I want to change some strings:
space+cows --> space + cows
stupid+rabbit --> stupid + rabbit
(put spaces around the `+`)
In Sublime Text 2, I tried to use these:
Find: \w+\+\w+
Replace: \w+ \+ \w+
The finding regex matched everything well, but obviously, my strings were replaced with literally
w+ + w+.
One more example:
Strings:
bool *foo --> bool* foo
int *bar --> int* bar
Pattern:
Find: (bool|int) *(foo|bar)
Replace: (bool|int)* (foo|bar)
Result:
(bool|int)* (foo|bar)
(bool|int)* (foo|bar)
Needless to say I wanted to keep the actual bool, int, foo and bar as they were before.
I also cannot use only \* to match the strings because it would select other stuff that I don't want to replace; I need some context around the actual \* to select the correct strings. In the same way, I cannot use patterns like \*[^ ] because the not-space character after the asterisk would be obliterated after replacement.
I fixed my problem by using Sublime Text's multiline edition but I am still wondering: is it possible to use a regex in such a way that you can replace strings containing "group of characters" without wiping the actual contents of the "group of characters"?
Yes, this is possible. The reason your replacements don't work is (as you've noticed) your replacement text is just literal text; whatever you put in the box is what replaces what was matched as you would expext.
What you need to do is use a RegEx capture for this. What this does is make the regular expression processor (in this case Sublime Text) not only match the test but also store it for use in the replacement. You do that by wrapping the parts of the match you want to save in parenthesis. Each set of parenthesis is a Capture Group.
For your example, your regex becomes"
(\w+)\+(\w+)
The value of the match inside each set of parenthesis is saved into it's own numeric group, starting at one. A syntax like the following expands out to the contents of the first match, followed by the plus sign with spaces around it, followed by the second word:
\1 + \2
You can use each number multiple times, if you want:
\1 and again \1 and also \2
Regex to turn "stupid+rabbit" to "stupid + rabbit"
Find: (\w+)\+(\w+)
Replace: $1 + $2
Regex to turn "bool *foo" or "int *bar" into "bool* foo" or "int* bar"
Find: (bool|int) \*(foo|bar)
Replace: $1* $2
() - forms groups which can be later used. $1 is the first group and $2 is the second group.
I have something in a text file that looks like '%r'%XXXX, where the XXXX represents some name at the end. Examples include '%r'%addR or '%r'%removeA. I can match these patterns using regex '%r'%\w+. What I would like to replace this with is '{!r}'.format(XXXX). Note that the name has to stay the same in the replace so I'd get '{!r}.format(addR) or '{!r}.format(removeA). Is there a way to replace parts of the matched string in this way while retaining the unknown variable name pulled out with \w+ in the regex search?
I'm specifically looking for a solution using the find and replace features in Notepad++.
You can use
'%r'%(\w+)
and replace with '{!r}.format\(\1\)
The '%r'%(\w+) pattern contains a pair of unescaped parentheses that create a capturing group. Inside the replacement pattern, we use a \1 backreference to restore that value.
NOTE: The ( and ) in the replacement must be escaped because otherwise they are treated as Boost conditional replacement pattern functional characters.
See more on capturing groups and backreferences.
Search on:
'%r'%(XXXX)
Replace with:
Whatever You like \1
\1 will match the first set of grouping parentheses.
I found this related question : In perl, backreference in replacement text followed by numerical literal
but it seems entirely different.
I have a regex like this one
s/([^0-9])([xy])/\1 1\2/g
^
whitespace here
But that whitespace comes up in the substitution.
How do I not get the whitespace in the substituted string without having perl confuse the backreference to \11?
For eg.
15+x+y changes to 15+ 1x+ 1y.
I want to get 15+1x+1y.
\1 is a regex atom that matches what the first capture captured. It makes no sense to use it in a replacement expression. You want $1.
