I believe task I am trying to accomplish is fairly easy, but I have still managed to run into a problem, thus some help is appreciated.
I have got a base class (in a header and a source file), which I am subclassing two times as part of my program, lets call it WorkerBase. One of subclasses WorkerA is fairly trivial, whilst the other, WorkerB, depends on third-party libraries that depend on the hardware which program is running on. If hardware is unsuitable or those libraries are missing, using that subclass results in a fail. In this case, I would like to use WorkerA.
So, basically, how do I detect library loading failure? Now main program just wouldn't start if library is missing.
I am using Qt and the program is going to be Windows-only. Thank you.
I think, the simplest solution would be to move Woker's to plugins.
You can load plugin with QPluginLoader dynamically during run-time.
Then, while WorkerB would be statically linked to 3rd party lib, if required dependencies for WorkerB would not be satisfied, WorkerB plugin will simply fail to load, you would catch that with QPluginLoader and load WorkerA plugin instead.
The other way is to reinvent the wheel your own plugin system using QLibrary (and QPluginLoader as a reference realization).
Possibly that helps
http://developer.qt.nokia.com/doc/qt-4.8/qlibrary.html
bool QLibrary::load ()
Loads the library and returns true if the library was loaded successfully; otherwise returns false. Since resolve() always calls this function before resolving any symbols it is not necessary to call it explicitly. In some situations you might want the library loaded in advance, in which case you would use this function.
Related
Qt + C++ + C gurus, I could some advice:
I started writing a Qt6 GUI C++ app that includes some extern C code. Much to my surprise, upon launch the ui->setupUi(this) call immediately segfaulted and I found myself inside of one of the extern C functions that was imported! This is literally at the first line of my MainWindow constructor - with no calls to any of the C code even added yet.
The C function where the segfault dumped me was named "crc32". I temporarily renamed it (and all calls to it) to test my theory and sure enough the program started correctly afterwards. So... Qt appears to invoke "crc32" when doing things like adding QMenu items... due to some name collision.
I'm puzzled how to fix it. I don't want to change the C code because it's actually a git submodule for a project I do not want to maintain a fork of forever. Since it's Qt calling it from the C++ side, I can't exactly specify the namespace on the call either.
Weird sidenote: When I was doing testing this morning with Qt5 (instead of 6), I was not running into this issue. The crc32 name collision may be specific to Qt6.
Looks like you are on Linux (or similar) and encountering a violation of the One Definition Rule. When the shared lib loader tries to load symbols from a shared lib, it will first check to see if it already has one with that name loaded. If so, it skips it. Thus, if you try to load two symbols with an identical name, you'll only get one of them, and then problems can ensue.
Possible options:
Hide symbols you don't need in the library. For this, consider using GCC's visibility controls.
Separate the symbols into different executables and share data with some interprocess communication like shared mem or a socket.
Use dlopen() on one of the libs along with the RTLD_LOCAL flag so it does not override the symbol.
Add a namespace to the project (or use its build options to control that, if available -- like Boost does). Yes, this violates your wish not to modify it, but it could be done with a patch or similar that does not modify the original checkout if you switched to using a package manager like Conan instead of a git submod.
crc32 is a symbol from zlib. Qt does use either the system zlib, or a built-in version of it. If it uses the built-in version, symbols are prefixed with z_ (so z_crc32) to avoid exactly such a clash.
So, if you want to use crc32, you have the options to configure Qt to either not use zlib at all (-no-zlib), or use the built-in version (-qt-zlib).
I'd like my Windows application to be able to reference an extensive set of classes and functions wrapped inside a DLL, but I need to be able to guide the application into choosing the correct version of this DLL before it's loaded. I'm familiar with using dllexport / dllimport and generating import libraries to accomplish load-time dynamic linking, but I cannot seem to find any information on the interwebs with regard to possibly finding some kind of entry point function into the import library itself, so I can, specifically, use CPUID to detect the host CPU configuration, and make a decision to load a paricular DLL based on that information. Even more specifically, I'd like to build 2 versions of a DLL, one that is built with /ARCH:AVX and takes full advantage of SSE - AVX instructions, and another that assumes nothing is available newer than SSE2.
One requirement: Either the DLL must be linked at load-time, or there needs to be a super easy way of manually binding the functions referenced from outside the DLL, and there are many, mostly wrapped inside classes.
Bonus question: Since my libraries will be cross-platform, is there an equivalent for Linux based shared objects?
I recommend that you avoid dynamic resolution of your DLL from your executable if at all possible, since it is just going to make your life hard, especially since you have a lot of exposed interfaces and they are not pure C.
Possible Workaround
Create a "chooser" process that presents the necessary UI for deciding which DLL you need, or maybe it can even determine it automatically. Let that process move whatever DLL has been decided on into the standard location (and name) that your main executable is expecting. Then have the chooser process launch your main executable; it will pick up its DLL from your standard location without having to know which version of the DLL is there. No delay loading, no wonkiness, no extra coding; very easy.
If this just isn't an option for you, then here are your starting points for delay loading DLLs. Its a much rockier road.
Windows
LoadLibrary() to get the DLL in memory: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms684175(v=vs.85).aspx
GetProcAddress() to get pointer to a function: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683212(v=vs.85).aspx
OR possibly special delay-loaded DLL functionality using a custom helper function, although there are limitations and potential behavior changes.. never tried this myself: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/151kt790.aspx (suggested by Igor Tandetnik and seems reasonable).
