I'm looking for an XML library that writes out the XML stream as it goes. I've looked at TinyXML, pugixml, etc. and it seems these only write the stream when the entire DOM is built in memory. I want a library that will write each object as soon as all children and attributes are available. Is there such a thing?
The word you're looking for is SAX.
Xerces is one such C++ SAX library. If you're in the MS world then MSXML supports SAX2 too.
I wrote my own library in the end. I'm willing to share the source if it's of interest to anyone - it's a little clunky and minimal though.
Related
I have requirement where we have to read a small XML file on Linux. Our application is in C++ and I like to use any light weight XML library. Please suggest me the library.
Thanks
You can Try pugixml Light-weight, simple and fast XML parser for C++
As a 2nd option look at TinyXML
Have a look also at TinyXml (http://sourceforge.net/projects/tinyxml). It is extremely lightweight and for this reason it is used also in mobile and game programming. The API is minimal though so you have to evaluate if it fully satisfy your needs.
This xml parser is good
There is xerces-c for that. It's complete, but I don't know if you will find it small enough. Your question is relative to what?
I know of at least three light weight C++ XML parsers: RapidXML, TinyXML and PugiXML. However, all three use a DOM based interface (ie, they build their own in-memory representation of the XML document and then provide an interface to traverse and manipulate it). For most situations that I have to deal with, I much prefer the SAX interface (where the parser just spits out a stream of events like start-of-tag, and the application code is responsible for doing whatever it wants based on those events).
Can anyone recommend a light weight C++ XML library with a SAX interface?
Edit: I should also note the Microsoft XmlLite library, which does use a SAX interface (well, actually a "pull" interface which is possibly even better). Unfortunately, it's ruled out for me at the moment since as far as I know it's closed source and Windows only (please correct me if I'm wrong on this).
I've used expat when I needed to parse XML. It's very light-weight (well, it used to be; it's a while since I've done XML stuff) and does the job.
you can try https://github.com/thinlizzy/die-xml . it seems to be very small and easy to use
this is a recently made C++0x XML SAX parser open source and the author is willing feedbacks
it parses an input stream and generates events on callbacks compatible to std::function
the stack machine uses finite automata as a backend and some events (start tag and text nodes) use iterators in order to minimize buffering, making it pretty lightweight
PugiXML and RapidXML do not have DOM conforming interfaces.. those API came with severe limitations on functionalities and conformance. You might want to investigate VTD-XML that is signifiantly more advanced than either DOM or SAX/Pull
I'm looking for a simple non-validating XML parser in either C or C++.
Several years back I found one that was just a single file solution but I can't find
it anymore.
I'm after some links and suggested ones that are very small and lightweight
ideally suited for an embedded platform.
Expat
You can work with or without validation and in "streaming mode". It is very lightweight.
What about something like pugixml. From their site...
pugixml is a light-weight C++ XML
processing library. It features:
DOM-like interface with rich traversal/modification capabilities
Extremely fast non-validating XML parser which constructs the DOM
tree from an XML file/buffer
XPath 1.0 implementation for complex data-driven tree queries
Full Unicode support with Unicode interface variants and
automatic encoding conversions
The library is extremely portable and
easy to integrate and use.
pugixml is developed and maintained
since 2006 and has many users. All
code is distributed under the MIT
license, making it completely free to
use in both open-source and
proprietary applications.
Also, this answer has more info.
There is also tinyxml and RapidXml.
There is definitely a pure C, tiny xml parser available. It was cited in an earlier answer on SO, but I can't find it right now. If I remember right, it's just a few hundred lines of code.
Update: Here's the question/answer that references it:
Is there a good tiny XML parser for an embedded C project?
And the actual code:
http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/cstuff/file/tip/tinyxml
RapidXML is a single-header (multiple headers if you want extra functionality) ultra-lightweight, ultra-fast implementation. It can operate in "destructive" mode, that means by setting pointers right into the XML and possibly overwriting some, avoiding all extra memory allocations and data copies.
tinyxml is not precisely single-header, but it is still fairly lightweight compared to other parsers. I've used it for half a decade without ever encountering an issue. The author has recently started with "tinyxml-2", which is supposedly better and even more lightweight, but I've not had occasion to actually try that one yet.
http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/cstuff/file/tip/tinyxml
can this parser work with nested XML like
<CServiceType>
<serno>61</serno>
<caption1 />
<caption2>Satelite</caption2>
<caption3 />
</CServiceType>
I was wondering what is the best XML Library in C++ (I'm using Visual Studio), considering fast set-up is critical. Basically, I want to create a file to save annotations on various .avi files.
Thank you in advance.
You should be able to get TinyXML set up and working in a matter of minutes.
TinyXML is simple enough for almost all your use (if you don't bother having the whole xml representation in memory) but other libraries offer better important features :
RapidXML is made to be really really fast. It's used in the boost::property_tree library for the xml file read/write features. If you already use boost, using directly boost::property_tree might be a good idea, if adequate, as you already can easily use it with it's simple interface.
pugiXML has been mentionned as a good replacement for RapidXML by someone on the boost mailing list, but I'm not aware of the differences.
Xerces-C++ is made to allow you high level manipulations on xml like validation using xsd files -- but is really heavy on both speed and memory size...
wrappers around classic C xml libraries (like LibXML2) might be interesting choice if you don't find what you're looking for with the previous ones...
I've used XercesC++ in the past and it was relatively painless to get working and working with.
I'm currently using MSXML and it is painful.
Need to write some C++ code that reads XML string and if i do
something like:
get valueofElement("ACTION_ON_CARD") it returns 3
get valueofElement("ACTION_ON_ENVELOPE") it returns YES
XML String:
<ACTION_ON_CARD>3</ACTION_ON_CARD>
<ACTION_ON_ENVELOPE>YES</ACTION_ON_ENVELOPE>
Any code example would be helpfull
Thanks
writing an xml parser is not necessarily an easy thing to do, so unless it is a requirement you do it yourself I suggest you get a library to do that for you.
There are many available like xerces (pretty complete but not exactly simple), tinyxml (mostly the opposite of xerces, it probably suits best your needs) or libxml (never tried this one)
If you have the schema, you could use codesynthesis xsd compiler.
I recommend the XML parser from the Poco C++ library. It's well documented and easy to use.