I have a command that I've added to a "national" node in the Sitecore Editor. The command generates a list of the 50 state nodes beneath it. It then goes through the state nodes (1 at a time) and generates a list of local nodes under each state node. Within the lists of local nodes, I iterate through them and check if the new item exists - if it does not, I add (create) it as a child under the local node. Ultimately, there are nearly 300 local items that are being added during the course of this command.
Is there a more efficient way to do this (fast query to get the 300 local nodes into one list, then check if the item exists, and create it)? If so, I'm not sure how to do that...
I'm not sure what is the most costly part of the operation. Ultimately, I'm still doing up to 300 separate queries to check if it's there, followed by insert statements, so that may still take a while to run. If so, which setting in web config will increase the applicable "timeout" setting in Sitecore? The sample structure is as follows:
//Derive the template from the name of the item (page) that was passed in - this assumes that the template name and the item name are the same
Sitecore.Data.Database database = Sitecore.Data.Database.GetDatabase("master");
TemplateItem contentPageTemplate = database.SelectSingleItem("fast:/sitecore/Templates/User Defined/Home/Pages/Local Site/" + newPage);
Sitecore.Data.Items.Item[] stateNodes = null;
Sitecore.Data.Items.Item[] localNodes = null;
Item localHomePage = null;
Item newLocalPage = null;
int webBusinessID = 0;
string ID = "";
WebBusiness business;
//Get all of the immediate child nodes (state pages) under the "parent" node ("National Locations") - and put them into a list or array
stateNodes = database.SelectItems("fast:/sitecore/content/Home/National Locations/*");
for (int i = 0; i < stateNodes.Length; i++)
{
if (stateNodes[i].Children.Count > 0)
{
localNodes = database.SelectItems("fast:/sitecore/content/Home/National Locations/" + stateNodes[i].Fields["State Abbreviation"].ToString() + "/*");
}
else
{
//Do nothing
}
for (int j = 0; j < localNodes.Length; j++)
{
localHomePage = localNodes[j];
if (localHomePage.Publishing.IsPublishable(DateTime.Now, false) == true)
{
//If the new page does not exist, create it
if (localHomePage.Children[newPage] == null)
{
newLocalPage = localHomePage.Add(newPage, contentPageTemplate);
counter = counter + 1;
}
else
{
//Additional business logic
}
}
}
}
Unless I'm missing logic/code you don't have there, I think you can simply trim this down to one query to get to the local nodes by changing the XPath:
localNodes = database.SelectItems("fast:/sitecore/content/Home/National Locations/*/*");
The change is to get all immediate sub-items of the immediate sub-items of "National Locations"
Related
I'm customizing the Sales Order screen in Acumatica to add notes based on the product modifiers from eCommerce, below is the piece of code I grab from previous customization.
I
public virtual void SaveBucketImport(BCSalesOrderBucket bucket, IMappedEntity existing, String operation, SaveBucketImportDelegate baseMethod)
{
MappedOrder order = bucket.Order;
for (int i = 0; i < (order.Extern.OrderProducts?.Count ?? 0); i++)
{
OrdersProductData data = order.Extern.OrderProducts[i];
SalesOrderDetail detail = order.Local.Details.Where(x => x.Delete != true).Skip(i).Take(1).FirstOrDefault();
if(detail != null)
{
// HERE TO ADD NOTES PER LINE
}
}
}
I tried PXNoteAttribute.SetNote(sender, data, option.DisplayName) but still not working
I already debug and try to add PXCache but its seems not working
Using Roslyn, the only mechanism for determining members of Visual Basic document appears to be:
var members = SyntaxTree.GetRoot().DescendantNodes().Where(node =>
node is ClassStatementSyntax ||
node is FunctionAggregationSyntax ||
node is IncompleteMemberSyntax ||
node is MethodBaseSyntax ||
node is ModuleStatementSyntax ||
node is NamespaceStatementSyntax ||
node is PropertyStatementSyntax ||
node is SubNewStatementSyntax
);
How do get the member name, StarLineNumber and EndLineNumber of each member?
