I'm working with Java3d under eclipse Indigo in windows. After finally modifying the StlLoader example and ObjLoad classes to get my STL files to load up, I get a result that looks like the below (I think from other questions these are definitely bad vector normals). Does anybody know why I might be having this problem? I am using SolidWorks to save the STL as an ASCII file and using a modification of the code for loading STL files given on java3d.org. Although I have only changed some appearance properties and fixed broken imports etc. I have confirmed that the facet normals put into "normList" below definitely match those from the file.
Example of Result:
Snippet of StlFile.java from http://www.java3d.org :
private SceneBase makeScene()
{
// Create Scene to pass back
SceneBase scene = new SceneBase();
BranchGroup group = new BranchGroup();
scene.setSceneGroup(group);
// Store the scene info on a GeometryInfo
GeometryInfo gi = new GeometryInfo(GeometryInfo.TRIANGLE_STRIP_ARRAY);
// Convert ArrayLists to arrays: only needed if file was not binary
if(this.Ascii)
{
coordArray = objectToPoint3Array(coordList);
normArray = objectToVectorArray(normList);
}
gi.setCoordinates(coordArray);
gi.setNormals(normArray);
gi.setStripCounts(stripCounts);
// Setting the Material Appearance
Appearance app = new Appearance();
// Coloring Attributes
ColoringAttributes catt = new ColoringAttributes();
catt.setShadeModel( ColoringAttributes.NICEST );
app.setColoringAttributes(catt);
Material mat = new Material(new Color3f(0.6f, 0.6f, 0.6f), // ambient
new Color3f(0, 0, 0), // emissive
new Color3f(0.6f, 0.6f, 0.6f), // diffuse
new Color3f(0.6f, 0.6f, 0.6f), // specular
10); // shininess
app.setMaterial(mat);
// Put geometry into Shape3d
Shape3D shape = new Shape3D(gi.getGeometryArray(), app);
group.addChild(shape);
scene.addNamedObject(objectName, shape);
return scene;
} // end of makeScene
If some areas on the surface are really black (0x000000), I would guess some of the normals are actually pointing inwards the model rather than to the outside.
You may check if vertices v1,v2,v3 for all the triangles are defined in right-hand order (just test if det(v1,v2,v3) > 0 ) and reorder points accordingly. Alternatively, detect the "opposite" normals and multiply them by -1
Related
I have many Esri Grid files (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esri_grid#ASCII) and I would like to render them in 3D without losing precision, I am using OpenSceneGraph.
The problem is this grids are around 1000x1000 (or more) points, so when I extract the vertices, then compute the triangles to create the geometry, I end up having millions of them and the interaction with the scene is impossible (frame rate drops to 0).
I've tried several approches:
Triangle list
Basically, as I read the file, I fill an array with 3 vertices per triangle (this leads to duplication);
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Geode> l_pGeodeSurface = new osg::Geode;
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Geometry> l_pGeometrySurface = new osg::Geometry;
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Vec3Array> l_pvTrianglePoints = osg::Vec3Array;
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Vec3Array> l_pvOriginalPoints = osg::Vec3Array;
... // Read the file and fill l_pvOriginalPoints
for(*triangle inside the file*)
{
... // Compute correct triangle indices (l_iP1, l_iP2, l_iP3)
// Push triangle vertices inside the array
l_pvTrianglePoints->push_back(l_pvOriginalPoints->at(l_iP1));
l_pvTrianglePoints->push_back(l_pvOriginalPoints->at(l_iP2));
l_pvTrianglePoints->push_back(l_pvOriginalPoints->at(l_iP3));
}
l_pGeometrySurface->setVertexArray(l_pvTrianglePoints);
l_pGeometrySurface->addPrimitiveSet(new osg::DrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 3, l_pvTrianglePoints->size()));
Indexed triangle list
Same as before, but the array contains the every vertices just once and I create a second array of indices (basically i tell osg how to build triangles, no duplication)
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Geode> l_pGeodeSurface = new osg::Geode;
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Geometry> l_pGeometrySurface = new osg::Geometry;
osg::ref_ptr<osg::DrawElementsUInt> l_pIndices = new osg::DrawElementsUInt(osg::PrimitiveSet::TRIANGLES, *number of indices*);
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Vec3Array> l_pvOriginalPoints = osg::Vec3Array;
... // Read the file and fill l_pvOriginalPoints
for(i = 0; i < *number of indices*; i++)
{
... // Compute correct triangle indices (l_iP1, l_iP2, l_iP3)
// Push vertices indices inside the array
l_pIndices->at(i) = l_iP1;
l_pIndices->at(i+1) = l_iP2;
l_pIndices->at(i+2) = l_iP3;
}
l_pGeometrySurface->setVertexArray(l_pvOriginalPoints );
l_pGeometrySurface->addPrimitiveSet(l_pIndices.get());
Instancing
this was a bit of an experiment, since I've never used shaders, I tought I could instance a single triangle, then manipulate its coordinates in a vertex shader for every triangle in my scene, using transformation matrices (passing the matrices as a uniform array, one for triangle). I ended up with too many uniforms just with a grid 20x20.
