I wish to know when another application finishes editing a file.
I am aware of FindFirstChangeNotification, ReadDirectoryChangesW and the FileSystemWatcher class, however I think these are only able to detect file creation and changes. Which won't allow me to know whether the file still has content which will be written to it in future or not. One solution would be to wait to ensure that all data has been written, but I feel that there should be a better way.
I wish to know when the process writing to the file closes the handle it has, I think writing a File System Filter Driver may allow for this, can anyone confirm? Or provide another method I which I could use. Also I would prefer not to rely on something like .net but I wouldn't rule it out.
Thanks very much, in advance.
You can poll this by trying to open the file in exclusive mode.
On windows you can use OpenFile with OF_SHARE_EXCLUSIVE.
Related
How can I check if a file is still being written? I need to wait for a file to be created, written and closed again by another process, so I can go on and open it again in my process.
In general, this is a difficult problem to solve. You can ask whether a file is open, under certain circumstances; however, if the other process is a script, it might well open and close the file multiple times. I would strongly recommend you use an advisory lock, or some other explicit method for the other process to communicate when it's done with the file.
That said, if that's not an option, there is another way. If you look in the /proc/<pid>/fd directories, where <pid> is the numeric process ID of some running process, you'll see a bunch of symlinks to the files that process has open. The permissions on the symlink reflect the mode the file was opened for - write permission means it was opened for write mode.
So, if you want to know if a file is open, just scan over every process's /proc entry, and every file descriptor in it, looking for a writable symlink to your file. If you know the PID of the other process, you can directly look at its proc entry, as well.
This has some major downsides, of course. First, you can only see open files for your own processes, unless you're root. It's also relatively slow, and only works on Linux. And again, if the other process opens and closes the file several times, you're stuck - you might end up seeing it during the closed period, and there's no easy way of knowing if it'll open it again.
You could let the writing process write a sentinel file (say "sentinel.ok") after it is finished writing the data file your reading process is interested in. In the reading process you can check for the existence of the sentinel before reading the data file, to ensure that the data file is completely written.
#blu3bird's idea of using a sentinel file isn't bad, but it requires modifying the program that's writing the file.
Here's another possibility that also requires modifying the writer, but it may be more robust:
Write to a temporary file, say "foo.dat.part". When writing is complete, rename "foo.dat.part" to "foo.dat". That way a reader either won't see "foo.dat" at all, or will see a complete version of it.
You can try using inotify
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inotify
If you know that the file will be opened once, written and then closed, it would be possible for your app to wait for the IN_CLOSE_WRITE event.
However if the behaviour of the other application doing the writing of the file is more like open,write,close,open,write,close....then you'll need some other mechanism of determining when the other app has truly finished with the file.
Alright so to start this is strictly for Windows and I'd prefer to use C++ over .NET but I'm not opposed to boost::filesystem although if it can be avoided in favor of straight Windows API I'd prefer that.
Now the scenario is an application on another machine I can't change is going to create files in a particular directory on the machine that I need to make backups of and do some extra processing. Currently I've made a little application which will sit and listen for change notifications in a target directory using FindFirstChangeNotification and FindNextChangeNotification windows APIs.
The problem is that while I can get notified when new files are created in the directory, modified, size changes, etc it only notifies once and does not specifically tell me which files. I've looked at ReadDirectoryChangesW as well but it's the same story there except that I can get slightly more specific information.
Now I can scan the directory and try to acquire locks or open the files to determine what specifically changed from the last notification and whether they are available for further use but in the case of copying a large file I've found this isn't good enough as the file won't be ready to be manipulated and I won't get any other notifications after the first so there is no way to tell when it's actually done copying unless after the first notification I continually try to acquire locks until it succeeds.
The only other thing I can think of that would be less hackish would be to have some kind of end token file but since I don't have control over the application creating the files in the first place I don't see how I'd go about doing that and it's still not ideal.
Any suggestions?
This is a fairly common problem and one that doesn't have an easy answer. Acquiring locks is one of the best options when you cannot change the thing at the remote end. Another I have seen is to watch the file at intervals until the size doesn't change for an interval or two.
