I've just launched my new site, and in going though it in multiple browsers to see how it performs, I've noticed something weird.
Can you see the gap after the word 'but'? By my reasoning, the word 'was' on the following line should be next to it, as there is plenty of space for it - but as you can see, it isn't.
Although this screenshot is from Firefox (10), I'm getting the same thing in Chrome (17) and Internet Explorer (9).
Using Firebug to inspect the element, it is showing a between the 'was' and 'disappointed' (which would explain why it isn't on the line above) - but upon viewing the source, no such exists.
This is leading me to suggest that the browser is inserting them - but I have no idea why.
Anyway, the page in question is http://limeblast.co.uk/2012/02/currently-playing/
I used wget to download the page directly to a file and I noticed that the space between was and 'disappointed' and all other spaces that you see as
are encoded with two bytes, C2 A0 hex, while the other spaces are encoded with one byte, 20hex.
Hope this helps.
Off-topic, I would also recommend justifying the text.
You should look into your colorbox implementation. It isn't working properly, and it's causing other issues on the page. I don't think it's necessarily related to what you're describing, but fix it, and you'll get your colorbox effect that you're after.
I took a look and tried a few things with your code, best solution I would recommend is to force your to be justified, right now your text is left aligned.
I had the same problem with text coming from the WP tinymce editor. This here solved it for me:
function b09_remove_forced_spaces($content) {
$string = htmlentities($content, null, 'utf-8');
$content = str_replace(" ", " ", $string);
$content = html_entity_decode($content);
return $content;
}
add_filter("the_content", "b09_remove_forced_spaces", 9);
based on https://stackoverflow.com/a/21801444/586823
Related
Totally stumped on this. I need help extracting dialogue from a story so I can hand it off for narration.
Basically, this is a problem where I have a big chunk of text (a novel), and I want to extract all the dialogue from the text in a format I can pipe into a spreadsheet.
But, I also want, if it exists, the speaker information as well. So, given a string like:
'"I'm really hungry," she said.'
I would like the values returned as:
[ "I'm really hungry", "she said" ]
If there is no dialogue, as in this example:
"I'm not hungry."
the result would just be:
["I'm really hungry."]
Is this madness? Is it even possible? I have fooled around with this regex (am not a regex guru, knowing only enough to be dangerous):
"([^"]*)"
Which seems to get the dialogue tags, but doesn't get the speaker info. Any advice in how to get the speaker info as well would be greatly appreciated. I've been wrestling with this for awhile now.
Maybe a better approach would be to get the dialogue in one field, and the entire paragraph it is found in as the second field. That could also work, but I have no idea where to start with this.
Basically I want to put these all into a spreadsheet so I can hand them off to a narrator with enough context that they know whose dialogue is who's in the story.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
It definitely is possible
Look at this regex: ^.*?'?(?P<line>\".*\")(?P<actor>[^'\n]*)'?.*?$
demo here: https://regex101.com/r/UCRZwY/5
It basically marks the outer quotes as optional, but if it does find them, stores whatever provided as '$actor' (and the line as '$line') these are of course just names i've given them, feel free to change
Note updated to include such text as part of regular sentence, see example in demo
I'm a rather happy PhpStorm user, but there are a few things that really annoy me, but I'm not a settings expert and wish there is a solution for them (editing PHP files) :
Navigation
Often in the editor, one want to go back to where the cursor was 100 lines above etc... And in PhpStorm Back Alt-Shift-Left and Forward Alt-Shift-Right do this - but they follow an algorithm that is beyond me: it definitely misses "steps" (e.g. from line 500 go to line 300 using keys like arrows or -even worse- page-up/down, then Alt-Shift-Left doesn't bring you back to line 500)
=> Is there a way to refine the conditions that drive the behavior of Back and Forward?
Indentation
Is there a way to refine the indentor behavior? For instance
$a = array('X' => 'Something',
'Y' => 'Something else',[RETURN]
^ ^
now there
like in Emacs the cursor would go there right under the first quote after the spaces (and not at now where PS goes)?
=> Is a regexp (or something else) able to refine the behavior of the indentor, Not only for this very specific case but for the behavior in general?
(Not mentioning another problem when Shift-Inserting where the indent is often unreliable)
Quotes (automatic)
I don't want to disable the automatic quoting feature as it is sometimes convenient, but it seems the algorithm doesn't parse correctly the environment where the " or ' is inserted (don't have an example right now but at times it was annoying, like inserting 2 " unexpectedly while only one is required, deleting one will actually delete the 2 (normal because they were inserted automatically... but I needed 1 only!) so have in this case to trick PhpStorm to force a 1 ").
=> Is there a regexp or similar to control the quoting behavior?
