Does anyone have a good way to set up multiple CFML engines, and versions of them, together in a suitable environment for cross testing a CFML based application.
Ideally, I'd like this to be Ubuntu Server based as I'm using it with VirtualBox (under Windows 7). Plus it'd be helpful if it was possible to switch between, so my laptop can cope with one at a time rather than all running at once. I'm thinking of the following:
Adobe ColdFusion 9
Adobe ColdFusion 10
Railo 3.3.x
Railo 4.x
OpenBD 2.x
I'd also like to get them serving from the same shared directory, so I don't have to have a copy of the code for each engine. Cheers
You mentioned being able to "switch between, so my laptop can cope with one at a time rather than all running at once", I'm guessing that you are thinking that each one will run on a different VM, or that they might require a huge amount of memory. I don't think you need to worry about that. Unless you require that they be on different machines, I think you could do this all on one VM and with one instance of a servlet container (like Tomcat).
From a high-level view, here is how I would do it.
Install Tomcat
Create or download .wars for each of the engines.
Deploy said .wars to that one instance of Tomcat
Set up Tomcat to use each of those servlets from a different host name (server.xml)
Create a code directory outside of Tomcat for your one copy of the code
Set up a Symbolic link in each webapp to link the code folder into the servlet
You should then be able to hit the same source from each engine by visiting the different host names in the browser.
I may be missing something. It has been a long time since I set something like this up. You'll likely need to make a bunch of tweaks (JVM settings, switching to Sun/ORACLE JVM vs. OpenJDK, etc).
I don't think running this many engines will cause you great trouble. In my experiences, for development, I have had 3 instances of CF9 running on Tomcat using only 189mb of RAM. And each additional instance did not increase that number by 1/3. Far less. It would not surprise me if you could run all of those handily with less than 512md of RAM. Possibly even 256mb if you are really hurting on memory.
I hope this helps.
For ColdFusion 10, Railo and OpenBD you would be looking at deploying with standalone installations of Tomcat, Jetty or JBoss.
ColdFusion 9, probably the easiest solution is "Enterprise Multiserver configuration" setup.
With these kinds of installation they are pretty much platform agnostic.
The things to be aware of are the web server, proxy and jndi ports that are used by each installation, but only if you want to run more than one server at a time.
After that it's whether you are bothered about proxying from apache or Nginx to the server instances and the connector you want to use.
No idea if this helps...
Since you've mentioned the VirtualBox, I'll share my personal approach to this task. It includes few fairly simple steps:
Install Ubuntu Server as VirtualBox guest (host is also Ubuntu).
Set up only basic software like JVM and updates. Set up virtual
machine networking as bridged adapter to use my Wi-Fi connection.
Configure my Wi-Fi router DHCP to assign static IP for MAC address of the virtual machine.
Add entry to my (host) system hosts: ip_assigned_to_vm virtual.ubuntu
Set up guest additions and mount my ~/www directory inside the machine to access web applications.
Now, when I need another machine for experiments, or some other configuration of software (I've tested ACF 10 and Railo 4 this way) I do two things:
Clone existing clean machine.
Make sure it is using the same MAC address with bridged interface.
That's it.
It doesn't matter which of the machines I run, they all can be accessed as http://virtual.ubuntu (of course, it requires proper web-server configuration on the guest). Same time they are independent and it is completely safe to make anything I wish and test anything that runs on Ubuntu.
Obvious downsides are that I can run just one machine at a time, plus much more disk space is used. Not a problem to me.
I've tried approach with Tomcat and multiple WARs, but it has couple of issues: I can't use different JVM and Tomcat settings, also if I screw the setup -- all the Tomcat hosts are down.
Hope this helps.
Related
I have a problem with a web service that is installed and started with a .msi that is created with the WiX toolset.
The service can be installed and started on all the machines I tested so far (shown as running in the Services Manager) but on some machines it is not reachable (for example via a browser) and not shown in the list of listening ports on that machine (displayed with 'netstat -a').
I am trying to figure out what's going wrong but I am not really familiar with web service development and configuration. It's a third party service, thus I don't know how it works internally.
A good starting point for me would be to find out, what exactly happens when a service is installed and started during the execution of the .msi-file.
Maybe I could try to tackle the problem on a lower level then.
