I am trying to wrap my head around Microsoft Cloud for Sustainability. Apparently it's a solution based on Microsoft Dynamics. I need to have more back-end to that solution, because as it is right now I'm either lacking permissions (or extra paid access to Microsoft resources) or missing a chunk of documentation, because I'm unable to:
Change default language across the board - I can switch MS Dynamics to any language I want, but it will work for a shell only. Anything that's CfS specific, is in English. Do I remove the demo data and import my own scopes and data? As only thing available are database and Cube for BI analytics and JSON files describing CfS structure in general (that's in CDM), do I really have to create it from scratch? This brings me to second question:
Access entry-level data that's already in demo version - I need to see what's in the database the CfS is using, or be able to modify it. Is there any way to get to it via Business Central, if at all possible?
Since I will be preparing several presentations for potential customers, I need a way to quickly create a dataset based on initial and very basic information provided by each customer, how can I do that with trial user
I work for a company that's Microsoft Certified Partner, so logically resources for what I need should be available to me, but either links in the documentation are dead (and some are, as they redirect to general info) or require some special access level (or are dead, but error message is really not helpful at all).
Is there somewhere else I can go? The Documentation page offers little towards what I need...
P.S. I think I should tag this question with CfS specific tags, but not enough rep...
My friend asked me if it is possible to build a web site like Microsoft shared point for his planning startup company. He want to share doc with his employees. I think the reason he asked is Microsoft is too expensive. I have no idea right now for this. Anybody knows anything about this? thanks,
EDIT:
Because docs shared are sensitive (contains SSN and other sensitive data), security should be good enough.
If he just wants to share file he could try Box.net or dropbox. Box.net also have simple workflows with tasks.
I use Google Docs quite often and it is very useful. You can also setup a wiki and attach docs as needed.
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation is free and comes with a host of features.
Tell your friend to sign up for Microsoft BizSpark. This is a free program from Microsoft specifically for startups and will give them access to a whole suite of software for free for 3 years (with a $100 charge at the end). This includes SharePoint.
I would recommend a combination of Google Sites and Google Docs. It's free, it's easy, and it eliminates the need to maintain the hardware and other infrastructure associated with a site, much less something as heavy-weight as Sharepoint.
we need an online offline wiki type app that is basically a number of pages with documentation in, but that also would need to link to a number of files .. words docs/ pdfs/ ppts etc that are on a synched mapped drive on the users laptop..
could anyone suggest whether or not google gears would be a reasonable solution to this, i have just had a brief peruse on the gears documentation.. and its seems pretty cool/useful.
as in make a web wiki and gears it up.
the app would also need some way of holding the links to the actual files (docs/pdfs etc) but that should impact the gearsiness of it i imagine)
thanks...
sorry its late in the day so the question may not actually make any sense..
nat
Given that Google is publicly committed to supporting HTML 5 and it's very extensive offline application capabilities, I would personally choose that direction over Gears.
Neither Gears nor HTML 5 is going to give you any ability to read content off of the computer. Web browsers are intentionally sand-boxed to prevent that kind of activity.
Check out the remarkable capabilities of HTML 5, and then see how extensive support for it already is.
Gears is for allowing web pages to store local content and applications on a client computer for offline mode, not for allowing the web browser to peek out on the user's computer.
Gears is also deprecated in favor of HTML5 local storage and other developments.
Web services and web APIs have managed to increase the accessibility of the information stored and catalogued on the internet. They have also opened up a vast array of enterprise power functionality for smaller thin client applications.
By taping into these services developers can provide functionality that would have taken them months perhaps years to set up. They can combine them into single applications that make life generally easier for its users.
Whether displaying information about the music being played, finding items of interest in the locale of the user or just simply tweeting and blogging from the same application - the possibilities are growing everyday.
I want to know about the most interesting or useful services that are out there, especially ones that most of us may not have heard about yet. Do you maintain an API or service? or do you have a clever mash up that provides even more benefits than the originals?
YQL - Yahoo provide a tool that lets you query many different API's across the web, even for sites that don't provide an API as such.
From the site:
The Yahoo! Query Language is an
expressive SQL-like language that lets
you query, filter, and join data
across Web services.
...
