I have Direct3D rendering library compiled with VS2008. The another application (built with VS2008) uses my library and everything works fine.
Recently, parent application was moved to VS2010 but my library is still being built under VS2008. And still everything works fine BUT one call on only ONE sprite.
D3DXSprite->Draw method crashes in D3DX9_43.dll in D3DXCore::CSprite::Draw() method. And it occurs only when I'm trying to draw a specific element from texture.
I've also tried to rebuild my library under VS2010, but no success. Crash still occurs.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
This may not be want you want to hear, but all I can suggest for debugging something like this is the liberal use of break points and special debugging if-statements.
Place a try-catch statement around the render function that is failing and place a breakpoint in the catch block.
You may need to add some counters and debugging variables so that you can monitor the size/cont of your data structures vs. what your rendering code actually processed.
If you still don't have any hints, it's time to temporarily fork your code (copy it) and simplify. Start ripping out chunks of code to see if it still fails. Eventually you'll narrow it down.
Good luck.
Related
When running my asmjs\emscripten application, compiled from C++, it has suddenly started to log: "run() called, but dependencies remain, so not running" to the web console, and nothing more happens.
I've added some cout's at the absolute start of my main, but even they aren't reached.
The application executed successfully before, but suddenly this started to happen and I don't know what change triggered this.
Does anyone know how to debug this?
Update
After removing as much source code as I could, this happens as soon as I #include , even due my main simply consists of a single cout.
Ideally you would have the entire environment when it was running in version control, and build every version since to see where it broke.
You might have your code in version control, but perhaps not Emscripten itself. If you've updated Emscripten, this could lead to differences in behaviour. I would try going back to whatever version you used when it was running. Note that sometimes various cache directories survive an Emscripten version change, and might need to be cleared manually (I forgot which exactly).
The dependencies remaining could mean that you are trying to do something before Emscripten has loaded any other files it needs to, say files requested by --preload-file or --memory-init-file. Note that according to https://kripken.github.io/emscripten-site/docs/getting_started/FAQ.html#faq-when-safe-to-call-compiled-functions you should not try to run any Emscripten functions, until the C++ main function has run. To detect this, you can, for example, call your own Javascript function from main (there are other ways).
The fact this wasn't causing a problem before could have been something that seems quite unrelated: a change or update in the web browser, changing limits of concurrent downloads, or a change in the web server this is running from. You could look in the Network tab in the browser to see if anything leaps out at you as being different or suspicious.
However, as main isn't even reached, then it might not be that. I would try commenting out virtually all of your code, and make it so you have practically nothing but a hello-world program. Perhaps you don't have a correct setting in the Module object, or maybe the request for the memory initialization file is failing (you can check in the Network tab in the browser for that one). If your basic hello world program still isn't working, then you could post again, with its code, in a separate question.
This can also happens when the browser runs out of memory. Unfortunately, the browser's memory handling is not in our control so there isn't much you can do beside reducing your payload. This includes code size, preload content size, etc. Basically anything that can reduce the total memory consumption of your program will help fixing this. Browser vendors are constantly working to improve this, but it's going to take a while still.
I think you haven't given enough information to really know for sure. But it might be for instance that your js suddenly crossed some memory threshold which exceeds what the browser wants to allocate to it. You could try reducing the amount of memory used / streaming some assets instead of preloading them / ship less code / use -Os optimization level?
We have a program which is proving difficult to debug. The MFC application runs fine for a few hours but over a day it will crash. Sometimes it will not throw any errors and simply exit the "dlg.DoModal()" section of our code without the user (or any obvious part of the code) closing the dialog. Other times it will crash and throw an error outside of our code and have a horrendous call stack that has nothing to do with our code, it has a lot of calls to system DLLs however.
A bit of background to our problem.
We are trying to develop a MFC bases C++ application (with a dialog). We have multiple threads and the code is rather large which makes debugging a nightmare. We have been experiencing intermittent crashes that we have been unable to locate the source of so far.
We are well past the use of breakpoints for debugging as we are pretty sure it is an issue somewhere in MFC, maybe not a bug but more a problem with the way we are using MFC.
