My basic issue is this: my program (MyProgram.exe) has a dependency on a DLL from another program (OtherProgram), and I'm trying to avoid repackaging a new DLL every time OtherProgram updates. I'd like to have MyProgram.exe link in OtherProgram's DLL when it launches, but I'm not completely sure that Windows allows for this. So if there is some kind of workaround that would also be acceptable.
And just for some background, the platform is Windows 7 x64, and MyProgram.exe runs fine when I create a symlink in the MyProgram.exe project directory to the DLL in OtherProgram's install directory. When I try to run it without the symlink, I get the "program can't start because OtherProgramDLL.dll is missing from your computer" error.
Any advice or links to relevant info is greatly appreciated!
EDIT: Clarification: the DLL is not linked at compile-time, this issue crops up at runtime
There are two types of dynamic linking in the Windows world:
Load-Time linking is when a DLL is loaded automatically when your program starts up. Windows finds this DLL using a specific algorithm I'll discuss below.
Run-Time linking is when you specifically load a DLL by calling LoadLibrary in your code. Similar rules apply as to how the library is found, but you can specify a fully-qualified or relatively-qualified path to control the search.
In the case of Load-Time linking, MS recommends that your program's DLLs are stored in and loaded from the same directory where your application is loaded from. If this is at all workable, this is probably your best option.
If that doesn't work, there are several other options, outlined here. One is to leverage the search order by putting the DLL in either the working directory or the directory where the application was loaded from.
You can change the working directory of an application by:
Create a shortcut to your application.
Bring up the shortcut's properties
Edit the "Start in" property with the directory where the DLL is located.
When you launch your application using the shortcut, it will load the right DLL.
Other options for load-time linking include:
Adding a manifest to your application which specifies where your dependent assemblies are, or,
Setting the PATH.
You could use LoadLibrary, but you would need a way to guarantee the DLL's location. This Wikipedia article provides good example on how to use the DLL after it has been loaded.
You can add the directory where the dll is located to the PATH environment variable.
I have struggled with the same problem and also found a dead end with the suggested methods like LoadLibrary, SetDllDirectory, Qt's addLibraryPath and others. Regardless of what I tried, the problem still remained that the application checked the libraries (and didn't find them) before actually running the code, so any code solution was bound to fail.
I almost got desperate, but then discovered an extremely easy approach which might also be helpful in cases like yours: Use a batch file! (or a similar loader before the actual application)
A Windows batch file for such a purpose could look like this:
#echo off
PATH=%PATH%;<PATH_TO_YOUR_LIB>
<PATH_TO_YOUR_APP_EXE>
/edit: Just saw #SirDarius comment in Luchian's answer which describes that way, so just take my batch code bit as a reference and all credits go to him.
I have the same problem with one application I am working on.
I do not want to use runtime loading because there are tens of functions I would need to manually create function pointer for.
Mr Dibling's mention of manifest file opened a new door for me but I sadly found out that the oldest version of windows that supports the feature is Windows 7. It won't even work on Vista.
Long story short, a friend familiar with Windows Application development told me to look up Delay-Loaded DLL, which turns out to solve the problem perfectly with minimal effort. It delays the loading of DLL library to either the point you manually do, or the first time its function is called. So you just need to add your DLL path to the search path before that happens, where SetDllDirectory helps.
Here is the steps to make it work:
1) Specify the DLL to be delay-loaded to linker, either through your makefile, cmake or VS property page (Linker->Input of VS2015)
2) Call SetDllDirectory at the beginning of your program, before any call to the DLL is made.
Delay-loaded DLL is supported all the way back to VC6.
SetDllDirectory is supported after XP SP1.
Use Symbolic Links to the 3rd Party Executables
I found the approach advocated by Aaron Margosis useful. See:
Using NTFS Junctions to Fix Application Compatibility Issues on 64-bit Editions of Windows
Essentially, create symbolic links to each of the dependent 3rd Party executables. Place these symbolic link files in and amongst your own dependent executable files. Except for filename changes to the targets, the 'soft' symbolic links will resolve the load-time dependencies even as the target of the links are changed by future updates.
Related
As a background: my application requires:
admin privileges
access to WinAPI DLLs
be able to run on all OSs: Win7-Win10
Normally, to use API, I can just link required *.lib files. However it uses default search order, that means (according to https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/dlls/dynamic-link-library-search-order) it firstly loads DLLs from "The directory from which the application loaded."
