I am trying to compile a project that depends on the Xerces XML Parser. The project compiles for Windows without any difficulty, but I'm having some trouble compiling it with g++ in Cygwin.
In order to use Xerces, I am trying to compile my code against the static library libxerces-c.a. But when I do so, I get errors that look like this:
/tmp/cc2QGvMh.o:test.cpp:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to `xercesc_2_8::DOMImplementationRegistry::getDOMImplementation(unsigned short const*)'
I've inspected the static library using ar, and confirmed that it contains the DOMImplementationRegistry.o file that defines the function that I am calling.
ar -t libxerces-c.a
...
DOMImplementationImpl.o
DOMImplementationRegistry.o
DOMLocatorImpl.o
...
I've also extracted the object files from the library, and used 'nm' to make sure that the function I am calling actually exists:
ar -x libxerces-c.a
nm --demangle DOMImplementationRegistry.o
...
00000080 T xercesc_2_8::getDOMImplSrcVectorMutex()
00000300 T xercesc_2_8::DOMImplementationRegistry::getDOMImplementation(unsigned short const*)
000002a0 T xercesc_2_8::DOMImplementationRegistry::addSource(xercesc_2_8::DOMImplementationSource*)
...
Since I can compile everything for Windows but not with g++, I thought that the error could be in the linker order (similar to the problem described in this question). However, even after changing the linker order, I am still getting the same compiler error. I have tried both
g++ -o test.exe test.cpp -Llib -lxerces-c
and
g++ -o test.exe test.cpp lib/libxerces-c.a
Any ideas?
Your project uses method from xercesc_2_6 namespace as pointed by compiler error message but your library offers xercesc_2_8 version. Problem is probably caused by mismatch between headers you use and library object file.
You didn't say the source of the archive. If it isn't compiled with cygwin, it could be a name mangling problem. Compiling the library from source might well fix this.
It could also be that the archive is built incorrectly so that it has internal resolution problems. Try giving the library name twice.
g++ -o test.exe test.cpp lib/libxerces-c.a lib/libxerces-c.a
If this works, the archive is broken and you should look for or build a new one.
Try the linker option --enable-stdcall-fixup (see 'man ld'). It will care for name mangling and calling conventions:
g++ -o test.exe test.o -Wl,--enable-stdcall-fixup -Llib -lxerces-c
Related
I am trying to link a .o file generated using g++ and another .o file generated using gfortran.
g++ -c mycppcode.cpp
produces the file mycppcode.o and the command
gfortran -c myfortrancode.f
produces the file myfortrancode.o
When I link these two files to get an output file
g++ -O mycppcode.o myfortrancode.o
I get the following error
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"__gfortran_pow_c8_i4", referenced from:
Could some one help me with this? Should I use another compiler? Also, I would like to know what functions or subroutines call "__gfortran_pow_c8_i4", so that I can try to avoid these functions or subroutines in fortran in future.
The following assumes you are using the GNU compiler tools. Things may be slightly different if you are using other compilers.
You can use either compiler to link the two together, but you need to provide the appropriate libraries.
Typically, you can use either
gfortran fortobj.o cppobj.o -lstdc++
or
g++ fortobj.o cppobj.o -lgfortran
This assumes that you are using a setup where both compilers know about each other's libraries (like if you installed through a linux repository).
In the case of the OP the C compilers came from XCode and gfortran is from homebrew. In that case, gfortran knows about the g++ libraries (since they were used to compile the compiler), but g++ doesn't know about the gfortran libraries. This is why using gfortran to link worked as advertised above. However, to link with g++ you need to add the path to libgfortran.* when you call the linker using the -L flag, like
g++ fortobj.o cppobj.o -L/path/to/fortran/libs -lgfortran
If for some reason your gfortran compiler is unaware of your g++ libs, you would do
gfortran fortobj.o cppobj.o -L/path/to/c++/libs -lstdc++
Note that there shouldn't be any difference in the final executable. I'm no compiler expert, but my understanding is that using the compiler to link your objects together is a convenience for calling the linker (ld on UNIX-like OS's) with the appropriate libraries associated with the language you are using. Therefore, using one compiler or the other to link shouldn't matter, as long as the right libraries are included.
