I'm getting the longest consecutive increasing numbers in an array with 10 items
int list[] = {2,3,8,9,10,11,12,2,6,8};
int start_pos = 0;
int lenght=0; // lenght of the sub-~consetuve
for (int a =0; a <=9; a++ )
{
if ((list[a]+1) == (list[a+1])) {
// continue just the string;
lenght++;
} else {
start_pos = a;
}
}
cout << lenght << " and start in " << start_pos;
getchar();
but it not working, it should return in length & start_pos ( 3 and lenght 4 ) because longest increasing is from 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 but it not working.
Assuming you actually meant subsequence, just guess the digit your sequence starts with and then run a linear scan. If you meant substring, it's even easier --- left as an exercise to OP.
The linear scan goes like this:
char next = <guessed digit>;
int len = 0;
char *ptr = <pointer to input string>;
while (*ptr) {
if ((*ptr) == next) {
next = next + 1;
if (next > '9') next = '0';
len++;
}
ptr++;
}
Now wrap that with a loop that sets to all digits from '0' to '9' and you are done, pick the one that gives the longest length.
simple idea: start point, end point and length of the sequence.
Run loop i
sequence will start whenever current number (at index i) less than next number 1 => start point set = i
it ends when condition above false => get end point => get the length = end -start (make more variable called max to compare lengths) => result could be max, reset start point, end point = 0 again when end of sequence
I made it myself:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
bool cons(int list[] , int iv) { bool ret=true; for (int a=0; a<=iv; a++) { if (list[a] != list[a+1]-1) ret=false; } return ret; }
void main() {
int str[10] = {12,13,15,16,17,18,20,21};
int longest=0;
int pos=0;
for (int lenght=1; lenght <= 9; lenght++) {
int li[10];
for (int seek=0; seek <= 9; seek++) {
for (int kor=0; kor <= lenght-1; kor ++ ) {
li[kor] = str[seek+kor];
}
if (cons(li , lenght-2)) {
longest = lenght;
pos=seek;
}
}
}
for (int b=pos; b <= pos+longest-1; b++) cout << str[b] << " - "; cout << "it is the end!" << endl; getchar();
}
Related
First of all, sorry for the mis-worded title. I couldn't imagine a better way to put it.
The problem I'm facing is as follows: In a part of my program, the program counts occurences of different a-zA-Z letters and then tells how many of each letters can be found in an array. The problem, however, is this:
If I have an array that consists of A;A;F;A;D or anything similar, the output will be this:
A - 3
A - 3
F - 1
A - 3
D - 1
But I am required to make it like this:
A - 3
F - 1
D - 1
I could solve the problem easily, however I can't use an additional array to check what values have been already echoed. I know why it happens, but I don't know a way to solve it without using an additional array.
This is the code snippet (the array simply consists of characters, not worthy of adding it to the snippet):
n is the size of array the user is asked to choose at the start of the program (not included in the snippet).
initburts is the current array member ID that is being compared against all other values.
burts is the counter that is being reset after the loop is done checking a letter and moves onto the next one.
do {
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (array[initburts] == array[i]) {
burts++;
}
}
cout << "\n\n" << array[initburts] << " - " << burts;
initburts++;
burts = 0;
if (initburts == n) {
isDone = true;
}
}
while (isDone == false);
Do your counting first, then loop over your counts printing the results.
std::map<decltype(array[0]), std::size_t> counts;
std::for_each(std::begin(array), std::end(array), [&counts](auto& item){ ++counts[item]; });
std::for_each(std::begin(counts), std::end(counts), [](auto& pair) { std::cout << "\n\n" << pair.first << " - " pair.second; });
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
// first check if we printed this character already;
// this is the case if the same character occurred
// before the current one:
bool isNew = true;
for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
{
// you find out yourself, do you?
// do not forget to break the loop
// in case of having detected an equal value!
}
if(isNew)
{
// well, now we can count...
unsigned int count = 1;
for(int j = i + 1; j < n; ++j)
count += array[j] == array[i];
// appropriate output...