I used these links as a reference:
https://learnopengl.com/Advanced-OpenGL/Instancing,
https://books.google.it/books?id=x_RkEBIJeFQC&pg=PT265&lpg=PT265&dq=osg+instanced+geometry&source=bl&ots=M8ii8zn8w7&sig=ACfU3U0_92Z5EGCyOgbfGweny4KIUfqU8w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj-7JD0nq7qAhUXxMQBHcLaAiUQ6AEwAnoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=osg%20instanced%20geometry&f=false
None of the above solved my issue, what else can I try? Am I missing something in terms of rendering techinques? I thought it was fairly simple task, but I'm kind of stuck.
I feel like you should consider taking a step back. If you're visualizing GIS-based terrain data, osgEarth is really designed for doing this and has fairly efficient LOD tools for large terrains. Do you need the data always represented at maximum full LOD or are you looking for dynamic LOD to improve frame rate?
Depending on your goals and requirements you might want to look at some more advanced terrain rendering techniques, like rightfield tracing, etc. If the terrain is always static, you can precompute quadtrees and Signed Distance Functions and trace against the heightfield.
I have a function that draws triangles through OpenGL
I draw two triangles by pressing a button (function on_drawMapPushButton_clicked()).
Then i draw a sphere that placed above these triangles. And now i see, that sphere is drawed correctly over first triangle, but second triangle drawed over the sphere and not vice versa.
If i press the button second time, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles.
When i press the button third time, then second triangle drawed over the sphere again.
When i press the button fourth time, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles and so on.
If i use in sphereMesh QPhongMaterial instead of QPhongAlphaMaterial, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles always. Like it must to be.
I can't understand what i do wrong to get my sphere is drawed always over the triangles.
Code, that draws transparent sphere:
selectModel_ = new Qt3DExtras::QSphereMesh(selectEntity_);
selectModel_->setRadius(75);
selectModel_->setSlices(150);
selectMaterial_ = new Qt3DExtras::QPhongAlphaMaterial(selectEntity_);
selectMaterial_->setAmbient(QColor(28, 61, 136));
selectMaterial_->setDiffuse(QColor(11, 56, 159));
selectMaterial_->setSpecular(QColor(10, 67, 199));
selectMaterial_->setShininess(0.8f);
selectEntity_->addComponent(selectModel_);
selectEntity_->addComponent(selectMaterial_);
Function drawTriangles:
void drawTriangles(QPolygonF triangles, QColor color){
int numOfVertices = triangles.size();
// Create and fill vertex buffer
QByteArray bufferBytes;
bufferBytes.resize(3 * numOfVertices * static_cast<int>(sizeof(float)));
float *positions = reinterpret_cast<float*>(bufferBytes.data());
for(auto point : triangles){
*positions++ = static_cast<float>(point.x());
*positions++ = 0.0f; //We need to drow only on the surface
*positions++ = static_cast<float>(point.y());
}
geometry_ = new Qt3DRender::QGeometry(mapEntity_);
auto *buf = new Qt3DRender::QBuffer(geometry_);
buf->setData(bufferBytes);
positionAttribute_ = new Qt3DRender::QAttribute(mapEntity_);
positionAttribute_->setName(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::defaultPositionAttributeName());
positionAttribute_->setVertexBaseType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::Float); //In our buffer we will have only floats
positionAttribute_->setVertexSize(3); // Size of a vertex
positionAttribute_->setAttributeType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::VertexAttribute); // Attribute type
positionAttribute_->setByteStride(3 * sizeof(float));
positionAttribute_->setBuffer(buf);
geometry_->addAttribute(positionAttribute_); // Add attribute to ours Qt3DRender::QGeometry
// Create and fill an index buffer
QByteArray indexBytes;
indexBytes.resize(numOfVertices * static_cast<int>(sizeof(unsigned int))); // start to end
unsigned int *indices = reinterpret_cast<unsigned int*>(indexBytes.data());
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < static_cast<unsigned int>(numOfVertices); ++i) {
*indices++ = i;
}
auto *indexBuffer = new Qt3DRender::QBuffer(geometry_);
indexBuffer->setData(indexBytes);
indexAttribute_ = new Qt3DRender::QAttribute(geometry_);
indexAttribute_->setVertexBaseType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::UnsignedInt); //In our buffer we will have only unsigned ints
