I am working on a function called add(BigDecimals c) which keeps getting an error that not all control paths are returning a value:
BigDecimal BigDecimal::add(BigDecimal c)
{
string fFirst = to_string(this->fraction()); //fraction part of the first number
string fSecond = to_string(c.fraction()); //fraction part of the second number
if (fFirst.length() < fSecond.length()) //fraction part of first/second number
{
string str(this->toString()); //convert fraction to string
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < fFirst.length() - fSecond.length(); i++) //difference between first and second
{
str += "0"; //pad in the 0's
}
this->equals(str); //call the equals function
}
if (fSecond.length() < fFirst.length()) //flip numbers around, second < first
{
string str(this->toString()); //convert fraction to string
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < fSecond.length() - fFirst.length(); i++) //difference between second and first
{
str += "0"; //pad in the 0's
}
this->equals(str); //call the equals function
}
for (unsigned int i = fSecond.length(); i > 0; i++)
{
int carryFlag = 0; //carry flag set to 0
int sum = carryFlag + stoi(this->at(i).toString()) + stoi(c.at(i).toString());
if (sum >= 10) //greater than 10
{
carryFlag = 1;
sum = sum % 10;
}
else //less than 10
{
carryFlag = 0; //set carry flag to 0
}
return BigDecimal(to_string(sum)); //this is the only thing I want to
//return
}
//It wants to return something here, but I am not sure what.
}
I have tried to fix this by replacing if statements with else statements, but nothing really works. I have no idea how to fix this error, so any help is appreciated!
Your logic is flawed (and the error message and the fact you don't know what to do about it is a good indication of that).
Your code will always return on the first iteration of the loop. Clearly what you want to do is accumulate a digit string one digit at a time, but that's not what the code you've written does.
This is something more like what you want. However I think you have other errors to do with the padding of numbers, so this code isn't going to work, but hopefully will give you some idea.
string result = "";
int carryFlag = 0; //carry flag set to 0
for (unsigned int i = fSecond.length(); i > 0; i--)
{
int sum = carryFlag + stoi(this->at(i).toString()) + stoi(c.at(i).toString());
if (sum >= 10) //greater than 10
{
carryFlag = 1;
sum = sum % 10;
}
else //less than 10
{
carryFlag = 0; //set carry flag to 0
}
result = to_string(sum) + result;
}
if (carryflag)
result = "1" + result;
return BigDecimal(result);
Notice the return is only after the loop has finished, and a new variable called result accumulates the digit generated each time round the loop.
Also notice the carryflag variable has been moved outside of the loop. The whole point of the carry is to hold the carry from one iteration of the loop to the next, so it can't be inside the loop. Also if there is a carry left over after all the digits have been added, you need to add a one digit to the beginning of the result.
Also I've changed i++ to i-- in the loop. You are iterating backwards through the strings you are adding so you need i--. It's an improvment but as I said before I still think this loop is wrong.
Clearly you understand how to do long addition, but what you haven't mastered yet is how to translate that into code. You have to think very carefully and precisely about what you are asking the computer to do.
Given a string S.We need to tell if we can make it to palindrome by removing exactly one letter from it or not.
I have a O(N^2) approach by modifying Edit Distance method.Is their any better way ?
My Approach :
int ModifiedEditDistance(const string& a, const string& b, int k) {
int i, j, n = a.size();
int dp[MAX][MAX];
memset(dp, 0x3f, sizeof dp);
for (i = 0 ; i < n; i++)
dp[i][0] = dp[0][i] = i;
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
int from = max(1, i-k), to = min(i+k, n);
for (j = from; j <= to; j++) {
if (a[i-1] == b[j-1]) // same character
dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1];
// note that we don't allow letter substitutions
dp[i][j] = min(dp[i][j], 1 + dp[i][j-1]); // delete character j
dp[i][j] = min(dp[i][j], 1 + dp[i-1][j]); // insert character i
}
}
return dp[n][n];
}
How to improve space complexity as max size of string can go upto 10^5.
Please help.
