I'm encountering an error I've not seen before, that states that reference to things are ambiguous.
I'm writing a small test program that calculates a running median. As the list grows, it recalculates the median. In this case, median means the middle number in the list, (or upper middle). Thus, the median of 7 is 7, the median of 7 and 9 is 9, and the median of 7 3 and 9 is 7.
I'm accomplishing this (I hope) with two dynamic arrays. Initially, the first value is set as the median, and then each number entered is compared to the current median. The median is obtained for calculating the middle element, between two arrays.
The left array is for all values less than the median, and the right array is for all greater. I use insertion sort to order the numbers in each array (it's great at almost sorted lists).
I just don't understand the errors I'm getting and or where I've gone wrong. I'm fairly new to C++, so I've opted for a more simple approach to the issue.
#include <cstdlib>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
vector<int> left;
vector<int> right;
int leftCount = 0;
int rightCount = 0;
void leftInsertionSort(int);
void rightInsertionSort(int);
void inputNumber(int, int);
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
int length = 0;
int value;
int median;
string input;
while (cin >> input) {
value = atoi(input.c_str());
inputNumber(value, median);
if (leftCount > rightCount) {
median = (((leftCount + rightCount) / 2) + 1);
cout << left[median];
} else {
median = (((leftCount + rightCount) / 2) + 1) - leftCount;
cout << right[median];
}
}
return 0;
}
void inputNumber(int value, int median) {
if (leftCount == 0 && rightCount == 0) {
left[0] = value;
median = value;
leftCount++;
} else
if (leftCount == 1 && rightCount == 0) {
right[0] = value;
if (left[0] > right[0]) {
right[0] = left[0];
left[0] = value;
}
median = right[0];
rightCount++;
} else
if (value < median) {
left[leftCount] = value;
} else {
right[rightCount] = value;
}
}
void leftInsertionSort(int lLength)
{
leftCount++;
int key, i;
for(int j = 1; j < lLength; j++)
{
key = left[j];
i = j - 1;
while (left[i] > key && i >= 0) {
left[i+1] = left[i];
i--;
}
left[i+1] = key;
}
}
void rightInsertionSort(int rLength)
{
rightCount++;
int key, i;
for(int j = 1; j < rLength; j++)
{
key = right[j];
i = j - 1;
while (right[i] > key && i >= 0) {
right[i+1] = right[i];
i--;
}
right[i+1] = key;
}
}
The error I seem to be getting is 'error: reference to ‘left’ is ambiguous'
Judging from the compiler error I get when trying to compile that, it seems that the namespace std defines names left and right, which you're also using as variable names. The compiler can't decide which definition to use, so you get the error. It's for reasons like these that importing everything from a namespace is frowned upon - you'd be better off either explicitly importing the names you need or using namespace qualifiers.
In any case, your algorithm seems needlessly complicated. Why not just keep a single vector, push_back into it when you get a new number, place the number at the right index using an insertion algorithm, and then just return the upper middle element of the vector?
left and right are flags in iostream.
Just rename the variables.
This is a good example of why #using namespace std is not a good idea. left and right are also defined for the std namespace and there's now a conflict. If you leave out that line and refer to vector, string, cin and cout by specifying their namespace explicitly with std:: you wouldn't have encountered this conflict.
Related
Consistently comparing digits symmetrically to its middle digit. If first number is bigger than the last , first is wining and I have to display it else I display last and that keep until I reach middle digit(this is if I have odd number of digits), if digit don't have anything to be compared with it wins automatically.
For example number is 13257 the answer is 7 5 2.
Another one 583241 the answer is 5 8 3.
For now I am only trying to catch when number of digits is odd. And got stuck.. This is my code. The problem is that this code don't display any numbers, but it compares them in the if statement(I checked while debugging).