indexAttribute_->setAttributeType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::IndexAttribute); // Attribute type
indexAttribute_->setBuffer(indexBuffer);
indexAttribute_->setCount(static_cast<unsigned int>(numOfVertices)); // Set count of our vertices
geometry_->addAttribute(indexAttribute_); // Add the attribute to ours Qt3DRender::QGeometry
shape_ = new Qt3DRender::QGeometryRenderer(mapEntity_);
shape_->setPrimitiveType(Qt3DRender::QGeometryRenderer::Triangles);
shape_->setGeometry(geometry_);
//Create material
material_ = new Qt3DExtras::QPhongMaterial(mapEntity_);
material_->setAmbient(color);
trianglesEntity_ = new Qt3DCore::QEntity(mapEntity_);
trianglesEntity_->addComponent(shape_);
trianglesEntity_->addComponent(material_);
}
Press button handler on_drawMapPushButton_clicked():
void on_drawMapPushButton_clicked()
{
clearMap(); //Implementation is above
QPolygonF triangle1;
triangle1 << QPointF( 0 ,-1000) << QPointF(0 ,1000) << QPointF(1000, -1000);
drawTriangles(triangle1, Qt::black);
QPolygonF triangle2;
triangle2 << QPointF(-1000,-1000) << QPointF(-100,1000) << QPointF(-100,-1000);
drawTriangles(triangle2, Qt::red);
}
Map clearing function clearMap():
void clearMap()
{
if(mapEntity_){
delete mapEntity_;
mapEntity_ = nullptr;
mapEntity_ = new Qt3DCore::QEntity(view3dRootEntity_);
}
}
Ok here comes the extend answer.
The reason why this sometimes happens and sometimes not depends on the order of your entities. If you experiment with two simple spheres, one transparent and one not, you will see that when the sphere that is transparent is added later it will be drawn above the opaque object - just like you want it to.
This happens because the opaque object will be drawn first (it comes first in the scene graph) and the transparent object later which will give you the result you want. In the other case where the transparent object gets drawn first, the opaque object is drawn above because the QPhongAlphaMaterial has a QNoDepthMask render state which tells it not to write to the depth buffer. Thus, the opaque object always passes the depth test, where the transparent object actually already drew to. You have to do some more work to properly draw transparent objects for arbitrary scene graphs and camera positions.
The Qt3D Rendering Graph
To understand what you have to do you should understand how the Qt3D rendering graph is laid out. If you know this already you can skip this part.
Italic words reference items in the graph image in the following text.
If you use a Qt3DWindow, you can't access the root node of rendering graph. It is maintained by the window. You can access the QRenderSettings and root node of your framegraph through the functions activeFramegraph() and renderSettings() which you can both call on the window. You can also set the root node of scene graph through the setRootEntity() function of Qt3DWindow. The window internally has a QAspectEngine, where it sets the root node of the whole graph, which is the root node of the rendering graph in the graph image above.
If you want to insert a framegraph node to the existing framegraph of the 3D window, you have to add it as the parent of the active framegraph which I will explain in the next section. If you have your own custom framegraph which you set on the window through setActiveFramegraph() then just append it to the end, this should suffice.
Using QSortPolicy
As you already found out according to you other questions, you can use QSortPolicy in your framegraph to sort the entities by distance to camera. You can add a sort policy as follows (assuming that view is your Qt3DWindow and scene is your root entity of the scene graph, although I don't understand why it has to be):
Qt3DRender::QFrameGraphNode *framegraph = view.activeFrameGraph();
Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy *sortPolicy = new Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy(scene);
framegraph->setParent(sortPolicy);
QVector<Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::SortType> sortTypes =
QVector<Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::SortType>() << Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::BackToFront;
sortPolicy->setSortTypes(sortTypes);
view.setActiveFrameGraph(framegraph);
The issue with this code is that this sort policy sorts the entities by the distance of their centers to the camera. If one of the opaque objects is closer to the camera than the transparent object it gets drawn later anyways and occludes the transparent object. See the images below for a graphical explanation.