$ perl -we'$_="abc"; s/(a)/\1/'
\1 better written as $1 at -e line 1.
In a string literal (including the replacement expression of a substitution), you can delimit $var using curlies: ${var}. That means you want the following:
s/([^0-9])([xy])/${1}1$2/g
The following is more efficient (although gives a different answer for xxx):
s/[^0-9]\K(?=[xy])/1/g
Just put braces around the number:
s/([^0-9])([xy])/${1}1${2}/g
grep "http:\/\/.*\.jpg" index.html -o
Gives me text starting with http:// and ending with .jpg
So does: grep "http:\/\/.*\.\(jpg\)" index.html -o
What is the difference? And is there any condition where this might fail?
I got it to match either jpg,png or gif using this regex:
http:\/\/.*\.\(jpg\|png\|gif\)
Something to do with backreference or regex grouping that I read. Cannot understand this part \(\)
Grouping is used for two purposes in regular expressions.
One uses is to delimit parts of the regexp when using alternatives. That's the case in your third regexp, it allows you to say that the extension can be any of jpg, png, or gif.
The other use is for backreferences. This allows you to refer to the text that matched an earlier part of the regexp later in the regexp. For instance, the following regexp matches any letter that appears twice in a row:
\([a-z]\)\1
The backreference \1 means "match whatever matched the first group in the regexp".
( and ) are metacharacters. i.e. they don't match themselves, but mean something to grep.
From here:
Grouping is performed with backslashes followed by parentheses ‘(’,
‘)’.
so in the above the \( and \) define within them a group of possibilities to match separated by the | character. i.e. your filename extensions.
I have a value like this:
"Foo Bar" "Another Value" something else
What regex will return the values enclosed in the quotation marks (e.g. Foo Bar and Another Value)?
In general, the following regular expression fragment is what you are looking for:
"(.*?)"
This uses the non-greedy *? operator to capture everything up to but not including the next double quote. Then, you use a language-specific mechanism to extract the matched text.
In Python, you could do:
>>> import re
>>> string = '"Foo Bar" "Another Value"'
>>> print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"', string)
['Foo Bar', 'Another Value']
I've been using the following with great success:
(["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1
It supports nested quotes as well.
For those who want a deeper explanation of how this works, here's an explanation from user ephemient:
([""']) match a quote; ((?=(\\?))\2.) if backslash exists, gobble it, and whether or not that happens, match a character; *? match many times (non-greedily, as to not eat the closing quote); \1 match the same quote that was use for opening.
I would go for:
"([^"]*)"
The [^"] is regex for any character except '"'
The reason I use this over the non greedy many operator is that I have to keep looking that up just to make sure I get it correct.
Lets see two efficient ways that deal with escaped quotes. These patterns are not designed to be concise nor aesthetic, but to be efficient.
These ways use the first character discrimination to quickly find quotes in the string without the cost of an alternation. (The idea is to discard quickly characters that are not quotes without to test the two branches of the alternation.)
Content between quotes is described with an unrolled loop (instead of a repeated alternation) to be more efficient too: [^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*
Obviously to deal with strings that haven't balanced quotes, you can use possessive quantifiers instead: [^"\\]*+(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*+ or a workaround to emulate them, to prevent too much backtracking. You can choose too that a quoted part can be an opening quote until the next (non-escaped) quote or the end of the string. In this case there is no need to use possessive quantifiers, you only need to make the last quote optional.
Notice: sometimes quotes are not escaped with a backslash but by repeating the quote. In this case the content subpattern looks like this: [^"]*(?:""[^"]*)*
The patterns avoid the use of a capture group and a backreference (I mean something like (["']).....\1) and use a simple alternation but with ["'] at the beginning, in factor.