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int countDigit(int n) {
int count = 0;
while (n != 0) {
count++;
n /= 10;
}
return count;
}
int main() {
int n;
cin >> n;
int middle;
int count = countDigit(n);
if (count % 2 == 0) {
cout<<"No mid digit exsist!!";
}
else {
int lastDigit = n % 10;
middle = (count + 1) / 2;
for (int i = 0; i < middle; i++) {
for (int j = lastDigit; j<middle; j--) {
if (i > j) {
cout << i <<' ';
}
else {
cout << j;
}
}
}
}
return 0;
}
An easier approach towards this, in my opinion, would be using strings. You can check the size of the string. If there are even number of characters, you can just compare the first half characters, with the last half. If there are odd numbers, then do the same just print the middle character.
Here's what I'd do for odd number of digits:
string n;
cin>>n;
int i,j;
for(i=0,j=n.size()-1;i<n.size()/2,j>=(n.size()+1)/2;i++,j--)
{
if(n[i]>n[j]) cout<<n[i]<<" ";
else cout<<n[j]<<" ";
}
cout<<n[n.size()/2]<<endl;
We analyze the requirements and then come up with a design.
If we have a number, consisting of digits, we want to compare "left" values with "right" values. So, start somehow at the left and the right index of digits in a number.
Look at this number: 123456789
Index: 012345678
Length: 9
in C and C++ indices start with 0.
So, what will we do?
Compare index 0 with index 8
Compare index 1 with index 7
Compare index 2 with index 6
Compare index 3 with index 5
Compare index 4 with index 4
So, the index from the left is running up and the index from the right is running down.
We continue as long as the left index is less than or equal the right index. All this can be done in a for or while loop.
It does not matter, wether the number of digits is odd or even.
Of course we also do need functions that return the length of a number and a digit of the number at a given position. But I see that you know already how to write these functions. So, I will not explain it further here.
I show you 3 different examples.
Ultra simple and very verbose. Very inefficient, because we do not have arrays.
Still simple, but more compressed. Very inefficient, because we do not have arrays.
C++ solution, not allowed in your case
Verbose
#include <iostream>
// Get the length of a number
unsigned int length(unsigned long long number) {
unsigned int length = 0;
while (number != 0) {
number /= 10;
++length;
}
return length;
}
// Get a digit at a given index of a number
unsigned int digitAt(unsigned int index, unsigned long long number) {
index = length(number) - index - 1;
unsigned int result = 0;
unsigned int count = 0;
while ((number != 0) && (count <= index)) {
result = number % 10;
number /= 10;
++count;
}
return result;
}
// Test
int main() {
unsigned long long number;
if (std::cin >> number) {
unsigned int indexLeft = 0;
unsigned int indexRight = length(number) - 1;
while (indexLeft <= indexRight) {
if (digitAt(indexLeft, number) > digitAt(indexRight, number)) {
std::cout << digitAt(indexLeft, number);
}
else {
std::cout << digitAt(indexRight, number);
}
++indexLeft;
--indexRight;
}
}
}
Compressed
#include <iostream>
// Get the length of a number
size_t length(unsigned long long number) {
size_t length{};
for (; number; number /= 10) ++length;
return length;
}
// Get a digit at a given index of a number
unsigned int digitAt(size_t index, unsigned long long number) {
index = length(number) - index - 1;
unsigned int result{}, count{};
for (; number and count <= index; ++count, number /= 10)
result = number % 10;
return result;
}
// Test
int main() {
if (unsigned long long number; std::cin >> number) {
// Iterate from left and right at the same time
for (size_t indexLeft{}, indexRight{ length(number) - 1 }; indexLeft <= indexRight; ++indexLeft, --indexRight)
std::cout << ((digitAt(indexLeft,number) > digitAt(indexRight, number)) ? digitAt(indexLeft, number) : digitAt(indexRight, number));
}
}
More modern C++
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <algorithm>
#include <cctype>
int main() {
if (std::string numberAsString{}; std::getline(std::cin, numberAsString) and not numberAsString.empty() and
std::all_of(numberAsString.begin(), numberAsString.end(), std::isdigit)) {
for (size_t indexLeft{}, indexRight{ numberAsString.length() - 1 }; indexLeft <= indexRight; ++indexLeft, --indexRight)
std::cout << ((numberAsString[indexLeft] > numberAsString[indexRight]) ? numberAsString[indexLeft] : numberAsString[indexRight]);
}
}
You are trying to do something confusing with nested for-cycles. This is obviously wrong, because there is nothing “quadratic” (with respect to the number of digits) in the entire task. Also, your code doesn’t seem to contain anything that would determine the highest-order digit.