As a result, if the DLL exists in the same directory, running my app by double-click loads also that DLL.
I want to look for DLLs only in system directories (similarly to https://stackoverflow.com/a/46182665/9015013 ).
I know I can try to create some kind of proxy, like
BOOL WinAPIFunction(WinAPIType param) {
return reinterpret_cast<decltype(&WinAPIFunction)>(
reinterpret_cast<void*>(GetProcAddress(manually_loaded_module, "WinAPIFunction")))(param);
}
But it is hard to maintain all these functions. Is there any better method to force windows to look only in system32? I thought about manifest file but it requires version for each DLL that can break "capability" requirement (DLLs have different version for Win7 and Win10)
The solution is posted by #Eryk Sun in comment above.
It is sufficient to add all DLLs not listed in known dlls to delayed loaded libraries and call SetDefaultDllDirectories(LOAD_LIBRARY_SEARCH_SYSTEM32); at the beginning of the WinMain.
Thanks
You can try to use "Known DLLs" feature: If Windows "knows" that DLL, Windows doesn't search dll file. Known feature is described into link, you written in question.
Some of our users have been complaining about a libmmd.dll not found error on our plugins loading.
Some background:
I'm talking about an issue occurring on Windows (8, for that matter).
We develop plugins for Digital Audio Workstations (for digital sound
processing purposes).
Our plugin is a DLL coded in VS2012 and compiled with Intel Compiler 2015 via Perl scripts calling icl.exe
from the cmd.
One of its dependencies is an Intel-supplied math
library provided in the 2015 flavor of its redistributables (which we
install together with our plugins) called libmmd.dll.
For a matter of convenience, let's call the plugin DLL plugin.dll (!!!).
I didn't have much time on one of the affected users' machine but from what I saw, reinstalling Intel's redistributables package didn't help, only moving libmmd.dll to the same folder as plugin.dll.
Whatever the reason for this (sudden and unexpected) behavior, we want to be able to deliver software protected against this kind of issues (DLL Hell).
What we want is for plugin.dll to look for libraries first in a specific directory (configurable would be even better), then in its usual search order.
I tried playing with manifests, registry, library names, linker options...
The only things that actually worked were switching the /MD option with /MT (but recompiling with static libs really adds to the size of plugin.dll) and copying the library to the folder plugin.dll is in.
Any ideas ?
Thanks !
The SetDllDirectory function lets you add a folder path to the DLL search order. It will be added in second place, immediately behind the program folder itself.
This only affects DLLs loaded via LoadLibrary however; if your DLLs are loaded statically it won't make any difference.
I've been making a program in Visual Studio 2012, what comes with it is that when I send my application to someone, they need the VS2012 Runtime, which sometimes they don't know where to download or what they need (for normal users "xxx.dll is missing" is very misleading).
I know exactly which dependencies my application requires (fantom.dll [Lego Mindstorms stuff] and the VC++ 2012 Redist).
I would like to show a dialog when these libraries are missing on application startup and provide the user with download links for these libraries.
Is this possible to accomplish?
Yeah you could do something like:
Move all of the code in your binary into a DLL.
Create an EXE which dynamically loads the DLL using LoadLibrary and unloads it with FreeLibrary.
If LoadLibrary fails, check if its due to missing DLLs, if so then display a MessageBox/your custom message and exit.
Of course this means your EXE project must NOT depend on the runtime itself - this shouldn't be an issue since you'll only need to call 3 win32 API's.
No it's not possible but you can create an installer for your program. The error is thrown during the loading of your program, before your code execution...
You can try with that : http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/24187/Creating-an-Installer
I can't speak for testing the VS2012 Runtime dynamically, but you can certainly validate fantom.dll dynamically. Instead of static-linking to the DLL directly, you can dynamically load it instead. You can configure your project to delay-load the DLL at run-time, and then provide a delay-load callback handler that the RTL will call if the delay-load fails. Or you can simply skip the delay-load feature and load the DLL yourself manually by calling LoadLibrary() and GetProcAddress() directly.
Sure, you can verify if a dependency exists on the deployed system. A few things come to mind...
You can see if the assembly is recognized on the running system by calling AppDomain.AssemblyResolve() . Further reading here
Another more primitive option is to call a File.Exists(your assembly path here) test, but I would advise against this as it's a bad practice to require hard-pathed installation locations.
That said, and as others have stated, it's still by far the best approach to create yourself an installation distribution.
