is there any sample project that shows how to use gamekit without gkpeerpicker? And is there any sample that uses bonjour (but without any internet connection and no wireless router)?
Some informations (for both projects):
only bluetooth (bonjour for the other project)
more than 2 devices (if possible)
server client model (how to make it work)
send/receive data
the server can decide whether is is "visible" for other "potenial" clients
show in a tableview the "discoverd" devices -> if the user clicks on a tableview cell (the name of the device e.g. "Tom's iPod Touch") it is going to pair up but the other user must accept the connection (UIAlertView) and if he accepts they will pair up
show all connected peers (connected to the server) in a uitableview
kick out some peers (only the server can kick other) (this should be easy to implement. just send a special packet to the client with a string that says "KICK YOURSELF" than it will kick itself)
invite other clients (in search)
(don't really need this but would be awesome):
let clients/server move objects (physic objects in box2d (cocos2d)) and than every client should show the exactly same simulation on the screen.
After using google for some hours I think there's no sample project(s) that shows these "features" above. Mayby someone could make one? Please do not say me some theory. I read so much but a sample project (or more and another for the bonjour version) with code commentary would be great!
Edit: I will probably add some bounty on this ;). Currently I can't ;)
Thank you very much for reading :)
cocos2dbeginner
I'm not going to write this for you but I can help with some information to get you started. There are many examples that show some of your features, particularly Apple's witap example.
One thing to note, you can't go from bluetooth to bonjour. bluetooth is the method of communication, bonjour is how you communicate. So you'd have to do bonjour broadcasting on one side and connecting on the other. Bonjour over bluetooth is taken care of in Apple's API, it should "just work". See this for some more info here.
This page from apple not only has gamekit concepts you are looking for but it also tells you the method names you will be using to get your tasks done, even if you don't want to be going through the supplied UI that apple has with GameKit.
Here, here, here, and here are links for more bonjour networking samples. As long as you're not doing complex tasks with sockets, I like this personally, it makes things very simple.
Hope that helps some.
I highly recommend Ray Wenderlichs page.
There is a tutorial for Gamecenter networking that matches some of your requests.
http://www.raywenderlich.com/3276/how-to-make-a-simple-multiplayer-game-with-game-center-tutorial-part-12
According to your alias: There are many more useful tutorials with a high quality. Go to http://www.raywenderlich.com/tutorials for a list.
Apple themselves have demo projects that show wifi connections using GKSession and Bluetooth using GKPeerPickerController. If you wanted a peerPicker and an option for both I think you need to use a peerpicker controller to give the user a choice. Use this code at the point you want the picker to appear, after you have instantiated the picker.
picker.connectionTypesMask = GKPeerPickerConnectionTypeOnline | GKPeerPickerConnectionTypeNearby;
Then if they choose wifi use the code from the GKRocket project in the iOS Sample Code Library. If they choose Bluetooth then use GKTank.
The GKRocket code (using GKSession and tables) is much harder to follow but GKSession automatically uses bluetooth if there is no wifi coverage. Given that you will need most of the code for GKSession in your project to handle wifi I think it is easier to forget about peerPickerController unless you only want bluetooth.
Eventually Apple will surely add the necessary methods and properties to peerPickerController to handle wifi, but for the moment it is GKSession you need.
Hope it helps.
Related
How does ZeroC ICE compare to 0MQ? I know that 0MQ/Crossroads and DDS are very similar, but cant seem to figure out where ICE comes in.
I need to quickly implement a system that offloads real-time market-data from C++ to C#, as a first phase of my project. The next phase will be to implement an Event Based architecture with an underlying Pub/Sub design.
I am willing to use TCP.. but the the system is currently running on a single 24 core server.. so an IPC option would be nice. From what I understand ICE is only TCP, while DDS and 0mq have an IPC option.
Currently ,I am leaning towards using Protobuf with either ICE or Crossroads IO. Got turned off from the OpenSplice DDS website. Ive done lots research on the various options, was originally considering OpenMPI + boost:mpi, but there does not seem to be MPI for .NET.
My question is:
How does ICE compare to 0MQ? I cant wrap my head around this. Was unable to find anything online that compares the two.
thanks in advance.
........
More about my project:
Currently using CMAKE C++ on Windows, but the plan is to move to CentOS at some point. An additional desired feature is to store the tic data and all the messages in a "NoSql" database such as Hbase/Hadoop or HDF5. Do any of these middleware/messaging/pub-sub libraries have any database integration?
Some thoughts about ZeroC:
Very fast; Able to have multiple endpoints; Able to load balance on the endpoints; Able to reconnect to a different endpoint in case one of the node goes down. This is transparent to the end user; Has good tool chain (IceGrid, IceStorm, IceBox, etc); Distributed, high availability, multiple failover, etc
Apart from that, I have used it for hot swapping code modules (something similar to Erlang) by having the client create the proxy with multiple endpoints, and later on bring down each endpoint for a quick upgrade one by one. With the transparent retry to a different endpoint, I could have the system up and running the whole time i did an upgrade. Not sure if this is an advertised feature or an unadvertised side-effect :)
Overall, it is very easy to scale out your servers if need be using ZeroC Ice.
