I'm working on creating a transparent GUI in OpenGL, and am trying to get text rendered over some semi-transparent quads, but the results are odd.
If I render the text by itself, with nothing behind it, it looks fine:
However, if I render a semi-transparent quad behind it (rendering the quad before rendering the text), I get this:
I have blending set to (GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA). The font texture is an all-white texture with the character shapes in the alpha channel.
Do I need to be doing something special when performing alpha-transparency over an existing layer of transparency? Or is there something else I need to check?
The alpha value of your font texture seems to be off. It should be 0 for texels that you want to be invisible and 1 (or 255 in bytes) for visible texels. You should check the texture and make sure alpha values are correct.
Instead of alpha blending, you can use alpha testing. This will completely get rid of fragments, that have a alpha value below a certain threshold and is often much faster than blending.
glDisbale(GL_BLEND);
glEnable(GL_ALPHA_TEST);
glAlphaFunc(GL_GREATER, 0.96f); // Or some fitting threshold for your texture
This might work even if your texture's alpha is off in some places, but doesn't look like it is the case here, as the 's' and 't' seem to have a low alpha in places where it should be 1.
Thanks for the responses. There was nothing wrong with my font texture, but your suggestions led me to try a few other things. Turns out the problem wasn't the transparency at all. There was a problem with rendering the background quad, which caused it to also render the text quads, but using the background texture. Bah...
Related
I'm trying to render a model in OpenGL. I'm on Day 4 of C++ and OpenGL (Yes, I have learned this quickly) and I'm at a bit of a stop with textures.
I'm having a bit of trouble making my texture alpha work. In this image, I have this character from Spiral Knights. As you can see on the top of his head, there's those white portions.
I've got Blending enabled and my blend function set to glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
What I'm assuming here, and this is why I ask this question, is that the texture transparency is working, but the triangles behind the texture are still showing.
How do I make those triangles invisible but still show my texture?
Thanks.
There are two important things to be done when using blending:
You must sort primitives back to front and render in that order (order independent transparency in depth buffer based renderers is still an ongoing research topic).
When using textures to control the alpha channel you must either write a shader that somehow gets the texture's alpha values passed down to the resulting fragment color, or – if you're using the fixed function pipeline – you have to use GL_MODULATE texture env mode, or GL_DECAL with the primitive color alpha value set to 0, or use GL_REPLACE.
I am drawing a map texture and, on top of it, a colorbar texture. Both have alpha channel and I am using blending, set as
// Turn on blending
glEnable(GL_BLEND);
glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
However, the following happens:
The texture on top (colorbar) with alpha channel imposes its black pixels, which I don't want to happen. The map texture should appear behind where the colorbar alpha = 0.
Is this related to the blending definitions? How should I change it?
Assuming the texture has an alpha channel and it's transparent in the right places, I suspect the issue is with the rendering order and depth testing.
Lets say you render the scale texture first. It blends correctly with a black background. Then you render the orange texture behind it, but the pixels from the scale texture have a higher depth value and cause the orange texture there to be discarded.
So, make sure you render all your transparent stuff in back to front order, or farthest to nearest.
Without getting into order independent transparency, a common approach to alpha transparency is as follows:
Enable the depth buffer
Render all your opaque geometry
Disable depth writes (glDepthMask)
Enable alpha blending (as in the OP's code)
Render your transparent geometry in farthest to nearest order
For particles you can sometimes get away without sorting and it'll still look OK. Another approach is using the alpha test or using alpha to coverage with a multisample framebuffer.
I'm trying to render some text, but at the moment I'm rendering each glyph separately, which is slow and ineffective.
Therefore I want to change the system, so the text is just rendered into a separate texture once, whenever it changes, and then that texture should be rendered onscreen in the main render pass.
So far so good, the problem is, to draw it over the main scene, I only have two options. I could specify a specific color (e.g. green) as 'transparent', clear the frame buffer texture of the text with that color, draw the text and use a shader afterwards to render the result onto the main scene, minus the transparent color.
While that would work, I wouldn't be able to use that color for the actual text anymore.
Instead I'd much rather clear the alpha of the frame buffer texture entirely (to get a colorless, blank slate essentially) and then draw the text, but that doesn't seem to be possible?
glColorMask(GL_FALSE,GL_FALSE,GL_FALSE,GL_TRUE);
glClearColor(0,0,0,0);
glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT);
Doing this will just apply the specified rgb values with the alpha as 'intensity' of those colors. In this case it wouldn't do anything at all because the color components are disabled. But I need to change the existing alpha of the texture in the frame buffer, without using glDrawPixels (which is too slow).
Now, I could of course write an additional shader to set the alpha-value for each fragment to 0, but that doesn't seem as effective / fast.
