I'm planning to get GREG from WSO2 as business service registry. We're currently storing services in a Spreadsheet as a delimited text file. Services are still abstract concepts (operations not).
Which is the best approach (painless, programming-less...) to do a bulk load of about 660 business services and 12000 operations?
The most painless way probably is using the registry client. WSO2 provides a java based client you can use to easily access the registry. It won't be completely painless, but with a couple of lines of code you could easily add this information.
On other option would be to directly plug in to the underlying JCR repository or database, but than your entering the painful area I think.
Related
I am new to the Hadoop environment, sorry if the question is obvious...
I need to develop a web service to record and read large volumes of data. Because of this requirement I thought of using a Hadoop cluster and HBase as my database.
I have designed my hbase schema to satisfy my requirements, so far so good.
The thing is that since it is a service I am developing, I would like the users of the service not to know the internal representation of the data.
I do not want the users to have to invoke a Put to a certain table, for example, to the Clients table, but instead invoke a high-abstraction method, for example, createClient().
How do I add this abstraction layer on top of HBase while maintaining the characteristics of reliable and distributed and the capacity to service lots of users simultaneously offered by HBase itself?
Thanks a lot
Consider Hbase Stargate to enable a REST server. If you want to obscure the table name in the URI, perhaps proxy Stargate with a web server.
First I am new in Xcode but start using Swift
I am so confused with the purpose of CloudKit (Document) if I want to develop multiuse app. Which normally I would use Web Services or Web base Application. It would be nice to use App in mobile and store all data in Cloud.
I have two questions:
Regardless of speed to deal with the iCloud, Can I make app with most or all data in iCloud and go to Appstore. Mean App only run when network available. (The reason I asked because some developers complained of Apple rejected with the reason "Specifically, your application requires iCloud support for the users to access this application, which can create poor user experience. ")
In case the app should maintain the syn of all data. I couldn't imagine how complicate to handle all in/out of the data. So the question: Is there any way to replicate iCloud data. just like some databases: MySql, Sql without much of the programming. Then I just focus on CoreData with replication features.
Concerning availability CloudKit is not very different from using web services. If there is no internet connection, then you will not be able to fetch data. How would you handle that if you were using web services? You should handle it the same way when using CloudKit. Just make sure that at least there is some functionality when the data is not available.
Your 2nd question is a bit broad. Yes, you could use CoreData syncing to iCloud. You could also just catch the fetched data using one of the many caching libraries that car available (search CocoaPods)
Nowadays a lot of web applications are providing API for other applications to use.
I am new to the usage of API so I want to understand the use cases for it.
Lets take Basecamp as an example.
What are the use cases for using their API in my web application?
For inserting current data in my web application into a newly created Basecamp account instead of inserting everything manually which could take days or weeks if the data is huge?
For updating my application data when the user changes something in Basecamp. If so, how do I know for example when a user add/edit/remove a contact in Basecamp. Do I make a request and check every minute from the backend?
For making backup of the Basecamp data so I can move it to other applications if necessary?
Are all the above examples good use cases for the usage of API?
Are there more use cases?
I want to have a clear picture of why it's good to use another web service API and how I can leverage that on my application.
Thanks.
I've found the biggest reason to use and provide web services is to be able to programmatically drive the application with another process. This allows the coupling of different actions in different applications driven by one event/process/trigger.
For example I could create a use a webservice provided by Basecamp, my bug tracking database and the continuous integration server. I could tie all those things together and kick them off from a commit hook script.
I can have a monitor in production automatically open a ticket in our ticket tracker. This could trigger an autoremediation process from the ticket tracker which logs into the box remotely and restarts the service.
The other major reason I've seen to use and provide web service is to reduce double entry. If you do change management in your production environment that usually means you create Change tickets. The changes that occur may also need to be reflected in the Change Management Database which is usually a model of how production is suppose to look. Most of these systems don't automatically drive the update of your configuration item with the data from the change. Using web services you can stitch them together to eliminate the double (manual) entry that would normally occur.
APIs are used any time you want to get data to/from an application without using the default interface.
*I'd bet there's a mobile app would use the basecamp api.
*You could use the api to pull information from basecamp into another application (like project manager software or an individual's todo webpage)
*the geekiest of us may prefer to update basecamp from a script/command line rather than interrupting our work flow to open a web page and click around.
I am very interested in the replacment ASP.NET Session Manager portion of Appfabric, and somewhat interested in the distributed cache manager. We don't have a need for its hosting features. While we do have a clustered SQLServer inhouse, adding that as a dependency for our aspnet/oracle application probably would not be well received.
There is a network based XML file option that the appfabric videos suggest is okay for small deployments, which we would be (one 2-node farn, one 5-node farm).
So are there any success stories w/o SQLServer on the backend? Would a DFS network share prove reliable enough for Appfabric instead of SQLServer?
I think this is precisely the situation where the AppFabric team intended the XML provider to be used i.e. where SQL Server is not available/not desired. I doubt that there are any case studies available yet where this has been done, purely because AppFabric is so new that they haven't been written yet. However I don't believe there are any quirks to using the XML provider over the SQL provider - all I can suggest is try it and see! You could always switch over to SQL Server at a later date if the XML provider proves problematic. Or if you're felling brave, you should be able to write an Oracle provider (though the documentation on this seems, um, sketchy).
Can anyone tell me what the need/advantage is to using a web service with an asp.net gui and using Linq to SQL? The web service layer seems unnecessary. Linq to SQL is completely new to me and I am researching as I am setting up a new project. Does anyone have any experience with this?
You would expose services for those cases in which other applications may need to access your data (such as a smart client, another application, a winforms app, etc.). A lot of people will develop using web services to prevent themselves from having to restructure to web services in the future.
In almost any professional/enterprise web application you want to separate the UI tier from the data access layer so you would not embed Linq to SQL calls in the UI tier. Instead you would have a service tier in between, whether its web services, WCF, or just a DLL with business logic that orchestrates your data access layer. Independent tiers are easier to maintain, update, refactor, and learn so the up front investment in creating them is worth the effort.
It is certainly not necessary, but can be handy in case you want to keep your data access layer on a separate server from your presentation server (ASP.NET). A web service allows you to restrict communication between the two servers to only port 80.
Note that this could apply to plain old ADO.NET or anything else too.
Webservices became a separation layer because they were intended as a platform agnostic way of sending data to other software. They are websites that serve information to other software and not directly to the user.
A webservice is an overhauled separation layer for a website and can not completely replace a good data, business logic and UI separation.
Do it as your logic tells you to, but beware of the performance drops that you pay if you do not need to communicate to other software.
Completely agree with Ovidiu Pacurar. Web services are NOT a good choice for modeling layers of concern. You should do this using good old fashioned OO design. There is no reason for a web application to call web services within itself for data access unless they are intended for client ajax calls or if you need to run the business/data layer on another server for extreme security concerns.
Agreed with previous poster. You'd probably want to do this to apply the "Separation of Concerns" idea...