Has anyone noticed that if you try to post a string that exceeds 1,000,000 characters, it simply does not include the field with the request?
...and doesn't throw()!
eg.
<cfscript>
var h = new http( url = "http://...", method = "post" );
h.addParam( type = "formField", name = "a", value = repeatString("a",5000) );
h.addParam( type = "formField", name = "b", value = repeatString("b",1000000) );
h.addParam( type = "formField", name = "c", value = repeatString("c",1000001) );
var p = h.send().getPrefix();
writeDump( var = p, abort = true );
</cfscript>
The "a" and "b" fields are present in the form scope of the recipient page.
The "c" field is missing!
ColdFusion 9,0,1,274733 + chf9010002.jar, Mac OS X 10.6.8, Java 1.6.0_31
Edit: It now works as expected!
Not sure what has changed? My cf admin configuration remains the same. The only possible candidate I can come up with is a recent Apple Java update. Could that be it?
You may need to specify
enctype="multipart/form-data"
This is a setting within CF administrator.
In Coldfusion 9 (this setting has existed for a while, but may exist elsewhere in other versions):
Click on "server settings" group to expand, click on "settings" link (top link). On the settings page:
Maximum size of post data 100 MB (default)
Limits the amount of data that can be posted to the server in a single request. ColdFusion rejects requests larger than the specified limit.
It's interesting that you're hitting a limit right at 100,000 ; sounds like someone got a little lazy with the "bytes" computation. :) At any rate, I'd try tinkering with this setting.
Just an FYI: You'll encounter a similar issue with data truncation on data inserts/updates unless you set your datasource to allow "Long Text Buffer (chr)" greater than the 64,000 default limit.
Related
Using AngleSharp v 0.9.9, I'm loading a page with OpenAsync which sets a bunch of cookies, something like:
var configuration = Configuration.Default.WithHttpClientRequester().WithCookies();
var currentContext = BrowsingContext.New(configuration);
// ....
var doc = context.OpenAsync(url, token);
This works fine and I can see the cookies have been set. For example, I can do this:
var cookieProvider = currentContext.Configuration.Services.OfType<ICookieProvider>().First() as MemoryCookieProvider;
And examine it in the debugger and see the cookies in there (for domain=.share.state.nm.us)
Then I need to submit a post:
var request = new DocumentRequest(postUrl);
request.Method = HttpMethod.Post;
request.Headers["Content-Type"] = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded";
request.Headers["User-Agent"] = userAgent;
//...
Which eventually gets submitted:
var download = loader.DownloadAsync(request);
And I can see (using Fiddler) that it's submitting the cookies from the cookieProvider.
However, I need to add a cookie (and possible change the value in another) and no matter what I try, it doesn't seem to include it. For example, I do this:
cookieProvider.Container.Add(new System.Net.Cookie()
{
Domain = ".share.state.nm.us",
Name = "psback",
Value = "somevalue",
Path = "/"
});
And again I can examine the cookieProvider in the debugger and see the cookie I set. But when I actually submit the request and look in fiddler, the new cookie isn't included.
This seems like it should be really simple, what is the correct way to set a new cookie and have it included in subsequent requests?
I think there are two potential ways to solve this.
either use document.Cookie for setting a new cookie (would require an active document that already is at the desired domain) or
Use a Filter for getting / manipulating the request before its send. This let's you really just change the used cookie container before actually submitting.
The Filter is set in the DefaultLoader configuration. See https://github.com/AngleSharp/AngleSharp/blob/master/src/AngleSharp/ConfigurationExtensions.cs#L152.
I've been trying to update our API call to the CIM interface for Authorize.net to hide the Billing Address fields on the hosted profile page.
The documentation states that when call the token creation function, passing in a setting "hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions" with a value of "showNone" will hide the billing address part of the form, however when I pass in this setting I am still getting the billing address showing.
I've verified that I'm passing the setting correctly (added the same way as the "hostedProfileIFrameCommunicatorUrl" and "hostedProfilePageBorderVisible" settings) and if I pass an invalid value for the "hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions" option, the Token creation function will return an error
Is there something else that this option is dependent on, such as an account setting or another settings parameter?
