I have two arrays values and keys both of the same length.
I want to sort-by-key the values array using the keys array as keys.
I have been told the boost's zip iterator is just the right tool for locking two arrays together and doing stuff to them at the same time.
Here is my attempt at using the boost::zip_iterator to solve sorting problem which fails to compile with gcc. Can someone help me fix this code?
The problem lies in the line
std::sort ( boost::make_zip_iterator( keys, values ), boost::make_zip_iterator( keys+N , values+N ));
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <ctime>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <boost/iterator/zip_iterator.hpp>
#include <boost/tuple/tuple.hpp>
#include <boost/tuple/tuple_comparison.hpp>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int N=10;
int keys[N];
double values[N];
int M=100;
//Create the vectors.
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
{
keys[i] = rand()%M;
values[i] = 1.0*rand()/RAND_MAX;
}
//Now we use the boost zip iterator to zip the two vectors and sort them "simulatneously"
//I want to sort-by-key the keys and values arrays
std::sort ( boost::make_zip_iterator( keys, values ),
boost::make_zip_iterator( keys+N , values+N )
);
//The values array and the corresponding keys in ascending order.
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
{
std::cout << keys[i] << "\t" << values[i] << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
NOTE:Error message on compilation
g++ -g -Wall boost_test.cpp
boost_test.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
boost_test.cpp:37:56: error: no matching function for call to ‘make_zip_iterator(int [(((unsigned int)(((int)N) + -0x00000000000000001)) + 1)], double [(((unsigned int)(((int)N) + -0x00000000000000001)) + 1)])’
boost_test.cpp:38:64: error: no matching function for call to ‘make_zip_iterator(int*, double*)’
You can't sort a pair of zip_iterators.
Firstly, make_zip_iterator takes a tuple of iterators as input, so you could call:
boost::make_zip_iterator(boost::make_tuple( ... ))
but that won't compile either, because keys and keys+N doesn't have the same type. We need to force keys to become a pointer:
std::sort(boost::make_zip_iterator(boost::make_tuple(+keys, +values)),
boost::make_zip_iterator(boost::make_tuple(keys+N, values+N)));
this will compile, but the sorted result is still wrong, because a zip_iterator only models a Readable iterator, but std::sort also needs the input to be Writable as described here, so you can't sort using zip_iterator.
A very good discussion of this problem can be found here: https://web.archive.org/web/20120422174751/http://www.stanford.edu/~dgleich/notebook/2006/03/sorting_two_arrays_simultaneou.html
Here's a possible duplicate of this question: Sorting zipped (locked) containers in C++ using boost or the STL
The approach in the link above uses std::sort, and no extra space. It doesn't employ boost::zip_iterator, just boost tuples and the boost iterator facade. Std::tuples should also work if you have an up to date compiler.
If you are happy to have one extra vector (of size_t elements), then the following approach will work in ~ o(n log n) time average case. It's fairly simple, but there will be better approaches out there if you search for them.
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
using namespace std;
template <typename T1, typename T2>
void sortByPerm(vector<T1>& list1, vector<T2>& list2) {
const auto len = list1.size();
if (!len || len != list2.size()) throw;
// create permutation vector
vector<size_t> perms;
for (size_t i = 0; i < len; i++) perms.push_back(i);
sort(perms.begin(), perms.end(), [&](T1 a, T1 b){ return list1[a] < list1[b]; });
// order input vectors by permutation
for (size_t i = 0; i < len - 1; i++) {
swap(list1[i], list1[perms[i]]);
swap(list2[i], list2[perms[i]]);
// adjust permutation vector if required
if (i < perms[i]) {
auto d = distance(perms.begin(), find(perms.begin() + i, perms.end(), i));
swap(perms[i], perms[d]);
}
}
}
int main() {
vector<int> ints = {32, 12, 40, 8, 9, 15};
vector<double> doubles = {55.1, 33.3, 66.1, 11.1, 22.1, 44.1};
sortByPerm(ints, doubles);
copy(ints.begin(), ints.end(), ostream_iterator<int>(cout, " ")); cout << endl;
copy(doubles.begin(), doubles.end(), ostream_iterator<double>(cout, " ")); cout << endl;
}
After seeing another of your comments in another answer.
I though I would enlighten you to the std::map. This is a key value container, that preserves key order. (it is basically a binary tree, usually red black tree, but that isn't important).
size_t elements=10;
std::map<int, double> map_;
for (size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
{
map_[rand()%M]=1.0*rand()/RAND_MAX;
}
//for every element in map, if you have C++11 this can be much cleaner
for (std::map<int,double>::const_iterator it=map_.begin();
it!=map_.end(); ++it)
{
std::cout << it->first << "\t" << it->second << std::endl;
}
untested, but any error should be simple syntax errors
boost::make_zip_iterator take a boost::tuple.