Linux
dlopen() to get the SO in memory: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/dlopen.html
dladdr() to get pointer to a function: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/dladdr.3.html
To add to qexyn's answer, one can mimic delay loading on Linux by generating a small static stub library which would dlopen on first call to any of it's functions and then forward actual execution to shared library. Generation of such stub library can be automatically generated by custom project-specific script or Implib.so:
# Generate stub
$ implib-gen.py libxyz.so
# Link it instead of -lxyz
$ gcc myapp.c libxyz.tramp.S libxyz.init.c
I have 3 things: open source application (let's call it APP),
closed source shared library (let's call it OPENGL)
and open source plugin for OPENGL (let's call it PLUGIN)[also shared library].
OS: Linux.
There is need to share data between APP and PLUGIN,
so APP linking with PLUGIN, and when I run it,
system load it automatically.
After that APP call eglInitialize that belongs to OPENGL,
and after that this function load PLUGIN again.
And after that I have two copies of PLUGIN in the APP memory.
I know that because of PLUGIN have global data, and after debugging
I saw that there are two copies of global data.
So question how I can fix this behaviour?
I want one instance of PLUGIN, that used by APP and OPENGL.
And I can not change OPENGL library.
It obviously depends a lot on exactly what the libraries are doing, but in general some solution should be possible.
First note that normally if a shared library with the same name is loaded multiple times it will continue to use the same library. This of coruse primarily applies to loading via the standard loading/linking mechanism. If the library calls dlopen on its own it still can get the same library but it depends on the flags to dlopen. Try reading the docs on dlopen to get an understanding of how it works and how you can manipulate it.
You can also try positioning the PLUGIN earlier in the linker command so that it gets loaded first and thus might avoid a double load later one. If you must load the PLUGIN dynamically this obviously won't help. You can also check if LD_PRELOAD might resolve the linking order.
As a last resort you may have to resort to using LD_LIBARY_PATH and putting an interface library in from of the real one. This one will simply pass calls to the real one but will intercept duplicate loads and shunt them to the previous load.
This is just a general direction to consider. Your actual answer will depend highly on your code and what the other shared libraries do. Always investigate linker load ordering first, as it is the easiest to check, and then dlopen flags, before going into the other options.
I suspect that OPENGL is loading PLUGIN with the RTLD_LOCAL flag. This
is normally what you want when loading a plugin, so that multiple
plugins don't conflict.
We've had similar problems with loading code under Java: we'd load a
dozen or so different modules, and they couldn't communicate with one
another. It's possible that our solution would work for you: we wrote a
wrapper for the plugin, and told Java that the wrapper was the plugin.
That plugin then loaded each of the other shared objects, using dlopen
with RTLD_GLOBAL. This worked between plugins. I'm not sure that it
will allow the plugins to get back to the main, however (but I think it
should). And IIRC, you'll need special options when linking main for
its symbols to be available. I think Linux treats the symbols in main
as if main had been loaded with RTLD_LOCAL otherwise. (Maybe
--export-dynamic? It's been a while since I've had to do this, and I
can't remember exactly.)
A program usually depends on several libraries and might sometimes depend on other programs as well. I look at projects like Wine and think how do they figure out what calls a program is making?
In a Linux environment, what are the approaches used to know what calls an executable is making in runtime in order to catch and map them to other calls?
Any code snippets or references to resources for extra reading is greatly appreciated :)
On Linux you're looking for the LD_PRELOAD environment variable. This will load your libraries before any requested by the program. If you provide a function definition that matches one loaded by the target program then your version will be called instead.
You can't really detect what functions a program is calling however. You can however get all the functions in a shared library and implement all of those. You aren't really catching the functions, you are simply reimplementing them.
Projects like Wine do this in some cases, but not in all. They also rewrite some of the dynamic libraries. So when a Win32 loads some DLL it is actually loading the Wine version and not the native version. This is essentially the same concept of replacing the functions with your own.
Lookup LD_PRELOAD for more information.
I have a application and two Dlls. Both libraries are loaded by the application. I don't have the source of the application, but the source of the libs. I want to instantiate a class in lib A and want to use this instance also in lib B.
How do I do this? I'm not sure, but I think that both libs are used in different threads of the application.
I have no idea where I have to search for a solution.
No. Think about DLL as just normal library. Both can be used in a single thread.
If you want to use a class A in library X, you must pass a pointer/reference to it. The same applies to library Y. This way both libraries can work with same class/data.
Two dll's loaded into the same process is a fairly simple setup.
You just need to be careful with module scope, which will be the same as dll scope.
e.g. each dll will have its own set of static instances for any static objects.
Next you need to understand how to reference functions/classes across the boundary and what sort of types are safe to use as arguments.
Have a look on any documentation for dllexport and dllimport - there are several useful questions on this site if you search with those terms.
You have to realize that even though your DLLs are used by the host application nothing prevents you (that is your DLLs) from using your DLLs as well. So in your DLL A you could load and use your DLL B and call functions and stuff. When DLL A is unloaded, free DLL B as well. DLLs are reference counted, so your DLL A will have a reference of 1 (the host application) and your DLL B 2 (the host application and DLL A). You will not have two instances of DLL B loaded in the same process.
Named pipes might be the solution to your problems.
If you're targetting windows, you can check this reference
[EDIT] Didnt see you wanted to work on the same instance. In that case you need shared memory spaces, however, you really have to know what you're doing as it's quite dangerous :)
A better solution could be to apply OO Networking principles to your libs and communicate with, say CORBA, using interprocess middleware or the 127.0.0.1 loopback interface (firewalls will need to allow this).
Seems the simple solution would be to include in some initialization function of library A (or in DllMain if needed) a simple call to a function in library B passing a pointer to the common object. The only caveat is that you must ensure the object is deleted by the same DLL that newed it to avoid problems with the heap manager.
If these DLL's are in fact used in different threads you may have to protect access to said data structure using some kind of mutex.