The overall program is too complex to display here. Basically, just pay attention to the green highlights in my recent git commit. I am very new to DirectInput, so I expect I've made several errors. I have very carefully studied the MSDN documentation, so I promise I'm not just throwing this out there and stamping FIX IT FOR ME on it. :)
Basically, I think I have narrowed down my problem to the area of code around Engine::getEvent (line 238+). I do not understand how these functions work, and I've messed with certain pieces to achieve different results. My goal here is to simply read in keyboard events directly and output those raw numbers to the screen (I will deal with the numbers' meaning later). The problem here relates to KEYBOARD_BUFFER_SIZE. If I make it small, the program seems to run fine, but it outputs no events. If I make it big, it runs a bit better, but it starts to slow down and then freeze (the OpenGL window just has a rotating color cube). How do I properly capture keyboard events?
I checked the return values on all the setup steps higher in the code. They all return DI_OK just fine.
Your code seems to be okay (according to this tutorial, which I have used in the past). The use of several stack-based arrays is questionable, but shouldn't be too much of an issue (unless you start having lots of concurrent getEvent calls running).
However, your best bet would be to stop using DirectInput and start using Windows Raw Input. It's best to make this switch early (ie, now) rather than realise later on that you really need to use something other than DI to get the results you want.
Related
I made a basic opengl program and opened it up and I was only getting 2400fps with dips to 700fps in release mode, and I was really confused so I took out everything in the main loop till the code looks like below
while (true)
{
glfwSwapBuffers(window);
}
and now I'm only getting 3400-4000fps (I switched to release mode).
For a bit of context, I've made a game in DirectX 11 where when nothing is drawing it gets 8000fps and that's with input and game logic not an empty loop.
I've tried compiling my own glfw and using precompiled binaries. Im thinking that maybe I need to figure out how to build glfw as apart of my project so I can get more optimization.
I'm really confused, I want to do some heavy stuff in this game but i'm already getting 2-4x less performance when nothing is going on.
Last second addition:
People have talked about glfwswapbuffers having low performance on other threads but in all those cases they are using vysnc. (im using glfwSwapInterval(0))
There might be a multiple reasons to impact the performance of glfwSwapBuffers. Since it works asynchronously, performance might be reduced by synchronizations as v-sync, or monitor refresh rate (60Hz?). Usually you want your engine to be in sync with other processes (even if they are a limiting factor). You might also want to try glfwSwapInterval(0).
I am creating a user interface using (Qt) and I am attaching it to my C/C++ motion application using shared memory as my form of Inter Process Communication.
I currently have a class which I created in my motion application that has many members. Most of these members are used to update data on the UI and some of them get updated about 20 to 50 times a second, so it is pretty fast (the reason being because it is tracking motion). My problem is that the data is not getting updated on the UI frequently. It gets updated every few seconds. I was able to get it work using other variables made in structures from my application by using "volatile" however it does not seem to be working for members of my class. I know that the problem is not on the UI (Qt) side, because I saw that the actual member data was not being updated in my application, even though I have commands every cycle to update the data.
I was pretty sure the problem is that some optimization is occurring since I do not have my members declared as volatile as in my structures, but when I made them volatile it still did not work. I found that when I through a comment to print out in the function that updates my motion data within my motion application, the UI updates much more frequently as if the command to print out the comment deters the compiler form optimizing out some stuff.
Has anyone experienced this problem or have a possible solution?
Your help is greatly appreciated. Thanks ahead of time!
EDIT:
The interface does not freeze completely. I just updates every few seconds instead of continuously as I intended for it to do. Using various tests I know that the problem is not on the GUI or shared memory side. The problem lies strictly on the motion application side. The function that I am calling is below: int
`motionUpdate(MOTION_STAT * stat)
{
positionUpdate(&stat->traj);
}
`
where
positionUpdate(){stat->Position = motStatus.pos_fb;}
Position is a class member that contains x, y, and z. The function does not seem to update the position values unless I put a printed out comment before positionUpdate(). I don't track the change in shared memory to update the UI, but instead just update the UI every cycle.