For reference, I'm testing this in the Sandbox system and I'm using the dotNet SDK, my test code for calling the API function is as follows
Public Shared Function CreateHostFormToken(apiId As String, apiKey As String, branchId As Int64, nUser As Contact, iframeComURL As String) As String
Dim nCustProfile = GetCustomerProfile(apiId, apiKey, branchId, nUser)
Dim nHost = New AuthorizeNet.Api.Contracts.V1.getHostedProfilePageRequest()
nHost.customerProfileId = nCustProfile
' Set Auth
Dim nAuth = New Api.Contracts.V1.merchantAuthenticationType()
nAuth.ItemElementName = Api.Contracts.V1.ItemChoiceType.transactionKey
nAuth.name = apiId
nAuth.Item = apiKey
nHost.merchantAuthentication = nAuth
' Set Params
Dim settingList As New List(Of Api.Contracts.V1.settingType)
Dim nParam As New Api.Contracts.V1.settingType With {.settingName = "hostedProfileIFrameCommunicatorUrl",
.settingValue = iframeComURL}
settingList.Add(nParam)
nParam = New Api.Contracts.V1.settingType With {.settingName = "hostedProfilePageBorderVisible",
.settingValue = "false"}
settingList.Add(nParam)
nParam = New Api.Contracts.V1.settingType With {.settingName = "hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions",
.settingValue = "showNone"}
settingList.Add(nParam)
nHost.hostedProfileSettings = settingList.ToArray
Dim nX = New AuthorizeNet.Api.Controllers.getHostedProfilePageController(nHost)
Dim nRes = nX.ExecuteWithApiResponse(GetEnvironment())
Return nRes.token
End Function
I've looked through the SDK code as well, and I don't see anything there that would be preventing the setting from being passed through.
Has anyone come across this issue, or successfully set the card entry form to hide the billing address?
There turned out to be two parts to the solution to this problem:
In order to use the "hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions" option, you need to use a newer version of the capture page than I was using. I was using "https://secure2.authorize.net/profile/", while the new version is "https://secure2.authorize.net/customer/". Added bonus, the new URL provides a much nicer and modern looking form.
However, once this was working, I then had the problem that on entering the card, a validation message told me that "address and Zip code are required", despite not being visible. I did also make sure that I had the option "hostedProfileBillingAddressRequired" set to false (which is it's default value anyway)
The response from Authorize.net support is that in order to capture card without an address, the option "hostedProfileValidationMode" must be set to "testMode".
This is not mentioned in the documentation (at least as far as I could see), so may not be something that other people are aware of since it is a little counter-intuitive to use 'testMode' on a live environment.
It's not ideal since validating the card for a customer account will send a transaction email to the merchant, but it seems there is not another way around this just now.
In summary, to allow the customer to add a credit card to their profile without having to provide an address, you need to specify the following options:
Form URL for capture - https://secure2.authorize.net/customer/
getHostedProfilePageRequest -
hostedProfileIFrameCommunicatorUrl: *your URL*
hostedProfilePageBorderVisible: false //assuming you are using an iFrame
hostedProfileValidationMode: testMode
hostedProfileBillingAddressOptions: showNone
In Sitecore, I have a statically-bound renderer in my Razor:
#Html.Sitecore().Rendering("[item ID]")
This works great, but I want to cache. So:
#Html.Sitecore().Rendering("[item ID]", new { Cacheable = true } )
This also works, and seems to cache for about 60 seconds, which I understand is the default.
I'd like to cache for 20 minutes (1200 seconds), but I can't find any way to specify this. That second param to Rendering is an anonymous object, so there's not help from Intellisense around that. I've tried:
new { Cacheable = true, Duration = 1200 }
new { Cacheable = true, Cache_Duration = 1200 } // Someone said Cache_ was the trick. It wasn't.
What is the setting to vary the cache duration of these renderings?
Update
I reflected a bit, but to no avail. The properties on that anonymous object are iterated and used to set values on Rendering.RenderingProperties. This is a key/value data structure, keyed by string, so any cache settings are no longer strongly-typed, and thus my reflecting trail ran cold.
Another Update
#sitecore-climber did some more reflecting, and found a property of RenderingCachingDefiniton called Timeout which appears to parse the value of the Cache_Timeout key into a Timespan object.