Select via Shift-Arrow (for instance, to delete...)
Almost forgot: PhpStorm remembers at which column the cursor is when navigating Up and Down. Fine. But when one want to select (using Shift and Up/Down Arrows) from beginning of line it is usually to select lines. Not a line-to-where-cursor-was-earlier. An example will explain better: * is where the cursor is [beginning of line 3], % is where the cursor was [middle of line 2]
1. $x = 'string';
2. $y = %'string';
3.*
doing Shift-Up will select (all s)
1. $x = 'string';
2. $y = *sssssssss
3.
while in the specific case of a selection, it should select that:
1. $x = 'string';
2.*sssssssssssssssss
3.
not sure there is a way to configure that though - just in case there is?
Thanks
Oh well...
1) Is there a way to refine the conditions that drive the behavior of Back and Forward?
No. Maybe (just maybe) it takes into consideration what you were doing at that location (even if you done nothing, then maybe how long the pause was). But mainly it looks at editing activity, navigation events (jump to declaration/implementation etc).
2) Is a regexp (or something else) able to refine the behavior of the indentor, Not only for this very specific case but for the behavior in general?
RegEx -- definitely no. This question is not clear for me anyway -- are you talking about formatting or navigation? If first -- then all currently existing settings are in "Settings | Code Style". If second -- then check "Settings | Editor | Smart keys" -- maybe they will help.
Otherwise -- please record some screencast/bunch of screenshots for current and desired behaviour and submit it as a new ticket to the Issue Tracker: http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues/WI
3) Is there a regexp or similar to control the quoting behavior?
No. You explanation is not clear enough. I suggest the same as for #2 -- get a code example and submit it as a new ticket to the Issue Tracker: http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues/WI . This way it may gets implemented/fixed for next version
4) not sure there is a way to configure that though - just in case there is?
Don't know. I'm also facing this usability issue and would like to know workaround. The way I'm using it -- pressing "Home" before (or during/after) making the selection (not ideal "solution" as it is still annoying to do so, but works). Alternatively you can use mouse to select the lines (use it over editor gutter area -- where the line numbers are).
If selection is to just delete/duplicate the line -- then there are shortcuts just for that.
Regarding quotes, in cases when you just want the one quote, hit del instead of backspace after typing ".
I've some qualms about the indentation (and code (re)formatting in general) too, but it's that it changes from release to release, there's not much you can do about it though...
Re: selection - in your case you can just hit Home while still holding shift. It never even registered to me as unexpected behavior.
I'm using a WYSIWYG to allow users to format text. This is the error-causing text:
<p><span style="line-height: 115%">This text starts with a 'T'</span></p>
The error is that the 'T' in "This", or whatever the first letter happens to be, is randomly removed when using URLDecode and saving to the DB. Removing URLDecode on the server side seems to fix it without any negative side-effects (the DB contains the same information).
The documentation says that
Query strings in HTTP are always URL-encoded.
Is this really the case? If so, why doesn't removing URLDecode seem to mess everything up?
So two questions:
Why is URLDecode causing the first text character to be removed like this (it seems to only happen when the line-height property is present)?
Do I really need (or would I even want) to use URLDecode before putting POSTed data into the database?
Edit: I made a test page to echo back the decoded text, and URLDecode is definitely removing that character, but I have no idea why.
I believe decoding is done automatically when form scope is populated. That's why characters after % (this char is used for encoding) are removed -- you are trying to decode the string second time.
For security reasons you might be interested in stripping script tags, or even cleaning up HTML using white-list. Try to search in CFLib.org for applicable functions.
I have a peculiar problem. I have an email group that pipes emails to a message board. The word wrap of the emails varies. In yahoo, the messages tend to fill the entire container on the message board. But in all other mail clients, only part of the container width is filled, because the original mail was wrapped. I want all of the email messages to fill the entire width of the container. I've thought of two possible solutions: CSS, or a Regex that eliminates line breaks. Because I am only a garage mechanic (at these sorts of things), I simply cannot get the job done. Any help out there?
Here is a link that shows the issue: http://seanwilson.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=1729&start=0&S=171399e41f2c10c4357dd9b217caaa3f
(compare the message of "sean" with that of "rob." One fills the container, the other not).
Can any of you suggest how to get all the mail to fill the container?
You gave too little information - what programming language are you using - PHP/Javascript/anything different?
I think you only need to replace \n, \r and \r\n with whitespace. PHP code for that:
$nowrap = str_replace('\r\n', ' ', $nowrap);
$nowrap = str_replace('\r', ' ', $nowrap);
$nowrap = str_replace('\n', ' ', $nowrap);
You can do that analogically in other languages (for JS see string.replace method: http://www.tizag.com/javascriptT/javascript-string-replace.php).
