I am wondering if any of the open source ESB provides strong change management capabilities:
ability to version services, components, rollback changes, compare
changes.
And if it could log which user has made changes and what is the
change to the application.
That's not an ESB ability.
But usually ESBs can behave like app containers (as in David A Chappell's Enterprise Service Bus book chapter 6). So the app/modules can be versioned.
For instance: Mule ESB can behave like a container. Mule provides a maven archetype for creating mule apps. Those apps can be commited to an version control repository. The hot deployment abilities of the container, should be enough to "rollback" changes.
Related
Why does the management console provide features to develop a service or customize a component of WSO2 ESB?
What's the purpose of one Vs other?
Doesn't the development stops after handover of CAR files/artifacts to DevOps team?
My understanding with Management Console is to deploy, manage(start-stop) & monitor ESB services/integration flows.
Is there an overlap on these two ? The documentation itself provides two ways to do the same thing. I mean why?
TIA,
--M
All these features are available in Management console for users to try out easily. For example, when they want to see what are available feature etc, quickly.
When you're using ESB in real development, you should use toolings instead.
WSO2 Carbon is not officially supported in webapp mode (see the selected answer here). However, I have no choice - If I want to run carbon, it must be run in webapp mode.
There are some detailed instructions here for setting up carbon 4.x in webapp mode.
I am concerned is that standalone mode is strongly recommended by WSO2.
My Questions are: What are the limitations:
when running Carbon 4.x in webapp mode?
when running other Carbon based products (e.g. ESB, AS, etc) in webapp mode?
If possible, please provide a detailed list of the limitations.
Limitations:
When you take the ESB, as you might have seen it exposes ports 8280/8243 (HTTP/HTTPS) in addition to 9763/9443 which is exposed through the servlet transport. In the case of ESB you need (and want) to use port 8280/8243 when you're interacting with the ESB because those are the two non-blocking high performant transports. When you deploy ESB on top of another web container, you're limited by the servlet transports provided by the container. So we can't get the desired performance out of the ESB for proxying and other scenarios.
Complexities involving using web container functionalities. Carbon has its own clustering/caching/security etc... infrastructure. When you deploy Carbon as a webapp then we should look at supporting all those functions provided by the container for different containers. Which is complex, not consistent and in some cases sub-optimal
IMHO those were the two most important factors why it's discouraged to deploy Carbon on top of other containers. Going with a standalone deployment approach it has contributed immensely to not include web container specific "hacks" into the platform to get things done and have a much cleaner consistent platform.
One issues with deploying Carbon in web-app mode is that this deployment model is not supported by WSO2. I will add more issues to this answer as I encounter them...
AFAIK, webapp is not supported... Please refer this thread :Running WSO2 Carbon as Web Application in Tomcat
Regards,
Mohan
I've been looking at WSO2 Carbon as an OSGi application platform providing the following functionality:
Services can be deployed as OSGi components (backend and frontend/UI)
A Service UI components can be hosted (snapped) into the Carbon UI
A Service can use Carbon User Management database for authentication and authorization
Does fuseesb have a similar UI concept?
Using fuse ESB for about 6 months, I'm very happy with it.
Services are easily deployed as OSGi components - these are quite easily configured and deployed as fuse features. Fuse profiles then contain property files that define which features are deployed to your OSGi containers.
Although I haven't used every feature, I haven't seen a similar UI concept for hosting / snapping.
For authentication and authorization there are various approaches - one nice solution is to use Apache zookeeper (a key/value store) as a basis for a simple user management component that can be available to all your services.
After study WSO2 products, seems I got the following concepts, all of them are only my understanding, I don't know whether is correct or not, please advice:
All the products are running in Carbon which is a 'container' of the wso2 products, something like JSP like stuffs running in tomcat. am I right?
if No.1 is correct, so 'Enterprise Service Bus', 'Identity Server', 'Data Service Server', 'Governance Reistry' etc are all running in Carbon Server, actually I downloaded all the products, and I found they are all released with carbon together, which mean I can use command to start the management console directly, and each of them can running themselves, they have there own management console. right?
after I read Carbon user guide, it says 'all the products of wso2 are the components of Carbon', so I think 'Enterprise Service Bus', 'Identity Server', 'Data Service Server', 'Governance Reistry' can be put into one management console, which mean they can be integrated together, after I started Carbon server, all the features are running together?
