This shakes my understanding of computers and operating systems on a level that makes me very uneasy. I have just spent about an hour entering different iterations of compile commands to g++ and in my exasperation I renamed the executable which kept having the delay from game.exe to gameg.exe and all of a sudden the problem vanished.
Here's some more background: I was noticing recently that when I ran my Eclipse unit test build, when I start with an SDL enabled test it would open the SDL window and freeze for about 20 seconds before being able to get the test started. On subsequent tests (which call SDL_Quit() and re-initialize SDL as part of the test process) this delay is not present. Now I have ascertained that ONLY when the executable is named exactly "game.exe" does this happen! I rename it to any other filename and it goes along running tests happily, initializing the SDL system within a second like it usually does. I had assumed before that there must be some kind of bug that was causing my Eclipse build to have this behavior which wasn't present in the makefile build, but it turns out if I take the eclipse build and rename its executable (the project folder it's in is called game hence game.exe) it doesn't exhibit the behavior.
Likewise I take my makefile build (whose filename is entropy_unittest_disp.exe fyi) and rename it to game.exe and it begins to do this. I rename it to game and it also does it (I am running from mingw's bash.. when not with .exe extension, explorer doesn't know it's an executable). However I changed it to game.exx and it worked normally.
WHAT IS THIS BLACK MAGIC? Why should a program function differently depending on its filename??? I do query argv[0] and i actually do it to print to console its value (for debug purposes) but unsurprisingly it just prints the program and its path. No logic is ever performed on it in my program.
I tried to run GDB to find out where it is freezing but once I press Ctrl+C GDB simply exits.
does anybody have any idea what this might be caused by? A virus?
edit: I downloaded this demo from this site: http://www.sdltutorials.com/sdl-opengl-tutorial-basics/
extracted it, renamed the file to game.exe, and yup, same thing happens. WHAT IS THIS? I'm going to try running dependency walker next to see if something's trying to hook into it.
I'm assuming you have either a AMD (ATI) or Nvidia graphics card with their official drivers.
Chances are, game.exe is the executable name for an actual game released and your drivers are running special optimizations for the "game" or loading the Crossfire or SLI profiles for this game. A quick Google search seems to tell me that Resident Evil 4 calls their executable "game.exe."
I recommend taking a look at this link for further details as to what may be happening:
http://www.kn00tcn.net/site/ati-catalyst-profiles/
not sure how to reply to steven's comment on the top answer, but regarding driver profiles, it's just a basic brute force check of .exe filenames
some games are guaranteed to be in a specific sub folder, so the driver looks for where the exe is located, such as '\team fortress 2\hl2.exe'
but since most games let you pick what folder name you're installing to, & a lot of the time the exe is in that same root folder, the drivers have no choice but to blindly assume gameX.exe is going to be gameX
a nice 'side effect' of this is you can force other game profiles on any game for troubleshooting purposes, or to try to enable CF/SLI scaling
so always try to make sure that your executable has an original name to know that the gfx driver isnt attempting to run 'optimizations' made exclusively for other games
Could this be due to Anti virus software running on your OS? Certain files are commonly used in Virus "Game.exe" could be one of them and hence additional care from OS / AV to ensure that it is safe
Test it in clean windows, without any extra software installation, if it work fine, then maybe you have some protection software like Anti-virus or sandbox , ... , if you have any of this software disable them, and test again
Check to see if game.exe is listed in the Image File Execution Options registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options. It can be used to launch a particular program as a debugger for an application with a particular name. (More info on Image File Execution Options)
An EXE will behave differently based on its name due to AppCompat Shimming. Check the loaded module list and see if there are a bunch of DLLs that start with "ac" loaded into your app.
Related
I'm a developer of Windows desktop software, and from time to time our app crashes. In rare cases I'd like to get a customer to run a debug version of the app to send me a stack trace so I know where it crashed. I followed the instructions in here:
Windows C++ stack trace from a running app
...but while it works on my development machine, it doesn't work on any client machine or those of my colleagues, who don't have Visual Studio installed. So I presume that there's some .dll or something they need before it'll work. They're using the same .exe I'm using, i.e. the one I compiled in VC++ in debug mode.