With YQL, developers can access and
shape data across the Internet through
one simple language, eliminating the
need to learn how to call different
APIs.
The World Bank API is pretty cool. Google uses it in search results. My favourite implementations are the cartograms at worldmapper.
(source: worldmapper.org)
It's very niche, but I happen to think the OpenCongress API is amazing.
Less niche: Google Translate has an API which will guess the language of something. You'd be AMAZED how frequently this comes in handy (even though it's not as tweakable as you'd like and is not trained on small samples).
I was just about to have a stab at using the SoundCloud API
I know many people who already use for sharing their musical masterpieces and its a pretty good site. Hopefully the api will be as well!
I like the RESTful API for weather.com. It's free and very useful for the new age of location-aware apps: https://registration.weather.com/ursa/xmloap/step1
It does require registration, but they don't spam you or anything - it's just to provide you a key to use the API.
Ah yes - here's another one I've been meaning to check out but haven't tried yet
The BBC offer a bunch of apis/feeds that look very promising
http://ideas.welcomebackstage.com/data
They include apis for accessing schedule data for both TV and Radio listings along with all kinds of news searches. It even looks like they'll be offering some sort of geo-location service soon so it will be interesting to see what that has to offer
Another interesting one for liberal brits! ;)
The Guardian news paper have their own api
http://www.guardian.co.uk/open-platform
MuiscBrainz
Excellent service for music mashups.
Not so many knows that Last.FM initial database was scraped from this service.
The United States Postal Service offers a web service that does address standardization. Quite useful in reducing clutter and cleaning data before it gets put into your database.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm building an app that authors would (hopefully) use to help them, uh.. author things.
Think of it like a wiki but just for one person, but cooler. I wish to make it as accessible as possible to my (potential) adoring masses, and so I'm thinking about making it a web-app.
It certainly doesn't have to be, there is no integration with other sites, no social features. It involve typing information into forms however, so for rapid construction the web would probably be the best.
However, I don't really want to host it myself. I couldn't afford it for one, but it's mostly that people who use this may not want their data stored elsewhere. This is private information about what they are writing and I wouldn't expect them to trust me with it, and so I'm thinking about making it a thick-client app.
And therein lies the problem, how to make a application that focuses mainly on form data entry available easily to potential users (yay web apps) but also offline so they know they are in full control of their data (yay thick-client apps).
I see the following solutions:
Build it as a thick-client Java app and run a cutdown version on the net as an applet that people can play with before downloading the full thing.
Build it as a Flex app for online and an Air app for offline (same source different build scripts basically).
Build it as a standard web-app (HTML, JS etc) but have a downloadable version that somehow runs the site totally on their computer. It wouldn't touch the net at all.
Ignoring 1 and 2 (I'm looking into them separately), I think 3 would involve:
Packaging up an install that contains a tiny webserver that has my code on it, ready to run.
Remapping the DB from something like mySQL to something like SQLite.
Creating some kind of convience app that ran the server and opened your browser to the right location, possibly using something like Prism to hide the whole broswer thing.
So, have you ever done something like this before?
If so, what problems did you encounter?
Finally, is there another solution I haven't thought of?'
(also, Joyent Slingshot was a suggestion on another question, but it's RoR (which I have no experience in) and I'm 99% sure it doesn't run under linux, so It's not right for me.)
I think you should look at tiddlywiki for inspiration.
It's a wiki written in JavaScript entirely self-contained in a single html file. You load it into your browser as a file:/// URL, so there is no need for a server.
I use it as a personal wiki to keep notes on various subjects.
Google Gears is used to offer a few of the google apps offline (Google Reader, Gmail, Docs and more).
What is Google Gears?
Gears is an open source browser extension that lets developers create
web applications that can run offline.
Gears provides three key features:
A local server, to cache and serve application resources (HTML,
JavaScript, images, etc.) without
needing to contact a server
A database, to store and access data from within the browser
A worker thread pool, to make web applications more
responsive
by performing expensive operations in
the background
Gears is currently an early-access developers' release. It is not yet intended for use by real users in production applications at this time.
If you're a developer interested in using Gears with your application, visit the Gears Developer Page.
