I have been reading a lot of django articles, including the official doc. Occasionally, I would see multiple instances of an app being mentioned without going into the details of it. This leads me to start thinking what are the uses/applications of having multiple instances of an app. A few examples would be appreciated.
In the section URL Dispatcher of the official doc, I read:
The Django Admin is deployed as instances of a AdminSite
Why multiple instances are needed here?
You could for example make another instance of AdminSite available under a different url than /admin - you could for example register different ModelAdmins with this second instance or have it customized in a different way. In the Django documentation you will also find some attributes of AdminSite that give you the possibility to customize it.
Also there can be use cases where you would need to subclass AdminSite to give it the properties you desire...
Say you design an app that creates a forum with categories, sub-categories, user profiles etc. Now company A that makes cars wants to use your software without going through the trouble of hosting it. So does company B that makes bikes. You could host both of them as multiple instances of your forum app.
Another example would be something like Google Apps that can be hosted on your domain. Each separate instance contains email, docs & a lot more. You can add whichever apps you want.
Related
Is there a way to deploy Django Admin and your main application separately, though both of them sharing the same Models / Business logic services.
I come from Grails background where you can create a plugin which can hold your Entities and common business logic and that plugin can be utilized by other application deployed and scaled separately though using the same Database. You don't have to repackage your plugin again for every change rather its just sibling folder to your other projects.
Can I achieve something similar with Django?
Assuming a typical setup, in order to be useful Django Admin needs access to project's apps and their models.
So a setup that you've described would require at least:
simple URLconf with just Django Admin
models and their Admin bindings for all apps that need Admin
settings with database credentials
Even if your models and Admin bindings are not dependent on other parts of the codebase,
extracting the above components to a separate project and then keeping everything
in sync sounds pretty hard.
Summarizing: I would say it's hard but possible if it's something that you really need,
but Django Admin hasn't been designed with such use case in mind.
Django admin is actually separate from the main application by placing it on its own url. Even if they know the admin url, users cannot log in to the site's admin unless they have already been assigned Staff status via the admin. You can set the admin prefix to anything you want, so if you want to "hide" the admin login page, just make it something long and random (good for security too), and basically no one but those you tell will even know where the admin site can be found.
Following the tutorial of the djangocms documentation, I've created an apphook to allow users to ask for registration to a list of newsletters. Clicking on the page menu goes to the url(r'^$', views.index, name='index') of the hooked application. It works fine.
I would like to create a second page for the newsletters administrator that will use another instance of the same application but using the url(r'^manage/$', views.manage, name='manage') when the page is selected. Is it possible? I don't find how to configure that.
Thanks a lot for any suggestion.
For the lack of a better way, I have usually created another App Hook and pointed it to another view - that way you can have every major part of the app catered for. If it's just two different pages, this may be the simplest solution.
In a page's advanced settings is the application instance name which is there to enable the same apphook to be used on multiple pages. Setting that would get you two instances of the same apphook.
Alternatively, and perhaps more appropriately, you could split your URLs into a separate file for management. Then you could have a NewsletterManagementAppHook which points to that new set of URLs, separate from the frontend URLs for users. That way you can setup another apphook on another page.
I have 50 different websites that use the same layout and code base, but mostly non-overlapping data (regional support sites, not link farm). Is there a way to have a single installation of the code and run all 50 at the same time?
When I have a bug to fix (or deploy new feature), I want to deploy ONE time + 1 restart and be done with it.
Also:
Code needs to know what domain the request is coming to so the appropriate data is displayed.
The Sites framework comes to mind.
Apart from that we have Django running for multiple sites by symlinking Django to various docroots. Works like a charm, too.
I can see two quite distinct ways to do this:
Use one database and the sites framework. Every post/picture/whatever model is connected to a Site and you always filter on Site. This requires a separate settings file for every database.
Use one database for each and every site. This allows different users for every site, but requires duplication of everything that is stored in the database. It also requires a separate settings file pointing to the correct database.
Either way, you do not duplicate any code, only data.