#include <boost/iterator/zip_iterator.hpp>
#include <boost/tuple/tuple.hpp>
#include <boost/tuple/tuple_comparison.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <ctime>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
std::vector<int> keys(10); //lets not waste time with arrays
std::vector<double> values(10);
const int M=100;
//Create the vectors.
for (size_t i = 0; i < values.size(); ++i)
{
keys[i] = rand()%M;
values[i] = 1.0*rand()/RAND_MAX;
}
//Now we use the boost zip iterator to zip the two vectors and sort them "simulatneously"
//I want to sort-by-key the keys and values arrays
std::sort ( boost::make_zip_iterator(
boost::make_tuple(keys.begin(), values.begin())),
boost::make_zip_iterator(
boost::make_tuple(keys.end(), values.end()))
);
//The values array and the corresponding keys in ascending order.
for (size_t i = 0; i < values.size(); ++i)
{
std::cout << keys[i] << "\t" << values[i] << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
Related
I have made a code that construct a set of sets. However, I want to access set index like vector *(vec.begin()+i) .Is it possible like accessing vector? I got an error,Please help me, Is there any solution
#include <iostream>
#include <set>
using namespace std;
int main ()
{
int myints[] = {75,23,65,42,13};
std::set<int> myset (myints,myints+5);
std::cout << "myset contains:";
for (int i = 0; i < myset.size(); i++) {
cout<<*(myset.begin()+i);
}
std::cout << '\n';
return 0;
}
You can with std::next. But it's not a good idea for std::set because it must linearly increment the iterator.
auto third = std::next(myset.begin(), 2);
I have a 2d boost matrix (boost::numeric::ublas::matrix) of shape (n,m), with the first column being the timestamp. However, the data I'm getting is out of order. How can I sort it with respect to the first column, and what would be the most efficient way to do so? Speed is critical in this particular application.
As I commented ublas::matrix might not be the most natural choice for a task like this. Trying the naive approach using matrix_row and some range magic:
Live on Coliru
#define _SILENCE_ALL_CXX17_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS
#include <boost/numeric/ublas/io.hpp>
#include <boost/numeric/ublas/matrix.hpp>
#include <boost/numeric/ublas/matrix_proxy.hpp>
#include <boost/range/adaptors.hpp>
#include <boost/range/irange.hpp>
#include <boost/range/algorithm.hpp>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
using namespace boost::adaptors;
using Matrix = boost::numeric::ublas::matrix<float>;
using Row = boost::numeric::ublas::matrix_row<Matrix>;
static auto by_col0 = [](Row const& a, Row const& b) { return a(0) < b(0); };
int main()
{
constexpr int nrows = 3, ncols = 4;
Matrix m(nrows, ncols);
for (unsigned i = 0; i < m.size1(); ++i)
for (unsigned j = 0; j < m.size2(); ++j)
m(i, j) = (10 - 3.f * i) + j;
std::cout << "before: " << m << "\n";
auto getrow = [&](int i) { return Row(m, i); };
sort(boost::irange(nrows) | transformed(getrow), by_col0);
std::cout << "after: " << m << "\n";
}
Does sadly confirm that the abstraction of the proxy doesn't hold:
before: [3,4]((10,11,12,13),(7,8,9,10),(4,5,6,7))
after: [3,4]((10,11,12,13),(10,11,12,13),(10,11,12,13))|
Oops.
Analysis?
I can't say I know what's wrong. std::sort is defined in terms of ValueSwappable which at first glance seems to work fine for matrix_row:
auto r0 = Row(m, 0);
auto r1 = Row(m, 1);
using std::swap;
swap(r0, r1);
Prints Live On Coliru
Maybe this starting point gives you something helpful. Since it's tricky like this, I'd highly consider using another data structure that is more conducive to your task (boost::multi_array[_ref] comes to mind).
If you go to this Eigen page, you'll see you can initialize VectorXd objects with the << operator. You can also dump a few vector objects into one big VectorXd object (e.g. look at the third example in the section called "The comma initializer").
I want to dump a few vectors into a big vector, but I'm having a hard time writing code that will work for an arbitrarily sized collection of vectors. The following doesn't work, and I'm having a hard time writing it in a way that does (that isn't a double for loop). Any suggestions?
#include <iostream>
#include <Eigen/Dense>
#include <vector>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
// make some random VectorXds
std::vector<Eigen::VectorXd> vOfV;
Eigen::VectorXd first(3);
Eigen::VectorXd second(4);
first << 1,2,3;
second << 4,5,6,7;
vOfV.push_back(first);
vOfV.push_back(second);
// here is the problem
Eigen::VectorXd flattened(7);
for(int i = 0; i < vOfV.size(); ++i)
flattened << vOfV[i];
//shows that this doesn't work
for(int i = 0; i < 7; ++i)
std::cout << flattened(i) << "\n";
return 0;
}
The comma initializer does not work like that. You have to fully initialize the matrix from that. Instead, allocate a large enough vector and iterate and assign the blocks.