Perl like:
["'](?:(?<=")[^"\\]*(?s:\\.[^"\\]*)*"|(?<=')[^'\\]*(?s:\\.[^'\\]*)*')
(note that (?s:...) is a syntactic sugar to switch on the dotall/singleline mode inside the non-capturing group. If this syntax is not supported you can easily switch this mode on for all the pattern or replace the dot with [\s\S])
(The way this pattern is written is totally "hand-driven" and doesn't take account of eventual engine internal optimizations)
ECMA script:
(?=["'])(?:"[^"\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^'\\]*)*')
POSIX extended:
"[^"\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^'\\]*)*'
or simply:
"([^"\\]|\\.|\\\n)*"|'([^'\\]|\\.|\\\n)*'
Peculiarly, none of these answers produce a regex where the returned match is the text inside the quotes, which is what is asked for. MA-Madden tries but only gets the inside match as a captured group rather than the whole match. One way to actually do it would be :
(?<=(["']\b))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)
Examples for this can be seen in this demo https://regex101.com/r/Hbj8aP/1
The key here is the the positive lookbehind at the start (the ?<= ) and the positive lookahead at the end (the ?=). The lookbehind is looking behind the current character to check for a quote, if found then start from there and then the lookahead is checking the character ahead for a quote and if found stop on that character. The lookbehind group (the ["']) is wrapped in brackets to create a group for whichever quote was found at the start, this is then used at the end lookahead (?=\1) to make sure it only stops when it finds the corresponding quote.
The only other complication is that because the lookahead doesn't actually consume the end quote, it will be found again by the starting lookbehind which causes text between ending and starting quotes on the same line to be matched. Putting a word boundary on the opening quote (["']\b) helps with this, though ideally I'd like to move past the lookahead but I don't think that is possible. The bit allowing escaped characters in the middle I've taken directly from Adam's answer.
The RegEx of accepted answer returns the values including their sourrounding quotation marks: "Foo Bar" and "Another Value" as matches.
Here are RegEx which return only the values between quotation marks (as the questioner was asking for):
Double quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
"(.*?[^\\])"
Single quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
'(.*?[^\\])'
Both (use value of capture group #2):
(["'])(.*?[^\\])\1
-
All support escaped and nested quotes.
I liked Eugen Mihailescu's solution to match the content between quotes whilst allowing to escape quotes. However, I discovered some problems with escaping and came up with the following regex to fix them:
(['"])(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*\1
It does the trick and is still pretty simple and easy to maintain.
Demo (with some more test-cases; feel free to use it and expand on it).
PS: If you just want the content between quotes in the full match ($0), and are not afraid of the performance penalty use:
(?<=(['"])\b)(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*(?=\1)
Unfortunately, without the quotes as anchors, I had to add a boundary \b which does not play well with spaces and non-word boundary characters after the starting quote.
Alternatively, modify the initial version by simply adding a group and extract the string form $2:
(['"])((?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*)\1
PPS: If your focus is solely on efficiency, go with Casimir et Hippolyte's solution; it's a good one.
A very late answer, but like to answer
(\"[\w\s]+\")
http://regex101.com/r/cB0kB8/1
The pattern (["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1 above does the job but I am concerned of its performances (it's not bad but could be better). Mine below it's ~20% faster.
The pattern "(.*?)" is just incomplete. My advice for everyone reading this is just DON'T USE IT!!!
For instance it cannot capture many strings (if needed I can provide an exhaustive test-case) like the one below:
$string = 'How are you? I\'m fine, thank you';
The rest of them are just as "good" as the one above.
If you really care both about performance and precision then start with the one below:
/(['"])((\\\1|.)*?)\1/gm
In my tests it covered every string I met but if you find something that doesn't work I would gladly update it for you.
Check my pattern in an online regex tester.
This version
accounts for escaped quotes
controls backtracking
/(["'])((?:(?!\1)[^\\]|(?:\\\\)*\\[^\\])*)\1/
MORE ANSWERS! Here is the solution i used
\"([^\"]*?icon[^\"]*?)\"
TLDR;
replace the word icon with what your looking for in said quotes and voila!