Especially Given you are using Qt, I would strongly advise not using "native" shared memory, but to use signals instead. Concurrency using message-passing (signals/slots is one such way) is much, much easier to reason about and debug than trying to share memory.
I would expect your problem with updating is that the UI isn't being called enough of the time, so there is a backlog of updating to do.
Try putting in some code that throws away updates if they happen less than 0.3 seconds apart and see if that helps. You may wish to tune that number but start at the larger end.
Secondly, make sure there aren't any "notspots" in your app, in which the GUI thread is not being given the chance to run. If there are, consider putting code into another thread or, alternatively, calling processEvents() within that part of the code.
If the above really isn't what's happening, I would suggest adding more info about the architecture of your program.
I've written a program based on an empty Win32 console app in VS2008 running on Win7 64bit. The program is entirely menu based spawning from a main.cpp which only calls external functions that lead to other interfaces based on the users needs (e.g. cashier, inventory, report, etc...). What I would love to do is provide a new console window for each interface.
Ideally it would close the main menu upon invoking any other interfaces and so on as the user progresses through its functions, including reopening the main menu when necessary.
The basis for doing it this way is that I'm starting a new semester next week diving deeper in OOP with C++ and I wanted to go over my text and complete the capstone project which progresses with the topics to ensure that I have all the basics down pat. As much as I would love to do this the smartest-easiest way, it's best if I stick to the limited knowledge presented in the book which only hints at STL and speaks nothing of additional libraries like boost.
I, of course, have searched on SO and elsewhere looking for the solution. I have found answers, most of them falling outside of my tight requirements, some dealing with building a console window from scratch. While from-scratch seems the most promising, it seemed to be dealing with those not using a robust IDE like VS and I don't know if it will cause more conflict than it's worth, or if it can even be used in multiplicity. The majority, however, left me with the impression it isn't possible. The one exception to this was linking a console to a process. This is what I hope is in my future!
What brought me to this was the need to present a clean look at each turn of events. At first I was fooling around with trying to clear the screen with a basic function like void clearScreen(int lines); but this will always clear from the bottom. So, if I clear the screen before the next interface it's still at the bottom. If I clear it then accept input, the prompt is still at the bottom.
In case it hasn't been clear up to this point. My question is:
Is it possible, within reason, to produce multiple console windows which are tied to processes, or is there an easy way which I do not know to manipulate the scrolling of the main console window?
Even though I "need" to stay within the confines of the baby-step process of traditional learning, I would love to hear any input aside from switching the app type.
This is more of an OCD issue than a requirement of the task, so if the effort isn't worth the benefit that's okay too.
There is no portable way of moving the cursor around the console window - in Unix/Linux, you can send terminal codes for that, in Windows I have no idea.
What would work cross-platform, but be terribly slow and not too nice, would be:
read your input character-by-character
remember where on the screen the next character should appear
redraw the whole screen after each key press
If you want to do better, you must turn to platform-specific solutions, or find a library which would do it for you (like ncurses in the Unix world), but I don't know if any of these fit in your requirements.
You can set the cursor-position on Windows using SetConsoleCursorPosition.
Since you were saying something about VS, I assume restricting yourself to Windows isn't a problem. If so, you can use the Windows API for this.
Other than that, ncurses seems to be at least partially ported to most common platforms.
If you were looking for a way to do this in standard C++ - it doesn't exist. C++ doesn't require the platform it's running on to even have a console, so there are no console manipulation functions.
Both aren't that hard to use, but if this is really just some student thingy where you expect to learn something useful you probably shouldn't bother. Console manipulation isn't something you'll have or want to do very often.
Although it may not have been clear in my original question, I was looking for a solution to be used in a console window. Ideally the solution would have been operable on at least Linux and Windows because any programs I write for school must be compiled on each. This wasn't an assignment but it's obviously advantageous to learn things that are usable there as well.