The red and black sphere are further away from the camera than the torus, that's why they get drawn first and they don't occlude the torus.
No the center of the red sphere is closer to the camera than the center of the torus. It gets rendered later than the torus and occludes it.
Using Two Framegraph Branches
You can tackle the issue above if you use two framegraph branches. One which draws all opaque entities and one which draws all transparent ones. To achieve this you have to make use of QLayer and QLayerFilter. You can attach layers to entities and then add layer filters to your framegraph. This way you can exclude entities from entering a certain branch of your framegraph.
Let's say you create two layers, one for opaque objects and one for transparents ones:
Qt3DRender::QLayer *transparentLayer = new Qt3DRender::QLayer;
Qt3DRender::QLayer *opaqueLayer = new Qt3DRender::QLayer;
You have to attach the transparent layer to each transparent object and the opaque layer to each opaque object as a component (using addComponent()).
Unfortunately, you need a special framegraph tree to include the two corresponding layer filters (again, assuming that view is your Qt3DWindow):
Qt3DRender::QRenderSurfaceSelector *renderSurfaceSelector
= new Qt3DRender::QRenderSurfaceSelector();
renderSurfaceSelector->setSurface(&view);
Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers *clearBuffers
= new Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers(renderSurfaceSelector);
clearBuffers->setBuffers(Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers::AllBuffers);
clearBuffers->setClearColor(Qt::white);
This is the first branch to clear the buffers. Now you add the following code:
Qt3DRender::QViewport *viewport = new Qt3DRender::QViewport(renderSurfaceSelector);
Qt3DRender::QCameraSelector *cameraSelector = new Qt3DRender::QCameraSelector(viewport);
Qt3DRender::QCamera *camera = new Qt3DRender::QCamera(cameraSelector);
// set your camera parameters here
cameraSelector->setCamera(camera);
Since you create the QViewport as a child of the QRenderSurfaceSelector it is now a sibling in your framegraph with respect to the QClearBuffers. You can see an illustration of the example framegraphs here.
Now you have to create the two leaf nodes that contain the layer filters. The Qt3D engine always executes a whole branch when it reaches a leaf. This means that first the opaque objects are drawn and then the transparent ones.
// not entirely sure why transparent filter has to go first
// I would have expected the reversed order of the filters but this works...
Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter *transparentFilter = new Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter(camera);
transparentFilter->addLayer(transparentLayer);
Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter *opaqueFilter = new Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter(camera);
opaqueFilter->addLayer(opaqueLayer);
The two layer filters are now leaf nodes in your framegraph branch and Qt3D will first draw the opaque objects and then afterwards, since it uses the same viewport and everything, will draw the transparent objects above. It will draw them correctly (i.e. not in front of parts of opaque objects that the transparent object actually lies behind, because we did not clear the depth buffers again -> Splitting the framegraph happens only on the camera node).
Now set the new framegaph on your Qt3DWindow:
view.setActiveFrameGraph(renderSurfaceSelector);
Result:
Edit (26.03.21): As Patrick B. pointed out correctly, using the suggested solution with two layers you will have to add both layers as components to any lights in the scene. You can get around this by setting the filter mode on the QLayerFilters to QLayerFilter::FilterMode::DiscardAnyMatching and then reverse the order of the filters. This way, the transparentFilter discards any entities with the transparentLayer attached - but not the lights because they don't have the transparentLayer. Vice versa for the opaqueFilter.
My mistake was that i did wrong order of creating and deletion of Triangles and Sphere entities.
In pseudo code right order is as follows:
clearTriangles();
clearSphere();
drawTriangles();
drawSphere();
If you are using Qt3d with QML and want to control the order elements are drawn you can control it by the order of layers in your QML file.
