Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
For web Sites/Applications and eCommerce,
which storage solution is more desirable and Why ?
Im very new to Amazon Cloud services I need some direction here.
S3 likes network storage, you can access it with web api
ebs likes hard disk, you can access it in your ec2
you can also see,
http://www.differencebetween.net/technology/internet/difference-between-amazon-s3-and-amazon-ebs/
EBS is meant for transactional data and S3 for everything else. In EBS you can have static IP which is required when we use database access etc.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 days ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for 1 click tool to fully replicate s3 bucket to another bucket(including all configs, ie Retention policy, Access policy, ACL etc).
Should be as easy as possible
Checked so far AWS Console tool, but it tries to pipe the copy via my browser, which is not optimal for large buckets.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed last month.
Improve this question
The case is:
I just need about 5 to 10 GB of storage and not 50 GB like WorkMail offers.
Hence my question: Is there an AWS service that I can use to send and receive emails with Outlook like WorkMail, but with less storage capacity?
No there is no other AWS Service that would offer the same service will less storage.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Can I run a EC2, t2.micro instance & a RDS db.t2.micro instance, parallel & continuously a whole month ?
Or is it I can only run one of them ?
I know both of them have 750 hours of up time available in the free tier. But I'm bit confused whether it is (EC2 OR RDS) or (EC2 & RDS) in the free tier.
Yes, you are able to run these parallel.
See free tier terms for more information.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm wanting to host a simple blog on AWS via Docker containers. I've gone the route of creating an EC2 instance via this link https://console.aws.amazon.com/ec2/v2/home?region=us-east-1#LaunchInstanceWizard:
I created an instance of type Amazon Linux AMI and it's a t2.micro.
How do I know if this is a low-cost way to host my blog? What are the fees? How do I know that I have 1 year free trial?
The reason I ask is because I looked at this on the docker site and then when clicking the Get Started with AWS link on that page, it brought me to a page that started talking about large costs...is this for larger servers that is not related to the free 1 year EC2 instance I'm trying to run for a simple blog?
I'm just looking for a cheap AWS instance to host my blog, maybe a few dollars a month with very small amount of traffic and want to make sure I'm doing this right in terms of creating and setting up my server since I do want to use docker to deploy my blog in a container.
I suggest you go with t2.nano instance which will cost you just $5/month + nominal data xfer cost. Later if you find the instance size not sufficient, you can upgrade the instance to t2.micro to t2.small to m3.medium etc., just by clicking few buttons.
Use this calculator: SIMPLE MONTHLY CALCULATOR to find the approximate cost.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
What is the best way to cut costs on AWS?
AWS, EC2 and RDS
There's not a lot of info given for your needs, but: AWS pricing is based on usage. Use less powerful instances for less time to save costs.
Glacier over S3 for long term storage.
Autoscaling, run as minimal as possible.
Smaller cache servers to lower the amount of application servers needed.
Read/write DB splitting so you can have smaller databases.
Less metrics, etc.
Used timed autoscaling to shut off non-essential boxes "after hours". Like dev boxes.