I am implementing a Java EE based Hospital Management System that has a web service and two clients are to be connected to it, a Java Swing App and a JSP-based web project. The web service is to be implemented using Stateless EJBs.
Please suggest a way of implementing authentication and login for both clients (Users are taken from database-DB2)
NB: This has to be submitted as a project so server(Websphere) based authentication should be avoided as much as possible. Could not find any resource corresponding to this scenario..
I suppose that users will authenticate to both applications with username (and password). If you don't need user authorization on the service side, you can just create username/password combination for each client and store it in web service configuration file. In that case i would suggest message level security for clients.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v7r0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.websphere.express.doc%2Finfo%2Fexp%2Fae%2Ftwbs_securews.html
In case you need user authorization on service side, you can still rely upon message level security but proceed users credentials instead.
Here are also some examples which might be helpful:
http://www.mkyong.com/webservices/jax-ws/application-authentication-with-jax-ws/
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/tutorials/0905_griffith/section7.html
Related
We need to implement an authentication/autorisation web service and I am not sure if we should use the Oauth protocol in our situration.
The background of the story:
We have some J2EE web applications in a jboss server. Authentication and authorisation of the applications are implemented by JAAS and deployed in this jboss server.We want to add some new web applications that are implemented in other languages and deployed in other servers. To re-use the authentication/autorisation mechanism in the jboss server, we need to implement authenication/authorisation web services for the new applications.
So here comes some thoughts:
Is it necessary to adapt the OAuth protocol for the authentication/autorisation web service ?
As I know, OAuth2 is use to grant access to functionality, user's data, etc.. without giving the password to the 3rd party app. This is not really our case as we actually own all the applications, although that the newly apps are not in the authentication server.
Another choix is to implement the login webservice et then return the new apps a ticket/token to use later.
In another way, with OAuth protocol, newly apps do not involve in user's login/passwords, which seems to be nice...
Do you have some ideas ?
OAuth works on the concept of "ResourceOwners (Which gets the user credentials and enables the client's access to the server's apis)", "Server (owner of the resources) and the "clients (who want access to the server resources but doesn't have access to the credentials).
OAuth is just one way of providing security to the resources which means it is not necessary to have it for all "authentication/autorisation".
In your case I dont think there is a need of full fledged 3-legged OAuth however you can still go ahead with 0-legged OAuth or some other approach. Also, I don't understand what did you mean by "newly apps do not involve in user's login/passwords" as this is completely composite to what OAuth is meant for. User generally provide the credentials when they login into the app and then that login call ensures that the clients have access to the server resources.
If you just want to "return the new apps a ticket/token to use later" then OAuth is not for you as it is more than just providing the token for later use. Also, token in OAuth is for server's api access.
I am developing several Web Services that will be accessed by a mobile application. I have several requirements:
Each user will need to sign in with their own User ID and Password (the same User ID and Password they use to sign into the website).
Every Web Service request will need to be authenticated to ensure that the request is coming from the mobile app(s).
Every Web Service request will need to authenticate the user, since there is user-specific fucntionality built in, and access will need to be blocked if the user's account is disabled.
Let's assume that OAuth is not an option.
In order to ensure that Web Service requests are coming only from the mobile app(s), I am planning to use HTTP Basic Authentication in IIS (the mobile app(s) will need to have a User Account setup in Windows Server and the mobile app will need to store the User Name & Password and pass these in the header).
Next is the User Authentication for each Web Service request. Would it be suitable to encrypt the User ID, Password, and some shared secret key (a "pepper", of sort) with AES-256, pass that encrypted string as a parameter with each request (over HTTPS, of course), and then decrypt and parse it on the server to authenticate? This is the existing plan, but something just doesnt seem right about it - like it's not "secure enough".
What else can I do to properly authenticate users for Web Service requests?
I recently went through this problem and asked opinions from a group of senior people about how they solve the problem. Opinions were varied, but one consistent feeling is that your level of security depends on the use case of your application. Are you doing online banking or storing medical records? Then your security needs may be quite high. Social networking? Maybe not so much.
