I'm trying to strip a string of all special characters except a few, plus remove everything between brackets (square, or any other, Including the brackets!). My current regex is:
^[a-zA-Z0-9äöüÄÖÜ;#.]*$
\\[.+\\]
\\<.+\\>
\\s+
All sequences that match one of the above are removed
It works fine on e.g.:
Foo Bar[Foo.Bar#google.com]
reducing it too FooBar but not on e.g.:
Foo
foo#bar.com
removing them completely
Update: Updating regex as per OP's edit.
You can use the following regex and replace the match with empty string.
\[.*?\]|<.*?>|\s|[^a-zA-Z0-9äöüÄÖÜ;#.]
To remove anything between brackets except brackets, you could use the following regex and replace it with an empty string:
/\[[^\]]*\]/
To remove special characters, you could use the one below. It selects everything except what is inside the brackets. So you could once again replace it with the empty string.
/[^a-zA-Z0-9äöüÄÖÜ;#]/
You could use them in sequence or build a bigger one.
In Ruby, I have the following test:
irb(main):001:0> s = "Foo Bar[Foo.Bar#google.com]"
=> "Foo Bar[Foo.Bar#google.com]"
irb(main):005:0* s.gsub(/\[[^\]]*\]|[^a-zA-Z0-9äöüÄÖÜ;#]/, "")
=> "FooBar"
Note that the space has disappeared.
Related
I have a some methods in a text file starting with
#Include("myparameter1", data);
bla1("myparameter2", data);
#Include("myparameter3", data);
That is my regex:
#"\((.*?)\)
It finds myparameter1, 2 and 3.
I only want to get literally myparameter1 and 3 without the quotes myparameter1 and myparameter3
I also tried to prepend Include before the regex but it has no effect.
if regex is too hard for getting the myparameter1 it would even be ok if only the Include stuff would work because I could split the result at the "," and then trim the quotes...
Assuming there is no escaped double-quotes within the double-quotes, you could match the required substring using ([^"]+), which means match and capture one or more characters that are not double-quotes.
C# string:
"#Include\(\"([^\"]*)\""
C# verbatim string :
#"#Include\(""([^""]*)"""
The required result is in Groups[1], for example:
foreach (Match match in matches) {
Console.WriteLine(match.Groups[1].Value);
}
I want to select some string combination (with dots(.)) from a very long string (sql). The full string could be a single line or multiple line with new line separator, and this combination could be in start (at first line) or a next line (new line) or at both place.
I need help in writing a regex for it.
Examples:
String s = I am testing something like test.test.test in sentence.
Expected output: test.test.test
Example2 (real usecase):
UPDATE test.table
SET access = 01
WHERE access IN (
SELECT name FROM project.dataset.tablename WHERE name = 'test' GROUP BY 1 )
Expected output: test.table and project.dataset.tablename
, can I also add some prefix or suffix words or space which should be present where ever this logic gets checked. In above case if its update regex should pick test.table, but if the statement is like select test.table regex should not pick it up this combinations and same applies for suffix.
Example3: This is to illustrate the above theory.
INS INTO test.table
SEL 'abcscsc', wu_id.Item_Nbr ,1
FROM test.table as_t
WHERE as_t.old <> 0 AND as_t.date = 11
AND (as_t.numb IN ('11') )
Expected Output: test.table, test.table (Key words are INTO and FROM)
Things Not Needed in selection:as_t.numb, as_t.old, as_t.date
If I get the regex I can use in program to extract this word.
Note: Before and after string words to the combination could be anything like update, select { or(, so we have to find the occurrence of words which are joined together with .(dot) and all the number of such occurrence.
I tried something like this:
(?<=.)(.?)(?=.)(.?) -: This only selected the word between two .dot and not all.
.(?<=.)(.?)(?=.)(.?). - This everything before and after.
To solve your initial problem, we can just use some negation. Here's the pattern I came up with:
[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
[^ ... ] Means to make a character class including everything except for what's between the brackets. In this case, I put \s in there, which matches any whitespace. So [^\s] matches anything that isn't whitespace.
+ Is a quantifier. It means to find as many of the preceding construct as you can without breaking the match. This would happily match everything that's not whitespace, but I follow it with a \., which matches a literal .. The \ is necessary because . means to match any character in regex, so we need to escape it so it only has its literal meaning. This means there has to be a . in this group of non-whitespace characters.
I end the pattern with another [^\s]+, which matches everything after the . until the next whitespace.