I would suggest that you start with something very simple: string’ify the number and then iterate over the digits in the string. This is obviously neither elegant nor particularly fast, but it will be a working solution to start with and you can improve it later.
BTW, the sooner you get out of the bad habit of using namespace std; the better. It is an antipattern, please avoid it.
Side note: There is no need to treat odd and even numbers of digits differently. Just let the algorithm compare the middle digit (if it exists) against itself and select it; no big deal. It is a tiny efficiency drawback in exchange for a big code simplicity benefit.
#include <cstdint>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using std::size_t;
using std::uint64_t;
uint64_t extract_digits(uint64_t source) {
const std::string digits{std::to_string(source)};
auto i = digits.begin();
auto j = digits.rbegin();
const auto iend = i + (digits.size() + 1) / 2;
uint64_t result{0};
for (; i < iend; ++i, ++j) {
result *= 10;
result += (*i > *j ? *i : *j) - '0';
}
return result;
}
int main() {
uint64_t n;
std::cin >> n;
std::cout << extract_digits(n) << std::endl;
}
If the task disallows the use of strings and arrays, you could try using pure arithmetics by constructing a “digit-inverted” version of the number and then iterating over both numbers using division and modulo. This will (still) have obvious limitations that stem from the data type size, some numbers cannot be inverted properly etc. (Use GNU MP for unlimited integers.)
#include <cstdint>
#include <iostream>
using std::size_t;
using std::uint64_t;
uint64_t extract_digits(uint64_t source) {
uint64_t inverted{0};
size_t count{0};
for (uint64_t div = source; div; div /= 10) {
inverted *= 10;
inverted += div % 10;
++count;
}
count += 1;
count /= 2;
uint64_t result{0};
if (count) for(;;) {
const uint64_t a{source % 10}, b{inverted % 10};
result *= 10;
result += a > b ? a : b;
if (!--count) break;
source /= 10;
inverted /= 10;
}
return result;
}
int main() {
uint64_t n;
std::cin >> n;
std::cout << extract_digits(n) << std::endl;
}
Last but not least, I would strongly suggest that you ask questions after you have something buildable and runnable. Having homework solved by someone else defeats the homework’s purpose.
Given an array of N numbers (not necessarily sorted). We can merge any two numbers into one and the cost of merging the two numbers is equal to the sum of the two values. The task is to find the total minimum cost of merging all the numbers.
Example:
Let the array A = [1,2,3,4]
Then, we can remove 1 and 2, add both of them and keep the sum back in array. Cost of this step would be (1+2) = 3.
Now, A = [3,3,4], Cost = 3
In second step, we can 3 and 3, add both of them and keep the sum back in array. Cost of this step would be (3+3) = 6.
Now, A = [4,6], Cost = 6
In third step, we can remove both elements from the array and keep the sum back in array again. Cost of this step would be (4+6) = 6.
Now, A = [10], Cost = 10
So, total cost turns out to be 19 (10+6+3).
We will have to pick the 2 smallest elements to minimize our total cost. A simple way to do this is using a min heap structure. We will be able to get the minimum element in O(1) and insertion will be O(log n).
The time complexity of this approach is O(n log n).
But I tried another approach, and wasn't able to find the cases where it fails. The basic idea was that the sum of two smallest elements that we will choose at any time will always be greater than the sum of the pair of elements chosen before. So the "temp" array will always be sorted, and we will be able to access the minimum elements in O(1).