If you wish to install Gears on your computer, visit the Gears Home Page. Please note, however, that Gears is not yet intended for general use.
But as you read it's still in early stages.
There is an additional option, and that is to use the new HTML5 offline application features, namely the Application Cache, Client-Side Databases, and Local Storage APIs.
Currently I believe that Safari is the only shipping browser to support any of these, and i believe it only supports the client side databases and local storage parts. The webkit nightlies support all of these features, the firefox nightlies support many of them (maybe all now?)
[Edit (olliej): Correction, Firefox 3 supports the Application cache, but alas not the client side DB]
We are using something similar to your third option to test our websites locally. Works just fine.
Our packaged webserver is not small enough to accomplish what you need, but then again we've not been trying to keep it small either. If you can package your webserver code into a small enough package I don't see why this approach would'nt work.
I think AIR is the way to go..
Have you checked into google gears?
Some pointers for solution 3:
for the GUI part, ExtJS seems really nice.
for the storage part, there is a nice javascript library that abstracts different storage backends: PersistJS.
Supported backends for PersistJS:
flash: Flash 8 persistent storage.
gears: Google Gears-based persistent storage.
localstorage: HTML5 draft storage.
whatwg_db: HTML5 draft database storage.
globalstorage: HTML5 draft storage (old spec).
ie: Internet Explorer userdata behaviors.
cookie: Cookie-based persistent storage.
Also, I think the moin moin wiki software has a desktop version that includes its own webserver. This stuff is easy in python, since batteries are included.
You might want to check out how they do it?
You could make a dedicated client using Webkit or Firefox's backbone. Some games use that solution for UI for example.
Or you could make a little webserver (I have a little webserver in Lua that I use for similar purposes, just a few megas with libaries and all). However if you take this route the biggest issue to consider is you don't want your webserver to depend on environmental variables, you want it to be totally autonomous. You should try to isolate all variables t o a config file and be done with it (bundle style)
Or you could use a Java client application to display the webpage
Or GoogleGears, but that's the same (almost) as Flex+Air. so choose Flex+Air if that's what you are familiar with
You didn't specify a language but I looked at Karigell a few years ago. It's Python web framework, similar to Django or TurboGears, but it doesn't have the overhead of those frameworks.
From my messing around with it, it seems like it would work for your purposes. It has a built-in web server (though you can use pretty much any server you want) and you can use any database that Python supports.
Plus, Python works well with Linux. :)
If you made the app a regular web app heavily reliant on client-side technologies (using DHTML and the likes of Google Gears to store data offline as already suggested) so once opened, there wasn't much interaction with the server, you could probably host the thing on a basic shared hosting account which wouldn't cost that much. That might be your easiest starting point as you wouldn't have to worry about all the issues with desktop apps such as compatibility with different operating systems, packaging up an install etc, yet you wouldn't need massive server resources behind it either.
You can use HTML, JS and whatever else in Adobe AIR and you'll have plenty of options of saving data locally, too.
in java world you could use jetty for a server, implement web app using your favorite framework and use hsqldb as a database - it lives entirely in your container (jetty). you can deploy preview app on the web and package downloadable offline version.
There's a portable distribution of Apache/MySQL/PHP (to place on USB keys):
http://portableapps.com/apps/development/xampp
This should be easily adapted to your needs.
You could also consider using XULRunner or Prism
They're the opensource technology that FireFox, Thunderbird and Joost are built on, and allows you to develop apps in XML and javascript essentially against the same rich api that FireFox itself has. And of course this is cross platform too, so it'd work on Mac/Linux/Windows...
Check here for more info:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XULRunner
I was thinking of doing something like this myself. My plan was to write app using django and write script that starts django's testing server and opens default browser on specified port. My plan was to use SQLite...
Also, it would be nice to pack it into one package, so users without django installed can run app without any dependecies...
My suggestion, as you pointed above, is to use a Wiki system to solve your problem. Now the question could be: Wich one?
You can use Trac, it is very simple and you can customize its GUI. But, if you prefer something more advanced please use MoinMoin. I used it for years, and IMO it is a very good and strong wiki system.
Depiste wich wiki you will choose, forget to write your web-app from scratch. According to yor question the best approach is to pick something that works and customize/modify it to fit your needs.