Example : Let String be abc then answer is "NO" and if string is "abbcbba then answer is "YES"
The key observation is that if the first and last characters are the same then you needn't remove either of them; which is to say that xSTRINGx can be turned into a palindrome by removing a single letter if and only if STRING can (as long as STRING is at least one character long).
You want to define a method (excuse the Java syntax--I'm not a C++ coder):
boolean canMakePalindrome(String s, int startIndex, int endIndex, int toRemove);
which determines whether the part of the string from startIndex to endIndex-1 can be made into a palindrome by removing toRemove characters.
When you consider canMakePalindrome(s, i, j, r), then you can define it in terms of smaller problems like this:
If j-i is 1 then return true; if it's 0 then return true if and only if r is 0. The point here is that a 1-character string is a palindrome regardless of whether you remove a character; a 0-length string is a palindrome, but can't be made into one by removing a character (because there aren't any to remove).
If s[i] and s[j-1] are the same, then it's the same answer as canMakePalindrome(s, i+1, j-1, r).
If they're different, then either s[i] or s[j-1] needs removing. If toRemove is zero, then return false, because you haven't got any characters left to remove. If toRemove is 1, then return true if either canMakePalindrome(s, i+1, j, 0) or canMakePalindrome(s, i, j-1, 0). This is because you're now testing whether it's already a palindrome if you remove one of those two characters.
Now this can be coded up pretty easily, I think.
If you wanted to allow for removal of more than one character, you'd use the same idea, but using dynamic programming. With only one character to remove, dynamic programming will reduce the constant factor, but won't reduce the asymptotic time complexity (linear in the length of the string).
Psudocode (Something like this I havn't tested it at all).
It is based on detecting the conditions that you CAN remove a character, ie
There is exactly 1 wrong character
It is a palendrome (0 mismatch)
O(n) in time, O(1) in space.
bool foo(const std::string& s)
{
int i = 0;
int j = s.size()-1;
int mismatch_count = 0;
while (i < j)
{
if (s[i]==s[j])
{
i++; j--;
}
else
{
mismatch_count++;
if (mismatch_count > 1) break;
//override first preference if cannot find match for next character
if (s[i+1] == s[j] && ((i+2 >= j-1)||s[i+2]==s[j-1]))
{
i++;
}
else if (s[j-1]==s[i])
{
j--;
}
else
{
mismatch_count++; break;
}
}
}
//can only be a palendrome if you remove a character if there is exactly one mismatch
//or if a palendrome
return (mismatch_count == 1) || (mismatch_count == 0);
}
Here's a (slightly incomplete) solution which takes O(n) time and O(1) space.
// returns index to remove to make a palindrome; string::npos if not possible
size_t willYouBeMyPal(const string& str)
{
size_t toRemove = string::npos;
size_t len = str.length();
for (size_t c1 = 0, c2 = len - 1; c1 < c2; ++c1, --c2) {
if (str[c1] != str[c2]) {
if (toRemove != string::npos) {
return string::npos;
}
bool canRemove1 = str[c1 + 1] == str[c2];
bool canRemove2 = str[c1] == str[c2 - 1];
if (canRemove1 && canRemove2) {
abort(); // TODO: handle the case where both conditions are true
} else if (canRemove1) {
toRemove = c1++;
} else if (canRemove2) {
toRemove = c2--;
} else {
return string::npos;
}
}
}
// if str is a palindrome already, remove the middle char and it still is
if (toRemove == string::npos) {
toRemove = len / 2;
}
return toRemove;
}
Left as an exercise is what to do if you get this:
abxyxcxyba
The correct solution is:
ab_yxcxyba
But you might be led down a bad path:
abxyxcx_ba
So when you find the "next" character on both sides is a possible solution, you need to evaluate both possibilities.