As I am sorting the input array and then simply traversing the array, the complexity of my approach is O(n log n).
int minCost(vector<int>& arr) {
sort(arr.begin(), arr.end());
// temp array will contain the sum of all the pairs of minimum elements
vector<int> temp;
// index for arr
int i = 0;
// index for temp
int j = 0;
int cost = 0;
// while we have more than 1 element combined in both the input and temp array
while(arr.size() - i + temp.size() - j > 1) {
int num1, num2;
// selecting num1 (minimum element)
if(i < arr.size() && j < temp.size()) {
if(arr[i] <= temp[j])
num1 = arr[i++];
else
num1 = temp[j++];
}
else if(i < arr.size())
num1 = arr[i++];
else if(j < temp.size())
num1 = temp[j++];
// selecting num2 (second minimum element)
if(i < arr.size() && j < temp.size()) {
if(arr[i] <= temp[j])
num2 = arr[i++];
else
num2 = temp[j++];
}
else if(i < arr.size())
num2 = arr[i++];
else if(j < temp.size())
num2 = temp[j++];
// appending the sum of the minimum elements in the temp array
int sum = num1 + num2;
temp.push_back(sum);
cost += sum;
}
return cost;
}
Is this approach correct? If not, please let me know what I am missing, and the test cases in which this algorithm fails.
SPOJ Link for the same problem
The logic seems very solid to me... all the computed sums will never be decreasing and therefore you only need to add up either oldest two computed sums, next two elements or oldest sum and next element.
I would just simplify the code:
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <stdio.h>
int hsum(std::vector<int> arr) {
int ni = arr.size(), nj = 0, i = 0, j = 0, res = 0;
std::sort(arr.begin(), arr.end());
std::vector<int> temp;
auto get = [&]()->int {
if (j == nj || (i < ni && arr[i] < temp[j])) return arr[i++];
return temp[j++];
};
while ((ni-i)+(nj-j)>1) {
int a = get(), b = get();
res += a+b;
temp.push_back(a + b); nj++;
}
return res;
}
int main() {
fprintf(stderr, "%i\n", hsum(std::vector<int>{1,4,2,3}));
return 0;
}
Very nice idea!
Another improvement is noting that the cumulative length of the two arrays being processed (the original one and the temporary one holding the sums) will decrease at every step.
Since the first step will use two input elements, the fact that the temporary array grows one element at each step will still not be enough for a "walking queue" allocated in the array itself to reach the reading pointer.
This means that there is no need of a temporary array and the space for the sums can be found in the array itself...
int hsum(std::vector<int> arr) {
int ni = arr.size(), nj = 0, i = 0, j = 0, res = 0;
std::sort(arr.begin(), arr.end());
auto get = [&]()->int {
if (j == nj || (i < ni && arr[i] < arr[j])) return arr[i++];
return arr[j++];
};
while ((ni-i)+(nj-j)>1) {
int a = get(), b = get();
res += a+b;
arr[nj++] = a + b;
}
return res;
}
About the error on SPOJ... I tried briefly to search for the problem but I didn't succeed. I tried however generating random arrays of random lengths and checking this solution with what finds a "brute-force" one implemented directly from the specs and I'm reasonably confident that the algorithm is correct.
I know at least one programming arena (Topcoder) where sometimes the problems are carefully crafted so that the computation gives correct results if using unsigned but not if using int (or if using unsigned long long but not if using long long) because of integer overflow.
I don't know if SPOJ also does this kind of nonsense(1)... may be that is the reason some hidden test case fails...
EDIT
Checking with SPOJ the algorithm passes if using long long values... this is the entry I used:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
int n;
scanf("%i", &n);
for (int testcase=0; testcase<n; testcase++) {
int sz; scanf("%i", &sz);
std::vector<long long> arr(sz);
for (int i=0; i<sz; i++) scanf("%lli", &arr[i]);
int ni = arr.size(), nj = 0, i = 0, j = 0;
long long res = 0;
std::sort(arr.begin(), arr.end());
auto get = [&]() -> long long {
if (j == nj || (i < ni && arr[i] < arr[j])) return arr[i++];
return arr[j++];
};
while ((ni-i)+(nj-j)>1) {
long long a = get(), b = get();
res += a+b;
arr[nj++] = a + b;
}
printf("%lli\n", res);
}
return 0;
}
PS: This very kind of computation is also what is needed to build an Huffman tree for entropy coding given the symbols frequency table and thus it's not a mere random exercise but it has practical applications.