Basic Authentication is generally fine when encrypted over SSL, ColdFusion works well with it. If you use Basic Auth, make sure to encrypt your traffic with 1024-bit keys or better. Don't authenticate every request with username/password - that's unnecessary. Authenticate the first request, set a session token, and rely on the session token for your identification of users.
Set a polling mechanism from the client to the server to keep the session alive - set the session timeout to 30 minutes and the polling frequency at 25 minutes, for example. Otherwise you may need to re-authenticate expired sessions. Again, how you approach this part of the solution depends on your paranoia level, which depends on what kind of data/app you are dealing with.
Cookies, and therefore sessions, should work fine in iOS apps. If you use sessions to verify identity after authentication, make sure your session cookies are memory-only (set at the server level).
Check the SSL implementation of your server against the Qualysis SSL Test:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/
The report will give you a surprising amount of detail about the strength of your SSL implementation.
Lastly, consider implementing two-factor authentication to combat password theft.
If you ignore the SSL advice and plan on encrypting your password and communicating over an insecure channel, look at the Kerberos protocol for a well-known example of how to authenticate securely:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerberos_%28protocol%29
Yes, you can use Basic Authentication but that means the client will need to store the username/password in plain text, and also send them over in plain text. Sending part is sort of fine if it's under HTTPS, but storing username/password in plain text may not be a good idea, unless you're using some secure key store.
Let's assume you have decided that Basic Authentication is the way to go, and you want to make use of the official CF way of supporting that, then you can use CFLOGIN.name & CFLOGIN.password. You may also check out Ask Ben: Manually Enforcing Basic HTTP Authorization In ColdFusion. In the remote cfc side, always validate the username/password, or return some sort of token and asks the client to use that token going forward. The token can be cfid+cftoken if you like, or even roll your own that never expires. If you use cfid+cftoken, and send them over as cookie or in body along with your web service call, I believe you can resume the session if you so choose.
I have an internal-facing RESTful web service. There are various client applications using the service, and the client apps themselves have end users. The web service needs to authorize requests based on the end user identities.
The question: What are the typical options for authenticating the end user here? That is, I want to authenticate the user, not the client application. (I don't mind if authenticating the client application is part of the scheme, but ultimately I need to know that the end user is who I think he or she is.)
One possible scheme, for example, would be to have per-client system accounts, and then have the client simply assert the user's identity (e.g. in an HTTP request header, say). So we authenticate the client application and delegate user authentication to the client. I don't think this is a very strong scheme, though, because it depends too much on keeping the system account credentials secret. I have seen too many examples of people e-mailing system account credentials around to put much faith in this sort of approach.
Another approach might be to have the client app, upon user login, use the user's credentials to get a token from the API, and then use that token for subsequent API requests. That way the authentication is user-specific without requiring the client app to hang onto the username/password credentials.
Anyway I'd like to have a better sense for the range of options I should be considering here.
The problem that you describe with "delegated authentication" is a real one. It means that a "client application" using it's credentials has access to the whole breadth of user data. This access can be used maliciously (for example a "semi-trusted" app harvesting api data) or negligently (for example an app accidentally exposing a Direct Object Reference Vulnerability - https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2010-A4-Insecure_Direct_Object_References)
Probably the most prevalent "token based" scheme is OAuth2 (http://oauth.net/2/), and the precursor, OAuth, which many sites choose to continue to use.
OAuth2 has a number of roles:
resource owner (the user in your case)
resource server (your api)
client (the apps you talk about)
authorization server (not clear who or what would fulfil this role in your case)
The basic scheme is that the resource owner authenticates using their credentials directly with the authorization server. They are then asked if they want to grant some information (which may just be a persistent identifier, or a description of the information exposed by your api) to some client. When they accept an 'auth code' is sent to the client and they use that (combined with their own credentials) to receive an 'access token'. This access token can then be used to authenticate against the resource server (which can check it's authenticity back against the authorization server).
Normally the way this is used is that the authorization server and the resource server are owned and managed by the same entity (for example google and facebook would fulfil this role) and then clients are independently managed.
