I have a C++ program which is mainly used for video processing. Inside the program, I am launching the system command in order to obtain pass the processed videos to some other binaries to postprocess them.
I have a while loop towards infinite and I am launching the system command inside the loop every time. The thing is that at a certain point I am receiving the -1 return code from the system command. What could be the reason for that?
Inside the system command I am just calling a binary file with the adequate parameters from the main project.
The system command which I want to execute is actually a shell file.
In this file I am extracting the main feature from the video and passing them through a SVM model from a 3D party library in order to obtain the the desired classification.
./LiveGestureKernel ./Video ./SvmVideo
./mat4libsvm31 -l SvmVideoLabels < SvmVideo > temp_test_file
./svm-predict temp_test_file svm_model temp_output_file
cat < temp_output_file
rm -f temp_*
After a certain number of iterations through the while loop, it just won't execute the script file and I cannot figure out the reason for this. Thanks!
If you get -1 from the call to system(), you should first examine the contents of errno - that will most likely tell you what your specific problem is.
The one thing to watch out for is that the return value from system is an implementation-defined one in the case where you pass it a non-NULL command, so it's possible that -1 may be coming from your actual executable.
Your best bet in that case is to print out (or otherwise log) the command being executed on failure (and possibly all the time), so that you can check what happens with the same arguments when you execute it directly from a command line or shell.
Related
There is a cpp application where I want to read following type of compressed file-
file_name.gz
file_name.Z
file_name.tar.gz
For this purpose, I check the file extension and choose decompression technique accordingly. E.g. file_name.gz will be decompressed using "gunzip -C file_name.gz".
I want to get the FILE handle for decompressed file. I use popen() API for it. Now, there might be a case where gunzip/uncompress/tar fails while decompressing the file due to memory issues. How do I capture the failure in my CPP application. There is way to check if popen failed or not. What about command passed to popen().
Please help. I tried to find it at various places but could not get satisfactory solution.
When a process terminates normally, it is expected to return the exit code of 0 (legally, EXIT_SUCCESS) to the parent. Otherwise, in the case of a crash or any other abnormal termination, a non-zero value is expected to be returned. You can obtain the exit code by calling pclose(). If the code is 0, the child process most probably terminated successfully.
I have a program that needs to run a program we'll call externalProg in parallel on our linux (CentOS) cluster - or rather, it needs to run many instances of externalProg, each on different cores. Each "thread" creates 3 files based on a few parameters - the inputs to externalProg, a command file to tell externalProg how to execute my file, and a bash script to set up the environment (calls a setup script provided by the manufacturer) and actually call externalProg with my inputs.
Since this needs to be parallel with an unknown number of concurrent threads and I don't want to risk overwriting another thread's files, I am creating temp files using
mkstemp("PREFIX_XXXXXX")
for these input files. After the external program runs, I extract the relevant data and store it, and close the temp files (therefore deleting them).
We'll call the files created (Which actually have a name based on the template above)
tmpInputs - Inputs to externalProg
tmpCommand - Input that tells externalProg how to execute tmpInputs
tmpBash - bash script to set up and call externalProg with my inputs
The file tmpBash looks something like
source /path/to/setup/script # Sets up environment variables
externalProg < /path/to/tmpCommand
where tmpCommand is just a simple text file.
The problem I'm having is actually executing the bash script. Within my program, I call
ostringstream launchcmd;
launchcmd << "bash " << path_to_tmpBash
system(launchcmd.str().c_str());
But nothing happens. No error, no warning, no 'file not found' or permission denied or anything. I have verified that the files are being created and have the correct content. The rest of the code after system() is executed successfully (Though it fails since externalProg wasn't run).
Strangely, if I go back to the terminal and type
bash /path/to/tmpBash
then externalProg is executed successfully. I have also cout'd the launchcmd string, copy and pasted that in to the terminal, which also works successfully. For some reason, this only fails when called within my program.
After a bit of experimentation, I've determined that system() calls /bin/sh on our cluster. If I change launchcmd to look like
/path/to/tmpBash
(So that the full command should look like /bin/sh /path/to/tmpBash), I get a permission denied error, which is no surprise. The problem is that I can't chmod +x the tmpBash file while it's still open, and if I close the file, it gets deleted - so I'm not sure how to address that.
