I'm trying to use StrutsTestCase 2.1.4 to do unit testing on my Struts application. But when I tried to run the test, a "missing configuration resources for path /WEB-INF/web.xml" error happens.
I looked it up in the FAQ of StrutsTestCase, and followed the instruction to add my application path to the classpath. However, it didn't work.
Then I use the setConfigFile() method to specify the path of web.xml and struts-config.xml. As you see, it didn't work, either.
Here's the setUp() method override in my test class:
public void setUp() throws Exception {
super.setUp();
File web = new File("E:/JavaPros/stolon/STOLONCAS/web/");
this.setContextDirectory(web);
this.setConfigFile("E:/JavaPros/stolon/STOLONCAS/web/WEB-INF/web.xml");
this.setConfigFile("E:/JavaPros/stolon/STOLONCAS/web/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml");
}
One thing different by using this method is the error msg became "Missing configuration resource for path E:/JavaPros/stolon/STOLONCAS/build/web/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml". This makes me very confused for I'm absolutely sure that there is the struts-config.xml in that path.
Related
I am trying to create a simple jetty server/container that will take a war file and deploy. This is not embedded jetty with spring-boot.
Here is my build.gradle dependencies:
dependencies {
def jettyVersion = "9.4.34.v20201102"
implementation "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server:$jettyVersion"
implementation "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-security:$jettyVersion"
implementation "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servlet:$jettyVersion"
implementation "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp:$jettyVersion"
implementation "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-annotations:$jettyVersion"
implementation "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-jmx:$jettyVersion"
}
Here is my main class:
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Server server = new Server(8080);
MBeanContainer mbContainer = new MBeanContainer(getPlatformMBeanServer());
server.addBean(mbContainer);
WebAppContext webapp = new WebAppContext();
webapp.setContextPath("/");
webapp.setWar(warFile()); // LOGIC TO UPLOAD WAR FILE
webapp.setExtractWAR(true);
Configuration.ClassList classList = Configuration.ClassList.setServerDefault(server);
classList.addBefore("org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.JettyWebXmlConfiguration",
"org.eclipse.jetty.annotations.AnnotationConfiguration");
webapp.setAttribute("org.eclipse.jetty.server.webapp.ContainerIncludeJarPattern",
".*/[^/]*servlet-api-[^/]*\\.jar$|.*/javax.servlet.jsp.jstl-.*\\.jar$|.*/[^/]*taglibs.*\\.jar$");
server.setHandler(webapp);
server.start();
server.dumpStdErr();
server.join();
}
However, when I try to go to the app (http://localhost:8080/index), I keep getting the following error message:
URI: /index
STATUS: 500
MESSAGE: JSP support not configured
SERVLET: jsp
There is only one line of error message in the console:
2020-12-11 09:49:51.563:INFO:oejshC.ROOT:qtp2025864991-33: No JSP support. Check that JSP jars are in lib/jsp and that the JSP option has been specified to start.jar
What JSP Jars that it is referring to? I am at a loss as to what dependencies I need to add to make it work for JSPs.
Thx.
You will have to add apache-jsp so that your server will support jsps. If your web app uses jstl, you should also add apache-jstl.
For WebAppContext usage (which is a bit easier to setup than ServletContextHandler usage) you'll need the following artifacts ...
https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.eclipse.jetty/apache-jsp (for the Jetty specific JettyJspServlet which extends from the Jasper JspServlet)
https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.eclipse.jetty/apache-jstl (to support Taglibs custom and standard)
Make sure your org.eclipse.jetty.server.webapp.ContainerIncludeJarPattern can reference the apache-jsp artifact properly, otherwise the internal javax.servlet.ServletContextInitializer will not load properly.
If nothing happens by simply adding those artifacts, you'll need to verify your default descriptor setup on your WebAppContext.setDefaultsDescriptor(String) to ensure that you pass in a resource reference (path or uri) to the Jetty default descriptor XML.
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/jetty-9.4.35.v20201120/jetty-webapp/src/main/config/etc/webdefault.xml
Enabling JSP support in embedded mode can be quite tricky if you use the ServletContextHandler instead of the WebAppContext.
If you ever decide to use the ServletContextHandler instead of a WebAppContext (to have a single fat/uber jar, to speed up load/deploy time, to ease unit testing, etc...), then check out the Jetty maintained example project at ...
https://github.com/jetty-project/embedded-jetty-jsp
I am using aspnetboilerplate 5.1.0.