However, my actual testing of this...
new { Cacheable = true, Cache_Timeout = "00:20:00"}
...doesn't seem to change the 60-second caching timeout. This is odd, since you can see all the other properties in the RenderingCachingDefinition class that parse off that anonymous object parameter (Cacheable, VaryByParam, etc.).
Of course, this might be parsing just fine, and Sitecore just doesn't do anything with the resulting value. But I followed that Timeout property around, and based on my reading, it's accurately used to set a timeout on the cache.
I tried on a Sitecore 8.1 solution and is working fine using
#Html.Sitecore().Rendering("{240A3624-8600-4A7B-8C07-5846A673F1F0}", new { Cacheable = true,Cache_Timeout = "00:20:00" } )
On my view container I have :
#Html.Sitecore().Rendering("{240A3624-8600-4A7B-8C07-5846A673F1F0}")
#Html.Sitecore().Rendering("{240A3624-8600-4A7B-8C07-5846A673F1F0}", new { Cacheable = true,Cache_Timeout = "00:20:00" } )
My view is very simple
#using Sitecore.Mvc
<div>
<h1>
#Html.Sitecore().Field("title")
</h1>
<div>
#Html.Sitecore().Field("text")
#System.DateTime.Now.Second
</div>
</div>
But caching is working just on normal mode not on experience editor or page editor. Did you try to publish and check your website?
Please check video I uploaded at : https://www.dropbox.com/s/57s5x0zw7yr8lyb/VideoAvi.avi?dl=0
I debug my API using Xdebug and PHPStorm's debugging features. For this to work, the client needs a cookie named XDEBUG_SESSION.
When using Postman, I used to use a Chrome extension to add this cookie, and Postman's cookie interception feature to get this to work in Postman (since it's a sandboxed app).
However, I cannot create cookies in Paw. So, as a workaround, I modified the API response cookie to have the key as XDEBUG_SESSION and value as PHPSTORM, and debugging worked fine. However, this is not ideal as I would also like to set the expiry date to something far in the future (which I can't in Paw).
So, my questions are:
Is there a way to add custom cookies in Paw?
If not, is there a way to to edit the expiry date for an existing cookie (considering that name, value, domain and path are editable)?
Are there any other alternatives to achieve my objective?
I just managed to achieve this exact thing to debug my APIs with Paw (2.1.1).
You just have to Add a Header with the name Cookie and a value of Cookies picked from the dropdown that will appear. You then have to insert a Cookie named XDEBUG_SESSION with a value of PHPSTORM inside the Cookies value of the header just created.
To be more clear, you can see it in the screenshot below:
I messed around with it to see if I could create an extension. I wasn't able to, and the below does not work but thought I'd share in case anyone knows the missing pieces.
First off, there is no extension category (generator, dynamic value, importer) that this functionality falls into. I tried to make use of the dynamic value category but was unsuccessful:
CookieInjector = function(key, value) {
this.key = "XDEBUG_SESSION";
this.value = "PHPSTORM";
this.evaluate = function () {
var f = function (x,y) {
document.cookie=this.key+"="+this.value;
return true;
}
return f(this.key, this.value);
}
// Title function: takes no params, should return the string to display as
// the Dynamic Value title
this.title = function() {
return "Cookie"
}
// Text function: takes no params, should return the string to display as
// the Dynamic Value text
this.text = function() {
return this.key+"="+this.value;
}
}
// Extension Identifier (as a reverse domain name)
CookieInjector.identifier = "com.luckymarmot.PawExtensions.CookieInjector";
// Extension Name
CookieInjector.title = "Inject Cookie Into Cookie Jar";
// Dynamic Value Inputs
CookieInjector.inputs = [
DynamicValueInput("key", "Key", "String"),
DynamicValueInput("value", "Value", "String")
]
// Register this new Extension
registerDynamicValueClass(CookieInjector);
The main thing stopping this from working is I'm not sure how the request is built in PAW and not sure how to attach the cookie. I've looked through the documentation here: https://luckymarmot.com/paw/doc/Extensions/Reference/Reference, and can't find what I need.