Other strategies include writing a no-byte file as a trigger when the main file is complete and writing to a temp directory then moving the complete file to the real destination. But to be reliable, it must be the sender who controls this. As the receiver, you are constrained to watching the directory and waiting for the file to settle.
It looks like ReadDirectoryChangesW is going to be your best bet. For each file copy operation, you should be receiving FILE_ACTION_ADDED followed by a bunch of FILE_ACTION_MODIFIED notifications. On the last FILE_ACTION_MODIFIED notification, the file should no longer be locked by the copying process. So, if you try to acquire a lock after each FILE_ACTION_MODIFIED of the copy, it should fail until the copy completes. It's not a particularly elegant solution, but there doesn't seem to be any notifications available for when a file copy completes.
You can process the data once the file is closed, right? So the task is to track when the file is closed. This can be done using file system filter driver. You can write your own or you can use our CallbackFilter product.
When trying to monitor a directory using inotify on Linux, as we know, we get notified as soon as the file gets created (before the other process finish writing to it)
Is there an effective way to make sure that the file is not read before writing to it is complete by the other process?
We could potentially add a delayed read; but as we all know, it is flawed.
For a little bit more clarity on the scenario; the two processes are running as different users; the load expected is about a few hundred files created per second.
Based on your question, it sounds like you're currently monitoring the directory with the IN_CREATE (and maybe IN_OPEN) flag. Why not also use the IN_CLOSE flag so that you get notified when the file is closed? From there, it should be easy to keep track of whether something has the file open and you'll know that you don't want to try reading it yet.
Create it somewhere else, write to it, close it, then rename it - or am I missing something obvious?
You can check /proc/<pid>/fd to see if the file is still opened. If it is not listed there, you can be sure that the process is no longer using it.
maybe the lsof command can help. It lists all the opened files.
$ man lsof
I'm trying to fulfill a client request here, and I'm not entirely sure I can actually do it. I have an MFC application that relies upon ShellExecute to open files in their appropriate viewer, which spawns multiple viewers if you try to open multiple files one after the other. If you open one .txt document, and then open another, two copies of notepad appear as expected.
The client wants us to change this functionality - Windows' functionality - to just pass file locations to any viewers that might already be opening. The first image clicked should open Image Viewer, but any other should just be opened in that existing process.
Is that kind of inter-application control/communication possible? Can I generically "pass" files to existing processes? I don't think I can. Executing a program with a file as a parameter is one thing, but passing a file to a running process is something else altogether. I'm not sure you can do that generically, I don't think that kind of functionality is anywhere in the Windows APIs.
I could be wrong, though.
This isn't possible if the viewer don't support multiple open files in same instance.
in your example: notepad will launch a new version with each file, while Notepad++ (a free editor) will open in same instance in a new tab.
The first thing you should try is calling the program again with the new parameters. If the program is written in such a way it will delegate the new parameter to the existing instance. Notepad doesn't do this, image viewer may though.
The next thing you can try is managing the life of the application by keeping track of the handle yourself. You call CreateProcess, so you create and own the handle to this process. On the next call to CreateProcess, enumerate the open windows and try to find your last handle. If the handle is found, close it and continue with your open process. You should only get one open application. For the most reliable solution, put this in a separate thread and wait for the handle (as well as a new request event) to avoid any race conditions.
Under Windows is there a way to modify a file/executable opened by another process using c++?
Is there a way to modify an open executable in windows?
No.
Is there a way to modify an open file in windows using c++?
Yes. If it has been opened with the proper share permissions. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363858(VS.85).aspx FILE_SHARE_WRITE
It may be possible but perhaps not easy to achieve. You need inject thread in destination process and know PE format for correctly edit opened file and modify it.
All information is on web.
Good Luck.
I find this freeware tool, it proposes to unlock files and folders.
The OS holds the executable file open for read-only sharing as long as it's running, so there's no way to modify it directly. You can, however, open it for reading (if you specify read-sharing in your CreateFile call), and make a modified copy of it, while it's running.
I don't know if that's what you had in mind, but if it's your own program you're doing this to, you can start the new copy and have it pick up where the previous one left off... not straightforward, but not all that difficult either.