Something like:
{
objectName: "firstLayer"
id : firstLayer
}
Layer {
objectName: "secondLayer"
id: secondLayer
}
The order you add them to layer filters will then control which is drawn first:
RenderSurfaceSelector {
CameraSelector {
id : cameraSelector
camera: mainCamera
FrustumCulling {
ClearBuffers {
buffers : ClearBuffers.AllBuffers
clearColor: "#04151c"
NoDraw {}
}
LayerFilter
{
objectName: "firstLayerFilter"
id: firstLayerFilter
layers: [firstLayer]
}
LayerFilter
{
id: secondLayerFilter
objectName: "secondLayerFilter"
layers: [secondLayer]
}
Then anything you add to the secondLayer will get drawn over-top of the first layer. I used this to make sure text always showed up in front of shapes, but it can be used similarly with transparencies.
I have a function that draws triangles through OpenGL
I draw two triangles by pressing a button (function on_drawMapPushButton_clicked()).
Then i draw a sphere that placed above these triangles. And now i see, that sphere is drawed correctly over first triangle, but second triangle drawed over the sphere and not vice versa.
If i press the button second time, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles.
When i press the button third time, then second triangle drawed over the sphere again.
When i press the button fourth time, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles and so on.
If i use in sphereMesh QPhongMaterial instead of QPhongAlphaMaterial, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles always. Like it must to be.
I can't understand what i do wrong to get my sphere is drawed always over the triangles.
Code, that draws transparent sphere:
selectModel_ = new Qt3DExtras::QSphereMesh(selectEntity_);
selectModel_->setRadius(75);
selectModel_->setSlices(150);
selectMaterial_ = new Qt3DExtras::QPhongAlphaMaterial(selectEntity_);
selectMaterial_->setAmbient(QColor(28, 61, 136));
selectMaterial_->setDiffuse(QColor(11, 56, 159));
selectMaterial_->setSpecular(QColor(10, 67, 199));
selectMaterial_->setShininess(0.8f);
selectEntity_->addComponent(selectModel_);
selectEntity_->addComponent(selectMaterial_);
Function drawTriangles:
void drawTriangles(QPolygonF triangles, QColor color){
int numOfVertices = triangles.size();
// Create and fill vertex buffer
QByteArray bufferBytes;
bufferBytes.resize(3 * numOfVertices * static_cast<int>(sizeof(float)));
float *positions = reinterpret_cast<float*>(bufferBytes.data());
for(auto point : triangles){
*positions++ = static_cast<float>(point.x());
*positions++ = 0.0f; //We need to drow only on the surface
*positions++ = static_cast<float>(point.y());
}
geometry_ = new Qt3DRender::QGeometry(mapEntity_);
auto *buf = new Qt3DRender::QBuffer(geometry_);
buf->setData(bufferBytes);
positionAttribute_ = new Qt3DRender::QAttribute(mapEntity_);
positionAttribute_->setName(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::defaultPositionAttributeName());
positionAttribute_->setVertexBaseType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::Float); //In our buffer we will have only floats
positionAttribute_->setVertexSize(3); // Size of a vertex
positionAttribute_->setAttributeType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::VertexAttribute); // Attribute type
positionAttribute_->setByteStride(3 * sizeof(float));
positionAttribute_->setBuffer(buf);
geometry_->addAttribute(positionAttribute_); // Add attribute to ours Qt3DRender::QGeometry
// Create and fill an index buffer
QByteArray indexBytes;
indexBytes.resize(numOfVertices * static_cast<int>(sizeof(unsigned int))); // start to end
unsigned int *indices = reinterpret_cast<unsigned int*>(indexBytes.data());
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < static_cast<unsigned int>(numOfVertices); ++i) {
*indices++ = i;
}
auto *indexBuffer = new Qt3DRender::QBuffer(geometry_);
indexBuffer->setData(indexBytes);
indexAttribute_ = new Qt3DRender::QAttribute(geometry_);
indexAttribute_->setVertexBaseType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::UnsignedInt); //In our buffer we will have only unsigned ints
indexAttribute_->setAttributeType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::IndexAttribute); // Attribute type
indexAttribute_->setBuffer(indexBuffer);
indexAttribute_->setCount(static_cast<unsigned int>(numOfVertices)); // Set count of our vertices
geometry_->addAttribute(indexAttribute_); // Add the attribute to ours Qt3DRender::QGeometry
shape_ = new Qt3DRender::QGeometryRenderer(mapEntity_);
shape_->setPrimitiveType(Qt3DRender::QGeometryRenderer::Triangles);
shape_->setGeometry(geometry_);
//Create material
material_ = new Qt3DExtras::QPhongMaterial(mapEntity_);
material_->setAmbient(color);
trianglesEntity_ = new Qt3DCore::QEntity(mapEntity_);
trianglesEntity_->addComponent(shape_);
trianglesEntity_->addComponent(material_);
}
Press button handler on_drawMapPushButton_clicked():
void on_drawMapPushButton_clicked()
{
clearMap(); //Implementation is above
QPolygonF triangle1;
triangle1 << QPointF( 0 ,-1000) << QPointF(0 ,1000) << QPointF(1000, -1000);
drawTriangles(triangle1, Qt::black);
QPolygonF triangle2;
triangle2 << QPointF(-1000,-1000) << QPointF(-100,1000) << QPointF(-100,-1000);
drawTriangles(triangle2, Qt::red);
}
Map clearing function clearMap():
void clearMap()
{
if(mapEntity_){
delete mapEntity_;
mapEntity_ = nullptr;
mapEntity_ = new Qt3DCore::QEntity(view3dRootEntity_);
}
}
Ok here comes the extend answer.