Below is my code in the ServiceInstall-Element:
<ServiceInstall
Id="ServiceID"
Type="ownProcess"
Vital="yes"
Name="ServiceName"
DisplayName="ServiceDisplayName"
Description="Lorem Ipsum"
Start="auto"
Account="LocalSystem"
ErrorControl="normal"
Interactive="no"
Arguments="action=run">
</ServiceInstall>
The argument is important - without it, the service won't start or run.
Maybe someone else encounterd the same or a similar problem and can help me out.
Thanks already in advance - each hint is appreciated.
EDIT I (15.04.18):
As it might be a problem with the specific service, I will add some further information here:
It's a third party software called CryptoLicensing:
http://www.ssware.com/cryptolicensing/cryptolicensing_net.htm
Part of this software is that specific program, that serves as a License Server and does the license registration, for example in a customer's network.
The service can be run as a Windows application or installed and run as a Windows service. In both cases it should be listening on a (pre-)specified port on the installed machine.
Whenever I start the .exe as an application, everything works as intended. The service is reachable (for example with the browser) and can be accessed from other machines in the network.
When the .exe is installed and started as a service, it does not work as intended on every machine. For example if I install and start the service on my laptop, it is shown as running in the Services Manager, but is not reachable on its assigned URL (not even on the localhost) nor is the specific port displayed in the active listening ports, for example with 'netstat -a'.
The service itself starts without any error messages and does not log any errors or exceptions as it seems to be running without any problems.
I contacted the vendor, but sometimes he doesn't reply quickly and he is not very specific in his replies.
Before asking the question I assumed that it was a problem with the Windows user rights and the WiX installer but during the discussion here I had the feeling that it might a problem with the service itself.
I hope this 'new' piece of information helps in isolating and location the problem.
Thanks to everyone who helped so far!
Hopefully not stating the obvious here, but WiX doesn't do much except populate the ServiceInstall table in the MSI file, so this is about why Windows Installer won't start the service. ServiceInstall table:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa371637(v=vs.85).aspx
Also, this isn't really about ServiceInstall - it's probably about the ServiceControl element in your WiX source, but it's not clear whether that's how you're starting it or if you're starting it manually later on. That does make a difference. What is the error message and where are you getting it, and is it a 1920 or 1921 error (in the context of ServiceControl).
The main reason a service will start on one system but not another is missing dependencies. If your service is C++ based (the post doesn't say) then there are probably dependencies on C runtimes, UCRT runtimes, MFC or ATL runtimes and so on.
First: are you sure this service is intended to run as LocalSystem? (MSDN, SO).
Second: did you check the event logs in detail for anything obvious? If the service is good you should find a hint at least. Something to start with. I find that I sometimes miss the actual logs in the event viewer because it is so "crowded". My take on it: empty the log and stop and restart the service.
Something locking / blocking: If the service installs and runs OK I would suspect other factors such as firewalls (hardware & software), security software in general (anti-virus, malware scanners), network configuration issues (proxies, WINS, DNS and all the complexities involved in networking). Is the service trying to reach an UNC path?
Diverse Machines: What are the target machines? Are they virtual, are they physical, are they test machines, are they operative SOE machines in corporate networks? Are they the same OS version and edition?
Further Ideas: It is not quite related, but maybe skim this list of suggestions for debugging from another answer (I am not sure why it was down-voted, I think it is an OK list to inspire debugging ideas): Windows Application Startup Error Exception code: 0xe0434352 (maybe just skim the bolded words for ideas - Recommended).
sc.exe: And finally, perhaps check the sc.exe tool (Service Control) and see if it can provide you with some useful information for debugging.
sc.exe in the context of killing hung services (sample use).
sc.exe from MSDN
Some further links:
Windows Services Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). Content seems to be up to date - at face value at least. These guys claim to be experts on services. I have no idea who they are.
Essential Tools for Windows Services: SC.EXE
Run Service Control (sc.exe) command on secure port
After almost 20 months we finally (and accidentally) found a solution to the problem! For the few machines, on which the service did not run properly, setting the NoInteractiveServices value in the registry to 0 did the trick. A value of 1 (which is default) means that no service is allowed to run interactively, regardless of whether it has the SERVICE_INTERACTIVE_PROCESS property. More information on Interactive Services.