I wrote a sample with O(n) complexity that works for the tests I threw at it. Not many though :D
The idea behind it is to ignore the first and last letters if they are the same, deleting one of them if they are not, and reasoning what happens when the string is small enough. The same result could be archived with a loop instead of the recursion, which would save some space (making it O(1)), but it's harder to understand and more error prone IMO.
bool palindrome_by_1(const string& word, int start, int end, bool removed = false) // Start includes, end excludes
{
if (end - start == 2){
if (!removed)
return true;
return word[start] == word[end - 1];
}
if (end - start == 1)
return true;
if (word[start] == word[end - 1])
return palindrome_by_1(word, start + 1, end - 1, removed);
// After this point we need to remove a letter
if (removed)
return false;
// When two letters don't match, try to eliminate one of them
return palindrome_by_1(word, start + 1, end, true) || palindrome_by_1(word, start, end - 1, true);
}
Checking if a single string is palindrome is O(n). You can implement a similar algorithm than moves two pointers, one from the start and another from the end. Move each pointer as long as the chars are the same, and on the first mismatch try to match which char you can skip, and keep moving both pointers as long as the rest chars are the same. Keep track of the first mismatch. This is O(n).
I hope my algorithm will pass without providing code.
If a word a1a2....an can be made a palindrome by removing ak, we can search for k as following:
If a1 != an, then the only possible k would be 1 or n. Just check if a1a2....an-1 or a2a3....an is a palindrome.
If a1 == an, next step is solving the same problem for a2....an-1. So we have a recursion here.
public static boolean pal(String s,int start,int end){
if(end-start==1||end==start)
return true;
if(s.charAt(start)==s.charAt(end))
return pal(s.substring(start+1, end),0,end-2);
else{
StringBuilder sb=new StringBuilder(s);
sb.deleteCharAt(start);
String x=new String(sb);
if(x.equals(sb.reverse().toString()))
return true;
StringBuilder sb2=new StringBuilder(s);
sb2.deleteCharAt(end);
String x2=new String(sb2);
if(x2.equals(sb2.reverse().toString()))
return true;
}
return false;
}
I tried the following,f and b are the indices at which characters do not match
int canwemakepal(char *str)//str input string
{
long int f,b,len,i,j;
int retval=0;
len=strlen(str);
f=0;b=len-1;
while(str[f]==str[b] && f<b)//continue matching till we dont get a mismatch
{
f++;b--;
}
if(f>=b)//if the index variable cross over each other, str is palindrome,answer is yes
{
retval=1;//true
}
else if(str[f+1]==str[b])//we get a mismatch,so check if removing character at str[f] will give us a palindrome
{
i=f+2;j=b-1;
while(str[i]==str[j] && i<j)
{
i++;j--;
}
if(i>=j)
retval=1;
else
retval=0;
}
else if(str[f]==str[b-1])//else check the same for str[b]
{
i=f+1;j=b-2;
while(str[i]==str[j] && i<j)
{
i++;j--;
}
if(i>=j)
retval=1;
else
retval=0;
}
else
retval=0;
return retval;
}
I created this solution,i tried with various input giving correct result,still not accepted as correct solution,Check it n let me know if m doing anything wrong!! Thanks in advance.
public static void main(String[] args)
{
Scanner s = new Scanner(System.in);
int t = s.nextInt();
String result[] = new String[t];
short i = 0;
while(i < t)
{
String str1 = s.next();
int length = str1.length();
String str2 = reverseString(str1);
if(str1.equals(str2))
{
result[i] = "Yes";
}
else
{
if(length == 2)
{
result[i] = "Yes";
}
else
{
int x = 0,y = length-1;
int counter = 0;
while(x<y)
{
if(str1.charAt(x) == str1.charAt(y))
{
x++;
y--;
}
else
{
counter ++;
if(str1.charAt(x) == str1.charAt(y-1))
{
y--;
}
else if(str1.charAt(x+1) == str1.charAt(y))
{
x++;
}
else
{
counter ++;
break;
}
}
}
if(counter >= 2)
{
result[i] = "No";
}
else
result[i]="Yes";
}
}
i++;
} // Loop over
for(int j=0; j<i;j++)
{
System.out.println(result[j]);
}
}
public static String reverseString(String original)
{
int length = original.length();
String reverse = "";
for ( int i = length - 1 ; i >= 0 ; i-- )
reverse = reverse + original.charAt(i);
return reverse;
}
Is there any technique for finding the reverse when there are zeros at the end.
