I'm working on a big, old, project that is using autotools. I would like to switch one part of the project to C++ (from C).
How can I switch the compiler used for a part of the project? I don't like the idea of completely splitting the project into two parts. The directory has only Makefile.am and I suppose I should register this somehow in configure.ac.
You must define output variable CXX in configure.ac (the simplest way is by using AC_PROG_CXX macro), then all files with appropriate suffixes (.cc, .cpp) will be compiled by C++ compiler.
In your source root, you mut have a configure.ac and Makefile.am with all the compiler options. So, you can create a subdirectory with a new configure.ac and Makefile.am with other options.
You only need to add this line in the parent configure.ac
AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS([subdir_name])
And add the new subdirectory in the parent Makefile.am
SUBDIRS= subdir_name
Hope can help.
Related
I have been given some C++ source files, together with a CMakeLists.txt file, which compile to create an executable. I now want to add my own source files to this project. However, I want to keep the original source files, and the original CMakeLists file, separate from the new files.
So, I want my solution to look like this:
/Project
/Project/src
/Project/src/CMakeLists.txt
/Project/src/OriginalSource
/Project/src/OriginalSource/CMakeLists.txt
/Project/src/OriginalSource/Original.cpp
/Project/src/NewSource
/Project/src/NewSource/CMakeLists.txt
/Project/src/NewSource/New.cpp
/Project/build
I want all the source files to then compile into an executable to be placed in the build directory. So my question is, what do I put in the three CMakeLists files, such that src/OriginalSource/CMakeLists.txt just compiles the original sources, src/NewSource/CMakeLists.txt just compiles the new sources, and src/CMakeLists.txt links together all these built sources, and creates an executable?
You could create a convenience library out of your code and then link it to the code you've already got. The idea is explained here.
Please see this link for more details:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake/Tutorials/Object_Library
I hope it helps.
No way to change the executable project in OriginSource without modifying the CMakeLists.txt in it. If you really do not want to modify the original project, you could write a new CMakeLists.txt including old and new sources.
One trick is define new sources in /Project/src/CMakeLists.txt, then include them in /Project/src/OriginalSource/CMakeLists.txt:
set(NEW_INCS ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR)/NewSource)
file(GLOB NEW_SRCS ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR)/NewSource/*.cpp)
I am trying to convert a project to use non-recursive automake. Based on a search on SO I could see that the topic has been covered to some extend. But there are not really any questions on how to convert a recursive automake project to a non recursive one. I have already read Karel Zak's blog and of course the autotools-mythbuster. There is a question with experiences regarding non-recursive automake but it does not explain how to convert a project. The only question that explains a bit seems to be regarding the subdir-objects option. But I could not get my project converted with these resources. Hence this question.
Lets start with a simple project setup:
project/
\-- configure.ac
|-- Makefile.am
\-- src/
\-- Makefile.am
|-- foo.c
|-- foo.h
\-- main.c
In configure.ac I just add the subdir-objects option:
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([subdir-objects])
In Makefile.am I removed the src directory from the root Makefiles.am's SUBDIRS variable. Then I removed the src/Makefile entry from the AC_CONFIG_FILES macro in `configure.ac.
Karel Zak's blog suggests to name the included Makefiles of the subdirectories Makemodule.am but Makefile.am seem to work too, if the sub folder is removed for the SUBDIRS variable and if the Makefile entry is removed from the AC_CONFIG_FILES config files macro.
Next I defined a global variable for the programs in the root Makefile.am and included the src/Makefile.am
bin_PROGRAMS=
include src/Makefile.am
In src/Makefile.am I changed:
bin_PROGRAMS=foo
to:
bin_PROGRAMS+=src/foo
and I also changed all occurences of foo_XXX to src_foo_XXX. And I added the prefix src/ to all .c and .h file names in src_foo_SOURCES.
But the program was not building and gave errors about include files not being found, for example:
fatal error: debug.h: No such file or directory
#include <debug.h>
Originally my src directories Makefile.am only hat the content variables src_foo_SOURCES, src_foo_CFLAGS, src_foo_LDFLAGS and src_foo_LDADD. My solution to this problem was to add src_foo_CPPFLAGS like this:
src_foo_CPPFLAGS = \
$(AM_CPPFLAGS) \
-I$(top_builddir)/src \
-DDATADIR='"$(datadir)"' \
-DMODULEDIR='"$(moduledir)"' \
-DLIBEXECDIR='"$(libexecdir)"'
But I dont' really understand why this was necessary and why it built fine when I was using recursive automake?