}
}
That would do the trick and retains the array as is, however is an O(n²) algorithm. More efficient (O(n*log(n))) is sorting the array in advance, then you can just iterate over the array once. Of course, original array sequence gets lost then:
std::sort(array, array + arrayLength);
auto start = array;
for(auto current = array + 1; current != array + arrayLength; ++current)
{
if(*current != *start)
{
auto char = *start;
auto count = current - start;
// output char and count appropriately
}
}
// now we yet lack the final character:
auto char = *start;
auto count = array + arrayLength - start;
// output char and count appropriately
Pointer arithmetic... Quite likely that your teacher gets suspicious if you just copy this code, but it should give you the necessary hints to make up your own variant (use indices instead of pointers...).
I would do it this way.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
string s;
vector<int> capCount(26, 0), smallCount(26, 0);
cout << "Enter the string\n";
cin >> s;
for(int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i)
{
char c = s.at(i);
if(c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z')
++capCount[(int)c - 65];
if(c >= 'a' && c <= 'z')
++smallCount[(int)c - 97];
}
for(int i = 0; i < 26; ++i)
{
if(capCount[i] > 0)
cout << (char) (i + 65) << ": " << capCount[i] << endl;
if(smallCount[i] > 0)
cout << (char) (i + 97) << ": " << smallCount[i] << endl;
}
}
Note: I have differentiated lower and upper case characters.
Here's is the sample output:
output
*Sorry about my poor English. If there is anything that you don't understand, please tell me so that I can give you more information that 'make sence'.
**This is first time asking question in Stackoverflow. I've searched some rules for asking questions correctly here, but there should be something I missed. I welcome all feedback.
I'm currently solving algorithm problems to improve my skill, and I'm struggling with one question for three days. This question is from https://algospot.com/judge/problem/read/RESTORE , but since this page is in KOREAN, I tried to translate it in English.
Question
If there are 'k' pieces of partial strings given, calculate shortest string that includes all partial strings.
All strings consist only lowercase alphabets.
If there are more than 1 result strings that satisfy all conditions with same length, choose any string.
Input
In the first line of input, number of test case 'C'(C<=50) is given.
For each test case, number of partial string 'k'(1<=k<=15) is given in the first line, and in next k lines partial strings are given.
Length of partial string is between 1 to 40.
Output
For each testcase, print shortest string that includes all partial strings.
Sample Input
3
3
geo
oji
jing
2
world
hello
3
abrac
cadabra
dabr
Sample Output
geojing
helloworld
cadabrac
And here is my code. My code seems to work perfect with Sample Inputs, and when I made test inputs for my own and tested, everything worked fine. But when I submit this code, they say my code is 'wrong'.
Please tell me what is wrong with my code. You don't need to tell me whole fixed code, I just need sample inputs that causes error with my code. Added code description to make my code easier to understand.
Code Description
Saved all input partial strings in vector 'stringParts'.
Saved current shortest string result in global variable 'answer'.
Used 'cache' array for memoization - to skip repeated function call.
Algorithm I designed to solve this problem is divided into two function -
restore() & eraseOverlapped().
restore() function calculates shortest string that includes all partial strings in 'stringParts'.
Result of resotre() is saved in 'answer'.
For restore(), there are three parameters - 'curString', 'selected' and 'last'.
'curString' stands for currently selected and overlapped string result.
'selected' stands for currently selected elements of 'stringParts'. Used bitmask to make my algorithm concise.
'last' stands for last selected element of 'stringParts' for making 'curString'.
eraseOverlapped() function does preprocessing - it deletes elements of 'stringParts' that can be completly included to other elements before executing restore().