I am not completely satisfied with the solution, because on all the other machines NoInteractiveServices is set to 1 AND the service runs properly anyway. However, on the machines where the service did not run interactively this solution worked for us. Thus I will accept this as an answer.
If anyone has more information on this issue and can explain why this works, feel free to
add them - I would be very interested!
Normally I've developed locally (on my own machine) and pushed to wherever things needed to go via mapped drives, ftp, github, etc. I have done a bit of work with vagrant/virtualbox (but again, locally) with a shared/mirrored folder.
I am now in a situation where everyone here has access to their own dev box (a vm on the network). I see some working in Vim directly via SSH, I believe, but I'm not there yet. So I'm left with the question: What's the best way for (more of a front end guy) to approach this?
I have heard of doing an SSH-mount from my workstation... if that's a viable thing. I'm curious what everyone's take on this kind of environment is and (perhaps) any best practices. Tips, links, and reading is highly welcome and appreciated, too... any pointing in a good direction would be wonderful.
Thank you.
The best answer will come from what virtual resources do you want to capitalize on for the virtual networked VMs. If you just want the storage space, then share the VM's drives, and mount them locally, treat them as local, end of story. If you want to run all the processing on the remote machine, and connect from a thin client, you have a couple of options, but they all take the same form. Connect to the machine, edit the files on the remote machine. Depending on your OS, you will have different options available.
If the remote machine doesn't have an graphical client installed you are stuck with either, mounting the remote share locally (you can use whatever editor you want) or ssh to the remote machine and using a commandline editor (vim, nano, emacs).
If there is a graphical client installed you have more options:
Remote in the server using any visual viewer (mstsc for windows, vnc is an option), and then use any remotely installed editor of your choice.
Remote in using ssh -X, and then run the remotely installed editor. Assuming you have an X-Server locally (if you are running linux you already do), the GUI part of the application will be run on the client side of the ssh tunnel, and the process will be run on the server. This is probably the best option.
So:
Make sure the remote server has a desktop client software (gtk, kde, gnome, almost any windows os, etc...)
install GUI editor of your choice on that server
ssh -X to that server
install sublime text, geany, or your choice of editor
run subl, geany, or other to start the application.
SSH mounting would indeed allow you to use all of the files on the VM as if they were stored in your local machine, letting you edit and update files without having to manually copy them every time you perform changes. You will run into a speed bump though, since files changed will have to be synchronized/copied to your remote machine every time and that takes a couple of seconds. Check this post by DigitalOcean, they explain how to get the SSH mount working.
A better option you have (IMHO) is to use an IDE in your local machine that allows you to push changes to a server after saving or by manually doing so. This would allow you to develop faster by using your local resources (local web server) since no files would have to be copied over the network to the remote VM; and would also allow you to test on that remote VM when needed by uploading the files when you are ready to test on that environment.
PS: Exporting visual apps or environments form the remote machine to your local one can be slow (depending on your network and the VM host load running your machine). If you still like that approach, you could also install something to access that VM over something more standard and lightweight like RDP for GNU/Linux (xrdp).
First of all please let me be clear that I am a windows user and very new to the web world. For the past months I have been learning both python and django, and it has been a great experience for me. Now I have somehow created a small project that I would like to deploy in the production server. Since django has its built-in development server there was no problem for me. But now that I have to deploy it to a production server I googled around and found Nginx + uWSGI or Nginx + Gunicorn as the best option for it. And as uWSGI and Gunicord are incompatible with Windows, I think I should adapt Ubuntu or other Unix system.
So my questions are:
Just to be clear, as I will have to work with one of the above, please explain to me why do I need two servers?
If I have to adapt the Ubuntu environment, do I have to learn Ubuntu shell scripting, SSH and other stuff? Or the hosting provider will help me do that?
Please let me be aware of what else do I need for the above concerned.
Thank you so much for your time and please pardon if my question was a lame question. Hoping for positive response answers.
A typical configuration involves two server processes (which can be run together on the same actual hardware or virtual server) so that the proxy server in front can buffer slow clients. For instance: a slow client will connect to nginx with a request. Nginx will pass the request on to Gunicorn and Gunicorn will respond. Nginx will then consume the Gunicorn response immediately, freeing up the Gunicorn resources right away. At that point, the slow client can take as much time as it wants to consume the response from Nginx without tying up much in the way of server resources. Alternatives to the two-server-process model are to use async workers with Gunicorn and put Gunicorn itself in front, or to use an async-sync combo like Waitress. Nginx in front has the added benefit of doubling as a ready-to-use statics server, though.