I'm sorry ask such kind a stupid question, but after read many articles I still cant find out the structure between them, please advice, thanks in advance.
WSO2 middleware products come with a bunch of components. These are based on Java OSGi. So every product comes with a set of OSGi bundles (in OSGi terminology). Carbon is a core framework that's common to every product. This is again a bunch of OSGi components. Carbon core (which is also reffered to as just Carbon) contains a set of must have bundles. Logging, clustering, security etc... Carbon is a separate download also which you can run. Running carbon itself by its own is not very interesting unless you're doing something specific and you know what you're doing.
Now, coming back to the products .. each product have carbon core plus some more OSGi components. These additional components reflect product specific functionality. For example if you take the ESB, it's carbon core plus additional components that makes it an "ESB". Likewise for other products.
You can take the carbon server and install all these additional features. Feature installation is done via the same technology Eclipse is using to install plugins. Since everything is an OSGi bundle there has to be an OSGi container that all these run on. Carbon is running on top of Equinox OSGi container.
So Tomcat is also a separate OSGi bundle. You can install these components into any running carbon server and instantly add webapp hosting capability.
Yes. All WSO2 products are running inside WSO2 Carbon which is mainly a OSGi based framework.
Yes. A WSO2 Product (e.g., ESB) is a specialized Carbon framework. Management console is a part of Carbon where you can install external features to the product / uninstall existing features in the product to customize the product.
Yes theoretically. If the Carbon concept is correctly implemented in all the components of WSO2, they (ESB, IS, DSS as you said) should be installable in a single Carbon server without any problem using the WSO2 Feature Manager. But due to some dependency conflicts and version conflicts sometimes it may not be possible if you try to do it. But still you can resolve these OSGi conflicts in code level and make it possible to make them compatible, if you want.
Actually all the WSO2 products share the WSO2 components seamlessly among their products already. And in some instances we recommend to install multiple products in a single Carbon server. For example CEP feature is asked to be installed in BAM product when the user wants to use CEP as a realtime data processing solution with the BAM. For most other product combinations we have not yet tested well so the conflicts can occur. Thats why I said this theoretical.
I need to develope WAS application and should be hosted into Demandware platform. Can i develop the WAS application using tomcat and can host it into the Demandware or should WAS application be developed in the Demandware platform?
I am new to Demanware platform and WAS. Guide me.
You cannot build a web service outside of the UX Studio paradigm like what you described, but you can build a psuedo-service like pipeline in UX Studio that returns JSON, XML, etc. and it will work more or less just like any other REST service.
Demandware is Software as a Service (SaaS) provider, which will not allow you to access the underlying infrastructure (e.g. Tomcat server, Oracle DB, etc.) to make/install your custom extensions.
UPDATE (25.09.2015):
Currently Demandware are making extensions to their controllers, migrating from pipeleine-based controllers to script based ones. Chances are that at some point they may even introduce an API for creating web-services.
Until this happens, your only option is to make some custom pipelines and utilize something like XML/JSON over HTTP for this type of functionality. (Or if you insist on having it as SOAP based service, you would need to parse the SOAP envelopes with explicit code)
Demandware platform is a proprietary technology which allows developing only using their sandboxes and own IDE "UX Studio". All this stuff is available for demandware developers on their xchange portal. Access there could be requested by a merchant you do a development for.
Demandware has the core framework is closed to third parties and is exposed via the Demandware script and REST API's as well as Demandware's own Pipelet system.
Sadly you can't deploy external application in Demandware server, we have to separately create new app in UX studio
You can get the proper help on Demandware Wiki or on Exchange