The reason why this sometimes happens and sometimes not depends on the order of your entities. If you experiment with two simple spheres, one transparent and one not, you will see that when the sphere that is transparent is added later it will be drawn above the opaque object - just like you want it to.
This happens because the opaque object will be drawn first (it comes first in the scene graph) and the transparent object later which will give you the result you want. In the other case where the transparent object gets drawn first, the opaque object is drawn above because the QPhongAlphaMaterial has a QNoDepthMask render state which tells it not to write to the depth buffer. Thus, the opaque object always passes the depth test, where the transparent object actually already drew to. You have to do some more work to properly draw transparent objects for arbitrary scene graphs and camera positions.
The Qt3D Rendering Graph
To understand what you have to do you should understand how the Qt3D rendering graph is laid out. If you know this already you can skip this part.
Italic words reference items in the graph image in the following text.
If you use a Qt3DWindow, you can't access the root node of rendering graph. It is maintained by the window. You can access the QRenderSettings and root node of your framegraph through the functions activeFramegraph() and renderSettings() which you can both call on the window. You can also set the root node of scene graph through the setRootEntity() function of Qt3DWindow. The window internally has a QAspectEngine, where it sets the root node of the whole graph, which is the root node of the rendering graph in the graph image above.
If you want to insert a framegraph node to the existing framegraph of the 3D window, you have to add it as the parent of the active framegraph which I will explain in the next section. If you have your own custom framegraph which you set on the window through setActiveFramegraph() then just append it to the end, this should suffice.
Using QSortPolicy
As you already found out according to you other questions, you can use QSortPolicy in your framegraph to sort the entities by distance to camera. You can add a sort policy as follows (assuming that view is your Qt3DWindow and scene is your root entity of the scene graph, although I don't understand why it has to be):
Qt3DRender::QFrameGraphNode *framegraph = view.activeFrameGraph();
Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy *sortPolicy = new Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy(scene);
framegraph->setParent(sortPolicy);
QVector<Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::SortType> sortTypes =
QVector<Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::SortType>() << Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::BackToFront;
sortPolicy->setSortTypes(sortTypes);
view.setActiveFrameGraph(framegraph);
The issue with this code is that this sort policy sorts the entities by the distance of their centers to the camera. If one of the opaque objects is closer to the camera than the transparent object it gets drawn later anyways and occludes the transparent object. See the images below for a graphical explanation.
The red and black sphere are further away from the camera than the torus, that's why they get drawn first and they don't occlude the torus.
No the center of the red sphere is closer to the camera than the center of the torus. It gets rendered later than the torus and occludes it.
Using Two Framegraph Branches
You can tackle the issue above if you use two framegraph branches. One which draws all opaque entities and one which draws all transparent ones. To achieve this you have to make use of QLayer and QLayerFilter. You can attach layers to entities and then add layer filters to your framegraph. This way you can exclude entities from entering a certain branch of your framegraph.
Let's say you create two layers, one for opaque objects and one for transparents ones:
Qt3DRender::QLayer *transparentLayer = new Qt3DRender::QLayer;
Qt3DRender::QLayer *opaqueLayer = new Qt3DRender::QLayer;
You have to attach the transparent layer to each transparent object and the opaque layer to each opaque object as a component (using addComponent()).