I have another question regarding the answer of Brett Hale in this question. He writes:
You could use "$(srcdir)/sourceA.cpp", but this directory is implicit anyway. All you need is:
libadapter_la_SOURCES = sourceA.cpp sourceB.cpp
But I could not get it to work without prefixing the path, so that seems wrong to me, can someone confirm my experience?
Update: I am also having problems with the po/ subdir, how can I make that non-recursive? There is no Makefile.am in po/ just a Makevars file. There is a post on autotools-mythbuster, that indicates non-recursive make with gettext is not supported, but that post is from 2011. I'm not sure if anything might have changed in the mean time.
I'll start from the bottom up: nothing changed with respect to gettext since 2011, and po/ directories should still be handled recursively, unfortunately. The same is true for gtk-doc. The reason is that they build somewhat-automake-compatible Makefile.in files, but they are not really automake-based.
As for the header file not found, the reason why it now fails is because you're using the wrong #include statement format: you should use #include "debug.h" and then it would work without having to add the -Isrc to the command line. The preprocessor will look for "" enclosed headers in the same directory as the source file, and for <> enclosed header in the include path; automake by default adds the current directory to the include path with -I. and that meant that it was satisfied when using recursive Makefile.am, but now the "current directory" no longer matches your source file's directory.
I would also suggest both against re-using the name Makefile.am if you're using Karel's suggested approach (automake, or at least some versions of it, will then generate a Makefile.in file for the subdirectory that will not work properly), and to consider not using Karel's approach at all if your software is self-contained enough, for instance if it only has one binary target. Karel's use case was linux-utils which is a fairly sparse project with a few dozen targets each with its own set of source files.
I'll try to comment on the Brett Hale answer you noted, as I think there's a misunderstanding there altogether.
I have been struggling with this for quite a while, and my adventures with cmake have only resulted in hackish solutions that I am pretty sure are not correct.
I created a library that consists of several files, as follows:
-libfolder
-codepart1folder
-CMakeLists.txt
-codepart1.cpp
-codepart1.hpp
-codepart2folder
-codepart3folder
-lib.cpp
-lib.hpp
-CMakeLists.txt
I wrote a CMakeLists file to compile the library (after some experimentation), and I can generate a lib.a file. Now I would like to include this code as a library in other projects, and access it through the interface in lib.hpp. What is the best way to do this, in terms of directory structure, and what I need to put into CMakeLists.txt in my root project?
My current attempt has been to add -libfolder as a subfolder to my current project, and add the commands:
include_directories(${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/libfolder)
link_directories(${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}/libfolder)
add_subdirectory(libfolder)
target_link_libraries(project lib)
When I run make, the library compiles fine, but when project.cpp compiles, it complains that it cannot find codepart1.hpp (which is included in lib.hpp, included from project.cpp).
I suspect that this is the wrong way about doing this, but I cannot wade through the CMake documentation and find a good tutorial on setting up projects like this. Please help, CMake gurus!
The clean way to import one CMake project into another is via the find_package command. The package declaration is done by using the export command. An advantage of using find_package is that it eliminates the need to hard-code paths to the package's files.
Regarding the missing hpp file, you didn't include codepart1folder, so it's not on the include path.
Ok, so after consulting a coworker of mine who is a CMake guru, it seems CMake does not have support for what I am trying to do, leaving one with 3 options:
Add all of the dependencies to the parent projects CMakeLists.txt - not very clean, but it will get the thing to work. You'll have to do this for every project you add the code to, and go back and fix things if your library changes.
clean up your library headers. This is done through some compiler hackery. The idea is to forward-declare every class, and use only pointers or boost::shared_ptr, and then include the dependencies only in the cpp file. That way you can build the cpp file using all the findpackage stuff, and you get the bonus of being able to use the lib by only including the header and linking to the library.
Look into build systems. Having portable code and fast code compilation with complex dependencies is not a solved problem! From my investigations it turned out to be quite complicated. I ended up adopting my coworkers build system which he created himself in cmake, using things he picked up from Google.
Looking at your post you don't seem to add 'codepart1folder' to the includes anywhere. How are you including codepart1.hpp as:
#include <codepart1.hpp>
#include "codepart1folder/codepart1.hpp"
I don't think there is a standard accepted way to structure cmake projects. I've looked at a bunch of cmake repos and they tend to have differences. Personally I do the following:
-project
CMakeLists.txt
-build
-cmake
OptionalCmakeModule.cmake
-src
-Main
Main.cpp
Main.hpp
-DataStructs
SomeTree.hpp
SomeObject.hpp
-Debug
Debug.hpp
-UI
Window.hpp
Window.cpp
Basically that dumps all the source code into 1 directory, then you perform an out of source build with: 'mkdir build && cd build && cmake .. && make' in the projects root folder.
