That's done for header files so that the contents only appear once in each preprocessed source file, even if it's included more than once (usually because it's included from other header files). The first time it's included, the symbol CLASS_H (known as an include guard) hasn't been defined yet, so all the contents of the file are included. Doing this defines the symbol, so if it's included again, the contents of the file (inside the #ifndef/#endif block) are skipped.
There's no need to do this for the source file itself since (normally) that's not included by any other files.
For your last question, class.h should contain the definition of the class, and declarations of all its members, associated functions, and whatever else, so that any file that includes it has enough information to use the class. The implementations of the functions can go in a separate source file; you only need the declarations to call them.
main.cpp doesn't have to know what is in class.cpp. It just has to know the declarations of the functions/classes that it goes to use, and these declarations are in class.h.
The linker links between the places where the functions/classes declared in class.h are used and their implementations in class.cpp
.cpp files are not included (using #include) into other files. Therefore they don't need include guarding. Main.cpp will know the names and signatures of the class that you have implemented in class.cpp only because you have specified all that in class.h - this is the purpose of a header file. (It is up to you to make sure that class.h accurately describes the code you implement in class.cpp.) The executable code in class.cpp will be made available to the executable code in main.cpp thanks to the efforts of the linker.
It is generally expected that modules of code such as .cpp files are compiled once and linked to in multiple projects, to avoid unnecessary repetitive compilation of logic. For example, g++ -o class.cpp would produce class.o which you could then link from multiple projects to using g++ main.cpp class.o.
We could use #include as our linker, as you seem to be implying, but that would just be silly when we know how to link properly using our compiler with less keystrokes and less wasteful repetition of compilation, rather than our code with more keystrokes and more wasteful repetition of compilation...
The header files are still required to be included into each of the multiple projects, however, because this provides the interface for each module. Without these headers the compiler wouldn't know about any of the symbols introduced by the .o files.
It is important to realise that the header files are what introduce the definitions of symbols for those modules; once that is realised then it makes sense that multiple inclusions could cause redefinitions of symbols (which causes errors), so we use include guards to prevent such redefinitions.
its because of Headerfiles define what the class contains (Members, data-structures) and cpp files implement it.
And of course, the main reason for this is that you could include one .h File multiple times in other .h files, but this would result in multiple definitions of a class, which is invalid.
In Python whenever I had a bunch of functions that I wanted to use across multiple programs I'd make another .py file and then just import that wherever I needed it. How would I do that in C/C++? Do I dump both prototype and implementation into an .h file? or do I need to place the function prototypes in the .h file and the implementations in a separate .cpp file with the same name as the .h file and #include the .h wherever I need it?
You need to do a couple of things:
Add the prototype to a header file.
Write a new source file with the function definitions.
In a source file that just wants to use the shared function, you need to add #include "header.h" (replacing header.h with the name of the file from step 1) someplace before you try to call the shared function (normally you put all includes at the top of the source file).
Make sure your build compiles the new source file and includes that in the link.
A couple of other comments. It's normal to have foo.h as the header for the foo.c but that is only a style guideline.
When using headers, you want to add include guards to protect against the multiple include issue.
In C/C++ we usually put declarations in .h files and implementation in .c/cpp files.
(Note: there're many other ways, for example the include, templates, inline, extern, ... so you may find some code only in header files or only in c/cpp files - for example some of the STL and templates.)
Then you need to "link" the file with your program, which works like the "import" in Python interpreter but actually works in static linking object files together into a single executable file.
However the "link" command and syntax depends on your compiler and OS linker. So you need to check your compiler for more information, for example "ld" on UNIX and "link.exe" on DOS/Windows. Moreover, usually the C compiler will invoke the linker automatically.
For example, say you have 2 files: a.c and b.c (with a.h and b.h), on gcc:
gcc -o a.out a.c b.c
On MSVC:
cl a.c b.c
There are two ways to approach this that differ only slightly. As others have said, the first steps are:
-Create a header file which contains your function prototypes. You'll want to mark this with
# ifndef myheader_h
# define myheader_h
// prototypes go here...
# endif
to prevent problems with multiple inclusions.
-Create a .c file which contains the actual definitions.
Here's where the solutions branch.
If you want to include the source directly in your project, make the .c file part of your compilation stage as well as your link stage.
However, if you really plan on using this across multiple projects, you'll probably want to compile this source file independently, and reference the object file from your other projects. This is loosely what a "library" is, though libraries may consist of multiple object modules - each of which has been compiled but not yet linked.
update
Someone pointed out that this really only keeps the header from being included in a single cpp file. News flash: that's all you need to do.
Compilers treat each cpp file individually. The header files included by each cpp source file tell the compiler, "hey! This thing is defined in another source file! Assume references that match this prototype are A-OK and keep moving on."
The LINKER, on other other hand, is responsible for fixing up these references, and IT will throw a fit if the same symbol is defined in multiple object files. For that to happen, a function would have to be defined in two separate source files - a real definition with a body, not just an extern prototype - OR the object file that contains its body/definition would have to be included in the link command more than once.
Re:"inline"
Use of "inline" is meant as an optmization feature. Functions declared as inline have their bodies expanded inline at each place where they are called. Using this to get around multiple definition errors is very, very bad. This is similar to macro expansion.
See Francis's answer. The sentence that you wrote, "or do I need to place the function prototypes in the .h file and the implementations in a separate .cpp file with the same name as the .h file and #include the .h wherever I need it?", is pretty-much correct. You don't have to do things exactly this way, but it works.
It's up to you how you do this, The compiler doesn't care. But if you put your functions in a .h file, you should declare them __inline otherwise if you include the header file in more than one .cpp file, you will have multiply defined symbols.
On the other hand, if you make them __inline, you will tend to get a copy created in each place that you use the function. This will bloat the size of your program. So unless the functions are quite small, it's probably best to put the functions in a .cpp and create a parallel .h with function prototypes and public structures. This is the way most programmers work.
On the other hand, in the STL (Standard Template Library), virtually all of the code is in header files. (without the .h extension)