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <cstring>
#include <string>
#define MAX 15
using namespace std;
int k;
string answer; // save shortest result string
vector<string> stringParts;
bool cache[MAX + 1][(1 << MAX) + 1]; //[last selected string][set of selected strings in Bitmask]
void restore(string curString, int selected=0, int last=0) {
//base case 1
if (selected == (1 << k) - 1) {
if (answer.empty() || curString.length() < answer.length())
answer = curString;
return;
}
//base case 2 - memoization
bool& ret = cache[last][selected];
if (ret != false) return;
for (int next = 0; next < k; next++) {
string checkStr = stringParts[next];
if (selected & (1 << next)) continue;
if (curString.empty())
restore(checkStr, selected + (1 << next), next + 1);
else {
int check = false;
//count max overlapping area of two strings and overlap two strings.
for (int i = (checkStr.length() > curString.length() ? curString.length() : checkStr.length())
; i > 0; i--) {
if (curString.substr(curString.size()-i, i) == checkStr.substr(0, i)) {
restore(curString + checkStr.substr(i, checkStr.length()-i), selected + (1 << next), next + 1);
check = true;
break;
}
}
if (!check) { // if there aren't any overlapping area
restore(curString + checkStr, selected + (1 << next), next + 1);
}
}
}
ret = true;
}
//check if there are strings that can be completely included by other strings, and delete that string.
void eraseOverlapped() {
//arranging string vector in ascending order of string length
int vectorLen = stringParts.size();
for (int i = 0; i < vectorLen - 1; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < vectorLen; j++) {
if (stringParts[i].length() < stringParts[j].length()) {
string temp = stringParts[i];
stringParts[i] = stringParts[j];
stringParts[j] = temp;
}
}
}
//deleting included strings
vector<string>::iterator iter;
for (int i = 0; i < vectorLen-1; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < vectorLen; j++) {
if (stringParts[i].find(stringParts[j]) != string::npos) {
iter = stringParts.begin() + j;
stringParts.erase(iter);
j--;
vectorLen--;
}
}
}
}
int main(void) {
int C;
cin >> C; // testcase
for (int testCase = 0; testCase < C; testCase++) {
cin >> k; // number of partial strings
memset(cache, false, sizeof(cache)); // initializing cache to false
string inputStr;
for (int i = 0; i < k; i++) {
cin >> inputStr;
stringParts.push_back(inputStr);
}
eraseOverlapped();
k = stringParts.size();
restore("");
cout << answer << endl;
answer.clear();
stringParts.clear();
}
}
After determining which string-parts can be removed from the list since they are contained in other string-parts, one way to model this problem might be as the "taxicab ripoff problem" problem (or Max TSP), where each potential length reduction by overlap is given a positive weight. Considering that the input size in the question is very small, it seems likely that they expect a near brute-force solution, with possibly some heuristic and backtracking or other form of memoization.
Thanks Everyone who tried to help me solve this problem. I actually solved this problem with few changes on my previous algorithm. These are main changes.
In my previous algorithm I saved result of restore() in global variable 'answer' since restore() didn't return anything, but in new algorithm since restore() returns mid-process answer string I no longer need to use 'answer'.
Used string type cache instead of bool type cache. I found out using bool cache for memoization in this algorithm was useless.
Deleted 'curString' parameter from restore(). Since what we only need during recursive call is one previously selected partial string, 'last' can replace role of 'curString'.