Is there something obviously wrong I'm doing, or does system() have some nuance that I'm missing?
edit: I wanted to add that I can successfully call things like
system("echo $PATH")
and get the expected results (in this case, my default $PATH).
Two separate ideas:
Change your SHELL environment variable to be /bin/bash, then call system(),
or:
Use execve directly `execve('/bin/bash', ['/path/to/tmpBash'], environ)
The go test command has support for the -c flag, described as follows:
-c Compile the test binary to pkg.test but do not run it.
(Where pkg is the last element of the package's import path.)
As far as I understand, generating a binary like this is the way to run it interactively using GDB. However, since the test binary is created by combining the source and test files temporarily in some /tmp/ directory, this is what happens when I run list in gdb:
Loading Go Runtime support.
(gdb) list
42 github.com/<username>/<project>/_test/_testmain.go: No such file or directory.
This means I cannot happily inspect the Go source code in GDB like I'm used to. I know it is possible to force the temporary directory to stay by passing the -work flag to the go test command, but then it is still a huge hassle since the binary is not created in that directory and such. I was wondering if anyone found a clean solution to this problem.
Go 1.5 has been released, and there is still no officially sanctioned Go debugger. I haven't had much success using GDB for effectively debugging Go programs or test binaries. However, I have had success using Delve, a non-official debugger that is still undergoing development: https://github.com/derekparker/delve
To run your test code in the debugger, simply install delve:
go get -u github.com/derekparker/delve/cmd/dlv
... and then start the tests in the debugger from within your workspace:
dlv test
From the debugger prompt, you can single-step, set breakpoints, etc.
Give it a whirl!
Unfortunately, this appears to be a known issue that's not going to be fixed. See this discussion:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-nuts/nIA09gp3eNU
I've seen two solutions to this problem.
1) create a .gdbinit file with a set substitute-path command to
redirect gdb to the actual location of the source. This file could be
generated by the go tool but you'd risk overwriting someone's custom
.gdbinit file and would tie the go tool to gdb which seems like a bad
idea.
2) Replace the source file paths in the executable (which are pointing
to /tmp/...) with the location they reside on disk. This is
straightforward if the real path is shorter then the /tmp/... path.
This would likely require additional support from the compiler /
linker to make this solution more generic.
It spawned this issue on the Go Google Code issue tracker, to which the decision ended up being:
https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=2881
This is annoying, but it is the least of many annoying possibilities.
As a rule, the go tool should not be scribbling in the source
directories, which might not even be writable, and it shouldn't be
leaving files elsewhere after it exits. There is next to nothing
interesting in _testmain.go. People testing with gdb can break on
testing.Main instead.
Russ
Status: Unfortunate
So, in short, it sucks, and while you can work around it and GDB a test executable, the development team is unlikely to make it as easy as it could be for you.
I'm still new to the golang game but for what it's worth basic debugging seems to work.
The list command you're trying to work can be used so long as you're already at a breakpoint somewhere in your code. For example:
(gdb) b aws.go:54
Breakpoint 1 at 0x61841: file /Users/mat/gocode/src/github.com/stellar/deliverator/aws/aws.go, line 54.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /Users/mat/gocode/src/github.com/stellar/deliverator/aws/aws.test
[snip: some arnings about BinaryCache]
Breakpoint 1, github.com/stellar/deliverator/aws.imageIsNewer (latest=0xc2081fe2d0, ami=0xc2081fe3c0, ~r2=false)
at /Users/mat/gocode/src/github.com/stellar/deliverator/aws/aws.go:54
54 layout := "2006-01-02T15:04:05.000Z"
(gdb) list
49 func imageIsNewer(latest *ec2.Image, ami *ec2.Image) bool {
50 if latest == nil {
51 return true
52 }
53
54 layout := "2006-01-02T15:04:05.000Z"
55
56 amiCreationTime, amiErr := time.Parse(layout, *ami.CreationDate)
57 if amiErr != nil {
58 panic(amiErr)
This is just after running the following in the aws subdir of my project:
go test -c
gdb aws.test
As an additional caveat, it does seem very selective about where breakpoints can be placed. Seems like it has to be an expression but that conclusion is only via experimentation.
If you're willing to use tools besides GDB, check out godebug. To use it, first install with:
go get github.com/mailgun/godebug
Next, insert a breakpoint somewhere by adding the following statement to your code:
_ = "breakpoint"
Now run your tests with the godebug test command.
godebug test
It supports many of the parameters from the go test command.