Exists not only the one way to get it:
1) As you try: I willn't show this way for all of kind member (they count are huge and the logic is the similar), but only a one of them, for example ClassStatementSyntax:
to achive it name just get ClassStatementSyntax.Identifier.ValueText
to get start line you can use Location as one of ways:
var location = Location.Create(SyntaxTree, ClassStatementSyntax.Identifier.Span);
var startLine = location.GetLineSpan().StartLinePosition.Line;
logic for retrieving the end line looks like a logic to receive the start line but it dependents on the corresponding closing statement (some kind of end statement or self)
2) More useful way – use SemanticModel to get a data that you want:
In this way you will need to receive semantic info only for ClassStatementSyntax, ModuleStatementSyntxt and NamespaceStatementSyntax, and all of their members will be received just calling GetMembers():
...
SemanticModel semanticModel = // usually it is received from the corresponding compilation
var typeSyntax = // ClassStatementSyntax, ModuleStatementSyntxt or NamespaceStatementSyntax
string name = null;
int startLine;
int endLine;
var info = semanticModel.GetSymbolInfo(typeSyntax);
if (info.Symbol is INamespaceOrTypeSymbol typeSymbol)
{
name = typeSymbol.Name; // retrieve Name
startLine = semanticModel.SyntaxTree.GetLineSpan(typeSymbol.DeclaringSyntaxReferences[0].Span).StartLinePosition.Line; //retrieve start line
endLine = semanticModel.SyntaxTree.GetLineSpan(typeSymbol.DeclaringSyntaxReferences[0].Span).EndLinePosition.Line; //retrieve end line
foreach (var item in typeSymbol.GetMembers())
{
// do the same logic for retrieving name and lines for all others members without calling GetMembers()
}
}
else if (semanticModel.GetDeclaredSymbol(typeSyntax) is INamespaceOrTypeSymbol typeSymbol2)
{
name = typeSymbol2.Name; // retrieve Name
startLine = semanticModel.SyntaxTree.GetLineSpan(typeSymbol2.DeclaringSyntaxReferences[0].Span).StartLinePosition.Line; //retrieve start line
endLine = semanticModel.SyntaxTree.GetLineSpan(typeSymbol2.DeclaringSyntaxReferences[0].Span).EndLinePosition.Line; //retrieve end line
foreach (var item in typeSymbol2.GetMembers())
{
// do the same logic for retrieving name and lines for all others members without calling GetMembers()
}
}
But attention, when you have a partial declaration your DeclaringSyntaxReferences will have a couple items, so you need to filter SyntaxReference by your current SyntaxTree
I am writing an automated test for a dynamic webtable using Selenium Webdriver with chromedriver and testNG.
The objective is to assert that a certain table-entry is there, delete it if it is, and then assert if it is deleted. This second assert is not working properly however.
During the first assert I call the method that creates a list of Webelements and gets the number of rows. I use this number to know when to stop iterating through the table.
The second assert uses the same table to do the same thing, but now the DOM has changed, en there are only 18 rules left in my table were there were 19 before. As soon as the iteration tries to get the 19th row I get the following:
org.openqa.selenium.NoSuchElementException: no such element: Unable to
locate element: {"method":"xpath","selector":".//tr[19]/td[1]"}
I have tried creating a new instance of the MyWishlistPage, but this new instance also sees the "old" number of table rules
I have also tried a thread sleep and a driver refresh after the row delete, but this doesn't help either (piece of code is still there, commented)
I ended up altering my test class to go to another page and then return to the MYWishlistPage. This works, but it's a sloppy workaround that I'm not happy with
Can anyone tell me how I can get the correct number of rows after deleting an entry from the table?