(1) I'm saying "nonsense" because in Topcoder they never give problems that require 65 bits; thus it's not a genuine care about overflows, but just setting traps for novices.
Another that I think is a bad practice I saw on TC is that some problems are carefully designed so that the correct algorithm if using C++ will barely fit in the timeout limit: just use another language (and get e.g. a 2× slowdown) and you cannot solve the problem.
First of all, think simple!
When using a priority queue, the problem is easy!
In the first test case :
1 6 3 20
// after pushing to Q
1 3 6 20
// and sum two top items and pop and push!
(1 + 3) 6 20 cost = 4
(4 + 6) 20 cost = 10 + 4
(10 + 20) cost = 30 + 14
30 cost = 44
#include<iostream>
#include<queue>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int t;
cin >> t;
while (t--) {
int n;
cin >> n;
priority_queue<long long int, vector<long long int>, greater<long long int>> q;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
int k;
cin >> k;
q.push(k);
}
long long int sum = 0;
while (q.size() > 1) {
long long int a = q.top();
q.pop();
long long int b = q.top();
q.pop();
q.push(a + b);
sum += a + b;
}
cout << sum << "\n";
}
}
Basically we need to sort the list in desc order and then find its cost like this.
A.sort(reverse=True)
cost = 0
for i in range(len(A)):
cost += A[i] * (i+1)
return cost
I wrote the following dp code for finding the prime factors of a number.
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
#define max 1000001
using namespace std;
vector <int> prime;
vector<bool> isprime(max,true);
vector<bool> visited(max,false);
vector<int> data(max,-1);
void dp(int n,int last)
{
if(n >= max || visited[n])
return;
visited[n] = true;
for(int i = last;i<prime.size();i++)
{
if(n*prime[i] >= max || data[n*prime[i]] != -1)
return;
data[n*prime[i]] = prime[i];
dp(n*prime[i],i);
}
}
int main()
{
isprime[1] = false;
data[1] = 1;
for(int i = 4;i<max;i += 2)
isprime[i] = false;
for(int i = 3; i*i< max;i += 2)
{
for(int j = i*i; j < max;j += i)
isprime[j] = false;
}
prime.push_back(2);
data[2] = 2;
for(int i =3;i<max;i += 2)
if(isprime[i])
{
prime.push_back(i);
data[i] = i;
}
for(int i = 0;i<prime.size();i++)
{
dp(prime[i],i);
}
cout<<"...1\n";
for(int i = 2;i<=8000;i++)
{
cout<<i<<" :- ";
int temp = i;
while(temp!= 1)
{
cout<<data[temp]<<" ";
temp = temp/data[temp];
}
cout<<endl;
}
return 0;
}
Here, last is the last index of prime number n.
But I am getting segmentation fault for this, when I change max to 10001, it runs perfectly. I'm not getting why is this happening since the data-structures used are 1-d vectors which can hold values up to 10^6 easily.
I checked your program out using GDB. The segfault is taking place at this line:
if(n*prime[i] >= max || data[n*prime[i]] != -1)
In your first ever call to DP in your for loop, where you call dp(2,0), the recursive calls eventually generate this call: dp(92692,2585).