Now we've tried simple things to help us like:
Enable all debug exceptions:
Debug -> Exceptions and then checking all the boxes so that we can
trap silly mistakes.
This proved helpful but we've now corrected all the errors it throws
within a few hours of running.
Search for memory leaks
We then tried Visual Leak Detector (which works beautifully by the
way) located here: http://vld.codeplex.com/ Our code now reports no
memory leaks so it is not an obvious memory leak issue. We have
included vld.h in the very top of our code near the entry point.
Adding Microsoft Symbol Server to obtain debug symbol files.
We then tried making our call stacks more human readable by using MS
Symbol servers shown in these tutorials:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/3f1825e1-6770-48c0-91b0-12d8946ab259/2-how-do-i-configure-visual-studio-to-use-microsoft-symbol-server?forum=vsdebug and http://support.microsoft.com/kb/311503
This ultimately did nothing as it still doesn't tell you enough about any errors.
Using the Thread window to see all call stacks, and using the
Parallel Stack window
We have been using the Thread and Parallel stack windows to aid our
debugging but ultimately they have proved nothing more than pretty
pictures and fancily formatted call stacks that makes you feel good
more than anything. We have been using the tutorial here which has
been very handy
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/79508/Mastering-Debugging-in-Visual-Studio-A-Beginn
Now for the more interesting things we've tried that do not throw errors straight away but can be detected as problems:
GDI Objects not being destroyed
This one is not obvious in VS2010 as an issue. Basically if you use a call like "CDC* pDC = lChild->GetDC();" and do not use the call "ReleaseDC(pDC);" then you have just created a GDI Object that will not be destroyed until your program terminates. VS2010 is a bit dumb in this regard and will keep creating these objects until your program crashes, and the call stack will look horrible and you will probably have no idea why it has crashed.
To find this issue, start Windows Task Manager -> Click Processes Tab -> Click the View Toolbar item -> Select Columns. Now check Handles, Threads, User Objects, and GDI Objects. Now start your program, find it's process in the list under Image Name, and watch to see if the GDI Objects column keeps growing or stabilizes.
Objects Not being destroyed
This is another not so obvious error, if you create a bitmap like this: "reinterpret_cast(LoadImage( GetModuleHandle(NULL), MAKEINTRESOURCE(IDB_BITMAPNPR), IMAGE_BITMAP, 0, 0, 0))" and assign it straight to a picture control, the bitmap will not be destroyed if you assign another bitmap to this picture control using similar code. Instead you need to assign the above to a HBITMAP variable which you then need to destroy when you are done.
This situation can also arise if you create a font or colour in a similar fashion.
Now with all that being said, we have tried all the methods above and we still can't find our issue. Sometimes our program will exit normally and we won't be given any debug info (this is usually after is has been running overnight), other times our program will lockup the PC (tested on multiple PCs), other times it will throw an error but we can't locate the culprit because it simply points to the ".DoModal()" part of our code and the rest is native windows DLLs which is useless for debugging purposes.
We suspect something is either being created and not destroyed properly but we aren't sure what and VS2010 is not telling us anything useful to point us in the right direction.
Does anyone have any ideas? How do we trap errors that aren't obvious to VS2010? Or rather how do we easily trap "GDI leaks" and the like?
Thanks in advance
Edit:
We've been using Microsoft's Application Verifier, it's found a few errors so far. To use it download it here http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=20028 run Application Verifier, add your .exe file in your Debug or Release directories and run the program in VS2010 as normal. VS2010 will break when Application Verifier 'sees' an error. It hasn't found anything too outrageous yet so I assume that we still have issues with our code.
The actual question: what are the differences between running in Visual C++ 2010 (both release and debug mode) and standalone, excluding anything that couldn't cause the problem stated at the bottom of this post?
I have a very specific problem with my program, so I am not going to post the code. If you would like to know details of the problem to gain some understanding, I post them at the bottom. Instead, I ask: what are the differences in running in visual c++ and standalone?