Note that "slow clients" can describe: mobile phones that lose their connection and leave the TCP socket hanging until timeout mid-request; mobile phones that are just slow; unreliable connections of all types; hostile denial-of-service clients who are deliberately trying to use server resources; sometimes any old connection that has a hiccup or malfunction for any reason. So this is a problem that will affect nearly any site.
You won't need shell scripting per se but getting used to Ubuntu will take some time. There is a lot to learn even outside of scripting, like how to use the package manager, how to configure packages once they're installed in ways that won't confound future updates, etc. And you will definitely have to learn to use SSH; it is one of the most fundamental server administration tools in the *nix world.
An alternative to learning to use Ubuntu or another server platform is to use a Platform-as-a-Service option like Heroku, as PaaS hosting providers really will take care of all of that stuff for you. I recommend this approach. That having been said, even though I think PaaS is a good option for people who want to focus on development and not server admin regardless of their level of skill, it's also true that a little bit of experience with Linux server platforms goes a long way in helping you to understand the environment that your code runs in. So even if you go with PaaS, you would still benefit from tinkering with Ubuntu a little (or a lot).
Another benefit from a PaaS is that normally their infrastructure handles the Nginx part of the deal (buffering of slow requests via proxy). This is the case with Heroku, for instance. So you won't have to worry about that part of the infrastructure at all.
This part of the question is too broad to answer, but let me know in the comments if you need clarification.
I'm doing it almoast like in this tutorial: http://michal.karzynski.pl/blog/2013/06/09/django-nginx-gunicorn-virtualenv-supervisor/
Nginx is my proxy to django app running on gunicorn and its serving statics, virtualenv for my python enviroment, supervisor to watch my app's running.
It's possible you will run in some error's if not using Postgresql, ask then I will help (used MySQL in the past now it's Postgresql)
Firstly, there's no need to use Ubuntu if you're happier with Windows. I don't know if nginx works on Windows, but I'd be very surprised if it doesn't (in fact, here are the nginx docs for installing on Windows). Apache, meanwhile, definitely does work on Windows. The Django documentation has a full explanation of how to set up Apache/mod_wsgi to serve Django.
You don't need two servers. I'm not sure why you think you do: the usual reason for that is to have the static assets on a separate server, but you don't mention that as a reason. Since you're only talking about a small site, though, you don't even need to do that. One server configured to serve both Django and the static assets will do fine. Again, the docs explain exactly how to do that.
I am a total newbie in servers/hosting etc, although I have some experience in programming in C,Java,etc. So excuse me if the question is 'absurd'.
I recently bought service from a hosting site,namely this(hostmds). I have some code I've written in C++ and I want to run it in the hosting site. So my question is:
Is this possible, or will I have to rewrite everything in a new language?
What should my approach be?
Edit: I have a Shared-Hosting account.
You will have to get a "virtual private server" account from your host in order to do this. This will enable you to compile your program on your host machine and run it essentially as if it were a separate machine under your control.
This means you will also be responsible for maintaining your own HTTP server program (such as Apache, if running on a Linux/Unix host), and your own database servers and other support.
If you have a "shared hosting" account (the most common low cost option) with SSH support, you may be able to compile your program, and even run it, but you will be subject to the whims (capricious or otherwise) of the administrators of your system (that it, you may find that libraries you need are removed or moved around)
What type of hosting is this?
What kind of application is this, is it a daemon?
Depending on the amount of access rights you have, you can run the code in the cgi-bin folder or through the shell of the server.
Depending on the OS/compiler you've used to write your code in you might have to modify some things so that it'll work on the target OS. You should probably add some more details. :)
Many hosting services provide CGI/FastCGI/SCGI that can be used for running C++ webapps. However, it depends on your host whether you can actually do this, as it may be difficult to get binaries built on some other system to run on the web hosting service (if you even can upload them in the first place).
On shell services and virtual servers you can also run daemons (that directly listen to a port), but especially on shell services you cannot listen on low ports (0..1024), for security reasons.