I am on APEX 3.2 and in a form used to insert fields f1 and f2 in table f, I would like to have a couple of text items that will automatically populate and display based on the data typed in f1 and from a query on table t. In other word, typing empno in f1, moving to the f2 box the user should automaticcaly see emp last_name and first_name displayed. This way she can verify the empno typed was correct, type other data in f2 and submit the form.
Any suggestion on how to reach this scope?
I guess I should use some javascript.
Many thanks.
Gabriele
I can see that you may already be going down the javascript road... I have worked with APEX 3.2 in the past on a similar problem and didn't know enough javascript to get this kind of dynamic functionality out of the platform. If you want to try an alternate method, you can tweak your user interface to provide the functionality you seek, but you'll have to check with the users if they can adapt to this style of approach, which you should be able to do using existing 3.2 functionality and no additional scripting:
Requirements:
Based on field inputs of field1 and field2, auto-populate an apex page with data from an existing table so that the user can confirm if the data inputted in field1 and field2 are correct. Use the data from the search results as parameters for input to a new process or form.
Suggested Design:
Page 1: start with blank page, then add three items: field1, field2 and a "submit" button.
add page process (after submit, conditional on submit button item) that redirects to Page 2 setting items P2_field1 and P2_field2 from the values on the Page 1 form.
Page 2: report page. set a query that will search your table of existing employees searching by partial or full string searches against the employee table. APEX 3.2 used to use the following convention to get around partial and case sensitive matching issues:
SELECT field1, field2, field3, field4, ...
FROM table1
WHERE instr(upper(field1), upper(:P2_field1), 1, 1) > 0
AND instr(upper(field2), upper(:P2_field2), 1, 1) > 0
Creating a report output "table" for a search effort helps when there may be multiple answers to the same search query... such as with common names like "Smith" or "John"...
Add an additional column to the report output or make the name column (field1 or field2) a linked column that goes to page 3 feeding the queried data from the employee table.
add the property to the column value on the report editor: redirect to "page 3", set P3_key = #KEY# where page 3 is your final target form or process and "key" is the index or primary key of the table you are searching from... or you can feed the n number of values needed already queried from the lookup table to populate the page 2 report.
I guess the important take-home is an appreciation for the limitations of older versions of Apex along with possible limitations with knowledge of advanced web scripting languages. Your requirements are still achievable even if all you are familiar with is the basics of your Apex version and a little SQL.
note: if your lookup table is HUGE (hundreds of thousands of records), you may need to consult your DBA for help with optimizing the table to handle the SQL search query. Adding UPPER and INSTR functions to the WHERE criteria isn't really the most efficient way to query large datasets without additional help in optimization.
I'm not a 3.2 wiz, i haven't worked with it. I do know there are no dynamic actions and no page on-demand process points, so i've worked with that in mind.
Application process: 'get_emp_details'
(I don't know the processing point you can/need to choose in 3.2. If you can pick on-demand, go for it.)
Code:
DECLARE
lEmp emp%rowtype;
BEGIN
SELECT *
INTO lEmp
FROM emp
WHERE empno = :P7_EMPNO;
htp.p('{"result":"ok", "emp":{"ename":"'||lEmp.ename||'","job":"'||lEmp.job||'"}}');
EXCEPTION
WHEN no_data_found THEN
htp.p('{"result":"nok", "emp":{}}');
END;
On your page (in my case i have used page 7, change the page numbers to your page number!) put this in the html headers section (or if you have the javascript section there, put the javascript code there without the script tags):
Edit: added in console.log lines. Mind that these will produce javascript errors in IE when the developer tools (F12) are not opened!
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function(){
console.log('document is ready');
$("#P7_EMPNO").change(function(){
var oDBGet = new htmldb_Get(null, $('pFlowId').val(), "APPLICATION_PROCESS=get_emp_details", '0');
oDBGet.add('P7_EMPNO', $("#P7_EMPNO").val());
var oResult = oDBGet.get();
var lReturn = $.parseJSON(oResult);
if(lReturn.result=='ok'){
var lEmp = lReturn.emp;
$("#P7_ENAME").val(lEmp.ename);
} else {
alert('ename could not be found for this empno!');
};
});
});
</script>
This will do an ajax callback when the EMPNO changes, and change the ename of the employee. Since there are no temporary application items that can be used (apex_application.g_x##) i'm submitting the required page item to session state. In this case P7_EMPNO is added to the p_arg_names array and its value in the corresponding position in the p_arg_values array. This is necessary because the session state of P7_EMPNO is used in the application process.