In the ProjectName.Web.Tests I have run into a situation that I cannot solve.
I have set up web tests for my controller using [Fact] or [Theory].
When I attempt to run the tests using GetResponseAsString(string url, HttpStatusCode expectedStatusCode = HttpStatusCode.OK) found in the webtestbase class. All the tests fail.
Here is an example of my Test:
[Fact]
public async Task Index_Test()
{
//Act
var response = await GetResponseAsStringAsync(
GetUrl<HomeController>(nameof(HomeController.Index))
);
//Assert
response.ShouldNotBeNullOrEmpty();
}
The Tests all fail on this:
Message:
Shouldly.ShouldAssertException : response.StatusCode
should be
HttpStatusCode.OK
but was
HttpStatusCode.NotFound
I have other aspnetboilerplate projects in version 3.8.3 and 4.2.1 and the web tests work just fine. So I'm not sure why the server is not able to find the action methods on my controllers.
The service tests found in the ProjectName.Tests project run just fine.
I found the culprit. The problem I was experiencing was due to attempting to copy a project for web unit tests from one of the aspnetboilerplate project template repositories and updating all of the references and class names to match the names and namespaces in the destination VS solution.
I submitted a similar question on the aspnetboilerplate github account.
https://github.com/aspnetboilerplate/aspnetboilerplate/issues/5463.
Ultimately, here is what happened.
After going through the same process with a newer project. I found that In the
class file that would by default be named AbpProjectNameWebTestBase.cs in the method
protected override IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder()
{
return base
.CreateWebHostBuilder()
.UseContentRoot(ContentRootFolder.Value)
.UseSetting(WebHostDefaults.ApplicationKey, typeof(AbpProjectNameWebModule).Assembly.FullName);
}
I mistakenly replaced AbpProjectNameWebModule with AbpProjectNameTestModule instead of AbpProjectNameWebMvcModule. This was trying to use the Application Service Unit test project as the web project. Therefore it could not find any of the referenced URI's and therefore returned httpStatusCode.NotFound.
After fixing this reference. I started getting exceptions that pertained to the public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env, ILoggerFactory loggerFactory) method.
These were things like adding app.UseAuthentication() and app.UseAuthorization() as well as needing to add a Middleware to provide a ClaimsIdentity and ClaimsPrincipal for the context.User (i.e. app.UserMiddleware<TestAuthenticationMiddleware>())
Now, I am able to get my web unit tests to run as I had in previous versions.
I'm using log4net, trying to get logging in my unit tests. If I manually call
log4net.Config.XmlConfigurator.Configure();
Since that works, that seems to eliminate all of the "bad config, config location" issues.
it works, but there are a large number of test classes, so that is not good.
I added
[assembly: log4net.Config.XmlConfigurator(Watch=true)]
to the assemblyinfo of my test project, but when I run (either via native MSTest, or Resharper test runner) I get no logging.
Help?
Source
[AssemblyInitialize()]
public static void MyTestInitialize(TestContext testContext)
{
// Take care the log4net.config file is added to the deployment files of the testconfig
FileInfo fileInfo;
string fullPath = Path.Combine(System.Environment.CurrentDirectory, "log4net.config");
fileInfo = new FileInfo(fullPath);
As it says in the documentation for assembly attributes
Therefore if you use configuration attributes you must invoke log4net
to allow it to read the attributes. A simple call to
LogManager.GetLogger will cause the attributes on the calling assembly
to be read and processed. Therefore it is imperative to make a logging
call as early as possible during the application start-up, and
certainly before any external assemblies have been loaded and invoked.
Because the unit test runners load the test assembly in order to find and the tests, it isn't possible to initialise log4net using an assembly attribute in unit test projects, and you will have to use the XmlConfigurator.
Edit: as linked in a comment by OP this can be done in one place for the whole test project by using the AssemblyInitializeAttribute
I am working with Zend Framework 2 and I want to run tests for all of my modules in PhpStorm 5.0.4. I have PhpStorm set up to check for tests in myproject/module and it successfully finds my tests. The problem is that it doesn't read my configuration file within each module, which is needed (it points to a bootstrap file).
