There is an interesting browser framework called Awesomium, which is basically a wrapper around the Chromium browser engine.
I'm interested in using it to redistribute WebGL-based games for the desktop. However Awesomium only supports rendering using a pixel buffer sent to the CPU, even though the WebGL context itself is based on a real hardware-accelerated OpenGL context. This is inefficient for real-time high-performance games and can kill the framerate on low-end machines.
Awesomium may eventually fix this, but it got me thinking: is it possible to search a process for an offscreen OpenGL context and render it directly to a window? This would avoid the inefficient rendering method, keeping rendering entirely on the GPU. I'm using a native C++ app on Windows, so presumably this will involve WGL specifics. Also since Chromium is a multithreaded browser engine it may involve finding an OpenGL context on a different thread or event a different process. Is it possible?
is it possible to search a process for an offscreen OpenGL context and render it directly to a window?
No, it it not possible. If the opengl context is created for the OS buffer, then it is not possible to redirect it to other buffer and other opengl context.
Maybe you can use shared opengl resources (if both opengl contexts are created using such option).
Related
Is this possible in nature? What role of SDL library in OpenVR API? Does it needed for OpenGL context or only for mirroring the stereo image to SDL window?
It is possible. If you don't use SDL, you'll have to create your rendering context and window by yourself. The whole code would be too long for this answer, but on Windows you could use functions like CreateWindowEx and wglCreateContext. OpenVR doesn't require anything different from a normal context setup, but you need to use a somewhat modern version of OpenGL (4.1 at least works for me).
I'd like to use certain functions of openGL, but nothing related to rendering visual content. Is there way to create it without ANY dependencies (not to windows, nor some package[SDL, SFML, GLUT])? Only libraries allowed are those without external libraries, just like GLEW which I use.
What you want to do is known in general as off-screen rendering. In theory it is possible perfectly well, however the practical implementation has a lot of caveats. Most importantly on all major high performance implementations: Even if no rendering window is visible you still need the graphics system running and being active and your program run in the environment of this graphics system.
On Windows the most straightforward way to go is creating invisible window, just a window you create with CreateWindowEx but not map with ShowWindow; you don't even need a event processing loop for that. In this window you create your OpenGL context as usual, but instead of rendering to the window framebuffer, you render to a Frame Buffer Object.
On X11/GLX it's even more straightforward: X11/GLX offers PBuffers without extensions (Windows has PBuffers, too, but for creating one you need a regular OpenGL context first). So on X11 you can create a PBuffer without a proxy window. The PBuffer iteself can be rendered to as off-screen buffer; Frame Buffer Object work in a PBuffer, as well, if the implementation supports them. Using a invisible window with a Frame Buffer Object, just like with Windows, works as well. Either way, with current drivers X11 must be active and the bound console, so you can not start an additional X server in the background and have your off-screen rendering happen there, but this is just a limitation of the drivers and not of X11, GLX or OpenGL.
Only libraries allowed are those without external libraries, just like GLEW which I use.
You can link GLEW statically to your program. If you're hardcore you can do extension loading manually, but why would you want to do that?
What is the lightest cross-platform library that can staticaly link and can create context.
How do you define "lightest?"
The two cross-platform libraries that do the least other than creating OpenGL windows are FreeGLUT and GLFW.
FreeGLUT has about a 5.2MB distribution (after unzipping), while GLFW has a 2.6MB distro. Does that make it "lighter"? FreeGLUT's compiled static library, in release mode under VS2008, is around 500KB; the one for GLFW under similar compilation is 120KB. Does that make it "lighter"?
When trying to implement a simple OpenGL application, I was surprised that while it is easy to find plenty of examples and documentation on advanced rendering stuff, the Win32 framework is poorly documented and even most samples and tutorials do not implement this properly even for basic cases, not mentioning advanced stuff like multiple monitors. Despite of several hours of searching I was unable to find a way which would handle Alt-Tab reliably.
How should OpenGL fullscreen application respond to Alt-Tab? Which messages should the app react to (WM_ACTIVATE, WM_ACTIVATEAPP)? What should the reaction be? (Change the display resolution, destroy / create the rendering context, or destroy / create some OpenGL resources?)
If the application uses some animation loop, suspend the loop, then just minimize the window. If it changed display resolution and gamma revert to the settings before changing them.
There's no need to destroy OpenGL context or resources; OpenGL uses an abstract resource model: If another program requires RAM of the GPU or other resources, your programs resources will be swapped out transparently.
EDIT:
Changing the window visibility status may require to reset the OpenGL viewport, so it's a good idea to either call glViewport apropriately in the display/rendering function, or at least set it in the resize handler, followed by a complete redraw.
We have an OpenGL Application (using Ogre3d and SDL, not directly calling OpenGL) and we are trying to change the Resolution at runtime. It seems that we need to re-initialize our OpenGL context with the new Resolution but a number of items are breaking along the way. On Linux it seems to work for a while, then we get graphical corruption on screen. On Windows it simply crashes the next time we try to render a frame. We have forced the reloading of textures in Ogre, and if we rendering nothing but textures (no 3d models) then this works fine, but any 3d models cause a crash and reloading before rendering them has no effect.
Here is a link to an in depth explanation of Ogre3d calls we are doing: http://www.ogre3d.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=62825
All we really need to know is, When re-initializing an Opengl context what resources need to be restored?
Why does adjusting an OpenGL context affect other resources? Is it the way OpenGL works, or did one of the libraries we use introduce this issue? Could we have added this issue without knowing it?
Did you have a look at this forum thread ?
SDL seems to destroy the OpenGL when changing resolution. In this case, all you GL resources are destroyed with the context.
One possible solution would be to create another 'dummy' GL context, sharing resources with you 'real' GL context, and to keep it alive with SDL destroys the 'main' context. This way most of your resources should survive.
Note that some resources can't be shared, textures and VBO are fine, but VAO can't.
OpenGL support was added SDL after its surface code had been established. That's why changing the size of a SDL window is destructive. You were pointed to OpenGL context sharing and its caveats. However I'd avoid the problem alltogether by not using SDL for creating an OpenGL window. You can use all the other facilities SDL provides without a window managed by SDL, so the only thing that would change is input event processing and how the window's created. Instead of SDL I'd use GLFW, which like SDL requires you to implement your own event processing loop, so using GLFW as a drop-in replacement for OpenGL window and context creation is straightforward.
Occassionally I hit places where I'd want to get an OpenGL framebuffer object, but where I'm not interested about opening a window of any kind.
Is it possible to create an opengl context without attaching it to a window of any kind?
Yes! you can use the desktop window as the window passed to OpenGL- as long as you don't try to display anything on it ;)
Just Call GetDesktopWindow and pass the result as an argument when creating new OpenGL window.
http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Creating_an_OpenGL_Context
According to this Web page, WGL_ARB_create_context can be used to create a context without a window. I have not actually tried it myself. I used freeGLUT to create the context and then rendered off-screen to a framebuffer+renderbuffer. I exit the program without ever calling glutMainLoop. It is klugy, but it works for my purposes.
Yes, you can perform off-screen rendering with OpenGL, but the exact way to set it up is dependent on the operating system.
The closest you get to an OS independent way would be to use Mesa 3D, but then your off-screen rendering would not be hw accelerated.