92692 * 2585 = 239608820
This number is larger than a 32 bit integer can hold, so the r-value generated by the integer multiplication of those two numbers overflows and becomes negative. nprime[i] becomes negative, so your first condition of the above loop fails, and the second is checked. data[n * prime[i]] is accessed, and since n*prime[i] is negative, your program accesses invalid memory and segfaults. To fix this, simply change n to a long long in your parameter list and you should be fine.
void dp(long long n, int last)
I was recently working on the following problem.
http://www.codechef.com/problems/D2
The Chef is planning a buffet for the DirectiPlex inauguration party, and everyone is invited. On their way in, each guest picks up a sheet of paper containing a random number (this number may be repeated). The guests then sit down on a round table with their friends.
The Chef now decides that he would like to play a game. He asks you to pick a random person from your table and have them read their number out loud. Then, moving clockwise around the table, each person will read out their number. The goal is to find that set of numbers which forms an increasing subsequence. All people owning these numbers will be eligible for a lucky draw! One of the software developers is very excited about this prospect, and wants to maximize the number of people who are eligible for the lucky draw. So, he decides to write a program that decides who should read their number first so as to maximize the number of people that are eligible for the lucky draw. Can you beat him to it?
Input
The first line contains t, the number of test cases (about 15). Then t test cases follow. Each test case consists of two lines:
The first line contains a number N, the number of guests invited to the party.
The second line contains N numbers a1, a2, ..., an separated by spaces, which are the numbers written on the sheets of paper in clockwise order.
Output
For each test case, print a line containing a single number which is the maximum number of guests that can be eligible for participating the the lucky draw.
Constraints
1 ≤ N ≤ 10000
You may assume that each number number on the sheet of paper; ai is randomly generated, i.e. can be with equal probability any number from an interval [0,U], where U is some upper bound (1 ≤ U ≤ 106).
Example
Input:
3
2
0 0
3
3 2 1
6
4 8 6 1 5 2
Output:
1
2
4
On checking the solutions I found this code:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <algorithm>
#define LIMIT 37
using namespace std;
struct node {
int val;
int index;
};
int N;
int binary(int number, vector<int>& ans) {
int start = 0;
int n = ans.size();
int end = n - 1;
int mid;
if (start == end)
return 0;
while (start != end) {
mid = (start + end) / 2;
if (ans[mid] == number)
break;
if (ans[mid] > number)
end = mid;
else
start = mid + 1;
}
mid = (start + end) / 2;
return mid;
}
void display(vector<int>& list) {
cout << endl;
for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++)
cout << list[i] << " ";
cout << endl;
}
int maxsubsequence(vector<int>& list) {
vector<int> ans;
int N = list.size();
ans.push_back(list[0]);
int i;
// display(list);
for (i = 1; i < N; i++) {
int index = binary(list[i], ans);
/*if(index+1<ans.size())
continue;*/
if (list[i] < ans[index])
ans[index] = list[i];
if (list[i] > ans[index])
ans.push_back(list[i]);
// display(ans);
}
return ans.size();
}
int compute(int index, int* g) {
vector<int> list;
list.push_back(g[index]);
int itr = (index + 1) % N;
while (itr != index) {
list.push_back(g[itr]);
itr = (itr + 1) % N;
}
return maxsubsequence(list);
}
int solve(int* g, vector<node> list) {
int i;
int ret = 1;
for (i = 0; i < min(LIMIT, (int)list.size()); i++) {
// cout<<list[i].index<<endl;
ret = max(ret, compute(list[i].index, g));
}
return ret;
}
bool cmp(const node& o1, const node& o2)
{ return (o1.val < o2.val); }
int g[10001];
int main() {
int t;
cin >> t;
while (t--) {
cin >> N;
vector<node> list;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
node temp;
cin >> g[i];
temp.val = g[i];
temp.index = i;
list.push_back(temp);
}
sort(list.begin(), list.end(), cmp);
cout << solve(g, list) << endl;
}
return 0;
}
Can someone explain this to me. I am well aware of calculating LIS in nlog(n).
What I am not able to understand is this part:
int ret = 1;
for (i = 0; i < min(LIMIT, (int)list.size()); i++) {
// cout<<list[i].index<<endl;
ret = max(ret, compute(list[i].index, g));
}
and the reason behind sorting
sort(list.begin(),list.end(),cmp);
This algorithm is simply guessing at the starting point and computing the LIS for each of these guesses.