CODE
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <cstring>
#include <string>
#define MAX 15
using namespace std;
int k;
vector<string> stringParts;
string cache[MAX + 1][(1 << MAX) + 1];
string restore(int selected = 0, int last = -1) {
if (selected == (1 << k) - 1) {
return stringParts[last];
}
if (last == -1) {
string ret = "";
for (int next = 0; next < k; next++) {
string resultStr = restore(selected + (1 << next), next);
if (ret.empty() || ret.length() > resultStr.length())
ret = resultStr;
}
return ret;
}
string& ret = cache[last][selected];
if (!ret.empty()) {
cout << "cache used in [" << last << "][" << selected << "]" << endl;
return ret;
}
string curString = stringParts[last];
for (int next = 0; next < k; next++) {
if (selected & (1 << next)) continue;
string checkStr = restore(selected + (1 << next), next);
int check = false;
string resultStr;
for (int i = (checkStr.length() > curString.length() ? curString.length() : checkStr.length())
; i > 0; i--) {
if (curString.substr(curString.size() - i, i) == checkStr.substr(0, i)) {
resultStr = curString + checkStr.substr(i, checkStr.length() - i);
check = true;
break;
}
}
if (!check)
resultStr = curString + checkStr;
if (ret.empty() || ret.length() > resultStr.length())
ret = resultStr;
}
return ret;
}
void EraseOverlapped() {
int vectorLen = stringParts.size();
for (int i = 0; i < vectorLen - 1; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < vectorLen; j++) {
if (stringParts[i].length() < stringParts[j].length()) {
string temp = stringParts[i];
stringParts[i] = stringParts[j];
stringParts[j] = temp;
}
}
}
vector<string>::iterator iter;
for (int i = 0; i < vectorLen - 1; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < vectorLen; j++) {
if (stringParts[i].find(stringParts[j]) != string::npos) {
iter = stringParts.begin() + j;
stringParts.erase(iter);
j--;
vectorLen--;
}
}
}
}
int main(void) {
int C;
cin >> C;
for (int testCase = 0; testCase < C; testCase++) {
cin >> k;
for (int i = 0; i < MAX + 1; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < (1 << MAX) + 1; j++)
cache[i][j] = "";
}
string inputStr;
for (int i = 0; i < k; i++) {
cin >> inputStr;
stringParts.push_back(inputStr);
}
EraseOverlapped();
k = stringParts.size();
string resultStr = restore();
cout << resultStr << endl;
stringParts.clear();
}
}
This algorithm is much slower than the 'ideal' algorithm that the book I'm studying suggests, but it was fast enough to pass this question's time limit.
I'm creating a program that creates an array of objects in random positions in an array size 8. Once created, I need them to sort so that all the objects in the array are shifted up to the top, so no gaps exist between them. I'm almost there, but I cannot seem to get them to swap to index 0 in the array, and they instead swap to index 1. Any suggestions? (Must be done the way I'm doing it, not with other sorting algorithms or whatnot)
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <ctime>
using namespace std;
struct WordCount {
string name = "";
int count = 0;
};
int main() {
cout << "Original random array: " << endl;
srand(static_cast<int>(time(0)));
int i = 0;
WordCount wordArr[8];
while (i < 4) {
int randomNum = 0 + (rand() % static_cast<int>(7 + 1));
if(wordArr[randomNum].name == "") {
wordArr[randomNum].name = "word" + static_cast<char>(i);
wordArr[randomNum].count = i;
i++;
}
}
int j = 0;
while (j < 8) {
cout << wordArr[j].name << " " << wordArr[j].count << endl;
j++;
}
cout << "\n\nSorted array: " << endl;
for (int i = 7; i >= 0; i--) {
for (int j = 0; j <= 7; j++) {
if (wordArr[i].name != "") {
if (wordArr[j].name == "") {
WordCount temp = wordArr[i];
wordArr[i] = wordArr[j];
wordArr[j] = temp;
}
}
}
}
int k = 0;
while (k < 8) {
cout << wordArr[k].name << " " << wordArr[k].count << endl;
k++;
}
return 0;
}
If I understand your requirement correctly, you want to move all the non-blank entries to the start of the array. To do this, you need an algorithm like this for example:
for i = 0 to 7
if wordArr[i].name is blank
for j = i + 1 to 7
if wordArr[j].name is not blank
swap [i] and [j]
break
So, starting from the beginning, if we encounter a blank entry, we look forward for the next non-blank entry. If we find such an entry, we swap the blank and non-blank entry, then break to loop again looking for the next blank entry.
Note, this isn't the most efficient of solutions, but it will get you started.
Note also I'd replace the 4 and 8 with definitions like:
#define MAX_ENTRIES (8)
#define TO_GENERATE_ENTRIES (4)
Finally:
wordArr[randomNum].name = "word" + static_cast<char>(i);
That will not do what you want it to do; try:
wordArr[randomNum].name = "word" + static_cast<char>('0' + i);
To append the digits, not the byte codes, to the end of the number. Or perhaps, if you have C++11:
wordArr[randomNum].name = "word" + std::to_string(i);
I see couple of problems.
The expression "word" + static_cast<char>(i); doesn't do what you are hoping to do.
It is equivalent to:
char const* w = "word";
char const* p = w + i;
When i is 2, p will be "rd". You need to use std::string("word") + std::to_string(i).