Unfortunately, you need a special framegraph tree to include the two corresponding layer filters (again, assuming that view is your Qt3DWindow):
Qt3DRender::QRenderSurfaceSelector *renderSurfaceSelector
= new Qt3DRender::QRenderSurfaceSelector();
renderSurfaceSelector->setSurface(&view);
Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers *clearBuffers
= new Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers(renderSurfaceSelector);
clearBuffers->setBuffers(Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers::AllBuffers);
clearBuffers->setClearColor(Qt::white);
This is the first branch to clear the buffers. Now you add the following code:
Qt3DRender::QViewport *viewport = new Qt3DRender::QViewport(renderSurfaceSelector);
Qt3DRender::QCameraSelector *cameraSelector = new Qt3DRender::QCameraSelector(viewport);
Qt3DRender::QCamera *camera = new Qt3DRender::QCamera(cameraSelector);
// set your camera parameters here
cameraSelector->setCamera(camera);
Since you create the QViewport as a child of the QRenderSurfaceSelector it is now a sibling in your framegraph with respect to the QClearBuffers. You can see an illustration of the example framegraphs here.
Now you have to create the two leaf nodes that contain the layer filters. The Qt3D engine always executes a whole branch when it reaches a leaf. This means that first the opaque objects are drawn and then the transparent ones.
// not entirely sure why transparent filter has to go first
// I would have expected the reversed order of the filters but this works...
Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter *transparentFilter = new Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter(camera);
transparentFilter->addLayer(transparentLayer);
Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter *opaqueFilter = new Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter(camera);
opaqueFilter->addLayer(opaqueLayer);
The two layer filters are now leaf nodes in your framegraph branch and Qt3D will first draw the opaque objects and then afterwards, since it uses the same viewport and everything, will draw the transparent objects above. It will draw them correctly (i.e. not in front of parts of opaque objects that the transparent object actually lies behind, because we did not clear the depth buffers again -> Splitting the framegraph happens only on the camera node).
Now set the new framegaph on your Qt3DWindow:
view.setActiveFrameGraph(renderSurfaceSelector);
Result:
Edit (26.03.21): As Patrick B. pointed out correctly, using the suggested solution with two layers you will have to add both layers as components to any lights in the scene. You can get around this by setting the filter mode on the QLayerFilters to QLayerFilter::FilterMode::DiscardAnyMatching and then reverse the order of the filters. This way, the transparentFilter discards any entities with the transparentLayer attached - but not the lights because they don't have the transparentLayer. Vice versa for the opaqueFilter.
My mistake was that i did wrong order of creating and deletion of Triangles and Sphere entities.
In pseudo code right order is as follows:
clearTriangles();
clearSphere();
drawTriangles();
drawSphere();
If you are using Qt3d with QML and want to control the order elements are drawn you can control it by the order of layers in your QML file.
Something like:
{
objectName: "firstLayer"
id : firstLayer
}
Layer {
objectName: "secondLayer"
id: secondLayer
}
The order you add them to layer filters will then control which is drawn first:
RenderSurfaceSelector {
CameraSelector {
id : cameraSelector
camera: mainCamera
FrustumCulling {
ClearBuffers {
buffers : ClearBuffers.AllBuffers
clearColor: "#04151c"
NoDraw {}
}
LayerFilter
{
objectName: "firstLayerFilter"
id: firstLayerFilter
layers: [firstLayer]
}
LayerFilter
{
id: secondLayerFilter
objectName: "secondLayerFilter"
layers: [secondLayer]
}
Then anything you add to the secondLayer will get drawn over-top of the first layer. I used this to make sure text always showed up in front of shapes, but it can be used similarly with transparencies.
I created a Unity sphere and applied standard material with albedo texture. Now I'm trying to rotate mesh uvs (it looks like this is the simpliest way to rotate the texture)
Here is the code
using UnityEngine;
public class GameController : MonoBehaviour
{
public GameObject player;
public float rotationValue;
void Start ()
{
Mesh mesh = player.GetComponent<MeshFilter>().mesh;
Vector2[] uvs = mesh.uv;
mesh.uv = changeUvs(uvs);
}
private Vector2[] changeUvs (Vector2[] originalUvs)
{
for (int i = 0; i < originalUvs.Length; i++)
{
originalUvs[i].x = originalUvs[i].x + rotationValue;
if (originalUvs[i].x > 1)
{
originalUvs[i].x = originalUvs[i].x - 1f;
}
}
return originalUvs;
}
}
This gives me this strange artifact. What am I doing wrong?
