I want to use regex to split some string like this #key='value' to key and value.
my regex is [^#'=]+[^'=], the output is good when the length of key and value is > 1, but sometimes when the length is only 1 char, the output is not correct.
Can anybody suggest improvements for my regex?
If you'd like to capture the key and value, you might try this:
/^#([^=]+)='([^']+)'$/
Then you will have the key in $1 and the value in $2.
EDIT:
I think I see what you're doing. Change your regex simply to [^#'=]+ to see the difference. However we can't tell help you unless you tell us what language you're using and some sample code.
^#[A-Za-z0-9]+\s*=\s*'[A-Za-z0-9\s]+'
This captures
#Key = 'value'
#key='value'
#k = 'value'
etc..
\A#([^=]+)='([^']+)'
will work as the regex but it doesn't take into account escaping of the apostrophe. this is 2 capture groups... \A says start of string... then # then group.... (not= one or more) =' Group( not ' ) followed by '
Related
i have following statement {$("#aprilfoolc").val("HoliWed27"); $("#UgadHieXampp").val("ugadicome");}.and i want to get the string with combination.i have written following regex but it is not working.
please help!
(?=[\$("#]?)[\w]*(?<=[")]?)
Your lookaround assertions are using character classes by mistake, and you've confused lookbehind and lookahead. Try the following:
(?<=\$\(")\w*(?="\))
You could use this simpler one :
'{$("#aprilfoolc").val("HoliWed27");}'.match(/\$\(\"#(\w+)\"[^"]*"(\w+)"/)
This returns
["$("#aprilfoolc").val("HoliWed27"", "aprilfoolc", "HoliWed27"]
where the strings you want are at indexes 1 and 2.
This construction
(?=[\$*"#]?)
will match a lookahead, but only optional -- the character set is followed by a ?. This kind of defeats the next part,
[\w]
which matches word characters only. So the lookahead will never match. Similar, this part
(?<=[")])
will also never match, because logically there can never be one of the characters " or ) at the end of a string that matches \w only. Again, since this portion is optional (that ? at the end again) it will simply never match.
It's a bit unclear what you are after. Strings inside double quotes, yes, but in the first one you want to skip the hash -- why? Given your input and desired output, this ought to work:
\w+(?=")
Also possible:
/\("[#]?(.*?)"\)/
import re
s='{$("#aprilfoolc").val("HoliWed27");}'
f = re.findall(r'\("[#]?(.*?)"\)',s)
for m in f:
print m
I don't know why, but if you want capturing of two groups simultaneously, so:
/\("#(.*?)"\).*?\("(.*?)"\)/
import re
s='{$("#aprilfoolc").val("HoliWed27");}'
f = re.findall(r'\("#(.*?)"\).*?\("(.*?)"\)',s)
for m in f:
print m[0],m[1]
In JavaScript:
var s='{$("#aprilfoolc").val("HoliWed27")';
var re=/\("#(.*?)"\).*?\("(.*?)"\)/;
alert(s.match(re));
I have a string here, This is a string: AAA123456789.
So the idea here is to extract the string AAA123456789 using regex.
I am incorporating this with X-Path.
Note: If there is a post to this, kindly lead me to it.
I think, by right, I should substring(myNode, [^AAA\d+{9}]),
I am not really sure bout the regex part.
The idea is to extract the string when met with "AAA" and only numbers but 9 consequent numbers only.
Pure XPath solution:
substring-after('This is a string: AAA123456789', ': ')
produces:
AAA123456789
XPath 2.0 solutions:
tokenize('This is a string: AAA123456789 but not an double',
' '
)[starts-with(., 'AAA')]
or:
tokenize('This is a string: AAA123456789 but not an double',
' '
)[matches(., 'AAA\d+')]
or:
replace('This is a string: AAA123456789 but not an double',
'^.*(A+\d+).*$',
'$1'
)
Alright, after referencing answers and comments by wonderful people here, I summarized my findings with this solution which I opted for. Here goes,
concat("AAA", substring(substring-after(., "AAA"), 1, 9)).
So I firstly, substring-after the string with "AAA" as the 1st argument, with the length of 1 to 9...anything more, is ignored. Then since I used the AAA as a reference, this will not appear, thus, concatenating AAA to the front of the value. So this means that I will get the 1st 9 digits after AAA and then concat AAA in front since its a static data.
This will allow the data to be correct no matter what other contributions there is.
But I like the regex by #Dimitre. The replace part. The tokenize not so as what if there isn't space as the argument. The replace with regex, this is also wonderful. Thanks.
And also thanks to you guys out there to...