While following the algorithm of %10 technique the result is 52. And the 0's are missing.
I have got the reverse by just printing the reminders (with 0's). But I am not satisfied as I wish to display the answer as the value in a variable.
Kindly tell me is there any technique to store a value 005 to a variable and also to display 005 (please don't use String or Character or array).
Numbers are stored as binary 0 and 1 and so they always have leading 0's which are chopped off. e.g. a 64-bit integer has 64-bit bits, always and when it is printed these leading 0's are dropped.
You need to know how many leading zeros you want to keep and only use that many when you print. i.e. you can record how many leading zeros there were in a normal number without encoding it e.g. by adding a 1 at the start. i.e. 0052 is recorded as 10052 and you skip the first digit when you print.
If you need to store a single value you can do the following. I use do/while so that 0 becomes 10 and is printed as 0. The number 0 is the one place where not all leading zeros are dropped (as it would be empty otherwise)
This appears to be the solution you want and it should be basically the same in C or C++
static long reverse(long num) {
long rev = 1; // the 1 marks the start of the number.
do {
rev = rev * 10 + num % 10;
num /= 10;
} while(num != 0);
return rev;
}
// make the reversed number printable.
static String toStringReversed(long num) {
return Long.toString(num).substring(1);
}
long l = reverse(2500); // l = 10052
An alternative is to print the digits as you go and thus not need to store it.
e.g.
static void printReverse(long l) {
do {
System.out.print(l % 10);
l /= 10;
} while(l != 0);
}
or you can have the input record the number of digits.
static void printReverse(long l, int digits) {
for(int i = 0; i < digits; i++) {
System.out.print(l % 10);
l /= 10;
}
}
// prints leading zero backwards as well
printReverse(2500, 6); // original number is 002500
prints
005200
You cannot represent an integer with leading zeros as a single integer variable, that information is simply not part of the way bits are allocated in an integer. You must use something larger, i.e. a string or an array of individual (small integer) digits.
You can't store them in a simple integer variable because in binary format
00101 is same as 000101 which is same as 101 which only results into 5. The convertion between a decimal number and binary numbers don't consider leading zeroes so it is not possible to store leading zeroes with the same integer variable.
You can print it but you can't store the leading zeroes unless you use array of ints...
int num = 500;
while(num > 0)
{
System.out.print(num%10);
num = num/10;
}
Alternatively you can store the count of leading zeroes as a separate entity and combine them when ever you need to use. As shown below.
int num = 12030;
boolean leading=true;
int leadingCounter = 0;
int rev = 0;
while(num > 0)
{
int r = num%10;
if(r == 0 && leading == true)
leadingCounter++;
else
leading = false;
rev = rev*10 + r;
num = num/10;
}
for(int i = 1; i <= leadingCounter ; i++)
System.out.print("0");
System.out.println(rev);
I think the accepted answer is a good one, in that it both refutes the parts of the question that are wrong and also offers a solution that will work. However, the code there is all Java, and it doesn't expose the prettiest API. Here's a C++ version that based on the code from the accepted answer.
(Ha ha for all my talk, my answer didn't reverse the string! Best day ever!)
After going back to school and getting a degree, I came up with this answer: it has the makes the somewhat dubious claim of "not using strings" or converting any values to string. Can't avoid characters, of course, since we are printing the value in the end.
#include <ostream>
#include <iostream>
class ReverseLong {
public:
ReverseLong(long value) {
long num = value;
bool leading = true;
this->value = 0;
this->leading_zeros = 0;
while (num != 0) {
int digit = num % 10;
num = num / 10;
if (leading && digit == 0) {
this->leading_zeros += 1;
} else {
this->value = this->value * 10 + digit;
leading = false;
}
}
};
friend std::ostream & operator<<(std::ostream& out, ReverseLong const & r);
private:
long value;
int leading_zeros;
};
std::ostream & operator<<(std::ostream& out, ReverseLong const & r) {
for (int i =0; i < r.leading_zeros; i++) {
out << 0;
}
out << r.value;
return out;
};
int main () {
ReverseLong f = ReverseLong(2500); // also works with numbers like "0"!
std::cout << f << std::endl; / prints 0052
};
This is a task from school, I am supposed to write a recursive function that will convert a given int to a string, I know I'm close but I can't point the missing thing in my code, hints are welcome.
void intToStr(unsigned int num, char s[])
{
if (num < 10)
{
s[0] = '0' + num;
}
else
{
intToStr(num/10, s);
s[strlen(s)] = '0' + num%10;
}
}
Edit: my problem is that the function only works for pre initialized arrays, but if I let the function work on an uninitialized function it will not work.