After some painstaking "message window" debugging, I learnt it's failing in SymGetSymFromAddr64() - this returns FALSE. But when I walk the stack, this always returns FALSE or it returns garbage that doesn't make sense (random unrelated method names), as if it's the PC values which are invalid, not the mapping process. To reiterate, it's a debug mode .exe that produces a perfect symbolic stack trace on my development machine.
I did some research and found some mentions of "dbghelp.dll" and "imagehlp.dll" but I just ended up confused. "dbghelp.dll" ships with all versions of Windows, but with reduced functionality. There's some other things I could install, but it's a little scary to be installing some Windows "WDK" or "debug kits" which might overwrite important system .dll's or do god-knows-what to your computer.
So what I need to know is: "what's the simplest set of instructions I can give to these helper customers e.g. the minimum set of .dll's and where to stick them so that we can get proper symbolic information out of the stack traces when our program crashes?"
The most likely reason for failing to find the symbols is that the .pdb file cannot be found. Even if you generate a .exe in debug mode, the symbols are not in the .exe, they are in the .pdb file. Through a lot of empirical testing, it seems that the process has the pathname of the .pdb hardcoded in it, so if your clients don't have that file at that location, they won't necessarily find it. However, you can supply a "search path" to the SymInitialize() function - a folder or set of folders to use to search for the .pdb file.
In my configuration, I had an exe called "Edval.exe" and a .pdb called "DebugEdval.pdb". The process searches for "DebugEdval.pdb" in the search folders. This corresponds to what you've configured in "Properties > Linker > Debugging > Generate Program Database File".
I'm getting ready to enter Ludum Dare this evening, and I'm getting really frustrated because I'm unable to build my project into a standalone .exe.
I feel like this question has been asked at least 100 times but none of the answers I'm finding are helping me out at all... I don't really understand what static linking is or how to do it, and that doesn't even seem like the solution to my problem; I don't mind if I'm shipping out a bunch of .dll files with my program, I just want the program to run on its own so I can submit it at the end of the competition.
Basically, my visual studio (2010 express) configuration follows exactly LazyFoo's tutorial on setting it up. Everything runs fine on both debug and release configurations when I start the program from visual studio, but when I navigate into the Debug or Release folders of the project and try to run the .exe, the programs break with an error about abort() being called, or they give me the error "X program has stopped working."
I'm including all of my DLLs in the same folder as the executables are being placed, and the game runs perfectly fine from inside VS, but I just can't seem how to figure out how to compile it as a standalone .exe (or even including a folder full of dlls) without it falling apart.
Can someone give me a pretty precise way to get this working? Any help would be great.
If you have an EXE, then your program is compiling. Most likely in debug mode, the program is running using a specific directory as the current working directory (CWD), but when you run it as standalone, the CWD is different.
The CWD affects both the DLL that can be loaded as well as the search of any file that uses a relative path (that is, not starting with a [back]slash). That is probably your problem: textures, graphics, configuration files, fonts...
My advise is to set the CWD in the debugging runs (there is an option for that) to be exactly the same than that of the EXE, that is the default when you run the EXE. Then you will be able to debug your crash.
I've been running and compiling a program on my Windows 7 64-bit machine for several months now, but recently I had to change several VC project settings of the static libs that it uses and now the generated executable file requires me to run it in "Windows XP Compatibility Mode".
Compiled on Windows7 64-bit machine with Visual Studio 2010 SP1
The program I am generating is being built in Win32, debug mode.
The static lib projects specify Target Machine /X86.
When I run the program from the debugger, it start up and runs, however if running via the windows icon, it requires XP compatibility mode.
When trying to start outside of the debugger the EXE shows up in task manager for a second then goes away.
I've tried using Microsoft Application Verifier on it, however I don't know what to look for in the output.
I've been unable to find any details on how to troubleshoot this issue so if anyone has any ways if finding what could be causing this recent Compatibility Mode requirement I'd love to hear how it was fixed.