The scheme can also be used internally within an organisation without the "explicit grant" which can still at least confirm that a specific end-user is present before releasing any data from an api.
I have the following scenario:
I have an application (html files + javascripts hosted in a webserver)
There is a SOAP web service that we need to develop.
Web service will be called from java script (AJAX calls).
User will access the application in intranet scenario. Users are validated against active drectory.
Requirement states that user need to be logging in using logged in users network credentials. There should not be a login screen shown to user.
Web service interfaces need to be invoked with logged in users credentials. A login inteface of web service specifically needs to be called as first call.
I have a specific question on how to pass user credential to web service.
I am planning to configure Integrated windows authentication (NTLM) for web application to avoid login screen.
However I do not know a way to capture and send user id and password to login interface of web service.
Most of the questions and answers around this topic has been for microsoft technlogies. Any specific ideas?
Further research and several blog posts pointed me to Kerberos authentication and a single sign on framework. With NTLM i cannot delegate credentials to web service. However with Kerberos i can. I will be using SPNEGO and delegate the credentials after authentication. Please refer to below link for further details.
http://spnego.sourceforge.net/
Hey folks, this seems to have been discussion fairly often but I want to make a simple, watered down question around doing authentication with RESTful services. The scenario is as follows:
There is a system that houses registered users for an application. The system exposes a RESTful API for accessing these users.
There is a front-end application that has a login form. The application can either be internal, or external.
The front-end application needs to use the data in the User system to authenticate a user.
The question now is how to authenticate a user whose credentials (username/password) are entered in the client application against the data in the User system such that it is secure and performant? For the sake of this question, suppose the client application is internal to some sort of Intranet but the applications will not reside on the same machine and may only communicate through the service.
I understand the idea of having the application being "hypermedia driven" but we should be able to provide filtering/searching services. For example, consider the resources and API as below:
http://example.com/users
GET - retrieves all users (paged, hypermedia driven)
POST - creates new user
PUT/DELETE not supported
http://example.com/users/[id]
GET - returns a full representation of a user with id = {id}
PUT - updates user, takes in any predefined media type
DELETE - deletes the user (with appropriate authorization)
POST not supported
Based on the above, my idea would be have the client application GET on the user listing, filtering by username. The service will return the hashed password and salt to the client, the client will perform the authentication.
Thoughts?
If I understand your question correctly, you are looking to implement a generic service that will handle authentication, so that you can re-use it for different applications.
I suggest you take a look at OAuth which has been built for precisely this problem domain.
Passing the username and the salt back is unnecessary and a real security risk.
Perhaps you could consider this approach:
Have the client pass the username and password to the server via Basic Authentication
The server fetches the encrypted password for the username along wiht the salt
The server encrypts the given password using some encryption method, using the salt to assist the algorithm (Ruby code follows):
def User.authenticate(login, password)
ok = false
user = User.find_by_login(login)
if user
#
# user contains the salt, it isn't passed from the client
#
expected_password = hash_password(password, user.salt)
ok = (user.password == expected_password)
end
return ok
end
There are multiple places to use this kind of approach but I like to do it in Rack.
Last point, do it all on a HTTPS connection
Stormpath
Stormpath company dedicated to providing a user login management API and service for developers. They use a REST JSON approach.
There are some other companies that seem to dabble in this new area of authentication-as-a-service, but Stormpath is the only one I know of that is dedicated to it.
First, you don't want the client to perform the authentication, as it then would be trivial to write a client that breaks into your service.
Instead, just use an authentication mechanism like HTTP Basic or HTTP Digest.
Note that if you're using Java, the Restlet framework provides interceptors, called Guards, which support these and other mechanisms. I highly recommend Restlet.
Mozilla Persona
Since this question was posted, the Mozilla Foundation (the maker of the Firefox browser) has taken on the problem of simple user authentication. Their solution is Mozilla Persona, "a sign-in system for the Web". Designed to be easy for users and for developers. The user's identity is an email address. See Wikipedia article.
Update
Mozilla has basically given up work on Persona but not quite killed the project.