The first value in a LIS is likely to be a small number, so this algorithm simply tries the LIMIT smallest values as potential starting points.
The sort function is used to identify the smallest values.
The for loop is used to check each starting point in turn.
WARNING
Note that this algorithm may fail for certain inputs. For example, consider the sequence
0,1,2,..,49,9900,9901,...,99999,50,51,52,...,9899
The algorithm will try just the first 37 starting points and miss the best starting point at 50.
You can test this by changing the code to:
int main() {
int t;
t=1;
while (t--) {
N=10000;
vector<node> list;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
node temp;
if (i<50)
g[i]=i;
else if (i<150)
g[i]=9999-150+i;
else
g[i]=i-100;
temp.val = g[i];
temp.index = i;
list.push_back(temp);
}
sort(list.begin(), list.end(), cmp);
cout << solve(g, list) << endl;
}
return 0;
}
This will generate different answers depending on whether LIMIT is 37 or 370.
In practice, for randomly generated sequences it will have a good chance of working (although I don't know how to compute the probability exactly).
I need to find the Lexicographically largest string out of the given input string.
So if the input is
enjoy
the o/p should be
yenjo
The code i tried was....
int n;
cout<<"Enter the number of strings";
cin>>n;
int len[n];
char str[n][1000];
for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
{
cin>>str[i];
len[i]=strlen(str[i]);
}
int num,pos[n];
for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
{
pos[i]=0;
num=int(str[i][0]);
for(int j=1;j<len[i];j++)
{
if(int(str[i][j])>num)
{
num=int(str[i][j]);
pos[i]=j;
}
}
}
int i,j,k;
char temp[1];
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
for(j=0;j<pos[i];j++)
{
temp[0]=str[i][0];
for(k=0;k<len[i];k++)
{
str[i][k]=str[i][k+1];
}
strcat(str[i],temp);
str[i][len[i]]='\0';
}
cout<<str[i]<<"\n";
}
return 0;
}
But this code only ckecks for the largest number and not for the number present next to it and hence fails for the i/p
blowhowler
The o/p should be wlerblowho but i get the o/p as whowlerblo.
How can i keep track of each element that preceeds the largest character so as to get the correct output?
For good performance on the average case (actually, O(N)), but still O^2 on the worst (and always correct), you can keep track of possibilities, and keep eliminating them as you go. Basically something like this.
struct PermSum
{
int sum;
int perm;
}
LinkedList<PermSum> L;
for(int i = 0; i != input.size(); ++i) L.append(PermSum{0,i});
int depth = 0;
int max = 0;
const int length = input.size()
while(L.size() > 1 && depth < length)
{
for(l in L)
{
l.sum += input[(l.perm + depth) % length]
if (l.sum > max) max = l.sum
}
for(l in L)
{
if (l.sum < max) L.delete(l)
}
depth ++;
}
if (L.size() == 1)
return L.front().perm
else
return -1
I got a bit lazy in some parts with the c++ code but I'm sure you can figure out for l in L. The key line is the first for loop. The idea is that its adding the lexicographical value at the depth-th letter of the l.perm-th permutation. In this way, it updates all the possibilities, while simultaneously keeping track of the level of the best possibility. You then do a second pass to delete any possibility falling short of the best. It's worth noting that the way I coded this up, it probably uses the reverse of the standard convention for circular permutations. That is, the perm field in my program represents how many spots LEFT you circular shift, whereas usually positive numbers are circular shifting right. You can fix this with a minus sign somewhere.
As for the running time analysis, it's basically the same argument as Quickselect. Each while loop iteration takes time proportional to the length of L. The first iteration, L will always have length = N (where N is the length of the string, the same as the variable length in the code). The next round, we typically only expect 1/26 of the data to get through, the round after that 1/26 again... so we have N(1 + 1/26 + 2/26^2...) which is O(N).
