I want to know if it is possible to have multiple layers which can be manipulated independently and displayed in an overlapping manner.
Here is what I want to do. I'm implemeting a Turtle Graphics API. I want to animate the turtle movement. I was wondering if i could have all the graphics in one layer and the turtle (which I'm representing using a small isosceles triangle) alone in another layer so that I can erase the turtle by clearing this layer and without affecting the graphics layer and redraw the turtle in another location/orientation on the turtle plane.
OpenGL is not a scene graph.
OpenGL is (generally) not a classic 2D framebuffer where you want to try to minimize redraws. With OpenGL you'll generally be redrawing the entire scene each frame after clearing the depth and color buffers.
You have several options:
1) Disable the depth buffer/depth check and render your layers back to front.
2) Make sure each of your layers has an appropriate Z coordinate and render them in whatever order, letting the Z buffer take care of getting the layering right. Won't work if your layers are translucent.
3) Render your turtle path to a texture via whatever method you feel like supporting (glCopyPixels(), PBOs, FBOs, cairo). Render a screen-sized textured quad and your turtle on top.
4) Redraw your turtle path in full each frame, oldest point first. Shouldn't be slow unless you have line count in the hundreds of thousands. Make sure to use vertex arrays or VBOs.
Related
Not long ago, I tried out a program from an OpenGL guidebook that was said to be double buffered; it displayed a spinning rectangle on the screen. Unfortunately, I don't have the book anymore, and I haven't found a clear, straightforward definition of what a buffer is in general. My guess is that it is a "place" to draw things, where using a lot could be like layering?
If that is the case, I am wondering if I can use multiple buffers to my advantage for a polygon clipping program. I have a nice little window that allows the user to draw polygons on the screen, plus a utility to drag and draw a selection box over the polygons. When the user has drawn the selection rectangle and lets go of the mouse, the polygons will be clipped based on the rectangle boundaries.
That is doable enough, but I also want the user to be able to start over: when the escape key is pressed, the clip box should disappear, and the original polygons should be restored. Since I am doing things pixel-by-pixel, it seems very difficult to figure out how to change the rectangle pixel colors back to either black like the background or the color of a particular polygon, depending on where they were drawn (unless I find a way to save the colors when each polygon pixel is drawn, but that seems overboard). I was wondering if it would help to give the rectangle its own buffer, in the hopes that it would act like a sort of transparent layer that could easily be cleared off (?) Is this the way buffers can be used, or do I need to find another solution?
OpenGL does know multiple kinds of buffers:
Framebuffers: Portions of memory to which drawing operations are directed changing pixel values in the buffer. OpenGL by default has on-screen buffers, which can be split into a front and a backbuffer, where drawing operations happen invisible on the backbuffer and are swapped to the front when finishes. In addition to that OpenGL uses a depth buffer for depth testing Z sort implementation, a stencil buffer used to limit rendering to cut-out (=stencil) like selected portions of the framebuffer. There used to be auxiliary and accumulation buffers. However those have been superseeded by so called framebuffer objects, which are user created object, combining several textures or renderbuffers into new framebuffers which can be rendered to.
Renderbuffers: User created render targets, to be attached to framebuffer objects.
Buffer Objects (Vertex and Pixel): User defined data storage. Used for geometry and image data.
Textures: Textures are sort of buffers, i.e. they hold data, which can be sources in drawing operations
The usual approach with OpenGL is to rerender the whole scene whenever something changes. If you want to save those drawing operations you can copy the contents of the framebuffer to a texture and then just draw that texture to a single quad and overdraw it with your selection rubberband rectangle.
I been working in a new game, and finally reached the point where I started to code the motion of my main character but I have a doubt about how do that.
Previously, I make two games in Allegro, so the spritesheets are kind of easy to implement, because I establish the frame and position on the image, and save every frame in a different bitmap, but I know that do that with OpenGL it's not neccesary and cost a little bit more.
So, I been thinking in how save my spritesheet and used in my program and I have only one idea.
I loaded the image and transformed in a texture, in my function that help me animate I simply grab a portion of the texture to draw instead of store every single texture in my program.
This is the best way to do that?
Thanks beforehand for the help.
You're on the right track.
Things to consider:
leave enough dead space around each sprite so that the video card does not blend in texels from adjacent sprites at small scales.
set texture min/mag filtering appropriately. GL_NEAREST is OK if you're going for the blocky look.
if you want to be fancy and save some texture memory, there's no reason that the sprites have to be laid out in a regular grid. Smaller sprites can be packed closer in the texture.
if your sprites are being rendered from 3D models, you could output normal & displacement maps from the model into another texture, then combine them in a fragment shader for some awesome lighting and self-shadowing.