Depending on the situation (people always seem to add 2 linebreaks between paragraphs), you could say the problem is: replace all newlines not directly preceded or followed by a newline with a space.
//just to be sure, remove \r's
$string = str_replace("\r",'',$string);
$string = preg_replace('/(?<!\n)\n(?!\n)/',' ',$string);
While allowing \r's:
$string = preg_replace('/(?<!\r|\n)\r?\n(?!\r|\n)/',' ',$string);
Edit: nevermind: do not use: while people tend to write their email text in paragraphs, you will break their signature / signoff with this regex. One could fiddle around with a minimum linelength before deeming it 'breakable' (i chose 63), but fiddly it will be:
$string = preg_replace('/([^\r\n]{63,})\r?\n(?!\r|\n)/','$1 ',$string);
The problem is: there are no assurance the linebreak wasn't intended. With a fiddleable line-length you could base it on average users, but the question is: what do they mind more: the differences between breaking & non-breaking paragraphs, or the breaking of their signatures?
Thanks for getting back so quickly!
The discussion board uses php (and also CSS). The only trouble is that I am somewhat limited in my ability to tinker with its programing. If I am to do this at my current level of skilty, I have only one of two options.
using a preg-replace in php. The discussion board allows us to do this from a control panel. So If I could do it with one preg-replace statement, it should work.
Would Wrikken's solution work if I do not remove \r's? Because that seems to be spot on. (could the \r's be added to the preg-replace?)
I had hoped the solution could come through a css property of some sort. I guess that isn't possible.
Thanks so much for your help!
[NOTE: thanks so much for your help! The solution worked!!! I changed the number to 53 or so. It needed to be a little smaller. I don't care that a rare, long signature lines may lose its carriage return. That's a small price to pay for a full message box! You easily saved me several days of learning something that was bound to be moderately frustrating, Thanks so much for that quick fix. I am joyous at the help I received here.]
I'm working on a web application that parses and displays email messages in a threaded format (among other things). Emails may come from any number of different mail clients, and in either text or HTML format.
Given that most people have a tendency to top post, I'd like to be able to hide the duplicated message in an email reply in a manner similar to how Gmail does it (e.g. "show quoted text").
Determining which part of the message is the reply is somewhat challenging. Personally, I use "> " delimiters at the beginning of the quoted text when replying. I created a regexp that looks for these lines and wraps a div around them to allow some JS to hide or show this block of text.
I then noticed that Outlook doesn't use the "> " characters by default, it simply adds a header block above the reply with the summary of the headers (From, Subject, Date, etc.). The reply is untouched. I can match on this and hide the rest of the email, working with the assumption that it's a top quote.
I then looked at Thunderbird, and it uses "> " for text, and <blockquote> for HTML mails. I still haven't looked at what Apple Mail does, what Notes does, or what any of the other millions of mail clients out there do.
Will I be writing a special case regexp for every single client out there? or is there something I'm missing?
Any suggestions, sample code or pointers to third party libraries much appreciated!
It'll be pretty hard to duplicate the way gmail does it since it doesn't care about whether it was a quoted piece or not, like Zac says, it just seems to care about the diff.
Its actually pretty hard to get this right 100% of the time. Plain text email is "lossy", its entirely possible for you to send
> Here is my long line that is over 74 chars (email line length limit)
Which can get encoded as something like
> Here is my long line that is over 74 chars (email=
line length limit)
And then is decoded as
> Here is my long line that is over 74 chars (email
line length limit)
Making it indistinguishable from an inline-reply.
This is email, so variations are abound. Email usually line-wraps at something like 74 characters, and encoding schemes can differ. Its a real PITA. If you can access the HTML version, you will probably have better luck looking for quote tags and the like. Another idea would be to parse both the plain text and html version to try and determine the boundries.
Additionally, its best to just plan for specific client hacks. They all construct mime messages differently, both in structure and header content.
Edit: I say this with the experience of writing an email processing system as well as seeing several people try to do the -exact- thing you're doing. It always only got "ok" results.
From what I can tell, gmail does not bother about prefixed lines or section headings, except to ignore them. If the text lines appeared earlier in the thread, and then reappear, it is considered to be quoted. Thus, e.g., if you send multiple messages and don't change your signature, the signature is considered to be quoted. If you've already dealt with the '>' prefix, a simple diff should do most of the rest. No need to get fancy.
First thing I think I'd do is strip out all the white space, or reduce white space to 1 between each word, and special characters from both blocks, then look for the old one in the new one.
Here's a mozdev project that may be helpful for others who stumble across this page looking for a Thunderbird solution:
http://quotecollapse.mozdev.org/