I am using Visual C++ 2010, and my program is using SFML 2.0. It runs fine in studio (I am calling it studio because it is easier to type), but when run standalone on some computers only a bug will occur within the program, to do with movement being delayed but other parts not. I cannot find any links between the computer specs of the users who test it and whether they work or not.
All dlls and such are included (at least, I think they are - the program runs fine, as detailed at the bottom - maybe some users have some framework installed?). On my computer, it works all the time in studio but not standalone. On my netbook, it works, on my older computer, it doesn't. The only project settings I changed with vc++ directories and linker settings.
Problem details:
All the sounds sound slightly different and there is a possible high pitched background noise. Character movement, enemy movement and space bar delay which is supposed to be 0.5 seconds is increased to about 5 seconds but "generating pixels" (an aspect in the game with the arrow keys isn't.
I'm stressing again that it only happens on SOME COMPUTERS, mine included, but always works when run within studio. A number of people have tested the game, and some reported the problem and others different.
[NOT THE MAIN POINT OF THE QUESTION BUT HERE IS AN EXTRA BIT: If you are so willing to help me that you wish to look through the entire source code, it's here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/53835113/EVERYTHING.zip [note: ignore the massive amount of bugs and memory leaks other than the problem described :P]]
EDIT: THE POINT ISN'T THAT I WANT MY PROGRAM DEBUGGED! That is an optional extra. The question: what are the differences in running in visual c++ and standalone?
More edits: Found that the problem is due to the frame time not being correct. Not sure if this provides some insight.
Thanks to anyone who tries to help me!
GetFrameTime() in SFML was removed in a recent version because it returns the time since last frame rather than the time since last update. As a result, the it may return 0.
I am debugging an Iphone program with the simulator in xCode and I have one last issue to resolve but I need help resolving it for the following reason: when it happens the program goes into debugging mode but no errors appear (no BAD ACCESS appears) and it does not show where the code fails. Putting some variables as global helps me to see their values to start pin pointing where the bug is but before I go into this fully I would like to know what techniques/tools you guys use to debug these situations.
If it helps Im debugging the following: I merged some code into the SpeakHere demo. The code was added in the C++ modules of the program (AQRecorder.h and .mm). I seem to have pinpointed the problem code in a function I wrote.
My favourite is always to add debugging code and log it to a file. This allows me so report any and all information I need to resolve the issue if the debugger is not working properly.
I normally control the debugging code by use of a flag which I can manipulate at run time or by the command line.
If the error is (and it probably is) a memory management issue, printing log entries is really not going to help.
I would reccomend learning how to use Instruments, and use its tools to track down the memory leak when it occurs rather than waiting until the application crashes later on.
Here's the scenario. I'm debugging my own app (C/C++) which is using some library developed by another team in the company. An assertion fails when my code generates some edge case. Its a pain because the assertion is not formulated correctly so the library function is working OK but I get all these interruptions where I just have to continue (lots as its in a loop) so I can get to the stuff I'm actually interested in. I have to use the debug version of the library when debugging for other reasons. The other team wont fix this till next release (hey, it works on our machine).
Can I tell the debugger to ignore the breakpoints asserted by this section of code (i.e. can it auto-continue for me).
If the code is triggering breakpoints on its own (by __debugbreak or int 3), you cannot use conditional breakpoints, as the breakpoints are not know to Visual Studio at all. However, you may be able to disable any such breakpoints you are not interested in by modifying the code from the debugger. Probably not what you want, because you need to repeat this in each debugging session, however still may be better than nothing. For more information read How to disable a programmatical breakpoint / assert?.
There's no good way to automatically ignore ASSERT() failures in a debug library. If that's the one you have to use, you're just going to have to convince the other team that this needs fixed now, or if you have the source for this library, you could fix or remove the assertions yourself just to get your work done in the meantime.
You can add an exception handler around the call(s) to the library, catch the EXCEPTION_BREAKPOINT exception and do nothing.
Example 2 in the following link seems to be what you want to do:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms681409(VS.85).aspx
You can use conditional breakpoints. Some links:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308469
http://dotnettipoftheday.org/tips/conditional_breakpoint.aspx