This is a piece of the class for the page that I have the problem with :
public class MyWishlistsPage
{
private WebDriver driver;
public MyWishlistsPage(WebDriver driver)
{
this.driver = driver;
//This call sets the WebElements
PageFactory.initElements(driver, this);
}
public Boolean isWishlistAvailable(String nameToAssert)
{
//This list gets the number of rows from the table
List<WebElement> rows = driver.findElements(By.xpath(".//tr"));
//This loop finds the first row which' title matches sRowValue
for (int i = 1; i < rows.size(); i++)
{
String sValue = driver.findElement(By.xpath(".//tr[" + i + "]/td[1]")).getText();
if (sValue.equalsIgnoreCase(nameToAssert))
{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
public void deleteWishlistsEntry (String sRowValue)
{
//This list gets the number of rows from the table
List<WebElement> rows = driver.findElements(By.xpath(".//tr"));
//This loop finds the first row which' title matches sRowValue
for (int i = 1; i < rows.size(); i++)
{
String sValue = driver.findElement(By.xpath(".//tr[" + i + "]/td[1]")).getText();
if (sValue.equalsIgnoreCase(sRowValue))
{
// If the sValue matches with the description, the element in the seventh column of the row will be clicked
driver.findElement(By.xpath(".//tr[" + i + "]/td[7]/a/i")).click();
driver.switchTo().alert().accept();
/* try
{
Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch(InterruptedException ex)
{
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
driver.navigate().refresh(); */
}
}
}
}
This is a piece of the testclass I am calling the page from :
Assertions.assertThat(mywishlistspage.isWishlistAvailable(listToAssert)).as("The list you were trying to delete did not exist, and an attempt to create it failed ").isTrue();
//Deletes the chosen list
mywishlistspage.deleteWishlistsEntry(listToAssert);
//Verifies that list has been deleted
//homepage.clickMyAccountPage();
//myaccountpage.goToMyWishlistsPage();
Assertions.assertThat(mywishlistspage.isWishlistAvailable(listToAssert)).as("The list you tried to delete is still there").isFalse();
In the deleteWishlistsEntry, First it get the number of rows, after clicking on the "anchor" the line item will be deleted, after that u have to break / exit from that loop once it clicked on the anchor tag... But in the code u r looping until the 19th element that is why u get "Unable to locate element: {"method":"xpath","selector":".//tr[19]/td[1]"}"
public void deleteWishlistsEntry (String sRowValue)
{
//This list gets the number of rows from the table
List<WebElement> rows = driver.findElements(By.xpath(".//tr"));
//This loop finds the first row which' title matches sRowValue
for (int i = 1; i < rows.size(); i++)
{
String sValue = driver.findElement(By.xpath(".//tr[" + i + "]/td[1]")).getText();
if (sValue.equalsIgnoreCase(sRowValue))
{
// If the sValue matches with the description, the element in the seventh column of the row will be clicked
driver.findElement(By.xpath(".//tr[" + i + "]/td[7]/a/i")).click();
driver.switchTo().alert().accept();
break;
}
}
}
I have an Apps Script that copies the content of an template-file to the end of a document. It works with one minor annoyance: the numbered list continues from one copy to the next.
I have many different templates that users can append to the end of the document. Each template is stored in its own Document.
function addSub(template_id){
var mainBody = DocumentApp.getActiveDocument().getBody();
var tempBody = DocumentApp.openById(template_id).getBody();
for(var i = 0;i<tempBody .getNumChildren();i++){
var element = tempBody .getChild(i);
if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.TABLE)
mainBody.appendTable(element.copy());
else if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.PARAGRAPH)
mainBody.appendParagraph(element.copy());
else if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.LIST_ITEM)
mainBody.appendListItem(element.copy());
else if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.PAGE_BREAK)
mainBody.appendPageBreak(element.copy());
}
}
It could look like this: ( I want the list to reset for each new copy of the template)
table with name of this template
some raw text
List item1
List item2
table with name of this template
some raw text
List item1
List item2
Do you now that ListItems have an ID, which is a STRING and you can access it via myListItem.getListId().
