Can anyone point me to the templates/code blocks that are used for the order totals block on the Magento order mail and invoice e-mail templates?
The tax issue is solved but I need to implement some logic to get rid of the shipping and the subtotal. Which templates are used for the emails?
I found the frontend and changed this as needed, but can't find the template/block that is used for the e-mails sent by the system.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks,
Bart
Niels answer of app/design/frontend/base/default/template/sales/order/totals.phtml is correct however I thought some further clarification was in order because one doesn't merely make cosmetic changes to this file in order to effect the desired change. totals.phtml loops over the "totals", each of which produces a total-related line-item (Subtotal, Shipping & Handling, Tax, Grand Total (Excl. Tax), and Grand Total (Incl. Tax)). Your best bet is to use Mage::Log to output each of the totals (which are looped over via an associative array $_code => $total). If you log each key ($_code), you'll see names such as subtotal, shipping, grand_total, tax, and grand_total_incl. I filtered out those from the sales order e-mail that I didn't want by adding the following code directly below the foreach:
<?php if (in_array($_code, array('grand_total'))) {
continue;
} ?>
Hopefully this will help anybody who is puzzling over where these totals are mysteriously coming from. :-)
This template is being used for the totals in the e-mail templates and order overview in My Account:
app/design/frontend/base/default/template/sales/order/totals.phtml
Jason's answer is good for telling Magento to not generate the likes of grand_total HTML. However, you should look at System > Configuration > Sales > Tax to see if you can remove the fields the proper way first.
If you then see a message saying "Warning tax configuration can result in rounding errors" at the top of your admin pages, you'll need to adjust your settings. See the manual for the default settings, if you need them.
I am not entirely sure but could it be this one:
\app\design\adminhtml\default\default\template\email\order\items.phtml
Directory might not exactly match yours but I'm sure you would be able to find it.
HTH
Related
I am currently building a Django application where visitors can buy an online course. I now want to implement the possibility to provide discount codes. As these discount codes should be limited by quantity I now have the following implementation idea:
Guest visits www.page.com?discount=TEST
The model discount contains the fields discount_codes & max qty. I will check here, if the code exists. Also, I have to count all entries in my order model that used the discount code TEST. My order model contains the foreign_key field 'redeemed_discounts').
As soon the user clicks on Pay (via Stripe) I'll once again count all the orders in my order model which contain 'TEST' to make sure, the 'max_qty' is not reached meanwhile.
Now I can charge the visitor.
Would you consider this as good implemented or do you see any problems with the way I am planning to do it?
instead of using max_qty why don't you use something like use_left and max_use
so whenever someone uses that code you can reduce the count accordingly and when count hits zero you can stop using that with this approach you don't have to scan order table every time to see if the coupon code is still available.
I am having trouble with my order processing for Opencart 1.5.6. I have a series of checkboxes that if checked each cost $50.00. The problem is that the customer is ordering print materials in quantities of 500, 1000, 5000, etc. When they get to the shopping cart it charges the $50 extra for each option for each individual item ordered based on the quantity. This makes it so that their total skyrockets. If they pick one option for $50 and order 500 business cards they get charged an extra $25,000 for that one option.
The only solution that I can see is to have the Quantity be an option and only allow them to order one product but that does not allow them to change the Quantity of cards in the Cart.
Is there anyway to set it up so that an option charges a flat rate not based on total quantity of the order?
When customizing OpenCart follow these steps.
Look to see if this link has an extension that will do what you want.
If step 1 did not work. Go to your public_html file (the place that has all your code). Open the files that are related to your problem and edit those. There is also an OpenCart forum that will help with common problems.
As far as changing the settings on your payment function. Go look at OpenCart->catalog->checkout folder. Or maybe OpenCart->admin->checkout. You will need to find the function that adds quantity and gives value. You will need to change those around a little.
1st I want to remove text field for date so the calendar will replace it.