The way this works is it looks for the keyword and doesn't care what else in between the quotes.
EG:
id="fb-icon"
id="icon-close"
id="large-icon-close"
the regex looks for a quote mark "
then it looks for any possible group of letters thats not "
until it finds icon
and any possible group of letters that is not "
it then looks for a closing "
I liked Axeman's more expansive version, but had some trouble with it (it didn't match for example
foo "string \\ string" bar
or
foo "string1" bar "string2"
correctly, so I tried to fix it:
# opening quote
(["'])
(
# repeat (non-greedy, so we don't span multiple strings)
(?:
# anything, except not the opening quote, and not
# a backslash, which are handled separately.
(?!\1)[^\\]
|
# consume any double backslash (unnecessary?)
(?:\\\\)*
|
# Allow backslash to escape characters
\\.
)*?
)
# same character as opening quote
\1
string = "\" foo bar\" \"loloo\""
print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"',string)
just try this out , works like a charm !!!
\ indicates skip character
My solution to this is below
(["']).*\1(?![^\s])
Demo link : https://regex101.com/r/jlhQhV/1
Explanation:
(["'])-> Matches to either ' or " and store it in the backreference \1 once the match found
.* -> Greedy approach to continue matching everything zero or more times until it encounters ' or " at end of the string. After encountering such state, regex engine backtrack to previous matching character and here regex is over and will move to next regex.
\1 -> Matches to the character or string that have been matched earlier with the first capture group.
(?![^\s]) -> Negative lookahead to ensure there should not any non space character after the previous match
Unlike Adam's answer, I have a simple but worked one:
(["'])(?:\\\1|.)*?\1
And just add parenthesis if you want to get content in quotes like this:
(["'])((?:\\\1|.)*?)\1
Then $1 matches quote char and $2 matches content string.
All the answer above are good.... except they DOES NOT support all the unicode characters! at ECMA Script (Javascript)
If you are a Node users, you might want the the modified version of accepted answer that support all unicode characters :
/(?<=((?<=[\s,.:;"']|^)["']))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)/gmu
Try here.
echo 'junk "Foo Bar" not empty one "" this "but this" and this neither' | sed 's/[^\"]*\"\([^\"]*\)\"[^\"]*/>\1</g'
This will result in: >Foo Bar<><>but this<
Here I showed the result string between ><'s for clarity, also using the non-greedy version with this sed command we first throw out the junk before and after that ""'s and then replace this with the part between the ""'s and surround this by ><'s.
From Greg H. I was able to create this regex to suit my needs.
I needed to match a specific value that was qualified by being inside quotes. It must be a full match, no partial matching could should trigger a hit
e.g. "test" could not match for "test2".
reg = r"""(['"])(%s)\1"""
if re.search(reg%(needle), haystack, re.IGNORECASE):
print "winning..."
Hunter
If you're trying to find strings that only have a certain suffix, such as dot syntax, you can try this:
\"([^\"]*?[^\"]*?)\".localized
Where .localized is the suffix.
Example:
print("this is something I need to return".localized + "so is this".localized + "but this is not")
It will capture "this is something I need to return".localized and "so is this".localized but not "but this is not".
A supplementary answer for the subset of Microsoft VBA coders only one uses the library Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5 and this gives the following code
Sub TestRegularExpression()
Dim oRE As VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp '* Tools->References: Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5
Set oRE = New VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp
oRE.Pattern = """([^""]*)"""
oRE.Global = True
Dim sTest As String
sTest = """Foo Bar"" ""Another Value"" something else"
Debug.Assert oRE.test(sTest)
Dim oMatchCol As VBScript_RegExp_55.MatchCollection
Set oMatchCol = oRE.Execute(sTest)
Debug.Assert oMatchCol.Count = 2
Dim oMatch As Match
For Each oMatch In oMatchCol
Debug.Print oMatch.SubMatches(0)
Next oMatch
End Sub