What's the best way to handle something like this?
So far so good, the problem is, to draw it over the main scene, I only have two options. I could specify a specific color (e.g. green) as 'transparent', clear the frame buffer texture of the text with that color, draw the text and use a shader afterwards to render the result onto the main scene, minus the transparent color.
You're overcomplicating the whole thing. If you render your text/glyphs into a texture that has just a single channel that's being used as alpha channel, that gives you the glphys shape. The color is controlled in form of a vertex attribute and combined with the alpha from the texture upon rendering.
If you want to get fancy, instead of rendering the bare glyphs to the texture, you might instead want to produce a signed distance field map, to save on texture size, while retaining high quality text output.
Following problem: I have two textures and I want to combine these two into a new texture. Thus, one texture is used as background, the other will be overlaid. The overlay texture is getting initialized with glClearColor(1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.0). Objects are draw onto the texture, these objects do have alpha values.
Now blending between the two textures leaves a white border around the objects. The border comes from the fact that the background color in the second texture is white, isn't it?
How can I use alpha blending where I do not have to think about the background color of the overlaying texture?
I solved the problem myself, but thanks a lot to all of you guys!
The problem was following: to combine both textures I used glblend(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) which does not work due to the fact that OpenGL uses pre-multiplied alpha values. Blending with glblend(GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA), works as the source term now will be:
1*src_alpha*src_color!
How can i use alpha blending where i do not have to think about the background color of the overlaying texture?
You can't; your blend function incorporates the background color into it, because it may not actually be the "background". You render multiple objects to the texture, so the "background" color may in fact be a previously rendered object.
Your best bet is to minimize the impact. There's no particular need for the background color to be white. Just make it black. This won't make the artifacts go away; it will hopefully just make it less noticeable.
The simple fact is that blending in graphics cards simply isn't designed to be able to do the kinds of compositing you're doing. It works best when what you're blending with is opaque. Even if there are layers of transparency between the opaque surface and what you're rendering, it still works.
But if the background is actually transparent, with no fully opaque color, the math simply stops working. You will get artifacts; the question is how noticeable they will be.
If you have access to more advanced hardware, you could use some shader-based programmatic blending techniques. But these will have a performance impact.
Although I think you probably get better results with a black background, as Nicol Bolas pointed out. But you should double check your blending functions, because as you point out, it SHOULD not matter...
1.0 * 0.0 + 0.734 * 1.0 = 0.734
What I don't really get is why your base texture is fully transparent? Is that intended? Unless you blend the textures and then use them somewhere else initializing to Alpha = 1.0 is a batter idea.
Make sure you disable depth writing before you draw the transparent texture (so one transparent texture can't "block" another, preventing part of it from being drawn). To do so just call glDepthMask(false). Once you are done drawing transparent objects, call glDepthMask(true) to set depth writing back to normal.
I am rendering to a texture through a framebuffer object, and when I draw transparent primitives, the primitives are blended properly with other primitives drawn in that single draw step, but they are not blended properly with the previous contents of the framebuffer.
Is there a way to properly blend the contents of the texture with the new data coming in?
EDIT: More information requsted, I will attempt to explain more clearly;
The blendmode I am using is GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA. (I believe that is typically the standard blendmode)
I am creating an application that tracks mouse movement. It draws lines connecting the previous mouse position to the current mouse position, and as I do not want to draw the lines over again each frame, I figured I would draw to a texture, never clear the texture and then just draw a rectangle with that texture on it to display it.
This all works fine, except that when I draw shapes with alpha less than 1 onto the texture, it does not blend properly with the texture's previous contents. Let's say I have some black lines with alpha = .6 drawn onto the texture. A couple draw cycles later, I then draw a black circle with alpha = .4 over those lines. The lines "underneath" the circle are completely overwritten. Although the circle is not flat black (It blends properly with the white background) there are no "darker lines" underneath the circle as you would expect.
If I draw the lines and the circle in the same frame however, they blend properly. My guess is that the texture just does not blend with it's previous contents. It's like it's only blending with the glclearcolor. (Which, in this case is <1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f>)
I think there are two possible problems here.
Remember that all of the overlay lines are blended twice here. Once when they are blended into the FBO texture, and again when the FBO texture is blended over the scene.
So the first possibility is that you don't have blending enabled when drawing one line over another in the FBO overlay. When you draw into an RGBA surface with blending off, the current alpha is simply written directly into the FBO overlay's alpha channel. Then later when you blend the whole FBO texture over the scene, that alpha makes your lines translucent. So if you have blending against "the world" but not between overlay elements, it is possible that no blending is happening.
Another related problem: when you blend one line over another in "standard" blend mode (src alpha, 1 - src alpha) in the FBO, the alpha channel of the "blended" part is going to contain a blend of the alphas of the two overlay elements. This is probably not what you want.