Good Day Everyone,
N.B - This problem has been solved - I have provided my own solution in the answer section however the solution provided by Jonathan is much shorter. Nevertheless, this was the following question I originally posted:
I am basically trying to compile a serial library (for UART communication) on Linux however I am not really sure how to correctly compile (I have mentioned what I have done so far below), any suggestions would be highly valuable. I am using the serialib library - which is composed of 2 main files (serialib.h and serialib.cpp) , you may directly view the source code of these files here (scroll all the way to the bottom and view the files in new tabs): http://serialib.free.fr/html/classserialib.html
I transferred these files (serialib.h and serialib.cpp) to my BeagleBone Black micro-controller which is running Debian (Wheezy) , g++/gcc (Debian 4.6.3-14) 4.6.3. I wrote my own program (uart.cpp is my file name) to access the functions provided by this library, this is what I wrote:
#include <iostream>
#include "serialib.h"
#ifdef __linux__
#define DEVICE_PORT "/dev/ttyO1"
#endif
int main()
{
serialib LS;
return 0;
}
So as you can see I am trying to access the 'seriallib' class. serialib.h, serialib.cpp and uart.cpp are all in the home directory. I also manually added the iostream library in serialib.cpp as I did not see it being declared in the original source code.
Now I am really unsure of how to compile such external libraries but so far I tried the following steps:
g++ -c -Wall -Werror -fPIC serialib.c to convert to PIC which gives the following error:
distcc[3142] (dcc_parse_hosts) Warning: /home/debian/.distcc/zeroconf/hosts contained no hosts; can't distribute work
distcc[3142] (dcc_zeroconf_add_hosts) CRITICAL! failed to parse host file.
distcc[3142] (dcc_build_somewhere) Warning: failed to distribute, running locally instead
g++ serialib.cpp -L /home/debian/serialib.h which gives the following error:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.6/../../../arm-linux-gnueabihf/crt1.o: In function _start':
(.text+0x30): undefined reference tomain'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
distcc[3210] ERROR: compile serialib.cpp on localhost failed
As of now I am still finding out how to compile this and if I manage to work this out then I'll post my solution here too. Once again any suggestion will be highly valuable. Thank you all :) .
g++ -c -Wall -Werror -fPIC serialib.c to convert to PIC which gives the following error:
The "error" is not an error, it's a warning, telling you that your distcc setup is broken, but that it compiled locally.
That command doesn't "convert to PIC", it compiles the file serialib.c and produces a compiled object file, serialib.o
g++ serialib.cpp -L /home/debian/serialib.h
This is just nonsense. It tries to build a program from serialib.cpp and use the directory /home/debian/serialib.h (which isn't a directory!) to find libraries.
You don't need to "compile a library" you can just compile both the source files and link them together into a program. Either:
g++ -c serialib.cpp
g++ -c uart.cpp
g++ serialib.o uart.o -o uart
Or all in one command:
g++ serialib.cpp uart.cpp -o uart
You should read An Introduction to GCC to understand the commands, not just enter bogus commands without understanding them.
I have found a solution to this problem, hope this helps for all the future readers with similar problems. I have my own source code uart.cpp (Given in the question) which I want to compile, the external library is serialib that contains two main files (serialib.h and serialib.cpp), you will want to replace the following commands with respect to the files you have
Step 1: Compiling with position independent code
g++ -c -Wall -Werror -fpic serialib.cpp
Step 2: Creating a shared library
g++ -shared -o libserialib.so serialib.o , here the library is libserialib.so.
Step 3: Linking your source code with library
g++ -L /home/debian -lserialib uart.cpp -o uart
g++ -L /home/debian -Wall -o test uart.cpp -lserialib
You may save the library at a different path and you may have a different name of course. Suppose you have a library called libabc.so at the directory /home/user/myDir then the commands will be like:
g++ -L /home/user/myDir -labc your_code.cpp -o your_code
g++ -L /home/user/myDir -Wall -o test your_code.cpp -labc
test is out own program, lserialib is actually looking for libserialib.so and not serialib.o as gcc/g++ assumes all libraries start with lib and end with .so or .a and you can see the same goes for labc as it will look for libabc.so thus it is important to make sure your library name begins with lib and ends with .so or .a
Step 4: Making library available at run time
Here we provide the path where the library is actually stored, I saved it in the directory /home/debian which is why my command looks like:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/debian:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
if your library is saved at /path/to/file then the command will look like:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/file:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
This is to help the loader find the shared library and to view this path: echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and to unset this: unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH
To execute the program type either ./test or ./uart and in case of any modification to the main source code (uart.cpp in this case) , simply repeat step 3. I found the following link very useful: http://www.cprogramming.com/tutorial/shared-libraries-linux-gcc.html . Thank you to all of you who took time to read this question and especially those who gave me suggestions. If anyone has more or better solutions, feel free to post them here to assist future readers :).