Here is the directory structure for a module (source):
/module
/User
/tests
/UserTest
/Model
/UserTest.php
Bootstrap.php
phpunit.xml.dist
TestConfig.php.dist
When I run the test, it gives me an error because Bootstrap.php is not run prior to running UserTest.php. All of the files are correct, because if I cd to /myproject/module/User/tests/ and run phpunit within the Terminal, it works fine.
I would like it to use the configuration (and thereby bootstrap) within each module. I tried to use the --configuration option with a relative path, but I couldn't get it to work.
Here is my current configuration:
Any pointers on how I can run the configuration file (and bootstrap) when a module is being tested? That is, a module has its own configuration file and bootstrap.
Thanks in advance.
PHP Storm 7 assumes that you will only need ONE default bootstrap file and thus does not enable individual bootsrap files DIRECTLY for each PHPUnit test configuration.
However, zf2 conducts tests on a per module basis. Thus, after you set the defaults to the first module the other modules don't work. The way around this is to
Remove the default options in File|Settings|PHP|PHPUnit
You don't have to remove the default configuration file but you must EMPTY OUT and uncheck the default bootstrap file. Just unchecking will not be enough
Go Run|Edit Configurations (there are other shortcuts to this box)
For each module you have to create a test configuration. For example, you'll have the standard Application Module and thus an "Application Module Test" for it, maybe an Admin Module and then an "Admin Module Test" for that
For each test (assuming standard zf2 directory structure)
a. Test Scope: Directory
b. Directory: C:\wamp\www\PROJECT-NAME\module\MODULE-NAME\test
c. Check "Use alternative configuration file:"
d. Enter C:\wamp\www\PROJECT-NAME\module\MODULE-NAME\test\MODULE-NAMETest\phpunit.xml.dist
e. In "Test Runner options", enter "--bootstrap C:\wamp\www\PROJECT-NAME\module\MODULE-NAME\test\MODULE-NAMETest\Bootstrap.php"
Repeat for next module
The issue here is that as long as the default bootsrap field has an entry, phpstorm will add that as default as a --bootstrap option AFTER whatever you put in the case specific Test Runner options. So, no matter what you do, you end up running the wrong bootstrap file everytime except for the first/default test case
Hope this helps
Unless I missed something, you'll have to set up a test configuration for each module. In your case, you have myproject. Instead, you'll want one for each module, and then set up the configuration for each (Use alternative configuration file).
I make use of the environment variables option in the run configuration to to define a value I can use within a global bootstrap.php to pull in requirements specific to a given module or section of the application.
class GlobalBootstrap
{
private static $applicationSections = [
'section_a',
'section_b',
'section_c'
];
public static function init()
{
$localMethod = self::fetchLocalMethod();
if (!is_null($localMethod)) {
self::$localMethod();
} else {
throw new Exception(
__CLASS__
. '::'
. __FUNCTION__
. 'Says: No local method has been defined for this test section'
);
}
}
private static function fetchLocalMethod()
{
$section = getenv('APPLICATION_SECTION');
if (is_null($section) || !in_array($section, self::$applicationSections)) {
return null;
}
$section = preg_replace("/[^a-zA-Z]+/", "", $section);
$method = 'bootstrap' . ucfirst(strtolower($section));
return $method;
}
/**
* Section specific methods
*/
protected static function bootstrapSectiona()
{
require __DIR__ . '/../../{section_a}/module/Test/Bootstrap.php';
}
}
GlobalBootstrap::init();
Any arbitrary variable and value can be created and then referenced in your bootstrap.php using: getevn(VARIABLE_NAME); This saves a lot of long-winded configuration in PHPStorm, but culd potentially get equally as complex if you're relying on a lot of differing bootstrap functionality.
I've been having problems to access to my EJB services from a standalone client i've developed on grails 2.0.3. The EJB services are deployed on a glassfish server (Java). I tested this code on a netbeans tester class to access the EJBs:
Properties p = new Properties();
p.put("java.naming.factory.initial", "com.sun.enterprise.naming.SerialInitContextFactory");
p.setProperty("java.naming.factory.url.pkgs", "com.sun.enterprise.naming");
p.setProperty("java.naming.factory.state", "com.sun.corba.ee.impl.presentation.rmi.JNDIStateFactoryImpl");
p.setProperty("org.omg.CORBA.ORBInitialHost", INTEGRATION_IP);
p.setProperty("org.omg.CORBA.ORBInitialPort", CORBA_PORT);
ctx = new InitialContext(p);
try {
this.admAuth = (AdmAuthenticationRemote) this.ctx.lookup(Tester.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICE_JNDI);
}catch(Exception e){
...