It can't be done the way you're trying to do it. Even if you go outside the [0,1] range as pleluron suggests there will be a line on the sphere where the texture interpolates from high to low, and you get the entire texture in a single band as you see now.
The way the original sphere solves the problem is by having a seam that is duplicated. One version has x 0 and the other one has x 1. You don't see it because the vertices are at the same location. If you want to solve the problem with uv trickery then the only option is to move the seam, which involves creating a new mesh.
Actually the simplest way to rotate the planet is by leaving the texture alone and just rotate the object! If this for some reason is not an option then go into the material and find the tiling and offset. If you're using the standard shader then make sure you use the top one, just below the emission checkbox. If you modify that X you get the effect you're trying to create with the script you posted.
I am rendering a point cloud using OSG. I followed the example in the OSG cookbook titled "Rendering point cloud data with draw instancing" that shows how to make one point with many instances and then transfer the point locations to the graphics card via a texture. It then uses a shader to pull the points out of the texture and move each instance to the right location. There appear to be two problems with what is getting rendered.
First, the points aren't in the right location compared to a more straight forward, working approach to rendering. It looks like they are roughly scaled from zero wrong, some kind of multiplicative factor on position.
Second, the imagery is blurry. Points tend to be generally in the right place; there are many points in the place where a large object should be. However, I can't tell what the object. Data rendered with my working (but slower) rendering method looks sharp.
I have verified that I have the same input data going into the texture and draw list in both methods so it seems it has to be something with the rendering.
Here is the code to set up the Geometry which is nearly directly copied from the text book.
osg::Geometry* geo = new osg::Geometry;
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Image> img = new osg::Image;
img->allocateImage(w,h, 1, GL_RGBA, GL_FLOAT);
osg::BoundingBox box;
float* data = (float*)img->data();
for (unsigned long int k=0; k<NPoints; k++)
{
*(data++) = cloud->x[k];
*(data++) = cloud->y[k];
*(data++) = cloud->z[k];
*(data++) = cloud->meta[0][k];
box.expandBy(cloud->x[k],cloud->y[k],cloud->z[k]);
}
geo->setUseDisplayList(false);
geo->setUseVertexBufferObjects(true);
geo->setVertexArray( new osg::Vec3Array(1));
geo->addPrimitiveSet( new osg::DrawArrays(GL_POINTS, 0, 1, stop) );
geo->setInitialBound(box);
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Texture2D> tex = new osg::Texture2D;
tex->setImage( img);
tex->setInternalFormat( GL_RGBA32F_ARB );
tex->setFilter( osg::Texture2D::MIN_FILTER, osg::Texture2D::LINEAR);
tex->setFilter( osg::Texture2D::MAG_FILTER, osg::Texture2D::LINEAR);
And here is the shader code.
void main () {
float row;
row = float(gl_InstanceID) / float(width);
vec2 uv = vec2( fract(row), floor(row) / float(height) );
vec4 texValue = texture2D(defaultTex,uv);
vec4 pos = gl_Vertex + vec4(texValue.xyz, 1.0);
gl_Position = gl_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * pos;
}
After a bunch of experimenting, I found that the example code from the OSG Cookbook has some problems.
The scale issue (the first problem) is in the shader.
vec4 pos = gl_Vertex + vec4(texValue.xyz, 1.0);
Should be
vec4 pos = gl_Vertex + vec4(texValue.xyz, 0.0);
This is because the gl_Vertex is a 3-vector with an extra 1 element to aide with matrix transformation. That element should always be 1. The example created another 3+1 vector and added it to gl_Vertex making it a 2. Replace the 1 with a zero and the scale problem goes away.
The blurriness (the second problem) was caused by texture interpolation.
tex->setFilter( osg::Texture2D::MIN_FILTER, osg::Texture2D::LINEAR);
tex->setFilter( osg::Texture2D::MAG_FILTER, osg::Texture2D::LINEAR);
needs to be
tex->setFilter( osg::Texture2D::MIN_FILTER, osg::Texture2D::NEAREST);
tex->setFilter( osg::Texture2D::MAG_FILTER, osg::Texture2D::NEAREST);
so that the interpolator will just take the values from the texture instead of interpolating them from neighboring texture pixels which may be points on the other side of the point cloud. After fixing these two issues, the example works as advertised and seems to be a bit faster in my limited testing.