I have the source/projects/solutions for the majority of the static libs that I link against, as well as the exe file generated, however some of the external dependencies I only have the .lib,.dll, and .h files for. This means I can change (most) of the project settings for the dependencies if neccessary, but I need to know which ones to look for.
Thanks
To be honest, don't be afraid to make another project and copy the code files, even if it's 5 projects. You need to cut the problem in half. If it works with the new projects then it's the project files, if not, it's the code. Making projects isn't that hard really, though I'm sure a source of much consternation and something people avoid. If its the projects you can diff the files and see what happened by process of elimination. If you are really worried, copy the entire solution to another folder; always make backups.
The problem is that you probably won't be able to hoist enough information up to us to get a meaningful answer unless get lucky, and all the answers will be shots in the dark.
So I'm goign to take this question as "this happens, what can I do about it". The strategy above will get you out of it, if this used to work before. This exercise will arm you for the future and will be more productive in the long term. Go look at UAC and manifest files, aka Vista+ difference tht dramatically changes load and run behaviour (Linker Commands, Vista Migration Guide) if you need one thing to look at, but try the above process.
----
Other generic things to try:
1) another machine
2) another install of VS
3) a simple project with one window that does nothing to prove everything else in your tool chain and environment is ok.
4) planting message boxes along the code path with different messages so you know where its crapping out.
5) turing on pdb in release and runnign outside of debugger. If craps out, then try debugging and see if still craps out, but you get to see where.
6) assume that your code is unstable and you were getting lucky when it used to work. (this one is no fun). Many times things work in debug and not in release due to mem layout being different. If your progam is large you can find creative ways to use #if's whatever to elimitate code from running while haivng the whole thing still load. You can find the code that causes the bad behaviour.
7) turn off UAC and error reporting if its on, see if changes.
8) go find the "run without debugging" menu button in Visual Studio, so you don't have to go run it with the icon. That's an accident waiting to happen, and eliminates one more environmental difference. It looks like the run with debugging button, but it's hollow, a plain green triangle. It's under debug menu set. My oppinion is that it has done more harm than good to not have that on the bar by default as its confused many many people to think launching wiht VS means always using the debugger.
and so on....
I have a program that runs fantastically when run from inside Visual Studio 2010 Express but when built and taken out, it has problems. I have set up the external test environment the same as when it is run from within Visual Studio so that shouldn't be the problem. I want to attach it to the .exe to see where the crash is but I don't have the non-Express versions.
Any suggestions? Why would a program crash outside of the the VSC++ 2010 Express environment but run perfectly inside.
I would post code but it's a huge project, not a line that would cause an error.
Thank you so much for your time.
It's very difficult to know for certain without knowing what the crash is, but a couple of common issues that may cause this:
Environment variables not the same. Perhaps you are relying on something in vcvars32.bat in your test environment.
The PATH environment variable is not the same and your picking up some bad or incompatible DLL.
Your code is somehow dependant on the current working directory being the one when run from Visual Studio.
Wikipedia to the rescue?
Time can also be a factor in heisenbugs. Executing a program under control of a debugger can change the execution timing of the program as compared to normal execution. Time-sensitive bugs such as race conditions may not reproduce when the program is slowed down by single-stepping source lines in the debugger. This is particularly true when the behavior involves interaction with an entity not under the control of a debugger, such as when debugging network packet processing between two machines and only one is under debugger control.
Also, note that User32.dll slightly changes its behavior when under a debugger, in order to make debugging easier for you. That shouldn't change anything, though.
You could debug this using the freely available Debugger Tools for Windows. There's plenty of documentation and quick start guides available, especially the chm included in the install. In your case, you may want to try the following:
Make sure you have the PDBs for your app available somewhere on a share.
Attach to the running instance of the app: windbg -p <PID>. Note that you can also start the program under the context of the debugger by doing windbg -g foo.exe.
Repro the crash.
Change the symbol path to your symbols and the Microsoft public symbol server to get proper symbols for components: .sympath x:\YourPathToPDBs; SRV*x:\symbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
Tell the debugger to reload symbols using your path: .reload
Get a callstack by hitting k in the debugger.