--
If you need to do site-specific, or post-specific changes to ie. a template, you should read up on how Django loads templates. It allows you to specify a list, ie ["story_%d.html", "story_site_%d.html", "story.html"] and django will look for the templates in that order.
I just ran into this and ended up using a custom middleware class that:
Fetch the HTTP_HOST
Clean the HTTP_HOST (remove www, ports, etc.)
Look up domain in a Website table that's tied to each account.
Set the account instance on the HTTPRequest object.
The throughout my view code I do lookups based on the account stored in the HTTPRequest objects.
Hope that helps someone in the future.
Im still fairly new to Django, so please explain things with that in
mind.
I'm trying to create three websites using 2 subdomains and 1 domain:
for the blog, blog.mysite.com
for the forums, forums.mysite.com
for the custom web app, mysite.com
When building the custom web app, I used contrib.auth to make use of
the built-in django provided user models and functionality.
For the forums, I am planning on using SNAPboard (http://
code.google.com/p/snapboard/) with minimal, if any, modifications. On
initial inspection, it looks like it also uses contrib.auth users.
For the blog, I will probably be rolling my own lightweight blogging
app (since that seems to be the Django way and, also, b/c as Bennet
mentions, there is no killer Django Blog app)
Currently, I am considering two features that require some integration
between the three sites. First, I want to have the users of the custom
web app to use the same account to also log into the forums. Second, I
also (but I haven't figured out how I'm going to do this yet) would
like my blog posts to automatically become a topic for discussion in
the forums (this is just an idea I had, I might end up dropping it).
Ok, so to my questions:
1) Again, I'm new to Django, but this integration leads me to believe
the three websites need to be all under one project. Is this correct?
2) How would I accomplish the url structure for the websites that I
described above (blog.mysite.com, etc)? In the project's urls.py, I
don't know how to filter off of subdomains. If it was mysite.com/
forums/, that would be easy, but I don't know how to to catch
forums.mysite.com and forward it to the appropriate Django app.
3) Would I have to make use of the django.contrib.sites framework? I
don't understand that framework fully, but it seems like it's used
when two different websites are using the same django app in the
background. Whereas my three websites are all using different django
apps, but I want them to share a little bit of data.
Thanks for your help.
1) Yes, it's only true way for that
2) Use middleware
3) No, you don't need it.
I'm looking at setting up a small company that hosts flash-based websites for artist portfolios. The customer control panel would be django-powered, and would provide the interface for uploading their images, managing galleries, selling prints, etc.
Seeing as the majority of traffic to the hosted sites would end up at their top level domain, this would result in only static media hits (the HTML page with the embedded flash movie), I could set up lighttpd or nginx to handle those requests, and pass the django stuff back to apache/mod_whatever.
Seems as if I could set this all up on one box, with the django sites framework keeping each site's admin separate.
I'm not much of a server admin. Are there any gotchas I'm not seeing?
Maybe. I don't think the built-in admin interface is really designed to corral admins into their own sites. The sites framework is more suited to publish the same content on multiple sites, not to constrain users to one site or another. You'd be better off writing your own admin interface that enforces those separations.
As far as serving content goes, it seems like you could serve up a common (static) Flash file that uses a dynamic XML file to fill in content. If you use Django to generate the XML, that would give you the dynamic content you need.
This django snippet might be what you need to keep them seperate:
http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/1054/
"A very simple multiple user blog model with an admin interface configured to only allow people to edit or delete entries that they have created themselves, unless they are a super user."
Depending on the amount of sites you're going to host it might be easier to write a single Django app once, with admin, and to create a separate Django project for each new site. This is simple, it works for sure AND as an added bonus you can add features to newer sites without running the risk of causing problems in older sites.
Then again, it might be handier to customize the admin such that you limit the amount of objects users can see to those on the given site itself. This is fairly easy to do, allthough you might want to use RequestSite instead of the usual Site from the sites framework as that requires separate settings for each site.
There exists this one method in the ModelAdmin which you can override to have manual control over the objects being edited.