The logic for moving objects with the non-empty names to objects with empty names did not make sense to me. It obviously does not work for you. The following updated version works for me:
for (int i = 0; i <= 7; ++i) {
// If the name of the object at wordArr[i] is not empty, move on to the
// next item in the array. If it is empty, copy the next object that
// has a non-empty name.
if ( wordArr[i].name == "") {
// Start comparing from the object at wordArr[i+1]. There
// is no need to start at wordArr[i]. We know that it is empty.
for (int j = i+1; j <= 7; ++j) {
if (wordArr[j].name != "") {
WordCount temp = wordArr[i];
wordArr[i] = wordArr[j];
wordArr[j] = temp;
}
}
}
}
There was two problems as :
wordArr[randomNum].name = "word" + static_cast<char>(i); this is not what your are looking for, if you want that your names generate correctly you need something like this :
wordArr[randomNum].name = "word " + std::to_string(i);
Your sorting loop does not do what you want, it's just check for the "gaps" as you said, you need something like this :
for (int i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
for (int j = i+1; j < 8; ++j) {
if (wordArr[i].name == "" || (wordArr[i].count < wordArr[j].count)) {
WordCount temp = wordArr[i];
wordArr[i] = wordArr[j];
wordArr[j] = temp;
}
}
}
Your algorithm sorts the array, but then looses the sorting again.
You want to swap elements only when i > j, in order to push elements to the top only. As a result, you need to change this:
if (wordArr[j].name == "")
to this:
if (wordArr[j].name == "" && i > j)
Consider this array example:
0
ord 1
0
0
rd 2
word 0
d 3
0
Your code will sort it to:
d 3
ord 1
word 0
rd 2
0
0
0
0
but when i = 3, it will try to populate the 5th cell, and it will swap it with rd 2, which is not what we want.
This will push rd 2 down, but we don't want that, we want gaps (zeroes) to go to the end of the array, thus we need to swap eleemnts only when they are going to go higher, not lower, which is equivalent to say when i > j.
PS: If you are a beginner skip that part.
You can optimize the inner loop by using one if statement and a break keyword, like this:
for (int j = 0; j <= 7; j++) {
if (wordArr[i].name != "" && wordArr[j].name == "" && i > j) {
WordCount temp = wordArr[i];
wordArr[i] = wordArr[j];
wordArr[j] = temp;
break;
}
}
I was training on solving algorithms, I wrote a code but it won't compile
in (if) I can not check s[i]=='S' .
I'm trying to if s[i] is S character or not but I don't know where my problem is.
If I can't use this syntax, what could be a solution?
#include<iostream>
#include<string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
double v_w=25,v_s=25,d_w=25,d_s=25;
int n;
cin>>n;
string s[]={"WSSS"};
int i ;
for (i=0; i<n; i++)
{
if( s[i] == "W" )
{
v_s += 50;
d_w = d_w + (v_w/2);
d_s = d_s + (v_s/2);
cout<<"1 \n";
}
if(s[i]=='W')
{
v_w +=50;
d_w = d_w + (v_w/2);
d_s = d_s + (v_s/2);
cout<<"2 \n";
}
return 0;
}
cout<< d_w<<endl<<d_s;
}
string s[]={"WSSS"}; means an array of strings which the first one is "WSSS".
What you need is:
std::string s="WSSS";
string s[] = {"Hello"} is an array of strings (well, of one string).
If you iterate over it, or index into it s[0] is "Hello".
Whereas
string s{"Hello"} is one string, which is made up of characters.
If you iterate over it, or index into it s[0], you will get 'H'.
To pre-empt all the other things that are going to go wrong when the string versus character problem is sorted, lets move the return 0; from the middle of the for loop.
Then let's think about what happens if the number n entered is larger than the length of the string:
int n;
cin>>n; //<- no reason to assume this will be s.length (0 or less) or even positive
string s{"WSSS"}; //one string is probably enough
int i ;
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
if( s[i] == 'W' ) //ARGGGGGGG may have gone beyond the end of s
{
In fact, let's just drop that for now and come back to it later. And let's use a range based for loop...