When inspecting the console tab in Firebug:
Post values of ajax call:
Response values of ajax call:
Tom,
here is your code modified to work in my system:
-- On Demand Application Process get_emp_details:
DECLARE
lEmp emp%rowtype;
BEGIN
SELECT *
INTO lEmp
FROM emp
WHERE badge = :P2_BADGE;
htp.p('{"result":"ok", "emp":{"lastname":"'||lEmp.last_name||'","firstname":"'||lEmp.first_name||'"}}');
EXCEPTION
WHEN no_data_found THEN
htp.p('{"result":"nok", "emp":{}}');
END;
-- Javascript in page header:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function(){
$("#P2_BADGE").change(function(){
$.post('wwv_flow.show',
{"p_request" : "APPLICATION_PROCESS=get_emp_details",
"p_flow_id" : $v('pFlowId'),
"p_flow_step_id" : '0',
"p_instance" : $v('pInstance'),
"p_arg_names" : ['P2_BADGE'],
"p_arg_values" : [$('#P2_BADGE').val()]},
function(data){
if(data){
var lReturn = $.parseJSON(data);
if(lReturn.result=='ok'){
var lEmp = lReturn.emp;
$("#P2_LAST_NAME").val(lEmp.last_name);
} else {
alert('ename could not be found for this empno!');
};
};
}
);
});
});
</script>
I am probably missing something and it doesn't display last_name in P2_LAST_NAME when I type the badge number in P2_BADGE.
Thanks,
Gabriele
Tom, here is what I have in the watch right window of firebug for the function(data) step:
this
function()
arguments
[
"wwv_flow.show"
, Object { p_request=
"APPLICATION_PROCESS=get_emp_details"
, p_flow_id=
"120"
, p_flow_step_id=
"0"
, more...}, function()]
0
"wwv_flow.show"
1
Object { p_request=
"APPLICATION_PROCESS=get_emp_details"
, p_flow_id=
"120"
, p_flow_step_id=
"0"
, more...}
p_arg_names
[
"P2_BADGE"
]
p_arg_values
[
"155752"
]
p_flow_id
"120"
p_flow_step_id
"0"
p_instance
"2189517750670012"
p_request
"APPLICATION_PROCESS=get_emp_details"
2
function()
e
"wwv_flow.show"
r
Object { p_request=
"APPLICATION_PROCESS=get_emp_details"
, p_flow_id=
"120"
, p_flow_step_id=
"0"
, more...}
p_arg_names
[
"P2_BADGE"
]
p_arg_values
[
"155752"
]
p_flow_id
"120"
p_flow_step_id
"0"
p_instance
"2189517750670012"
p_request
"APPLICATION_PROCESS=get_emp_details"
s
undefined
i
function()
toString
function()
Closure Scope
Closure Scope { toString=function()}
Closure Scope
Closure Scope { toString=function()}
Window
Window f?p=120:2:2189517750670012::NO:::
From my firebug 1.10.6 console:
document is ready
f?p=12...::NO::: (line 29)
empno has changed
f?p=12...::NO::: (line 31)
performing a post with empno value: undefined
f?p=12...::NO::: (line 32)
POST
400 Bad Request
48ms
wwv_fl....min.js (line 2)
HeadersPostResponseHTMLCookies
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<TITLE>400 Bad Request</TITLE>
</HEAD><BODY><H1>Bad Request</H1>
The HTTP client sent a request that this server could not understand.</BODY></HTML>
-- And the post tab:
Parametersapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded
p_arg_names[] P2_BADGE
p_arg_values[] 155751
p_flow_id 120
p_flow_step_id 0
p_instance 4466366911674565
p_request APPLICATION_PROCESS=get_emp_details
Source
p_request=APPLICATION_PROCESS%3Dget_emp_details&p_flow_id=120&p_flow_step_id=0&p_instance=4466366911674565&p_arg_names%5B%5D=P2_BADGE&p_arg_values%5B%5D=155751