2nd I want to make the status order.. I want to sell the service, so I need to make booking order by calendar. If the date is green client can make an order. If red the client can't book an order. If yellow there certain items can be ordered.
I hope someone can help..
Thanks.
You have to try something at least and ask only for advice then.
Anyway, few suggestions:
it cannot be done using that option field of type date, at least not with the default datepicker.
You will need to create Your own datepicker component that will search for free/partialy/fully ordered days in the database and color the table cells accordingly.
It is not very wise to hide the input - by this visible user could anytime check what date did he pick - if it is not visible he would need to always open the datepicker to check for it...
Disallowing to order some service based on some reservations is highly decreasing Your conversion rate - thus decreasing Your income. I would definitely go the way let the user buy/order anything at anytime while having separate reservation system. If user buys a service at thank You page I would recommend him to book a concrete date for the service to be drawn. Here You do not need to fight with product options which are meant totally for something different that You are trying to.
Keep that in mind (mainly the 4th point) and re-think Your problem.
Using the Graph API or FQL, is there a way to efficiently find a user's first post or status? As in, the first one they ever made?
The slow way, I assume, would be to paginate through the feed, but for users like me who joined in 2005 or earlier, that would take a very long time with a huge amount of API calls.
From what I have found, we cannot obtain the date the user registered with Facebook for a good starting point, and we cannot sort by date ascending (not outside of the single page of data returned) to get the oldest post on top.
Is there any reasonable way to do this?
you can use facebook query language (FQL) to get first post information.
Please refer below query for more details :-
SELECT message, time FROM status WHERE uid= me() ORDER BY time ASC LIMIT 1
Please check and let me know in case of any issue.
Thanks and Regards
Durgaprasad
I think the Public API is limited to the depth of information it is allowed to query. Facebook probably put in these constraints for performance and cost concerns. Maybe they've changed it. When I tried to go backwards thru a person's stream about 4 months ago, there seemed to be a limit as to how far back I could go. Maybe it's a time limit or a # posts back limit. If you know when your user first posted, then getting to it should be fairly quick using the since/until time stamps in your queries.
I'm having an issue with querying an index where a common search term also happens to be part of a company name interspersed throughout most of the documents. How do I exclude the business name in results without effecting the ranking on a search that includes part of the business name?
example: Bobs Automotive Supply is the business name.
How can I include relevant results when someone searches automotive or supply without returning every document in the index?
I tried "-'Bobs Automotive Supply' +'search term'" but this seems to exclude any document with Bobs Automotive Supply and isn't very effective on searching 'supply' or 'automotive'
Thanks in advance.
Second answer here, based on additional clarification from first answer.
A few options.
Add the business name as StopWords in the StopWordFilter. This will stop Solr from Indexing them at all. Searches that use them will only really search for those words that aren't in the business name.
Rely on the inherent scoring that Solr will apply due to Term frequency. It sounds like these terms will be in the index frequently. Queries for them will still return the documents, but if the user queries for other, less common terms, those will get a higher score.
Apply a low query boost (not quite negative, but less than other documents) to documents that contain the business name. This is covered in the Solr Relevancy FAQ http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_do_I_give_a_negative_.28or_very_low.29_boost_to_documents_that_match_a_query.3F
Do you know that the article is tied to the business name or derive this? If so, you could create another field and then just exclude entities that match on the business name using a filter query. Something like
q=search_term&fq=business_name:(NOT search_term)
It may be helpful to use subqueries for this or to just boost down rather than filter out results.
EDIT: Update to question make this irrelavent. Leaving it hear for posterity. :)
This is why Solr Documents have different fields.
In this case, it sounds like there is a "Footer" field that is separate from your "Body" field in your documents. When searches are performed, they would only done against the Body, which won't include data from the Footer. You could even have a third field which is the "OriginalContent" field, which contains the original copy for display purposes. You wouldn't search that, just store it for later.
The important part is to create the two separate fields in your schema and make sure that you index those field that you want to be able to search.