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <Eigen/Dense>
// http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/dox/group__TopicStlContainers.html
#include <Eigen/StdVector>
EIGEN_DEFINE_STL_VECTOR_SPECIALIZATION(Eigen::VectorXd)
int main()
{
// make some random VectorXds
std::vector<Eigen::VectorXd> vOfV;
Eigen::VectorXd first(3);
Eigen::VectorXd second(4);
first << 1,2,3;
second << 4,5,6,7;
vOfV.push_back(first);
vOfV.push_back(second);
int len = 0;
for (auto const &v : vOfV)
len += v.size();
Eigen::VectorXd flattened(len);
int offset = 0;
for (auto const &v : vOfV)
{
flattened.middleRows(offset,v.size()) = v;
offset += v.size();
}
std::cout << flattened << "\n";
}
I'm beginner in programming. Something is giving me trouble to code. Suppose, I've an array.
int Array[] = {3,6,9,5,10,21,3,25,14,12,32,41,3,24,15,26,7,8,11,4};
I want to remove all elements which are greater than 9. How can I do this?
You can do this if you use vector. First initialize vector with your array. Then use remove_if() function. Hope this will help.
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
int main()
{
int Array[] = {3,6,9,5,10,21,3,25,14,12,32,41,3,24,15,26,7,8,11,4};
vector<int> V(Array, Array+20);
vector<int> :: iterator it;
it = remove_if(V.begin(), V.end(), bind2nd(greater<int>(), 9));
V.erase (it, V.end()); // This is your required vector if you wish to use vector
}
You cannot remove items from an array, since they are fixed in size.
If you used std::vector, then the solution would look like this:
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
std::vector<int> Array = {3,6,9,5,10,21,3,25,14,12,32,41,3,24,15,26,7,8,11,4};
Array.erase(remove_if(Array.begin(), Array.end(), [](int n) { return n > 9; }),
Array.end());
copy(Array.begin(), Array.end(), ostream_iterator<int>(cout, " "));
}
Live example: http://ideone.com/UjdJ5h
If you want to stick with your array, but mark the items that are greater than 10, you can use the same algorithm std::remove_if.
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int Array[] = {3,6,9,5,10,21,3,25,14,12,32,41,3,24,15,26,7,8,11,4};
int *overwrite_start = remove_if(std::begin(Array), std::end(Array), [](int n){ return n>9; });
fill(overwrite_start, std::end(Array), -1);
copy(std::begin(Array), std::end(Array), ostream_iterator<int>(cout, " "));
}
The above will move the "erased" items to the end of the array, and mark them with -1.
Live example: http://ideone.com/7rwaXy
Note the usage in both examples of the STL algorithm functions. The second example with the array uses the same remove_if algorithm function. The remove_if returns the start of the "erased" data, as remove_if doesn't actually remove, but moves the data to the end of the sequence.
i am try swap concept without using vector
int Array[] = {3,6,9,5,10,21,3,25,14,12,32,41,3,24,15,26,7,8,11,4};
int n;
int arr_len = sizeof(Array)/sizeof(int);
void print_array_value() {
int i;
cout << "\n";
for (i = 0; i < arr_len; i++) {
cout << Array[i] << ", ";
}
cout << " : " << arr_len << "\n";
}
void swap_array_value(int start) {
int i;
for ( ; (start+1) < arr_len; start++) {
Array[start] = Array[start+1];
}
}
void remove_array_value() {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < arr_len; i++) {
if (Array[i] > n) {
swap_array_value(i);
arr_len--;
i--;
}
}
}
void main () {
clrscr();
cout << "Enter the N value : ";
cin >> n;
print_array_value();
remove_array_value();
print_array_value();
cout << "Array Length : " << arr_len;
getch();
}
Say I have a vector with values [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. I want to create a new vector that refers to, for example, [5,6,7,8]. I imagine this is just a matter of creating a vector with pointers or do I have to push_back all the intermediary values I need?
One of std::vector's constructor accepts a range:
std::vector<int> v;
// Populate v.
for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) v.push_back(i);
// Construct v1 from subrange in v.
std::vector<int> v1(v.begin() + 4, v.end() - 2);
This is fairly easy to do with std::valarray instead of a vector:
#include <valarray>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <algorithm>
int main() {
const std::valarray<int> arr={0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10};
const std::valarray<int>& slice = arr[std::slice(5, // start pos
4, // size
1 // stride
)];
}
Which takes a "slice" of the valarray, more generically than a vector.
For a vector you can do it with the constructor that takes two iterators though:
const std::vector<int> arr={0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10};
std::vector<int> slice(arr.begin()+5, arr.begin()+9);
You don't have to use push_back if you don't want to, you can use std::copy:
std::vector<int> subvector;
copy ( v1.begin() + 4, v1.begin() + 8, std::back_inserter(subvector) );
I would do the following:
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void printvec(vector<int>& v){
for(int i = 0;i < v.size();i++){
cout << v[i] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}
int main(){
vector<int> v;
for(int i = 1;i <= 10;i++) v.push_back(i);
printvec(v);
vector<int> v2(v.begin()+4, v.end()-2);
printvec(v2);
return 0;
}
~