#include<iostream>
#include<string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
double v_w = 25, v_s = 25, d_w = 25, d_s = 25;
string s{ "WSSS" };
for (auto && c : s)
{
if (c == 'W')
{
v_w += 50;
d_w = d_w + (v_w / 2);
d_s = d_s + (v_s / 2);
cout << "2 \n";
}
}
cout << d_w << '\n' << d_s << '\n'; //<- removed endl just because...
return 0;
}
s is an array of strings in this case it has only element:
string s[] = {"WSSS"};
so writing s[2]; // is Undefined behavior
your code will produce a UB if the user enters n greater than the number of elements in s:
n = 4;
for(i = 0; i < n; i++) // s[3] will be used which causes UB
{
if( s[i] == 'W' ) // s[i] is a string not just a single char
{
}
}
also as long as s is an array of strings then to check its elements check them as strings not just single chars:
if( s[i] == "W" ) // not if( s[i] == 'W' )
I think you wanted a single string:
string s = {"WSSS"};
because maybe you are accustomed to add the subscript operator to character strings:
char s[] = {"WSSS"};
if so then the condition above is correct:
if( s[i] == 'W' )
I was solving a question, with which I am having some problems:
Complete the function getEqualSumSubstring, which takes a single argument. The single argument is a string s, which contains only non-zero digits.
This function should print the length of longest contiguous substring of s, such that the length of the substring is 2*N digits and the sum of the leftmost N digits is equal to the sum of the rightmost N digits. If there is no such string, your function should print 0.
int getEqualSumSubstring(string s) {
int i=0,j=i,foundLength=0;
for(i=0;i<s.length();i++)
{
for(j=i;j<s.length();j++)
{
int temp = j-i;
if(temp%2==0)
{
int leftSum=0,rightSum=0;
string tempString=s.substr(i,temp);
for(int k=0;k<temp/2;k++)
{
leftSum=leftSum+tempString[k]-'0';
rightSum=rightSum+tempString[k+(temp/2)]-'0';
}
if((leftSum==rightSum)&&(leftSum!=0))
if(s.length()>foundLength)
foundLength=s.length();
}
}
}
return(foundLength);
}
The problem is that this code is working for some samples and not for the others. Since this is an exam type question I don't have the test cases either.
This code works
int getEqualSumSubstring(string s) {
int i=0,j=i,foundLength=0;
for(i=0;i<s.length();i++)
{
for(j=i;j<s.length();j++)
{
int temp = j-i+1;
if(temp%2==0)
{
int leftSum=0,rightSum=0;
string tempString=s.substr(i,temp);
// printf("%d ",tempString.length());
for(int k=0;k<temp/2;k++)
{
leftSum=leftSum+tempString[k]-48;
rightSum=rightSum+tempString[k+(temp/2)]-48;
}
if((leftSum==rightSum)&&(leftSum!=0))
if(tempString.length()>foundLength)
foundLength=tempString.length();
}
}
}
return(foundLength);
}
The temp variable must be j-i+1. Otherwise the case where the whole string is the answer will not be covered. Also, we need to make the change suggested by Scott.
Here's my solution that I can confirm works. The ones above didn't really work for me - they gave me compile errors somehow. I got the same question on InterviewStreet, came up with a bad, incomplete solution that worked for 9/15 of the test cases, so I had to spend some more time coding afterwards.
The idea is that instead of caring about getting the left and right sums (which is what I initially did as well), I will get all the possible substrings out of each half (left and right half) of the given input, sort and append them to two separate lists, and then see if there are any matches.
Why?
Say the strings "423" and "234" have the same sum; if I sorted them, they would both be "234" and thus match. Since these numbers have to be consecutive and equal length, I no longer need to worry about having to add them up as numbers and check.
So, for example, if I'm given 12345678, then on the left side, the for-loop will give me:
[1,12,123,1234,2,23,234,3,34]
And on the right:
[5,56,567,5678,...]
And so forth.
However, I'm only taking substrings of a length of at least 2 into account.