That's the barebones you need to figure out where it's crashing. You can then go deeper and try to analyze exactly why it's crashing by looking at the debugger chm or other resources on MSDN or Tess's blog. One useful command is dv to dump local variables for a particular frame. If the callstack doesn't give line numbers, type .lines and then hit k or kb.
You could surround all code in your Main function with a try catch block. When you catch an excepcion, write to a log file the stack trace.
Then run your exe and check the log file to know where your program is crashing.
PS: Don't forget to place the *.pdb file together with the exe file, otherwise you won't be able to get the stacktrace information.
I realise this question is a couple of years old, but I have been experiencing the same thing and came upon a possible culprit (the actual culprit in my case), which may help others who have this issue.
One important difference when running an application within Visual Studio and running it outside is the Current Working Directory ("CWD").
A typical directory structure for a Visual C++ Solution/Project is along these lines:
Solution <- the location of your solution file
Debug <- where the Debug executables end up
Release <- where the Release executables end up
Project <- the location of your project file
Debug <- where Debug intermediate files end up
Release <- where Release intermediate files end up
When you execute the application from within Studio, either with "Start Debugging" or "Start Without Debugging", the default CWD is the Project directory, so in this case Solution\Project.
However, when you execute outside by simply double-clicking the application, the CWD is the application directory (Solution\Debug for example).
If you are attempting to open a file from the current directory (which is what happens when you do std::ifstream ifstr("myfile.txt")), whether it succeeds depends on where you were when you started the application.
I've completed a simple numbers-version of the game "Towers of Hanoi" using xcode's command line tool in C++. Being accustomed to PC compilers like borland's and visual-c, I've attempted to "share" the game with others via e-mail by simply attaching the executable product built by xcode. However, the recipients can't run the program as it shows up in a different format - usually machine code, it sounds like.
After a bit of extensive searching, I'm realizing the complexity of building projects within xcode's IDE and the variations on the build settings/ targets, etc.
Anyone know how to build a self-contained c++ executable to be universally run? I don't go outside the STL library for this game. I'd greatly appreciate any help.
thanks
OS X is based on Unix, which uses plain binary files (i.e. no filename extension) as executables. If they have a certain "executable permission," they can be double-clicked to be run as executables, or run from the command line. However, this permission can't be sent over email - it's metadata within the file system itself, and this makes sense from a security standpoint (you wouldn't want spammers sending you executable viruses over email right?). So when the recipient receives the binary, they'll need to run the following command line command on it, assuming "hanoi" is the name of the binary file:
chmod +x /path/to/hanoi
If you really want to package it as an instantly double-clickable application, you'll need to give it a native UI and package it as a .app, then put that .app (which is actually a folder with the .app extension) in an archive to distribute. Sorry if that's more work than you were hoping for. Hope this helps!
Sharing applications across dot releases of the same OS can be notoriously difficult on the Mac (at least, as far as personal experience goes).
In order to be able to share your application with the least amount of effort, you will need to figure out:
What project type is this? Are you using any resources like images etc?
What version of the OS your friends are using? If they are not on the Mac, you're out of luck (or you'll have to recompile for their OS-es).
If they run Mac, check out that you have the same OS versions, if you have developed on Leopard and someone's running on SnowLeopard your application might simply fail. (I also ran into issues between Mac OS 10.5.4 and 10.5.3 so keep your fingers crossed.)
Check out what sort of hardware you are running. Are you building for your hardware (say, MacIntel) only or are you creating an Universal Binary?
Make sure that all resources are packaged into your application bundle. Make sure your application uses only relative paths.
Check if you are not writing to special folders (i.e. use only temp and/or word-writable locations, if you need to).
I wish I could give a more detailed/to the point reply but unfortunately you'll have to figure out some of the answers yourself (without any other specific information about the error you are getting).
If you're satisfied with a command line tool rather than a double-clickable app, it should suffice to zip it and attach that to the e-mail. Be sure to build universal if anyone you're sending to might be using a PowerPC-based Mac. Oh, and set the deployment target to the minimum OS that any recipient might be using.