Better way to handle read buffer in C++ - c++

Question

I am working a linux server using epoll. I have this code to read buffer
int str_len = read(m_events[i].data.fd, buf, BUF_SIZE);
if (str_len == 0) {
if (!removeClient(m_events[i].data.fd))
break;
close(m_events[i].data.fd);
} else {
char *pdata = buf;
pushWork(pdata);
}
buf is declared like this
buf[BUF_SIZE]
pushWork function declared like this
pushWork(char *pdata){
push pdata to the thread pool's queue
}
Firt of all, I think char *pdata = buf has a problem since it just points to the buffer and the buffer will be overriden whenever a new data comes in. So do I need to memcpy?
Also, is there any other nice way to handle this in c++ ? This code is kind of c style I think I have a better way to do this in c++.

Answer 1

is there any other nice way to handle
this in c++ ? This code is kind of c
style I think I have a better way to
do this in c++
Like I suggested in one of your previous questions, the Boost.Asio library is the de-facto C++ networking library. I strongly suggest you spend some time reading about it and studying the examples if you are writing a C++ networking application.

Answer 2

That way is bad because you have only one buf, meaning that you can only have one thread at a time working on it, so you are not using threads like they should be used.
What you can do is malloc() a buffer, copy the payload to that malloc'd buffer and pass it to the thread and let the thread free that buffer once it's done with it. Just be sure to free it or else there will be memory leaks.
example code:
char * p;
p = (char *)malloc(str_len+1);
memcpy(p, buf, str_len+1);
pushWork(p); //free p inside, after use.

Answer 3

You will need to do a memcpy (or something equivalent) unless you can make it so that the data in (buf) is never needed after pushWork() returns. If you can afford to all the processing of the buffer's data inside pushWork(), OTOH, no copying of the buffer is necessary.
Another alternative would be to allocate a buffer off the heap in advance each time therough the epoll loop, and read() directly into that buffer instead of reading into a buffer on the stack... that way the dynamically allocated buffer would still be available for use ever after the event loop goes on to other things. Note that doing this would open the door to possible memory leaks or memory exhaustion though, so you'd need to be careful to avoid those issues.
As far as a "C++ way" to do this, I'm sure there are some, but I don't know that they will necessarily improve your program. The C way works fine, why fix what isn't broken?
(One other thing to note: if you are using non-blocking I/O, then read() will sometimes read and return fewer than BUF_SIZE bytes, in which case you'll need logic to handle that eventuality. If you are using blocking I/O, OTOH, read() will sometimes block for long periods (e.g. if a client machine dies having sent only half of a buffer) which will block your epoll loop and make it unresponsive for perhaps several minutes. That's a more difficult problem to deal with, which is why I usually end up using non-blocking I/O, even if it is more of a pain to get right.