I append each of these substrings, sorted by converting into a character array then converting back into a string, into ArrayLists.
So now that all this is done, the next step is to see if there are identical strings of the same numbers in these two ArrayLists. I simply check each of temp_b's strings against temp_a's first string, then against temp_a's second string, and so forth.
If I get a match (say, "234" and "234"), I'll set the length of those matching substrings as my tempCount (tempCount = 3). I also have another variable called 'count' to keep track of the greatest length of these matching substrings (if this was the first occurrence of a match, then count = 0 is overwritten by tempCount = 3, so count = 3).
As for the odd/even string length with the variable int end, the reason for this is because in the line of code s.length()/2+j, is the length of the input happened to be 11, then:
s.length() = 11
s.length()/2 = 11/5 = 5.5 = 5
So in the for-loop, s.length()/2 + j, where j maxes out at s.length()/2, would become:
5 + 5 = 10
Which falls short of the s.length() that I need to reach for to get the string's last index.
This is because the substring function requires an end index of one greater than what you'd put for something like charAt(i).
Just to demonstrate, an input of "47582139875" will generate the following output:
[47, 457, 4578, 24578, 57, 578, 2578, 58, 258, 28] <-- substrings from left half
[139, 1389, 13789, 135789, 389, 3789, 35789, 789, 5789, 578] <-- substrings from right half
578 <-- the longest one that matched
6 <-- the length of '578' x 2
public static int getEqualSumSubtring(String s){
// run through all possible length combinations of the number string on left and right half
// append sorted versions of these into new ArrayList
ArrayList<String> temp_a = new ArrayList<String>();
ArrayList<String> temp_b = new ArrayList<String>();
int end; // s.length()/2 is an integer that rounds down if length is odd, account for this later
for( int i=0; i<=s.length()/2; i++ ){
for( int j=i; j<=s.length()/2; j++ ){
// only account for substrings with a length of 2 or greater
if( j-i > 1 ){
char[] tempArr1 = s.substring(i,j).toCharArray();
Arrays.sort(tempArr1);
String sorted1 = new String(tempArr1);
temp_a.add(sorted1);
//System.out.println(sorted1);
if( s.length() % 2 == 0 )
end = s.length()/2+j;
else // odd length so we need the extra +1 at the end
end = s.length()/2+j+1;
char[] tempArr2 = s.substring(i+s.length()/2, end).toCharArray();
Arrays.sort(tempArr2);
String sorted2 = new String(tempArr2);
temp_b.add(sorted2);
//System.out.println(sorted2);
}
}
}
// For reference
System.out.println(temp_a);
System.out.println(temp_b);
// If the substrings match, it means they have the same sum
// Keep track of longest substring
int tempCount = 0 ;
int count = 0;
String longestSubstring = "";
for( int i=0; i<temp_a.size(); i++){
for( int j=0; j<temp_b.size(); j++ ){
if( temp_a.get(i).equals(temp_b.get(j)) ){
tempCount = temp_a.get(i).length();
if( tempCount > count ){
count = tempCount;
longestSubstring = temp_a.get(i);
}
}
}
}
System.out.println(longestSubstring);
return count*2;
}
Heres my solution to this question including tests. I've added an extra function just because I feel it makes the solution way easier to read than the solutions above.
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int getMaxLenSumSubstring( string s )
{
int N = 0; // The optimal so far...
int leftSum = 0, rightSum=0, strLen=s.size();
int left, right;
for(int i=0;i<strLen/2+1;i++) {
left=(s[i]-int('0')); right=(s[strLen-i-1]-int('0'));
leftSum+=left; rightSum+=right;
if(leftSum==rightSum) N=i+1;
}
return N*2;
}
int getEqualSumSubstring( string s ) {
int maxLen = 0, substrLen, j=1;
for( int i=0;i<s.length();i++ ) {
for( int j=1; j<s.length()-i; j++ ) {
//cout<<"Substring = "<<s.substr(i,j);
substrLen = getMaxLenSumSubstring(s.substr(i,j));
//cout<<", Len ="<<substrLen;
if(substrLen>maxLen) maxLen=substrLen;
}
}
return maxLen;
}
Here are a few tests I ran. Based upon the examples above they seem right.