Unless your array is zero-initialized, you are forgetting to append a null terminator when you modify it.
Just add it right after the last character:
void intToStr(unsigned int num, char s[])
{
if (num < 10)
{
s[0] = '0' + num;
s[1] = 0;
}
else
{
intToStr(num/10, s);
s[strlen(s)+1] = 0; //you have to do this operation here, before you overwrite the null terminator
s[strlen(s)] = '0' + num%10;
}
}
Also, your function is assuming that s has enough space to hold all the digits, so you better make sure it does (INT_MAX is 10 digits long I think, so you need at least 11 characters).
Andrei Tita already showed you the problem you had with the NULL terminators. I will show you an alternative, so you can compare and contrast different approaches:
int intToStr(unsigned int num, char *s)
{
// We use this index to keep track of where, in the buffer, we
// need to output the current character. By default, we write
// at the first character.
int idx = 0;
// If the number we're printing is larger than 10 we recurse
// and use the returned index when we continue.
if(num > 9)
idx = intToStr(num / 10, s);
// Write our digit at the right position, and increment the
// position by one.
s[idx++] = '0' + (num %10);
// Write a terminating NULL character at the current position
// to ensure the string is always NULL-terminated.
s[idx] = 0;
// And return the current position in the string to whomever
// called us.
return idx;
}
You will notice that my alternative also returns the final length of the string that it output into the buffer.
Good luck with your coursework going forward!
I am working on a programming assignment in which we are making our own BigNum class. One of the constructors needs to be set up so that it can take a number from a string (i.e. 342567) and reads it into an array. However if the number were 0000000342567 it would have to be able to skip over the 0s and just read 342567.
Where is what i have so far but am lost on trimming the 0s
BigNum::BigNum(const char strin[])
{
size_t size = strlen(strin);
positive = true;
capacity = size;
digits = new size_t[capacity];
used=0;
while(used<size)
{
if(strin[size - used -1] =='-')
{
positive = false;
size --;
}
else if(strin[size - used -1] =='+')
{
size --;
}
else
{
digits[used] = strin[size - used -1] - '0';
used++;
}
}
}
Here is the assignment description if it helps
http://csel.cs.colorado.edu/%7Eekwhite/CSCI2270Fall2011/hw2/Homework2.pdf
Here's a hint:
Write a separate loop at the beginning that skips over all the zeros.
Add this just before your while loop:
for (int i=0; i < size; i++)
{
if (strin[i] >= '1' && strin[i] <= '9')
{
used = i;
break;
}
}
This way, your while loop begins reading the string only from the index where the number actually begins, skipping over all leading 0s.
This should handle the leading sign as well:
BigNum::BigNum(const char strin[])
{
size_t size = strlen(strin);
positive = true;
used=0;
if (strin[0] == '+' || strin[0] == '-')
{
//set positive or negative
used++;
}
while (used < size)
{
if (strin[used] != '0')
break;
used++; //used will only increment if above if condition failed.
}
int digitIndex = 0;
digits = new size_t[size-used]; //create digits array here so it isn't larger than needed
while(used<size)
{
digits[digitIndex++] = strin[used++];
}
}
You just need to add another while loop before the one you have.
But just some other hints:
You can't change the sign of the number at any digit, the sign depends only on the very first charachter. So if you had a string like -2345, that'll be ok, but if you had something other like: 234-88 then this should be invalid, what will you do with this then?
Also the digits array shouldn't really be equal to size, but rather should drop the sign digit if it did exist, so how will you deal with capacity?
Hope that's helpful!