It seems that all your ListItems have the same ID.
If this is the case, the numbering has to be as you described.
Why do they have the same ListID?
I don't know.
Seems that the body.appendListem method always chooses the same listId.
I didn't test it yet, but you could try to set the listID of the newly append ListItem to that of the original document, if they are different.
Yes, i know, the .copy() method should enclose this information, but the body.appendListItem method may not care.
So, you could try to first save the detached copy of the listItem.
Then append it to the new body.
And then set the id of the newly appended listItem to that of the detached copy.
It's stupid, i know, but it may help.
Didn't try it yet.
And i have little experience with listItems, bit what i saw up to now is that there seems to be only one ListId in the body of a document, if you append or insert listItems.
This could be the cause of the problem.
Hope this helps.
After Richard Gantz solved it, It was corrected by this code:
var listItemDictionary = {};//top
...
else if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.LIST_ITEM){
var listCopy = element.copy().asListItem()
var lcID = listCopy.getListId();
if (listItemDictionary[lcID] == null){
var tempLI = mainBody.appendListItem("temp")
listItemDictionary[lcID] = tempLI;
}
Logger.log(lcID)
mainBody.insertListItem(childIndex+j, listCopy.setListId(listItemDictionary[lcID]));
}
...
if(listItemDictionary){//bottom
mainBody.appendParagraph("");
for(var key in listItemDictionary){
listItemDictionary[key].clear().removeFromParent()
}
}
Based on the answer from Niklas Ternvall/Richard Gantz, I found a simpler solution for the case of each template having no more than one list.
function addSub(template_id) {
var mainBody = DocumentApp.getActiveDocument().getBody();
var tempBody = DocumentApp.openById(template_id).getBody();
var listID = null;
for(var i = 0;i<tempBody.getNumChildren();i++){
var element = tempBody.getChild(i).copy();
var type = element.getType();
if(type == DocumentApp.ElementType.TABLE)
mainBody.appendTable(element);
else if(type == DocumentApp.ElementType.PARAGRAPH)
mainBody.appendParagraph(element);
else if(type == DocumentApp.ElementType.LIST_ITEM){
if(listID==null) // First list item
listID = mainBody.appendListItem('temp'); // Define new listID
mainBody.appendListItem(element).setListId(listID); // Apply to copy
}
else if(type == DocumentApp.ElementType.PAGE_BREAK)
mainBody.appendPageBreak(element);
}
mainBody.removeChild(listID); // Delete temporary list item
}
Each time you call the function, listID=null is the indicator for whether or not there have been any list items in the template. When you get to the first list item, appending the text 'temp' forces a new list and hence a new listID that you can apply to the list items from the template. After you finish going through the template, mainBody.removeChild(listID) removes 'temp' from the top of your list.
This solution worked for me when using one template 100 times in one document, essentially as a mail merge. I'm fairly new to Apps Script, so I would appreciate any feedback if there is a reason this wouldn't work for a single-list template.
Within NetSuite when trying to close out Return Authorization line items i receive the following error message:
INSUFFICIENT_PERMISSION
"You do not have permissions to set a value for element item.quantityreceived due to one of the following reasons: 1) The field is read-only; 2) An associated feature is disabled; 3) The field is available either when a record is created or updated, but not in both cases."
Here is the code:
//Pull down the RA in order to work with the line items in question
RecordRef rec = new RecordRef();
rec.internalId = internalId;
rec.type = RecordType.returnAuthorization;
rec.typeSpecified = true;
ReadResponse response = _service.get(rec);
//create the object from the response record returned
ReturnAuthorization ra = (ReturnAuthorization)response.record;
//cancel the order by updating the qty of each item to zero.