You got the right idea, if you have a bunch of sprites it is much better to just stick them all in one big textures. Just draw your sprites as textured quads whose texture coordinates index into the frame of the sprite. You can do a few optimizations, but most of them revolve around trying to get the most out of your texture memory and packing the sprites closely together with out blending issues.
I know that do that with OpenGL it's not neccesary and cost a little bit more.
Why not? There are no real downsides to putting a lot of sprites into a single texture. All you need to do is change the texture coordinates to pick the region in question out of the texture.
Is it a good or bad idea to use display lists for drawing textured rectangles?
The display list would be re-compiled only if the texture the sprite is using changes.
For drawing a single sprite, there's no real problem in doing it that way, but there's no advantage to it either, assuming you're using glRotate/glTranslate to position the sprite. Plenty of games have been written that way.
In my games, I use a vertex buffer object with GL_DYNAMIC_DRAW to store all the sprites which share each texture atlas. I update the vert positions on the CPU and send the whole batch in one draw call. I can draw many more sprites using this approach. I could do the positions in a vertex shader if I needed to draw even more.
Also, keep in mind that OpenGL ES2 doesn't support display lists, so if you're thinking of porting to an ES2 device you'd have to re-do it. (iPhone/iPad support ES1 but you can't mix and match with ES2, you can use display lists OR shaders but not both).
I'm writing a Minecraft like static 3d block world in C++ / openGL. I'm working at improving framerates, and so far I've implemented frustum culling using an octree. This helps, but I'm still seeing moderate to bad frame rates. The next step would be to cull cubes that are hidden from the viewpoint by closer cubes. However I haven't been able to find many resources on how to accomplish this.
Create a render target with a Z-buffer (or "depth buffer") enabled. Then make sure to sort all your opaque objects so they are rendered front to back, i.e. the ones closest to the camera first. Anything using alpha blending still needs to be rendered back to front, AFTER you rendered all your opaque objects.
Another technique is occlusion culling: You can cheaply "dry-render" your geometry and then find out how many pixels failed the depth test. There is occlusion query support in DirectX and OpenGL, although not every GPU can do it.
The downside is that you need a delay between the rendering and fetching the result - depending on the setup (like when using predicated tiling), it may be a full frame. That means that you need to be creative there, like rendering a bounding box that is bigger than the object itself, and dismissing the results after a camera cut.
And one more thing: A more traditional solution (that you can use concurrently with occlusion culling) is a room/portal system, where you define regions as "rooms", connected via "portals". If a portal is not visible from your current room, you can't see the room connected to it. And even it is, you can click your viewport to what's visible through the portal.
The approach I took in this minecraft level renderer is essentially a frustum-limited flood fill. The 16x16x128 chunks are split into 16x16x16 chunklets, each with a VBO with the relevant geometry. I start a floodfill in the chunklet grid at the player's location to find chunklets to render. The fill is limited by:
The view frustum
Solid chunklets - if the entire side of a chunklet is opaque blocks, then the floodfill will not enter the chunklet in that direction
Direction - the flood will not reverse direction, e.g.: if the current chunklet is to the north of the starting chunklet, do not flood into the chunklet to the south
It seems to work OK. I'm on android, so while a more complex analysis (antiportals as noted by Mike Daniels) would cull more geometry, I'm already CPU-limited so there's not much point.
I've just seen your answer to Alan: culling is not your problem - it's what and how you're sending to OpenGL that is slow.
What to draw: don't render a cube for each block, render the faces of transparent blocks that border an opaque block. Consider a 3x3x3 cube of, say, stone blocks: There is no point drawing the center block because there is no way that the player can see it. Likewise, the player will never see the faces between two adjacent stone blocks, so don't draw them.
How to draw: As noted by Alan, use VBOs to batch geometry. You will not believe how much faster they make things.
An easier approach, with minimal changes to your existing code, would be to use display lists. This is what minecraft uses.
How many blocks are you rendering and on what hardware? Modern hardware is very fast and is very difficult to overwhelm with geometry (unless we're talking about a handheld platform). On any moderately recent desktop hardware you should be able to render hundreds of thousands of cubes per frame at 60 frames per second without any fancy culling tricks.
If you're drawing each block with a separate draw call (glDrawElements/Arrays, glBegin/glEnd, etc) (bonus points: don't use glBegin/glEnd) then that will be your bottleneck. This is a common pitfall for beginners. If you're doing this, then you need to batch together all triangles that share texture and shading parameters into a single call for each setup. If the geometry is static and doesn't change frame to frame, you want to use one Vertex Buffer Object for each batch of triangles.
This can still be combined with frustum culling with an octree if you typically only have a small portion of your total game world in the view frustum at one time. The vertex buffers are still loaded statically and not changed. Frustum cull the octree to generate only the index buffers for the triangles in the frustum and upload those dynamically each frame.