First, I'm pretty sure you don't mean to have the [^ ... ]. That defines a "negative character class", i.e. your current regex says, "Give me a single character that is not one of the following: A0123456789{}". You probably meant, plainly, "AAA(\d{9})". Now, according to this handy website, XPath does support capture groups, as well as backreferences, so take your pick:
"AAA(\d{9})"
And extracting $1, the first capture group, or:
"(?<=AAA)\d{9}"
And taking the whole match ($0).
Can you try this :
A{3}(\d{9})
Sorry in advance that this might be a little challenging to read...
I'm trying to parse a line (actually a subject line from an IMAP server) that looks like this:
=?utf-8?Q?Here is som?= =?utf-8?Q?e text.?=
It's a little hard to see, but there are two =?/?= pairs in the above line. (There will always be one pair; there can theoretically be many.) In each of those =?/?= pairs, I want the third argument (as defined by a ? delimiter) extracted. (In the first pair, it's "Here is som", and in the second it's "e text.")
Here's the regex I'm using:
=\?(.+)\?.\?(.*?)\?=
I want it to return two matches, one for each =?/?= pair. Instead, it's returning the entire line as a single match. I would have thought that the ? in the (.*?), to make the * operator lazy, would have kept this from happening, but obviously it doesn't.
Any suggestions?
EDIT: Per suggestions below to replace ".?" with "[^(\?=)]?" I'm now trying to do:
=\?(.+)\?.\?([^(\?=)]*?)\?=
...but it's not working, either. (I'm unsure whether [^(\?=)]*? is the proper way to test for exclusion of a two-character sequence like "?=". Is it correct?)
Try this:
\=\?([^?]+)\?.\?(.*?)\?\=
I changed the .+ to [^?]+, which means "everything except ?"
A good practice in my experience is not to use .*? but instead do use the * without the ?, but refine the character class. In this case [^?]* to match a sequence of non-question mark characters.
You can also match more complex endmarkers this way, for instance, in this case your end-limiter is ?=, so you want to match nonquestionmarks, and questionmarks followed by non-equals:
([^?]*\?[^=])*[^?]*
At this point it becomes harder to choose though. I like that this solution is stricter, but readability decreases in this case.
One solution:
=\?(.*?)\?=\s*=\?(.*?)\?=
Explanation:
=\? # Literal characters '=?'
(.*?) # Match each character until find next one in the regular expression. A '?' in this case.
\?= # Literal characters '?='
\s* # Match spaces.
=\? # Literal characters '=?'
(.*?) # Match each character until find next one in the regular expression. A '?' in this case.
\?= # Literal characters '?='
Test in a 'perl' program:
use warnings;
use strict;
while ( <DATA> ) {
printf qq[Group 1 -> %s\nGroup 2 -> %s\n], $1, $2 if m/=\?(.*?)\?=\s*=\?(.*?)\?=/;
}
__DATA__
=?utf-8?Q?Here is som?= =?utf-8?Q?e text.?=
Running:
perl script.pl
Results:
Group 1 -> utf-8?Q?Here is som
Group 2 -> utf-8?Q?e text.
EDIT to comment:
I would use the global modifier /.../g. Regular expression would be:
/=\?(?:[^?]*\?){2}([^?]*)/g
Explanation:
=\? # Literal characters '=?'
(?:[^?]*\?){2} # Any number of characters except '?' with a '?' after them. This process twice to omit the string 'utf-8?Q?'
([^?]*) # Save in a group next characters until found a '?'
/g # Repeat this process multiple times until end of string.
Tested in a Perl script:
use warnings;
use strict;
while ( <DATA> ) {
printf qq[Group -> %s\n], $1 while m/=\?(?:[^?]*\?){2}([^?]*)/g;
}
__DATA__
=?utf-8?Q?Here is som?= =?utf-8?Q?e text.?= =?utf-8?Q?more text?=
Running and results:
Group -> Here is som
Group -> e text.
Group -> more text
Thanks for everyone's answers! The simplest expression that solved my issue was this:
=\?(.*?)\?.\?(.*?)\?=
The only difference between this and my originally-posted expression was the addition of a ? (non-greedy) operator on the first ".*". Critical, and I'd forgotten it.
Can somebody tell me how a regular expression should look like which searches in
V. Guimaraes - FC-Porto
and gives out:
V. Guimaraes
FC-Porto
The Source also could be:
V. Guimaraes - FC-Porto 2:2
V. Guimaraes - FC-Porto Foo
So, I don't want my pair to contain the score.
You could just split the string at " - " with your programing language's basic string functions. This way you don't even need any regular expressions.
how about (.*) - (.*)?
([\S\W]*)[\s]{1}-[\s]{1}([\S\W]*)
And you can fetch answer from group 1 and group 2 $1:$2
Search for: "(V.\s+Guimaraes)\s*-\s*(FC-Porto\b).*?"\s+"\1\s*-\s*\2.*?"