I've added a new library to my application (multiple projects-DLLs) - SQLite, to perform some in memory caching. There is just one library/project that is affected by this change - Lib1.
A build goes through fine. All libraries are built successfully and no errors are reported, including a couple of Com Objects.
If I try to register the com objects, I get the The DLL could not be loaded. Check to make sure all required application runtime files and other dependent DLLs are available in the component DLL's directory or the system path. message. But all the libs are at the same place. And all are in the path. A copy of this project builds and registers fine (without the few changes made for SqlLite ofcourse). Dependency walker reports no issues
Oddly, if I try to register the DLL of the com object (using regsvr32) it works fine. Also, I have another library, which is dependant on Lib1 (not on SqlLite) which also cannot be loaded.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
A'z
You can use Process Monitor (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645.aspx) set to filter process name regsvr32.exe in order to see all file and registry access.
Always use full path to your-com-dll when you issue regsvr32 commands, if you have the same dll somewhere else in path (for example c:\windows\system32) regsvr32 will use the other dll and not the one in your current directory.
Another trick would be to use "rundll32 your-com-dll,DllRegisterServer". In case of missing dlls it will tell which dll is missing instead of just saying that LoadLibrary failed.
Edit:
What do you mean by "If I try to register the com objects"? How are you doing this? I'm asking because you say that regsvr32 on the dll which actually implements these com object works fine.
Use the dependency walker tool to figure out what other dlls the COM server relies on. Then check the executable paths that is set in Visual Studio (Tools -> Options -> Projects -> Directories (I think)). Note that VS does not use the system PATH environment variable - it uses what is set in the options page so if the path to the dependencies is not listed there, the registration would fail, even though if you used regsvr32 from the command line it would succeed.
And so, the plot thickens!!!!
I've actually narrowed down the to the line of code that causes this linking problem.
In the modified library (LIB1) I've added a new class A1 which inherits from an existing class A.
When I change an existing class B which used to inherit from A to now inherit from A1 - this is when the problem is caused. Class B is in a lib3.
I've verified that just when I change the inheritance, only then the problem occurs!!!
I've used file-mon on regsvr32 when loading successfully and when failing. I stuggle to find the difference! Tomorrow morning I'll try Process Monitor and see if it helps.
Still desperate for help,
A'z
hmm... as Christian asks, how else are you attempting to register the objects if regsvr32.exe succeeds?
the rundll32.exe advice is also good. have you tried stepping through DllRegisterServer in a debugger to see precisely when it's failing? this sounds like a potential runtime failure if depends.exe isn't revealing anything.
btw, when i google for that exact error text i see: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/sqldataaccess/thread/402c1767-cf1d-42f0-aec9-e0169dbf1083/, but I assume you've probably already done this search and found it not helpful :)
I am writing a DLL to plug into another (3rd party) application. The DLL will need to depend on another set of DLLs (for license reasons I cannot link statically).
I would like my DLL to be "xcopy-deployable" to any directory. I would also like not to require adding this directory to the path.
If I just build the DLL the usual way, Windows will refuse to load the DLL, since it cannot find the DLLs next to the current process.
Are there any good options for helping Windows locate the DLL?
To answer some questions:
The DLL is written in C++.
The extra DLLs are QT-dlls.
I would like to place the extra DLLs in the same folder as my plugin DLL. I can get the name of that folder from GetModuleFileName.
The application is Firefox, the DLL is a PKCS#11 security module.
The application loads the DLL using the full path to the DLL (the user supplies it when installing the plugin).
Requiring that the DLLs be placed in System32 or next to the application would work, but it is a bit messy and could cause problems with uninstallers.
LoadLibrary and GetProcAddress would of course work, but is not really feasible in my case. I am using hundreds, if not thousands, of methods in the other DLLs. I really need to use the import-libraries.
I had thought about using delay-loaded dlls combined with SetDllDirectory in DllMain. Have anyone tried anything like this?
I can think of 3 ways.
put the dlls in the same folder as your application (you cannot do this?)
Use runtime linking. LoadLibrary() and GetProcAddress()
Use a manifest http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa374182(VS.85).aspx
But if the dll isn't in the same folder as the .exe, how are you going to know where it is? forget Windows not knowing, how do you know?
you can specify the path of dll as the parameter of LoadLibrary().
Another option is to modify the PATH variable. Have a batch file for launching the main app, and set the PATH=%PATH%;%~dp0. This ensures a minimal footprint, with no additional traces left in the system after running.