}
This Tester.AUTHENTICATION_SERVICE_JNDI is a variable tha contains the path to the deployed service, in this case something like "java:global/..." that represents the address to the service that is being requested. This way of accessing the services works perfectly from the tester, but when i try to do the same from grails doesn't works. I am able to create the context the same way, but when i invoke the ctx.lookup() call i get an exception:
Message: Lookup failed for 'java:global/...' in SerialContext[myEnv={java.naming.factory.initial=com.sun.enterprise.naming.SerialInitContextFactory,
java.naming.factory.state=com.sun.corba.ee.impl.presentation.rmi.JNDIStateFactoryImpl, java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=com.sun.enterprise.naming}
Cause: javax.naming.NamingException: Unable to acquire SerialContextProvider for SerialContext[myEnv={java.naming.factory.initial=com.sun.enterprise.naming.SerialInitContextFactory,
java.naming.factory.state=com.sun.corba.ee.impl.presentation.rmi.JNDIStateFactoryImpl, java.naming.factory.url.pkgs=com.sun.enterprise.naming}
[Root exception is java.lang.RuntimeException: Orb initialization erorr]
The main exception is a naming exception, which means that it failed in the ctx.lookup(), but the cause is the orb initialization exception, which has another exception stack:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Orb initialization erorr
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Can not set long field com.sun.corba.ee.impl.orb.ORBDataParserImpl.waitForResponseTimeout to java.lang.Integer
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Can not set long field com.sun.corba.ee.impl.orb.ORBDataParserImpl.waitForResponseTimeout to java.lang.Integer
I'm really lost here. I've been having a lot of problems to get this going on grails, I had to get all glassfish jars (libs and modules) so it could make the InitialContext() call, but now i'm not sure if this is still a jar problem or a configuration problem or what it is.
I know that IllegalArgumentException occurs when u try to assign incompatible types in java, but i'm not setting anything like that, so i assume its an internal method initialization.
So the question is why is this exception coming up??
Is there another way to invoke my services from grails that works better??
The error is that you're trying to run your web application using the tomcat plugin in grails (using the command grails run-app). The problem is that when you try to create the InitialContext (com.sun.enterprise.naming.SerialInitContextFactory) groovy gives you an error casting some types if you're using the client libraries for GF 3.1. (I know that this is the problem, but I really don't know the reason for this. Because in theory this should work)
If you generate the .war file and you deploy in an AppServer, you can connect to your EJBs without problems. And if you deploy it on another GF server you don't have to import any of the client jars.
This will work perfect on production, the only problem is that you must compile and deploy your app on the GF server with every little change, and this is a bit annoying in development.
If you want to work outside of GF and using the command "grails run-app", you must modify two of the .jar GF 3.1 on your remote server, where you have the grails application:
1- The jar file $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/glassfish-corba-omgapi.jar
You should search in the web the class com.sun.corba.ee.spi.orb.ParserImplBase, and modify this part
Field field = getAnyField(name);
field.setAccessible(true);
field.set(ParserImplBase.this, value);
for this
if (name.equalsIgnoreCase("waitForResponseTimeout")) {
Object newValue = new Long(1800000);
Field field = getAnyField(name);
field.setAccessible(true);
field.set(ParserImplBase.this, newValue);
} else {
Field field = getAnyField(name);
field.setAccessible(true);
field.set(ParserImplBase.this, value);
}
this should resolve the java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
2- The jar file $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/glassfish-corba-orb.jar
you must delete the javax.rmi.CORBA.PortableRemoteObjectClass class of this library, because this class have conflicts with one used by the grails plugin
PS:
If you do not want to have the GF client jars in your grails application, you can add to the classpath of your client machine the following libraries
$GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/ejb-container.jar
$GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/ejb.security.jar
$GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/management-api.jar
If you use the grails console with the grails run-app command, must modify the configuration file $GRAILS_HOME/conf/groovy-starter.conf whit this
load $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/ejb-container.jar
load $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/ejb.security.jar
load $GLASSFISH_HOME/modules/management-api.jar