I have wrapped my C++ header file in an extern "C" block to allow calling C++ functions from C. I have included the proper header files in the proper places. It works if I do something like the following:
g++ -c cpp_src.cc
gcc -c c_src.c
gcc -o c_exe c_src.o cpp_src.o -lstdc++
But if I remove the -lstdc++ from the last line, I get a bunch of errors. Because of reasons beyond my control, I cannot add the -lstdc++ flag. Is there a way to get the above to work without -lstdc++? What exactly is lstdc++, as in how does the gcc use it while linking with g++ compiled code?
Also, cpp_src.cc uses STL, if that makes a difference.
If you really need to have an object file that you can link with gcc without using -lstdc++, you can do an incremental link of your C++ object file with -lstdc++ and then use the result of that on your gcc link line. Something like:
ld -i -static cpp_src.o -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8 -lstdc++ -o cpp_withstdlib.o
This will link your C++ object file with the standard C++ library and produce a new object file (cpp_withstdlib.o) that contains all the standard C++ library stuff you need, so can be linked on the gcc command line without needing -lstdc++
The tricky part is the -L option -- you need to figure out where g++ has stashed its standard library, as it generally doesn't put it in the standard /usr/lib location. The above is for an Ubuntu 14.04 machine. On most Linux machines, you can find it with locate libstdc++.a
You're generally just better off using g++ to link C++ code, as it knows all the right paths and won't make little mistakes that result in a binary that superficially appears to work, but is actually incorrect.
Using Josh's suggestion, you can do:
ld -i -static cpp_src.o `g++ -print-file-name=libstdc++.a` -o cpp_withstdlib.o
which is a bit cleaner, and could readily be done in a Makefile.
-lstdc++ causes the linker to link to libstdc++, which is gcc's implementation of the C++ standard library. If your code uses any symbols from the standard library (it uses the standard library, and not all code is inlined from headers), it must link libstdc++ (or whichever standard library implementation you use).
You can avoid the standard library, or you can link against the system standard library, or you can statically link a copy of the standard library into your program.
I compiled the object files, and then tried to compile the executable, which failed by saying that there are undefined references to functions in "theLib".
g++ -I./theLib/src -c -o obj/main.o src/main.cpp
(works so far)
g++ -L./theLib -Wl,-rpath=./theLib obj/main.o -ltheLib -o exe
(error: libtheLib.so: undefined reference to 'some_function')
I checked for answers everywhere, and they all just suggest moving the -ltheLib part after the dependencies (which I did). But it still doesn't work. What really boggles my mind is that the same library compiles just fine for an example in a different directory.
The library is in C. Can that mess up trying to compile C++? Or am I just missing something with compiling the .o files first?
Turns out the library depended on functions that I had to implement and provide in my own source code. I never knew that some libraries did that, but lesson learned. Once I implemented the functions that were causing the errors and added those source files, it worked.
I have a project that I'm working on making run with CUDA. For various reasons, it needs to compile an executable either with or without GTK support, without recompiling all of the associated files. Under C, I accomplished this by compiling a base version of the objects to *.o and a GTK version of the objects to *.gtk.o. Thus, I can link to that library and if it needs to use GTK it will pull in those functions (and their requirements); if it doesn't it won't touch those objects.
Converting to nvcc has caused some issues: it works in either always or never GTK mode; but if I compile the libraries with the additional GTK objects, it refuses to ignore them and link a GTKless executable. (It fails with errors about being unable to find the cairo functions I call.)
I'm guessing that nvcc is linking to (at least one of) its helper functions embedded in the object, which is causing the linker to resolve the entire object.
Running ar d <lib> <objects.gtk.o> to manually strip them from the library will "fix" the problem, so there isn't a real dependency there.
I'm compiling/linking with
/usr/local/cuda/bin/nvcc --compiler-options -Wall --compiler-options -pipe
-rdc=true -O0 -g -G -I inc -I inc/ext -arch compute_20 -o program
program.cu obs/external.o libs/base.a libs/extra.a libs/core.a -lm
How can I get nvcc to ignore the unneeded objects?
How can I get nvcc to ignore the unneeded objects?
Before you can achieve that, you need to understand which symbol is causing the *.gtk.o objects to be pulled in from the library when they shouldn't be.
The way to do that is to run link with -Wl,--print-map, and look for linker messages such as:
Archive member included because of file (symbol)
libfoo.a(foo.o) main.o (foo)
Above, main.o referenced foo, which is defined in libfoo.a(foo.o), which caused foo.o to be pulled in into the main binary.
Once you know which symbols cause xxxx.gtk.o to be pulled into the link, searching the web and/or NVidia documentation may reveal a way to get rid of them.