Replace with: "$1"\r"$2"
So, if your are using PHP, it will be:
$result = preg_replace('/"(V.\s+Guimaraes)\s*-\s*(FC-Porto\b).*?"\s+"\1\s*-\s*\2.*?"/', '"$1"\r"$2"', $sourcestring);
The key is $1 $2 which hold the first and the second result.
\r means return characters (enter), you can replace it with anything you wish, e.g. a space.
Next time, please mention regex library or application you are using.
Use the split function of your preferred language to do this. eg Python
>>> s="V. Guimaraes - FC-Porto 2:2"
>>> s.split("-",1)
['V. Guimaraes ', ' FC-Porto 2:2']
I am attempting to parse a string like the following using a .NET regular expression:
H3Y5NC8E-TGA5B6SB-2NVAQ4E0
and return the following using Split:
H3Y5NC8E
TGA5B6SB
2NVAQ4E0
I validate each character against a specific character set (note that the letters 'I', 'O', 'U' & 'W' are absent), so using string.Split is not an option. The number of characters in each group can vary and the number of groups can also vary. I am using the following expression:
([ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTVXYZ0123456789]{8}-?){3}
This will match exactly 3 groups of 8 characters each. Any more or less will fail the match.
This works insofar as it correctly matches the input. However, when I use the Split method to extract each character group, I just get the final group. RegexBuddy complains that I have repeated the capturing group itself and that I should put a capture group around the repeated group. However, none of my attempts to do this achieve the desired result. I have been trying expressions like this:
(([ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTVXYZ0123456789]{8})-?){4}
But this does not work.
Since I generate the regex in code, I could just expand it out by the number of groups, but I was hoping for a more elegant solution.
Please note that the character set does not include the entire alphabet. It is part of a product activation system. As such, any characters that can be accidentally interpreted as numbers or other characters are removed. e.g. The letters 'I', 'O', 'U' & 'W' are not in the character set.
The hyphens are optional since a user does not need top type them in, but they can be there if the user as done a copy & paste.
BTW, you can replace [ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTVXYZ0123456789] character class with a more readable subtracted character class.
[[A-Z\d]-[IOUW]]
If you just want to match 3 groups like that, why don't you use this pattern 3 times in your regex and just use captured 1, 2, 3 subgroups to form the new string?
([[A-Z\d]-[IOUW]]){8}-([[A-Z\d]-[IOUW]]){8}-([[A-Z\d]-[IOUW]]){8}
In PHP I would return (I don't know .NET)
return "$1 $2 $3";
I have discovered the answer I was after. Here is my working code:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string pattern = #"^\s*((?<group>[ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTVXYZ0123456789]{8})-?){3}\s*$";
string input = "H3Y5NC8E-TGA5B6SB-2NVAQ4E0";
Regex re = new Regex(pattern);
Match m = re.Match(input);
if (m.Success)
foreach (Capture c in m.Groups["group"].Captures)
Console.WriteLine(c.Value);
}
After reviewing your question and the answers given, I came up with this:
RegexOptions options = RegexOptions.None;
Regex regex = new Regex(#"([ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTVXYZ0123456789]{8})", options);
string input = #"H3Y5NC8E-TGA5B6SB-2NVAQ4E0";
MatchCollection matches = regex.Matches(input);
for (int i = 0; i != matches.Count; ++i)
{
string match = matches[i].Value;
}
Since the "-" is optional, you don't need to include it. I am not sure what you was using the {4} at the end for? This will find the matches based on what you want, then using the MatchCollection you can access each match to rebuild the string.
Why use Regex? If the groups are always split by a -, can't you use Split()?
Sorry if this isn't what you intended, but your string always has the hyphen separating the groups then instead of using regex couldn't you use the String.Split() method?
Dim stringArray As Array = someString.Split("-")
What are the defining characteristics of a valid block? We'd need to know that in order to really be helpful.
My generic suggestion, validate the charset in a first step, then split and parse in a seperate method based on what you expect. If this is in a web site/app then you can use the ASP Regex validation on the front end then break it up on the back end.
If you're just checking the value of the group, with group(i).value, then you will only get the last one. However, if you want to enumerate over all the times that group was captured, use group(2).captures(i).value, as shown below.
system.text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Match("H3Y5NC8E-TGA5B6SB-2NVAQ4E0","(([ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTVXYZ0123456789]+)-?)*").Groups(2).Captures(i).Value
Mike,
You can use character set of your choice inside character group. All you need is to add "+" modifier to capture all groups. See my previous answer, just change [A-Z0-9] to whatever you need (i.e. [ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTVXYZ0123456789])
You can use this pattern:
Regex.Split("H3Y5NC8E-TGA5B6SB-2NVAQ4E0", "([ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTVXYZ0123456789]{8}+)-?")
But you will need to filter out empty strings from resulting array.
Citation from MSDN:
If multiple matches are adjacent to one another, an empty string is inserted into the array.