I have an issue using CryptoPP. I'm using AES, and am wanting to represent the binary ciphertext by encoding it to base64.
My problem is that I am randomly getting assertion errors when running the following code:
std::string encoded;
// ciphertext is of type std::string from AES
CryptoPP::StringSource(ciphertext, true,
new CryptoPP::Base64Encoder(new CryptoPP::StringSink(encoded)));
The specific assertion error is:
Assertion failed: m_allocated, file include\cryptopp\secblock.h, line 197
Because of this "random" behavior, it's leading me to believe that the issue lies within the contents of the ciphertext.
My question is: Am I doing this the correct way? I've been stumped for a while, and have been researching a bit without success. The closest thing I can find is: http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptopp-users#googlegroups.com/msg06053.html
My complete implementation is:
std::string key = "key";
std::string in = "This is a secret message.";
CryptoPP::SHA1 sha;
byte digest[CryptoPP::SHA1::DIGESTSIZE];
sha.CalculateDigest(digest, reinterpret_cast<const byte *>(key.c_str()), key.length());
byte iv[CryptoPP::AES::BLOCKSIZE];
memset(iv, 0x00, CryptoPP::AES::BLOCKSIZE);
CryptoPP::AES::Encryption encrypt(reinterpret_cast<const byte *>(digest), CryptoPP::AES::DEFAULT_KEYLENGTH);
CryptoPP::CBC_Mode_ExternalCipher::Encryption cbc_encrypt(encrypt, iv);
std::string ciphertext;
CryptoPP::StreamTransformationFilter encryptor(cbc_encrypt,
new CryptoPP::StringSink(ciphertext));
encryptor.Put(reinterpret_cast<const unsigned char *>(in.c_str()), in.length() + 1);
encryptor.MessageEnd();
std::string encoded;
CryptoPP::StringSource(ciphertext, true,
new CryptoPP::Base64Encoder(new CryptoPP::StringSink(encoded)));
My question is: Am I doing this the correct way?
Yes, the code is fine (except for the digest.erase();).
I've been stumped for a while, and have been researching a bit without success.
Run it under a memory checker. Valgrind or Clang Asan (address sanitizer).
The closest thing I can find is: http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptopp-users#googlegroups.com/msg06053.html
I've come across that assertion in the past, too. I don't recall if it was iOS or Linux. I think it was Linux with a specific version of GCC (maybe 4.4 or 4.5).
My problem is that I am randomly getting assertion errors when running the following code:
CryptoPP::StringSource(ciphertext, true,
new CryptoPP::Base64Encoder(new CryptoPP::StringSink(encoded)));
Change the above to this:
CryptoPP::StringSource ss(ciphertext, true,
new CryptoPP::Base64Encoder(new CryptoPP::StringSink(encoded)));
One version of GCC had problems with anonymous declarations. It would start running object destructors too soon.
Your intend is a bit unclear at the moment.
Why would you like to use the SHA digest as the key for the AES encryption?
And about the error in your code,
Your cipher at the end is a string. And if want to communicate it to somebody
you can readily send it.
Why did you use a Base 64 encoder at the end of your code ?
Had your cipher text been in the binary form you could have used Base64 Encoder
to convert it into the ASCII String format.
As long as it is not, you don't need the following part in your code.
std::string encoded;
StringSource(ciphertext, true, new Base64Encoder(new StringSink(encoded)));
Related
I want to encrypt and decrypt strings with RC6 but I don't understand how
it works with the Crypto++ library, could you give me a snippet ?
Thanks you !
Here's a snippet of code from the Crypto++ website demonstrating how to use the library to encrypt a string using AES (where as jww had pointed out, "RC6 is one of the AES candidates" and the snippet should be usable as a starting point for RC6 as well):
byte key[AES::DEFAULT_KEYLENGTH], iv[AES::BLOCKSIZE];
string plainText;
// ... populate key, iv, plainText here
string cipher;
StringSink* sink = new StringSink(cipher);
Base64Encoder* base64_enc = new Base64Encoder(sink);
CBC_Mode<AES>::Encryption aes(key, sizeof(key), iv);
StreamTransformationFilter* aes_enc = new StreamTransformationFilter(aes, base64_enc);
StringSource source(plainText, true, aes_enc);
I found this information when internet searching for sample code for the Crypto++ library. Admittedly, it wasn't as straight forward for me to find as I had expected.