If you have surfaces close to the camera, you can create a frustum which represents an area that is not visible, and cull objects that are entirely contained in that frustum. In the diagram below, C is the camera, | is a flat surface near the camera, and the frustum-shaped region composed of . represents the occluded area. The surface is called an antiportal.
.
..
...
....
|....
|....
|....
|....
C |....
|....
|....
|....
....
...
..
.
(You should of course also turn on depth testing and depth writing as mentioned in other answer and comments -- it's very simple to do in OpenGL.)
The use of a Z-Buffer ensures that polygons overlap correctly.
Enabling the depth test makes every drawing operation check the Z-buffer before placing pixels onto the screen.
If you have convex objects you must (for performance) enable backface culling!
Example code:
glEnable(GL_CULL_FACE);
glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST);
glDepthMask(GL_TRUE);
You can change the behaviour of glCullFace() passing GL_FRONT or GL_BACK...
glCullFace(...);
// Draw the "game world"...
I want to make a game with Worms-like destructible terrain in 2D, using OpenGL.
What is the best approach for this?
Draw pixel per pixel? (Uh, not good?)
Have the world as a texture and manipulate it (is that possible?)
Thanks in advance
Thinking about the way Worms terrain looked, I came up with this idea. But I'm not sure how you would implement it in OpenGL. It's more of a layered 2D drawing approach. I'm posting the idea anyway. I've emulated the approach using Paint.NET.
First, you have a background sky layer.
And you have a terrain layer.
The terrain layer is masked so the top portion isn't drawn. Draw the terrain layer on top of the sky layer to form the scene.
Now for the main idea. Any time there is an explosion or other terrain-deforming event, you draw a circle or other shape on the terrain layer, using the terrain layer itself as a drawing mask (so only the part of the circle that overlaps existing terrain is drawn), to wipe out part of the terrain. Use a transparent/mask-color brush for the fill and some color similar to the terrain for the thick pen.
You can repeat this process to add more deformations. You could keep this layer in memory and add deformations as they occur or you could even render them in memory each frame if there aren't too many deformations to render.
I guess you'd better use texture-filled polygons with the correct mapping (a linear one that doesn't stretch the texture to use all the texels, but leaves the cropped areas out), and then reshape them as they get destroyed.
I'm assuming your problem will be to implement the collision between characters/weapons/terrain.
As long as you aren't doing this on opengl es, you might be able to get away with using the stencil buffer to do per-pixel collision detection and have your terrain be a single modifyable texture.
This page will give an idea:
http://kometbomb.net/2007/07/11/hardware-accelerated-2d-collision-detection-in-opengl/
The way I imagine it is this:
a plane with the texture applied
a path( a vector of points/segments ) used for ground collisions.
When something explodes, you do a boolean operation (rectangle-circle) for the texture(revealing the background) and for the 'walkable' path.
What I'm trying to say is you do a geometric boolean operation and you use the result to update the texture(with an alpha mask or something) and update the data structure you use to keep track of the walkable area(which ever that might be).
Split things up, instead of relying only on gl draw methods
I think I would start by drawing the foreground into the stencil buffer so the stencil buffer is set to 1 bits anywhere there's foreground, and 0 elsewhere (where you want your sky to show).
Then to draw a frame, you draw your sky, enable the stencil buffer, and draw the foreground. For the initial frame (before any explosion has destroyed part of the foreground) the stencil buffer won't really be doing anything.
When you do have an explosion, however, you draw it to the stencil buffer (clearing the stencil buffer for that circle). Then you re-draw your data as before: draw the sky, enable the stencil buffer, and draw the foreground.
This lets you get the effect you want (the foreground disappears where desired) without having to modify the foreground texture at all. If you prefer not to use the stencil buffer, the alternative that seems obvious to me would be to enable blending, and just manipulate the alpha channel of your foreground texture -- set the alpha to 0 (transparent) where it's been affected by an explosion. IMO, the stencil buffer is a bit cleaner approach, but manipulating the alpha channel is pretty simple as well.
I think, but this is just a quick idea, that a good way might be to draw a Very Large Number of Lines.
I'm thinking that you represent the landscape as a bunch of line segments, for each column of the screen you have 0..n vertical lines, that make up the ground:
12 789
0123 6789
0123456789
0123456789
In the above awesomeness, the column of "0":s makes up a single line, and so on. I didn't try to illustrate the case where a single pixel column has more than one line, since it's a bit hard in this coarse format.
I'm not sure this will be efficient, but it at least makes some sense since lines are an OpenGL primitive.
You can color and texture the lines by enabling texture-mapping and specifying the desired texture coordinates for each line segment.
Typically the way I have seen it done is to have each entity be a textured quad, then update the texture for animation. For a destructible terrain it might be best to break the train into tiles then you only have to update the ones that have changed. Don't use GLdrawpixels it is probably the slowest approach possible (outside of reloading textures from disk every frame though it would be close.)