You can just:
1. generate rotations
2. put all rotations in map<>
3. find last element of the map.
Here is the implementation in C++.
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>
#include <map>
using namespace std;
int main() {
// your code goes here
string str;int len,i=0,j=0,k=0;char temp;
cin>>str;
len = str.length();
map<string,int>m;
while(i<len)
{
temp = str[0];
while(j<len-1)
{
str[j] = str[j+1];
j++;
}
str[j] = temp;
m[str] = k;
k++;
i++;j=0;
}
str = m.rbegin()->first;
cout<<str;
return 0;
}
The problem can be solved in O(n log n) time by appending the string to itself first and build the suffix array out of it. Find the corresponding entry and there your wanted result. Implementation left as an exercise.
//Here the index with greater value is selected,
//if the same char occurs again the next characters
// of prev and curr characters is checked:-Prev=maxIndex,curr=i
#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
int getIndex(char *str){
int max=INT_MIN,maxIndex;
int n=strlen(str);
int j,p;
for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
{
if(str[i]>max)
{
max=str[i];
maxIndex=i;
}
else if(str[i]==max)
{
j=maxIndex+1;
p=(i+1)%n;
while(j<n && p<n && str[j]==str[p]){
j++;
p=(p+1)%n;
}
maxIndex=str[p]>str[j]?i:maxIndex;
}
}
return maxIndex;
}
int main(void)
{
char str[4000008];
scanf("%s",str);
int i=getIndex(str);
for(int j=i;j<strlen(str);j++)
cout<<str[j];
for(int j=0;j<i;j++)
cout<<str[j];
}
Your algorithm, corrected, comes down to:
Set current best rotation to identity (start of rotated string is current index 0).
For each possible rotation (all other starting indices):
Compare to current-best-rotation with something like wrapcmp below.
Set the current-best-rotation if we had a better candidate.
Time-Complexity: O(n*n)
Space-Complexity: in-place
// Function to do ordinal-comparison on two rotations of a buffer
// buffer: The buffer containing the string
// n: The buffers size (string-length)
// a: Index where the first buffer starts pre-rotation
// b: Index where the second buffer starts pre-rotation
int wrapcmp(const void* buffer, size_t n, size_t a, size_t b) {
auto x = (const unsigned char*)buffer;
auto m = n - std::max(a, b);
int ret = memcmp(x+a, x+b, m);
if(ret) return ret;
auto left = n - m;
a = (a + m) % n;
b = (b + m) % n;
m = left - std::max(a, b);
ret = memcmp(x+a, x+b, m);
if(ret) return ret;
a = (a + m) % n;
b = (b + m) % n;
return memcmp(x+a, x+b, left - m);
}
Used on coliru: http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/4b138a6394483447
Putting it into the general algo left as an exercise for the reader.
This was too tempting so I may as well post my effort. Not sure how it rates efficiency wize. It seems to work as far as I tested it:
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <sstream>
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
std::string max_rot(const std::string& s)
{
std::string tmp;
std::string max;
std::string::const_iterator m = std::max_element(s.begin(), s.end());
if(m != s.end())
for(char c = *m; (m = std::find(m, s.end(), c)) != s.end(); ++m)
if(max < tmp.assign(m, s.end()).append(s.begin(), m))
max = tmp;
return max;
}
int main()
{
size_t times = 0;
std::string text;
do { std::cout << "\nHow many words? : "; }
while(std::getline(std::cin, text) && !(std::istringstream(text) >> times));
std::vector<std::string> words;
while(times-- && (std::cin >> text))
words.push_back(text);
for(const auto& s: words)
std::cout << max_rot(s) << '\n';
}
By way of explanation. It finds the highest character value in the string and rotates the string to make that character first. If then looks for duplicate highest characters in the remainder of the string keeping track of the highest attempt. There maybe room for optimization.
This challenge is used in an active contest, I request no answer to be provided till 18th Sep 9 PM IST. Because the code is visible, we might have to ban the user from participating in any of our contests going forward.