The Related sidebar on StackOverflow is pointing out other pages that I believe can also help, like the Q & A for Encrypt/Decrypt byte array Crypto++.
Update: An update just showed up today (March 26, 2017) at the RC6 web page at the Crypto++ wiki site. It's got RC6 specific code there now which looks like exactly what you need.
I have a simple program that encrypts and decrypts text from input gotten from a text file. When I encrypt and decrypt in one cycle, I get the desired result, but if I encrypt, close application then re-run application, this time decrypt, the process fails.
The decryption snippet looks like this :
string decoded, plainText;
string fileData((istreambuf_iterator<char>(fileDecrypt)), (istreambuf_iterator<char>()));
ECB_Mode<AES>::Decryption decryption;
decryption.SetKey((byte*)key.c_str(), sizeof(key));
StringSource(fileData, true, new HexDecoder(new StringSink(decoded)));
StringSource(decoded, true, new StreamTransformationFilter(decryption, new StringSink(plainText)));
When I run debugger in VS2010, I get error on the last line
StringSource(decoded, true, new StreamTransformationFilter(decryption, new StringSink(plainText)));
When I wrap a try-catch block around decrypt function, I get this error
StreamTransformationFilter: invalid PKCS #7 block padding found
Not sure why it works if I encrypt and decrypt in one build, but fail if I try to decrypt without first encrypting first on the same run.
ECB_Mode<AES>::Decryption decryption;
ECB mode operates on a full block size, and no padding is required.
You can pad it, but it does not look like you are doing so. The caveat is the plain text must be a multiple of 16, which is AES's blocksize.
When I wrap a try-catch block around decrypt function, I get this
error
StreamTransformationFilter: invalid PKCS #7 block padding found
That's because you are padding it in:
StreamTransformationFilter(decryption, new StringSink(...)).
StreamTransformationFilter has a padding parameter. As you probably realize, it is BlockPaddingScheme::PKCS_PADDING
Try:
ECB_Mode<AES>::Decryption decryption;
decryption.SetKey((byte*)key.data(), key.size());
std::string plainText;
StreamTransformationFilter filter(decryption, new StringSink(plainText),
StreamTransformationFilter::NO_PADDING);
FileSource fs(filename.c_str(), true, new HexDecoder(new Redirector(filter)));
...
Other errata:
ECB_Mode<AES>::Decryption decryption;
decryption.SetKey((byte*)key.c_str(), sizeof(key));
sizeof(key) is wrong. Use 16, 24, or 32. If the std::string is properly sized, then you can use key.size().
And name you objects. I've seen GCC generate bad code with Crypto++:
ECB_Mode<AES>::Decryption decryption;
StringSource ss1(fileData, ...);
StringSource ss2(decoded, ...);
And a quick warning....
ECB mode is usually wrong. I'm not saying it is in this case, or that you are wrong. But you might want to have a look at EAX mode, GCM mode or CCM mode. My apologies if this is more than it seems.
Even better, use a scheme like Elliptic Curve Integrated Encryption Scheme (ECIES) or Discrete Logarithm Integrated Encryption Scheme (DLIES). The schemes are IND-CCA, which is a very strong notion of security.
When using ECIES or DLIES, your problem reduces to sharing the public keys. But you have that problem now with the symmetric keys, so its a lateral move for key distribution, and a win for encryption.
I have an encrypted binary file of size 256*N bytes.
The last two bytes of the first page(256 length) contains the IV value to decrypt.
If i fetch that using the below code:
infile.seek(240,0)
iv = infile.read(16)
(infile is input file). IV value is not matching to that in the bin file.