I know ZeroMQ provides a fantastic set of tools and messaging patterns and I would keep using it for my pet projects. However, The problem that i see is that it is very easy to go overboard and lose track of all your distributed components. This is a must have in a distributed environment. How will you know where your clients/server are when you need to upgrade? If one of components down the chain does not receive a message, how to identify where the issue is? the publisher? the client? or any one of the bridges (REP/REQ, XREP/XREQ, etc) in between?
Overall, ZeroC provides a much better toolset and ecosystem for enterprise solutions.
And it is open source :)
Jaybny,
ZMQ:
If you want real good performance and the only job for Phase 1 of your job is to move data from C++ to C#, then Zmq is the best option.
Having a pub/sub model for event driven architecture is also something that Zmq can help you with, with its in-built messaging pattern.
Zmq also supports your IPC requirements in this case. Eg: you can have one instance of your application that consumes 24 cores by multithreading and communicating via IPC.
ZeroC Ice:
Ice is a RPC framework very much like CORBA.
Eg.
Socket/ZMQ - You send message over the wire. Read it at the other end, parse the message, do some action, etc.
ZeroC Ice - Create a contract between client and server. Contract is nothing but a template of a class. Now the client calls a proxy method of that class, and the server implements/actions it and returns the value. Thus, int result = mathClass.Add(10,20) is what the client calls. The method, parameters, etc is marshalled and sent to the server, server implements the Add method, returns the result, and the client gets 30 as the result. Thus on the client side, the api is nothing but a proxy for a servant running on a remote host.
Conclusion:
ZeroC ICE has some nice enterprisy features which are really good. However, for your project requirements, ZMQ is the right tool.
Hope this helps.
For me.. the correct answer was Crossroads I/O . It does everything I need.. but still unable to pub/sub when using protobufs... im sure ZeroC ICE is great for distributed IPC, but 0MQ/Crossroads, gives you the added flexibility to use Inter-Thread-Communication.
Note: on windows, 0mq does not have IPC.
So, all in all, the crossroads fork of 0mq is the best. but you will have to roll your own windows/ipc (or use tcp::127..) , and publisher side topic filtering features for pub/sub.
nanomsg, from the guy who wrote crossroads and 0mq (i think).
http://nanomsg.org/
I read some questions here but couldn't really find the specific problem I'am faced with here...
I need to implement a "DeviceCache" in a particular project which caches all device-names found in /proc/net/dev .
The Language is C/++
So I thought about a seperate thread looking every X seconds in the directory mentioned above but was encouraged to find a more direct way.
How can I register a method of my process to the device manager of linux?
Is there a similar way like events/signals?
I looked in other sites but couldn't find any helpful code... Im relatively new to Linux-programming but willing to learn new things :)
Based on your comments, what you really want is to track which network interfaces are operational at any given time.
The only true way to determine if a network interface is up is to test it - after all, the router on the other end may be down. You could send pings out periodically, for example.
However, if you just want to know if the media goes down (ie, the network cable is unplugged), take a look at these SO questions:
Linux carrier detection notification
Get notified about network interface change on Linux
If you just want to be notified of the actual hardware-level registration of interfaces (eg, when a USB NIC is plugged in), you can use udev events if your platform has udev; otherwise, I believe there's another netlink category for hardware addition/removal events.
Im looking for code that connects to another computer via remote desktop connection and checks if the connection was successful or not.
I packet logged and found out there was a galaxy worth of packets so i was wondering if there was some easy code out there.
There really isn't anything easy about RDP, that protocol stack is huge and builds on the ITU OSI protocols, which includes a fair amount of ASN.1/BER.
Your best bet is the code that's in FreeRDP.
A bit of terminology: you want a "RDP client library for C++".
As others have mentioned, look into the "FreeRDP" and "rdesktop" projects.
With FreeRDP, you're going to get a suite of libraries (each one doing it's thing). With rdesktop, you're going to get a client app (which you have to break the C code out of, and "build" your C++ api around).
If this is a new project, I'd pick FreeRDP over rdesktop, as they have libraries available with your C++ interface already in place.
Do you need to check if an RDP server is present, but not authenticate? In this case all you'd need are the first couple of packets used to negotiate protocol security. You can find the code in FreeRDP in libfreerdp-core/nego.c.
#Blanker1231 : You should have look on rdesktop code , its in c but can be very easily modified to be used in a C++ code , all you have to do is bridge their Struct Stream effectively .
moreover I have worked on a Rdp 7+ implementation ages ago in qt/c++ for a , so recently just for fun of it i used all of my experience and wrote a RDP parser and code generator and open sourced it on https://github.com/shashanksingh/Code-Generator-for-RDP
Right now it dead simple and i am still working on it more intelligent . Word of caution it doesn't generate everything . Examples includes demo.def which on compilation will generate all the class os ms-fscc used in ms-rdp
#Blanker1231 if you ever feel like , just fork the implementation and start pushing stuff in
My main goal is to create an advanced program for manipulating the packets that route within my network via the router. Let my program have total control over the router. Set the download/upload speeds to my inputs, apply the effect to certain devices within in my network. Block upload or download traffic. Set second delay for either the upload or download speed. Specify % of loss packets, and the list goes on.