Now, to solve your secondary problem, you want to make this match only work if it is preceded by a given keyword. Luckily, regex has a construct almost specifically for this case. It's called a lookbehind. The syntax is (?<= ... ) where the ... is the pattern you want to look for. Using your example, this will only match after the keywords INTO and FROM:
(?<=(?:INTO|FROM)\s)[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
Here (?:INTO|FROM) means to match either the text INTO or the text FROM. I then specify that it should be followed by a whitespace character with \s. One possible problem here is that it will only match if the keywords are written in all upper case. You can change this behavior by specifying the case insensitive flag i to your regex parser. If your regex parser doesn't have a way to specify flags, you can usually still specify it inline by putting (?i) in front of the pattern, like so:
(?i)(?<=(?:INTO|FROM)\s)[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
If you are new to regex, I highly recommend using the www.regex101.com website to generate regex and learn how it works. Don't forget to check out the code generator part for getting the regex code based on the programming language you are using, that's a cool feature.
For your question, you need a regex that understands any word character \w that matches between 0 and unlimited times, followed by a dot, followed by another series of word character that repeats between 0 and unlimited times.
So here is my solution to your question:
Your regex in JavaScript:
const regex = /([\w][.][\w])+/gm;
in Java:
final String regex = "([\w][.][\w])+";
in Python:
regex = r"([\w][.][\w])+"
in PHP:
$re = '/([\w][.][\w])+/m';
Note that: this solution is written for your use case (to be used for SQL strings), because now if you have something like '.word' or 'word..word', it will still catch it which I assume you don't have a string like that.
See this screenshot for more details
I am processing a CSV file and want to search and replace strings as long as it is an exact match in the column. For example:
xxx,Apple,Green Apple,xxx,xxx
Apple,xxx,xxx,Apple,xxx
xxx,xxx,Fruit/Apple,xxx,Apple
I want to replace 'Apple' if it is the EXACT value in the column (if it is contained in text within another column, I do not want to replace). I cannot see how to do this with a single expression (maybe not possible?).
The desired output is:
xxx,GRAPE,Green Apple,xxx,xxx
GRAPE,xxx,xxx,GRAPE,xxx
xxx,xxx,Fruit/Apple,xxx,GRAPE
So the expression I want is: match the beginning of input OR a comma, followed by desired string, followed by a comma OR the end of input.
You cannot put ^ or $ in character classes, so I tried \A and \Z but that didn't work.
([\A,])Apple([\Z,])
This didn't work, sadly. Can I do this with one regular expression? Seems like this would be a common enough problem.
It will depend on your language, but if the one you use supports lookarounds, then you would use something like this:
(?<=,|^)Apple(?=,|$)
Replace with GRAPE.
Otherwise, you will have to put back the commas:
(^|,)Apple(,|$)
Or
(\A|,)Apple(,|\Z)
And replace with:
\1GRAPE\2
Or
$1GRAPE$2
Depending on what's supported.
The above are raw regex (and replacement) strings. Escape as necessary.
Note: The disadvatage with the latter solution is that it will not work on strings like:
xxx,Apple,Apple,xxx,xxx
Since the comma after the first Apple got consumed. You'd have to call the regex replacement at most twice if you have such cases.
Oh, and I forgot to mention, you can have some 'hybrids' since some language have different levels of support for lookbehinds (in all the below ^ and \A, $ and \Z, \1 and $1 are interchangeable, just so I don't make it longer than it already is):
(?:(?<=,)|(?<=^))Apple(?=,|$)
For those where lookbehinds cannot be of variable width, replace with GRAPE.
(^|,)Apple(?=,|$)
And the above one for where lookaheads are supported but not lookbehinds. Replace with \1Apple.
This does as you wish:
Find what: (^|,)(?:Apple)(,|$)
Replace with: $1GRAPE$2
This works on regex101, in all flavors.
http://regex101.com/r/iP6dZ8
I wanted to share my original work-around (before the other answers), though it feels like more of a hack.
I simply prepend and append a comma on the string before doing the simpler:
/,Apple,/,GRAPE,/g
then cut off the first and last character.
PHP looks like:
$line = substr(preg_replace($search, $replace, ','.$line.','), 1, -1);
This still suffers from the problem of consecutive columns (e.g. ",Apple,Apple,").
I've got a string which has the following format
some_string = ",,,xxx,,,xxx,,,xxx,,,xxx,,,xxx,,,xxx,,,"
and this is the content of a text file called f
I want to search for a specific term within the xxx (let's say that term is 'silicon')
note that the xxx can all be different and can contain any special characters (including meta characters) except for a new line
match = re.findall(r",{3}(.*?silicon.*?),{3}", f.read())
print match
But this doesn't seem to work because it returns results which are in the format:
["xxx,,,xxx,,,xxx,,,xxx,,,silicon", "xxx,,,xxx,,,xxx,,,xxsiliconxx"] but I only want it to return ["silicon", "xxsiliconxx"]
What am I doing wrong?