WriteResponse res = null;
ReturnAuthorizationItem[] raItemList = ra.itemList.item;
for (int lineCounter = 0; lineCounter < raItemList.Length; lineCounter++)
{
//only if the qty received is zero are we closing out the item(setting qty to zero)
if (raItemList[lineCounter].quantityReceived == 0)
{
raItemList[lineCounter].quantity = 0;
raItemList[lineCounter].quantitySpecified = true;
}
}
//create a new object and add all the changes in order to update the order lines
ReturnAuthorization updRa = new ReturnAuthorization();
updRa.internalId = internalId;
updRa.itemList = new ReturnAuthorizationItemList();
updRa.itemList.item = new ReturnAuthorizationItem[raItemList.Length];
updRa.itemList.item = raItemList;
res = _service.update(updRa);
I am trying to update the line quantity to zero, which in affect will close the Return Authorization if everything has been zeroed out. Question is how do i correct this permissions issue in order to run this update. I have tried setting other fields on this same call. No matter which field i try and update i get the same error message. This is running under an admin account and all permissions look fine as far as i can see. In fact i am running this very same logic against the SaleOrder object to close out Sales Orders with no issues.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Billy
You can't directly edit that line item field. That field is maintained by Netsuite and reflects Item Receipts received against the RA.
If you want to close the RA without receiving just set the line item column field "Closed" to true.
After looking at this a little closer here is the solution:
Replace the if statement in the loop with this:
//only if the qty received and returned are zero do we close out the item(setting qty to zero)
if (raItemList[lineCounter].quantityReceived == 0 && raItemList[lineCounter].quantityBilled == 0)
{
raItemList[lineCounter].quantity = 0;
raItemList[lineCounter].quantitySpecified = true;
raItemList[lineCounter].isClosed = true;
raItemList[lineCounter].isClosedSpecified = true;
raItemList[lineCounter].quantityReceivedSpecified = false;
raItemList[lineCounter].quantityBilledSpecified = false;
raItemList[lineCounter].costEstimateSpecified = false;
}
else
{
raItemList[lineCounter].quantityReceivedSpecified = false;
raItemList[lineCounter].quantityBilledSpecified = false;
raItemList[lineCounter].costEstimateSpecified = false;
}
I am guessing that the fields i had to specific as false are fields that cannot be edited, hence the need to disclude them from the update.
This is a better sample. Note the comment re orderline
/Pull down the RA in order to work with the line items in question
RecordRef rec = new RecordRef();
rec.internalId = internalId;
rec.type = RecordType.returnAuthorization;
rec.typeSpecified = true;
ReadResponse response = _service.get(rec);
//create the object from the response record returned
ReturnAuthorization ra = (ReturnAuthorization)response.record;
//cancel the order by updating the qty of each item to zero.
WriteResponse res = null;
ReturnAuthorizationItem[] raItemList = ra.itemList.item;
ReturnAuthorization updRa = new ReturnAuthorization();
updRa.internalId = internalId;
updRa.itemList = new ReturnAuthorizationItemList();
ReturnAuthorizationItem[] updateItems = new ReturnAuthorizationItem[raItemList.Length];
for (int lineCounter = 0; lineCounter < raItemList.Length; lineCounter++)
{
updateItems[lineCounter].line = raItemList[lineCounter].line; // you'll need to test this. Setting only the line should result in no changes to the RA line items that are not to be closed. use the &xml=T view before and after to make sure orderline (hidden) is still populated properly.
//only if the qty received is zero are we closing out the item(setting qty to zero)
if (raItemList[lineCounter].quantityReceived == 0)
{
updateItems[lineCounter].isClosed = true;
// raItemList[lineCounter].quantitySpecified = true; // is quantitySpecified a field? it wasn't as of the 2012.2 endpoint
}
}
//create a new object and add all the changes in order to update the order lines
updRa.itemList.item = updateItems;
res = _service.update(updRa);