Also, is it fine if i just send this "iv" to AES.new ? as below code?
decryptor = AES.new(key, AES.MODE_CBC, iv)
Also, if i have to send a hard coded IV value to AES new function, in what format i need to send it? i have a 16 bytes HEX value and i need to convert it into a byte string right?
Please let me know how to do it.
First question
Yes, that seems to be the proper method to read the IV. Make sure you opened the file in binary mode though, not in text mode.
Second question
Yes, if the IV is a 16 byte binary value that would be correct.
Third question
Using a constant IV would defeat the purpose of the IV altogether. But if you must use one that is specified as hexadecimals you should unhexlify it.
I've recently been making a server which uses AES256 to encrypt/decrypt data, it took awhile to get it to send correctly. However now I'm having an issue I believe is down to memory, if I send the word "hello" it'll decrypt fine, if I then send "helloo", it'll also decrypt fine, but if I send anything shorter than "helloo" after, it'll error during decryption and if you print the encrypted string it received it's got what it should have plus the additional length of the old string.
e.g
hello: ####################
helloo: ##############################
hi: #####(#########################) //has the additional length made up from the encrypted string of "helloo" minus the first however many characters "hi" is
The code:
std::string decryptString(std::string ciphertext, byte *key, byte *iv)
{
std::string decodedtext;
CryptoPP::StringSource(ciphertext, true,
new CryptoPP::HexDecoder(new CryptoPP::StringSink(decodedtext)));
std::string plaintext;
CryptoPP::GCM<CryptoPP::AES>::Decryption dec;
dec.SetKeyWithIV((const byte *)key, CryptoPP::AES::MAX_KEYLENGTH,
(const byte *)iv, CryptoPP::AES::BLOCKSIZE);
CryptoPP::AuthenticatedDecryptionFilter adf(dec, new CryptoPP::StringSink(plaintext));
adf.Put((const byte *)decodedtext.data(), decodedtext.size());
adf.MessageEnd();
return plaintext;
}
Try using valgrind to find memory errors in your code.
Oh, and a tip: post the code itself, it might lead to more interesting answers.
If you always pass the same initialization vector to this method, may be the reason is in it. Try
dec.Resynchronize(iv);
Well, I've been going through my personal hell these days
I am having some trouble decrypting a message that was encrypted using
RSA and I'm always failing with a "RSA/OAEP-MGF1(SHA-1): invalid
ciphertext"
I have a private key encoded in base64 and I load it:
RSA::PrivateKey private_key;
StringSource file_pk(PK,true,new Base64Decoder);
private_key.Load( file_pk );
I then proceed to decode the message by doing:
RSAES_OAEP_SHA_Decryptor decryptor(private_key);
AutoSeededRandomPool rng;
string result;
StringSource(ciphertext, true,
new PK_DecryptorFilter(rng, decryptor,
new StringSink(result)
)
);
As far as I can tell, the message should be being parsed without any
problems. ciphertext is an std::string, so no \0 at the end that could
do something unexpected.
I just though of something, and what if the private key is incorrect
but can be loaded anyway without throwing a BER decode error. What
would that throw when decrypting?
Hope that anyone can shed some light on this.
Cheers
If the key was actually corrupted, the Load function should have failed. However you can ask the key to self-test itself, which should detect any corruption, by calling Validate, like:
bool key_ok = private_key.Validate(rng, 3);
The second parameter (here, 3) specifies how much checking to be done. For RSA, this will cause it to run all available tests, even the slow/expensive ones.
Another reason the decoding might fail is if the key simply is not the one that was used to encrypt the original message.
Obviously the ciphertext input must be completely identical to what was originally produced on the encrypting side. For debugging, one good way to check this would be to feed the ciphertext at both sides into a hash function (conveniently already available to you, of course) and comparing the outputs. If you hex or base64 encoded the ciphertext for transmission you must undo that before you give it to the RSA decryptor.