Try the following regex:
(?<=,{3})(?:(?!,{3}).)*?silicon.*?(?=,{3})
Example:
>>> s = ',,,xxx,,,silicon,,,xxx,,,xxsiliconxx,,,xxx'
>>> re.findall(r'(?<=,{3})(?:(?!,{3}).)*?silicon.*?(?=,{3})', s)
['silicon', 'xxsiliconxx']
I am assuming that the content in the xxx can contain commas, just not three consecutive commas or it would end the field. If the content in the xxx sections cannot contain any commas, you can use the following instead:
(?<=,{3})[^,\r\n]*?silicon.*?(?=,{3})
The reason your current approach doesn't work is that even though .*? will try to match as few characters as possible, the match will still start as early as possible. So for example the regex a*?b would match the entire string "aaaab". The only time the regex will advance the starting position is when the regex fails to match, and since ,,, can be matched by the .*?, your match will always start at the beginning of the string or just after the previous match.
The lookbehind and lookahead are used to address the issue raised by JaredC in comments, basically re.findall() won't return overlapping matches, so you need the leading and trailing ,,, to not be a part of the match.
Is there a simple way to ignore the white space in a target string when searching for matches using a regular expression pattern? For example, if my search is for "cats", I would want "c ats" or "ca ts" to match. I can't strip out the whitespace beforehand because I need to find the begin and end index of the match (including any whitespace) in order to highlight that match and any whitespace needs to be there for formatting purposes.
You can stick optional whitespace characters \s* in between every other character in your regex. Although granted, it will get a bit lengthy.
/cats/ -> /c\s*a\s*t\s*s/
While the accepted answer is technically correct, a more practical approach, if possible, is to just strip whitespace out of both the regular expression and the search string.
If you want to search for "my cats", instead of:
myString.match(/m\s*y\s*c\s*a\*st\s*s\s*/g)
Just do:
myString.replace(/\s*/g,"").match(/mycats/g)
Warning: You can't automate this on the regular expression by just replacing all spaces with empty strings because they may occur in a negation or otherwise make your regular expression invalid.
Addressing Steven's comment to Sam Dufel's answer
Thanks, sounds like that's the way to go. But I just realized that I only want the optional whitespace characters if they follow a newline. So for example, "c\n ats" or "ca\n ts" should match. But wouldn't want "c ats" to match if there is no newline. Any ideas on how that might be done?
This should do the trick:
/c(?:\n\s*)?a(?:\n\s*)?t(?:\n\s*)?s/
See this page for all the different variations of 'cats' that this matches.
You can also solve this using conditionals, but they are not supported in the javascript flavor of regex.
You could put \s* inbetween every character in your search string so if you were looking for cat you would use c\s*a\s*t\s*s\s*s
It's long but you could build the string dynamically of course.
You can see it working here: http://www.rubular.com/r/zzWwvppSpE
If you only want to allow spaces, then
\bc *a *t *s\b
should do it. To also allow tabs, use
\bc[ \t]*a[ \t]*t[ \t]*s\b
Remove the \b anchors if you also want to find cats within words like bobcats or catsup.
This approach can be used to automate this
(the following exemplary solution is in python, although obviously it can be ported to any language):
you can strip the whitespace beforehand AND save the positions of non-whitespace characters so you can use them later to find out the matched string boundary positions in the original string like the following:
def regex_search_ignore_space(regex, string):
no_spaces = ''
char_positions = []
for pos, char in enumerate(string):
if re.match(r'\S', char): # upper \S matches non-whitespace chars
no_spaces += char
char_positions.append(pos)
match = re.search(regex, no_spaces)
if not match:
return match
# match.start() and match.end() are indices of start and end
# of the found string in the spaceless string
# (as we have searched in it).
start = char_positions[match.start()] # in the original string
end = char_positions[match.end()] # in the original string
matched_string = string[start:end] # see
# the match WITH spaces is returned.
return matched_string
with_spaces = 'a li on and a cat'
print(regex_search_ignore_space('lion', with_spaces))
# prints 'li on'
If you want to go further you can construct the match object and return it instead, so the use of this helper will be more handy.
And the performance of this function can of course also be optimized, this example is just to show the path to a solution.
The accepted answer will not work if and when you are passing a dynamic value (such as "current value" in an array loop) as the regex test value. You would not be able to input the optional white spaces without getting some really ugly regex.
Konrad Hoffner's solution is therefore better in such cases as it will strip both the regest and test string of whitespace. The test will be conducted as though both have no whitespace.