If you have separate libs as part of your project, then you might want a separate libs directory with another subfolder for your specific lib.
I have some of my repos on: https://github.com/dcbishop/ if you want to look at the CMakeLists.txt files.
The main problems with my project structure are that I use the FILE_GLOB which is apparently the 'wrong' way to do things (if you add files after running 'cmake ..' then they won't be picked up hen you do a 'make'). I haven't figured out what the 'right' way to do it is (from what I can see it involves keeping a separate list of files) I also only use 1 CMakeLists.txt file.
Some projects also choose to separate their cpp and hpp files into separate directories. So you would have an include and src folders (at least for the hpp files that are intended to be used externally). I think that would mainly be for projects that are mainly large libraries. Would also make installing header files much easier.
You are probably missing
include_directories(${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/libfolder/codepart1folder)
In such a case you might want to set( CMAKE_INCLUDE_CURRENT_DIR on) to add all folders to the include directory path variable.
Check cmake's output on the command line whether the correct include folders are set or not. Additionally you can always use message() as "print debugging" for cmake variables.
In case of include directories however you need to read the directory property to see what is actually in the include directories.
get_property(inc_dirs DIRECTORY PROPERTY INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES)
message("inc_dirs = ${inc_dirs}")
I hope this helps you figuring out what is missing.
Edit
I just saw your comment about added codepart1folder in the libfolder. It is only available in the libfolder's include_directory path and not propagated to the root folder.
Since the include codepart1.hpp is present in the lib.hpp however you need to have it also available in the project path otherwise you will get missing declaration errors when you build your project.
I'm new to build tool, when I come across Autotool, I have an option to write only one Makefile.am in the top build folder and leave the source folder containing all cpp files clean. I could use VPATH to tell automake to look for the source code inside that folder instead of write /src/ every where. (refer to my old question here: Automake Variables to tidy up Makefile.am)
However It appears to me that CMake have no VPATH to set and some fox around said that It's impossible to do so. So there are two choices:
Create CMakeList.txt in the source folder
Create CMakeList.txt in top build folder and leave the source alone, with a cost that I need to extend "/src" to every source code files.
Which one is more commonly use? I prefer the second because It leave my source code clean from any build-relating-source. In that case is there anyway to get rid of "/src"?
In our company we're using the first option, having a CMakeLists.txt in every subdirectory and building the tree from a root-CMakeLists.txt by using the add_subdirectory command.
This is a modular approach where each subcomponent (think about the project has different parts like boost is split up into system, thread, date_time etc) has its own build-file. If a user wants he is able to just build the subcomponent or to build the whole project.
We're additionally using this as an easy way to include optional subcomponents to the project. The user then can set a Bool value like BUILD_SUBFOO and the add_subdirectory will just be executed, if this Bool is TRUE.
Well-known projects are using this approach too. Here is a link to the root CMakeLists.txt from KDevelop (look at lines 52-62).
I'm quite sure you can do:
FILE(GLOB Source_files src/*.cpp)
which would do exactly what you want.
I'm new to CMake and re-learning C++, so I hope these are appropriate questions. I have a project in directory /projects/A and some .h files in /projects/include/open-source-project-1 that the A project depends on.
Sample Hierarchy:
/projects
/CMakeLists.txt
/A
/CMakeLists.txt
/a.cpp
/B
/CMakeLists.txt
/include
/open-source-project-1
/includeMe.h
/open-source-project-2
Do I need to use a cmake include_directories() command? If so, in what CMakeLists.txt file do I need to put it in? (I've tried many variations)
Do I need a different cmake command?
If I put that in the top most level CMakeLists.txt, should that take care of all occurences of #include in the .cpp files for the A project or B project?
Is this a typical setup for a c++ project? Does it seem logical?
Your top-level CMakeLists.txt file is not needed unless all of the projects are directly inter-related somehow or have otherwise unresolvable dependencies. Unrelated projects should not include each other, nor do they need a parent list file.
If A and B are separate projects, ./A/CMakeLists.txt and ./B/CMakeLists.txt should contain at least this line:
include_directories(../include)
Otherwise, if A and B are parts of a larger single project, then it is appropriate to put these lines in the top-level CMakeLists.txt files:
include_directories(include)
add_subdirectory(A)
add_subdirectory(B)
Only for separate projects. One invocation of cmake will create one build tree. One project to a build tree is all you need.
No. Only if the top-level lists file contains an add_subdirectory directive will it affect the other list files.
No, this is atypical.