For example, if you draw two 50% alpha lines over each other in the overlay, to get the equivalent effect when you blit the FBO, you need the FBO's alpha to be...75%. (That is, 1 - (1-.5) * (1-0.5), which is what would happen if you just drew two 50% alpha lines over your scene. But when you draw the two 50% lines, you'll get 50% alpha in the FBO (a blend of 50% with...50%.
This brings up the final issue: by pre-mixing the lines with each other before you blend them over the world, you are changing the draw order. Whereas you might have had:
blend(blend(blend(background color, model), first line), second line);
now you will have
blend(blend(first line, second line), blend(background color, model)).
In other words, pre-mixing the overlay lines into an FBO changes the order of blending and thus changes the final look in a way you may not want.
First, the simple way to get around this: don't use an FBO. I realize this is a "go redesign your app" kind of answer, but using an FBO is not the cheapest thing, and modern GL cards are very good at drawing lines. So one option would be: instead of blending lines into an FBO, write the line geometry into a vertex buffer object (VBO). Simply extend the VBO a little bit each time. If you are drawing less than, say, 40,000 lines at a time, this will almost certainly be as fast as what you were doing before.
(One tip if you go this route: use glBufferSubData to write the lines in, not glMapBuffer - mapping can be expensive and doesn't work on sub-ranges on many drivers...better to just let the driver copy the few new vertices.)
If that isn't an option (for example, if you draw a mix of shape types or use a mix of GL state, such that "remembering" what you did is a lot more complex than just accumulating vertices) then you may want to change how you draw into the VBO.
Basically what you'll need to do is enable separate blending; initialize the overlay to black + 0% alpha (0,0,0,0) and blend by "standard blending" the RGB but additive blending the alpha channels. This still isn't quite correct for the alpha channel but it's generally a lot closer - without this, over-drawn areas will be too transparent.
Then, when drawing the FBO, use "pre-multiplied" alpha, that is, (one, one-minus-src-alph).
Here's why that last step is needed: when you draw into the FBO, you have already multiplied every draw call by its alpha channel (if blending is on). Since you are drawing over black, a green (0,1,0,0.5) line is now dark green (0,0.5,0,0.5). If alpha is on and you blend normally again, the alpha is reapplied and you'l have 0,0.25,0,0.5.). By simply using the FBO color as is, you avoid the second alpha multiplication.
This is sometimes called "pre-multiplied" alpha because the alpha has already been multiplied into the RGB color. In this case you want it to get correct results, but in other cases, programmers use it for speed. (By pre-multiplying, it removes a mult per pixel when the blend op is performed.)
Hope that helps! Getting blending right when the layers are not mixed in order gets really tricky, and separate blend isn't available on old hardware, so simply drawing the lines every time may be the path of least misery.
Clear the FBO with transparent black (0, 0, 0, 0), draw into it back-to-front with
glBlendFuncSeparate(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
and draw the FBO with
glBlendFunc(GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
to get the exact result.
As Ben Supnik wrote, the FBO contains colour already multiplied with the alpha channel, so instead of doing that again with GL_SRC_ALPHA, it is drawn with GL_ONE. The destination colour is attenuated normally with GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA.
The reason for blending the alpha channel in the buffer this way is different:
The formula to combine transparency is
resultTr = sTr * dTr
(I use s and d because of the parallel to OpenGL's source and destination, but as you can see the order doesn't matter.)
Written with opacities (alpha values) this becomes
1 - rA = (1 - sA) * (1 - dA)
<=> rA = 1 - (1 - sA) * (1 - dA)
= 1 - 1 + sA + dA - sA * dA
= sA + (1 - sA) * dA
which is the same as the blend function (source and destination factors) (GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) with the default blend equation GL_FUNC_ADD.
As an aside:
The above answers the specific problem from the question, but if you can easily choose the draw order it may in theory be better to draw premultiplied colour into the buffer front-to-back with
glBlendFunc(GL_ONE_MINUS_DST_ALPHA, GL_ONE);
and otherwise use the same method.
My reasoning behind this is that the graphics card may be able to skip shader execution for regions that are already solid. I haven't tested this though, so it may make no difference in practice.
As Ben Supnik said, the best way to do this is rendering the entire scene with separate blend functions for color and alpha. If you are using the classic non premultiplied blend function try glBlendFuncSeparateOES(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE, GL_ONE) to render your scene to FBO. and glBlendFuncSeparateOES(GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) to render the FBO to screen.
It is not 100% accurate, but in most of the cases that will create no unexpected transparency.
Keep in mind that old Hardware and some mobile devices (mostly OpenGL ES 1.x devices, like the original iPhone and 3G) does not support separated blend functions. :(