The problem is that I don't know where to start. I know most languages at the very most basic level. I'd like to create this program in either C, C++ or C# but I don't know yet. What else do I need to know before creating this program? Winsock or something? Winpcap APIs?
This goal is my motivation to learn programming to the extreme, and I'm really looking forward to it.
Thanks in advance!
Hmmm I guess you would want to look at pcap(?):
pcap
Check out:
http://beej.us/guide/bgnet/html/multi/index.html
'Beej's Guide to Network Programming
Using Internet Sockets'
All you could possibly need to know about programming sockets for capture and manipulation.
If I were you I'd write it in C, I'm writing a similar project at the moment in C++ and it's hell but too late to stop and start again.
Hope that helps.
Bear in mind that you either need a router that you can re-program or you need to use your PC as a router to do this.
Either way you want to look into how IPTABLES are implemented.
I've never seen Desktop Windows used as a router only Windows Server, though it may still be possible. libpcap is for packet capture, but not interception as I understand it. Programs like Wireshark use it to monitor copies of packets, but not to modify them. If you want to attempt this, my impression has been that there is a lot more documentation and tools for doing something like this with NetFilter/IPTables on Linux. You can even install something like OpenWRT on a compatible router and get a small, cheap Linux router, though having Desktop Linux will probably help for development. The NetFilter QUEUE library can be used with some IPTables firewall rules to redirects specific (or all) packets to a regular user program. That program can then read the packet and modify it or even request it to be dropped.
http://www.netfilter.org/projects/libnetfilter_queue/
If you want to manipulate network traffic on a Windows machine (as you mentioned), you will need some extra software. This operating system wont give you the full control over itself, which is fine for some reasons.
I think what you want to do, should be done with either winpcap or win10pcap if you are using Win10. These packages contains a windows driver and the libpcap user space library.
I have an installation program (just a regular C++ MFC program, not Windows Installer based) that needs to set some registry values based on the type of Internet connection: broadband, dialup, and/or wireless. Right now this information is being determined by asking a series of yes or no questions. The problem is that the person doing the installations is not the same person that owns and uses the computer, so they're not always sure what the answers to these questions should be. Is there a way to programatically determine any of this information? The code is written in C++ (and optionally MFC) for Windows XP and up. .NET-based solutions are not an option because I don't want to have to determine if the framework is installed before our installation program can run.
To clarify, the issue is mainly that wireless and dialup connections are not "always-on", which creates a need for our product to behave a different way because our server is not always available. So a strictly speed-measuring solution wouldn't help, though there is a setting that's speed dependent so that the product doesn't try to send MB of information through a dialup connection as soon as it connects.
[I have no idea how to get exactly the information you asked for, but...] Maybe you could rephrase (for yourself) what you try to accomplish? Like, instead of asking "does the user have broadband or dialup", ask "how much bandwidth does the user's internet connection have" - and then you can try to answer the rephrased question without any user input (like by measuring bandwidth).
Btw. if you ask the user just for "broadband or dialup", you might encounter some problems:
what if the user has some connection type you didn't anticipate?
what if the user doesn't know (because there's just an ethernet cable going to a PPPoE DSL modem/router)?
what if the user is connected through a series of connections (VPN via dialup, to some other network which has broadband?)
Asking for "capabilities" instead of "type" might be more useful in those cases.
Use InternetGetConnectedState API to retrieve internet connection state.
I tested it and it works fine.
I found this document which can help:
http://www.pcausa.com/resources/InetActive.txt
Regarding the question "is the internet connection permanent or not?":
best way would be probably to make the app robust enough to always cope with a non-permanent connection :-) which would work the same with dialup and broadband...
alternatively, maybe you can find out how long the user's internet connection has been established already, and compare with system uptime? If the connection has been online for almost as long as the computer was running, it's probably a permanent connection.
Anyway, these heuristics will probably fail for obscure connection types.
Also, regarding the point about not sending lots of data: if people have a "broadband + low traffic limit" tariff, you shouldn't send lots of data either even if bandwidth allows :-)
Best bet would be to grab the default active network connection, ensure it is an internet connection (ping google.com or similar) and then ask it what type of device it is. You should be able to determine from that what connection the user has.
I'm fairly confident this is possible, but not sure how to go about it though.
I think you should just do a quick connection-speed test. Just download some specific sized files, time how long it takes, and you'll know the speed. I agree with the other guy, don't ask them what type of connection they have, what's more important is the speed. Perhaps next year they come out with 100mbit dialup...do you want everyone using this amazing new device to get the crappy lowbandwidth version of your app?
I would agree with oliver, as you imply: you have the functionality already to cope with connection loss, why not enable it by default.
Broadband connections can get messed up to: routersoftware that freezes (happens a lot to me), or poweradapter that fries, ...