-test.bench string
regular expression per path component to select benchmarks to run
-test.benchmem
print memory allocations for benchmarks
-test.benchtime duration
approximate run time for each benchmark (default 1s)
-test.blockprofile string
write a goroutine blocking profile to the named file after execution
-test.blockprofilerate int
if >= 0, calls runtime.SetBlockProfileRate() (default 1)
-test.count n
run tests and benchmarks n times (default 1)
-test.coverprofile string
write a coverage profile to the named file after execution
-test.cpu string
comma-separated list of number of CPUs to use for each test
-test.cpuprofile string
write a cpu profile to the named file during execution
-test.memprofile string
write a memory profile to the named file after execution
-test.memprofilerate int
if >=0, sets runtime.MemProfileRate
-test.outputdir string
directory in which to write profiles
-test.parallel int
maximum test parallelism (default 4)
-test.run string
regular expression to select tests and examples to run
-test.short
run smaller test suite to save time
-test.timeout duration
if positive, sets an aggregate time limit for all tests
-test.trace string
write an execution trace to the named file after execution
-test.v
verbose: print additional output
I have a problem related to passing arguments to a C++ compiled executable. The program emulate the behaviour of a particular inference engine: the setup of the engine is load at runtime from an XML file, and then I want to call it from command line with different input values.
The characteristic of the input are:
Every time that I call the program, the input structure is different, because the system itself is different.
The input is a set of couple {name, value}, one for each part of the system.
I have to separate the configuration XML from the input.
I call the program from a PHP or Node.js server, since it return a result that I expose to the outside through an API.
Input value are obtained from an HTTP post request.
By now I have tried these solutions:
Pass it from the command line ex: "./mysoftware input1 value1 input2 value2 ...etc". A little unconfortable, since I have up to 200 input.
Create a file with all the couples name,value and then call the program that parse the file and then destroy at the end. This is a bottleneck of performance for my API, because at every call I have to create and destruct a file.
Does anyone know a better way to approach this problem?
3. Pass the values to the program via the standard input stream and read them from std::cin inside your C++ program.
I've got a series of cpp source file and I want to write another program to JUDGE if they can run correctly (give input and compare their output with standart output) . so how to:
call/spawn another program, and give a file to be its standard input
limit the time and memory of the child process (maybe setrlimit thing? is there any examples?)
donot let the process to read/write any file
use a file to be its standard output
compare the output with the standard output.
I think the 2nd and 3rd are the core part of this prob. Is there any way to do this?
ps. system is Linux
To do this right, you probably want to spawn the child program with fork, not system.
This allows you to do a few things. First of all, you can set up some pipes to the parent process so the parent can supply the input to the child, and capture the output from the child to compare to the expected result.
Second, it will let you call seteuid (or one of its close relatives like setreuid) to set the child process to run under a (very) limited user account, to prevent it from writing to files. When fork returns in the parent, you'll want to call setrlimit to limit the child's CPU usage.
Just to be clear: rather than directing the child's output to a file, then comparing that to the expected output, I'd capture the child's output directly via a pipe to the parent. From there the parent can write the data to a file if desired, but can also compare the output directly to what's expected, without going through a file.
std::string command = "/bin/local/app < my_input.txt > my_output_file.txt 2> my_error_file.txt";
int rv = std::system( command.c_str() );
1) The system function from the STL allows you to execute a program (basically as if invoked from a shell). Note that this approach is inherenly insecure, so only use it in a trusted environment.
2) You will need to use threads to be able to achieve this. There are a number of thread libraries available for C++, but I cannot give you recommendation.
[After edit in OP's post]
3) This one is harder. You either have to write a wrapper that monitors read/write access to files or do some Linux/Unix privilege magic to prevent it from accessing files.
4) You can redirect the output of a program (that it thinks goes to the standard output) by adding > outFile.txt after the way you would normally invoke the program (see 1)) -- e.g. otherapp > out.txt
5) You could run diff on the saved file (from 3)) to the "golden standard"/expected output captured in another file. Or use some other method that better fits your need (for example you don't care about certain formatting as long as the "content" is there). -- This part is really dependent on your needs. diff does a basic comparing job well.