Here's what I found ...Solution thanks to Tim Wei
void clearScreen()
{
#ifdef _WIN32
system("cls");
#else
system("clear");
#endif
}
This, as simple as it is, was exactly what I was looking for. The function clears the screen and puts the cursor at the top of the console window providing a way to provide static headers or titles with changing data tables. It also allows for simple text based animations - if you like that sort of thing. It made a significant difference in the look, feel and consistency in my console applications this semester!
I have written a small program using Borland's C++ builder, and along the way, everything seemed fine. My program has a map window and a table window, and when a user presses a button, a long process is started that reads in all the map and table information and then displays that. Every time i ran it through the debugger, I had no issues. Then today, I decided to test it without running it through the debugger. To my horror, The program reads in the map information and then displays it on the paintbox canvas without a problem, but when it loads the information for the grid, the map gets erased!!! It appears to happen during the load phase for the table. this takes about 4 seconds, and during which time, the window tells me that it isnt responding. This is when the map gets erased. Anyone have any ideas on why this is happening? Its driving me nuts, and I dont really understand whats going on under the hood here.
UPDATE:
I have fixed the problem to some degree. I was poking around and found this: Avoiding "(Not Responding)" label in windows while processing lots of data in one lump
I added the code to run once in the middle of the data read in for the table. this fixed my problems. however, I was wondering if anyone knows why this is the case? why does my program going unresponsive cause my canvases to be erased?
Marcus Junglas wrote a detailed explanation of the problem, which affects both Delphi and C++Builder.
When programming an event handler in
Delphi (like the OnClick event of a
TButton), there comes the time when
your application needs to be busy for
a while, e.g. the code needs to write
a big file or compress some data.
If you do that you'll notice that your
application seems to be locked. Your
form cannot be moved anymore and the
buttons are showing no sign of life.
It seems to be crashed.
The reason is that a Delpi application
is single threaded. The code you are
writing represents just a bunch of
procedures which are called by
Delphi's main thread whenever an event
occured. The rest of the time the main
thread is handling system messages and
other things like form and component
handling functions.
So, if you don't finish your event
handling by doing some lengthy work,
you will prevent the application to
handle those messages.
You can reduce the problem by calling Application->ProcessMessages(), while loading your map data, however I recomend using a separate thread to load the data.
I have never used C++ Builder, but i used Delphi. I think the libraries are the same.
Does that component you use store the image data? It may only draw to the screen. Try covering the window of your app with another window. If it erases it, you have to use a component which stores the image.
See this, it is for Delphi, but it may help. There should be a Image component in C++ Builder. Try using that instead of PaintBox.
You can solve the unresponsivenes problem by running the time consuming task in a separate thread or calling some function that processes the window's messages.
Basically what I am trying to do is write my own pseudo task bar in C++. The program needs to idle until another program is started up, at which point it needs to visually depict that the other program is running. For each other program that is running, the user should be able to click on the visual representation and have Windows switch focus to the selected program.
The big underlying question at this point: is this even a possibility? Or has Windows hidden most/all of its fiddly-bits to make this close to, if not completely, impossible?
[EDIT:] restructured the question
The obvious starting point would be SetWindowsHookEx(WH_SHELL,...); which will get you notifications when top-level windows are created or destroyed (along with some other related events, like a different window being activated, a window's title changing, etc.)
Think ahead to actually bringing the window to the front, as I once researched myself.
SetForegroundWindow() won't work unless issued from the foreground process - neither SwitchToThisWindow() nor the AttachThreadInput() kludge seemed to always work, but maybe I just wasn't doing it right. Anyway as far as I know there no way to make a window foreground as good as Windows does, please enlighten me if say you discover say an undocumented call which actually Works.
It seems possible to me at least in a basic way:
1. Set up a shell hook as described by Jerry
2. figure the executable file from the module handle to access it's icons using shell services
The Vista-like feature of keeping a 'live' miniature of the screen seems much more challenging.