int main() {
cout<<endl<<"Test 1 :"<<getEqualSumSubstring(string("123231"))<<endl;
cout<<endl<<"Test 2 :"<<getEqualSumSubstring(string("986561517416921217551395112859219257312"))<<endl;
cout<<endl<<"Test 3:"<<getEqualSumSubstring(string("47582139875"))<<endl;
}
Shouldn't the following code use tempString.length() instead of s.length()
if((leftSum==rightSum)&&(leftSum!=0))
if(s.length()>foundLength)
foundLength=s.length();
Below is my code for the question... Thanks !!
public class IntCompl {
public String getEqualSumSubstring_com(String s)
{
int j;
int num=0;
int sum = 0;
int m=s.length();
//calculate String array Length
for (int i=m;i>1;i--)
{
sum = sum + m;
m=m-1;
}
String [] d = new String[sum];
int k=0;
String ans = "NULL";
//Extract strings
for (int i=0;i<s.length()-1;i++)
{
for (j=s.length();j>=i+1;k++,j--)
{
num = k;
d[k] = s.substring(i,j);
}
k=num+1;
}
//Sort strings in such a way that the longest strings precede...
for (int i=0; i<d.length-1; i++)
{
for (int h=1;h<d.length;h++)
{
if (d[i].length() > d[h].length())
{
String temp;
temp=d[i];
d[i]=d[h];
d[h]=temp;
}
}
}
// Look for the Strings with array size 2*N (length in even number) and such that the
//the sum of left N numbers is = to the sum of right N numbers.
//As the strings are already in decending order, longest string is searched first and break the for loop once the string is found.
for (int x=0;x<d.length;x++)
{
int sum1=0,sum2=0;
if (d[x].length()%2==0 && d[x].length()<49)
{
int n;
n = d[x].length()/2;
for (int y=0;y<n;y++)
{
sum1 = sum1 + d[x].charAt(y)-'0';
}
for (int y=n;y<d[x].length();y++)
{
sum2 = sum2 + d[x].charAt(y)-'0';
}
if (sum1==sum2)
{
ans = d[x];
break;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
}
Here is the complete Java Program for this question.
Complexity is O(n^3)
This can however be solved in O(n^2).For O(n^2) complexity solution refer to this link
import java.util.Scanner;
import static java.lang.System.out;
public class SubStringProblem{
public static void main(String args[]){
Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
out.println("Enter the Digit String:");
String s = sc.nextLine();
int n = (new SubStringProblem()).getEqualSumSubString(s);
out.println("The longest Sum SubString is "+n);
}
public int getEqualSumSubString(String s){
int N;
if(s.length()%2==0)
{
//String is even
N = s.length();
}
else{
//String is odd
N=s.length()-1;
}
boolean flag =false;
int sum1,sum2;
do{
for(int k=0;k<=s.length()-N;k++){
sum1=0;
sum2=0;
for(int i =k,j=k+N-1;i<j;i++,j--)
{
sum1=sum1 + Integer.parseInt(s.substring(i,i+1));
sum2+=Integer.parseInt(s.substring(j,j+1));
}
if(sum1==sum2){
return N;
}
}
N-=2;
flag =true;
}while(N>1);
return -1;
}
}
What is your rationale for the number 48 on these two lines?
for(int k=0;k<temp/2;k++)
{
leftSum=leftSum+tempString[k]-48;
rightSum=rightSum+tempString[k+(temp/2)]-48;
}
I am just overly curious and would like to hear the reasoning behind it, because I have a similar solution, but without the 48 and it still works. However, I added the 48 an still got the correct answer.
Simple solution. O(n*n). s - input string.
var longest = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < s.length-1; i++) {
var leftSum = rightSum = 0;
for (var j = i, k = i+1, l = 2; j >=0 && k < s.length; j--, k++, l+=2) {
leftSum += parseInt(s[j]);
rightSum += parseInt(s[k]);
if (leftSum == rightSum && l > longest) {
longest = l;
}
}
}
console.log(longest);