Notice that the cheapest hosting packages generally only allow PHP at most, so you will need something more expensive for more access.
It is best to ask the hosting provider for further information, as these things wildly differ from host to another.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Background:
I'm running a full-time job and a part-time job in the weekends, and both my employers have supplied a laptop for me to work on. Of course I also have my powerful workstation at home to work from, and sometimes when I'm at the office at my weekend job (it's in another city) I'm working from yet another workstation.
Problem:
That makes a full 4 PC's I'm maintaining (software versions, licences and settings) just to do my work, and believe me, my list of prefered software is way too big.
I want to setup a Virtual Desktop on my VMware server, so I can work from the same installation and same session no matter which PC I'm working from.
Now I don't have the time and money to go through a full test of each setup, so I'd like to hear your experiences on the subject.
Question:
Should I use a VMware virtual workstation with some remote logon software (like realVNC, teamviewer, logmein, whatever...) or should I invest in a full VDI system like Sun or VMware provide?
Edit:
I'm programming in Adobe Dreamweaver on Windows XP - but I run my servers on Debian and sometimes do quick edits in VIM too. First I intend to virtualize a WinXP with base installation, to see how it runs.
I am a consultant and tend to work in a variety of environments. I carry a Thinkpad running VMWare Server over Ubuntu64 with 4GB of RAM. I've got a 320GB secondary hard drive that I use just for VM's and have 25 or so different virtual machines that I boot up as the circumstances demand.
They're a mix of Linux servers and workstations, Vista workstations and XP Workstations. I rarely use the VMWare server console. I access every one of them via one of the remote access methods.
For Linux, I usually install FreeNX or NXServer for desktop access and just SSH for commandline. On Windows, I always use Remote Desktop (RDP), but, on XP, that only works on the "Pro" versions, not the "Home" versions. If all else fails, I install VNC and use that. VNC is at the bottom of my list because it really is a last resort. The only thing it's better than is not actually being able to use the machine.
However, NX on Linux and RDP on Windows work WAY better than VNC. Other than little things like font smoothing and fancy desktop effects, the only big glitch would be if you are doing much with video or audio or DirectX-based stuff. Things like YouTube or other video do NOT like to work with any remote desktop protocol that I know of.
As far as performance, using Linux as a host for VMWare provides really good management of system resources. The Windows-based VM's aren't able to just gobble up memory, but still get it when they need to.
I do C# development all day in a virtual Vista workstation on Visual Studio 2008 and have absolutely no problems having 3-4 different solutions all open at once along with the normal stuff alongside over RDP on another machine, connected via wireless VPN.
I can flip over to the host OS and it won't even be touching swap space at all. As far as I'm concerned, it's a great way to work.
If you want to work with the same installation, you should seriously consider the Remote Desktop Server/Client solution, bundled into every windows OS from XP. Basically, this app displays the view from your remote desktop to your local one, using highly compressed images; this works even via low-bandwidth internet connections
While the XP version can only handle one user simultaneously, the one in Windows Server 2003 (and in Windows Server 2008, I presume) can handle multiple users (up to a certain limit).
Disadvantages, and side-effects include:
virtual pc via RDC is slow
anything using the 3d acceleration will be slow (at least using XP/2003)
Personally, I would go down the route of using a virtual workstation with some remote logon software. The network performance of VMWare has always been good in my experience, and depending on the OS, there may be a decent remote logon provided.
I guess you can live with Logmein Free. [Or Pro if u want those features]
Well, you don't say what OSs are involved, so.....
For windows, I find that Remote Desktop works as well or better than anything else, although if you pay for the RealVNC version with the mirror driver, that's supposed to be as good.
For off site access for windows, www.logmein.com (the free version) works very well.
If Unixes are involved, then VNC is definitely the way to go, there are various solutions for doing this remotely. Everything from redirection servers, to just forwarding a port in your firewall to an ssh server and setting up the various tunnels.
Performance of VMWare is very good, and I can run a SQL Server slice, a web server slice and develop on my laptop simultaneously. The VM slices reside on a USB 2 portable drive and make it easy to port between my laptop and desktop.
VM Console works well for accessing each environment, and depending on the configuration you set up with NAT vs. Bridging you can UNC to shares on slice.
The nice by-product of this is that should you host machine take a nose dive you can quickly recover your development environment.