I am trying to create a simple matcher that matches any string consisting of alphanumeric characters. I tried the following:
Ext.regModel('RegistrationData', {
fields: [
{name: 'nickname',type: 'string'},
],
validations: [
{type: 'format', name: 'nickname', matcher: /[a-zA-Z0-9]*/}
]
});
However this does not work as expected. I did not find any documentation on how should a regular expression in a matcher look like.
Thank you for help.
I found a blog on sencha.com, where they explain the validation.
I have no idea what sencha-touch is, but maybe it helps, when you tell us what you are giving to your regex, what you expect it to do, and what it actually does (does not work as expected is a bit vague). According to the blog it accepts "regular expression format", so for your simple check, it should be pretty standard.
EDIT:
As a wild guess, maybe you want to use anchors to ensure that the name has really only letters and numbers:
/^[a-zA-Z0-9]*$/
^ is matching the start of the string
$ is matching the end of the string
Your current regex /[a-zA-Z0-9]*/ would match a string containing zero or more occurrences of lower or upper case characters (A-Z) or numbers anywhere in the string. That's why Joe#2, J/o/e, *89Joe as well as Joe, Joe24andjOe28` match - they all contain zero or more subsequent occurrences of the respective characters.
If you want your string to contain only the respective characters you have to change the regex according to stema's answer:
/^[a-zA-Z0-9]*$/
But this has still one problem. Due to the * which meas zero or more occurrences it also matches an empty string, so the correct string should be:
/^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$/
with + meaning one or more occurrences. This will allow nicknames containing only one lowercase or uppercase character or number, such as a, F or 6.
Related
I'd like to match three-character sequences of letters (only letters 'a', 'b', 'c' are allowed) separated by comma (last group is not ended with comma).
Examples:
abc,bca,cbb
ccc,abc,aab,baa
bcb
I have written following regular expression:
re.match('([abc][abc][abc],)+', "abc,defx,df")
However it doesn't work correctly, because for above example:
>>> print bool(re.match('([abc][abc][abc],)+', "abc,defx,df")) # defx in second group
True
>>> print bool(re.match('([abc][abc][abc],)+', "axc,defx,df")) # 'x' in first group
False
It seems only to check first group of three letters but it ignores the rest. How to write this regular expression correctly?
Try following regex:
^[abc]{3}(,[abc]{3})*$
^...$ from the start till the end of the string
[...] one of the given character
...{3} three time of the phrase before
(...)* 0 till n times of the characters in the brackets
What you're asking it to find with your regex is "at least one triple of letters a, b, c" - that's what "+" gives you. Whatever follows after that doesn't really matter to the regex. You might want to include "$", which means "end of the line", to be sure that the line must all consist of allowed triples. However in the current form your regex would also demand that the last triple ends in a comma, so you should explicitly code that it's not so.
Try this:
re.match('([abc][abc][abc],)*([abc][abc][abc])$'
This finds any number of allowed triples followed by a comma (maybe zero), then a triple without a comma, then the end of the line.
Edit: including the "^" (start of string) symbol is not necessary, because the match method already checks for a match only at the beginning of the string.
The obligatory "you don't need a regex" solution:
all(letter in 'abc,' for letter in data) and all(len(item) == 3 for item in data.split(','))
You need to iterate over sequence of found values.
data_string = "abc,bca,df"
imatch = re.finditer(r'(?P<value>[abc]{3})(,|$)', data_string)
for match in imatch:
print match.group('value')
So the regex to check if the string matches pattern will be
data_string = "abc,bca,df"
match = re.match(r'^([abc]{3}(,|$))+', data_string)
if match:
print "data string is correct"
Your result is not surprising since the regular expression
([abc][abc][abc],)+
tries to match a string containing three characters of [abc] followed by a comma one ore more times anywhere in the string. So the most important part is to make sure that there is nothing more in the string - as scessor suggests with adding ^ (start of string) and $ (end of string) to the regular expression.
An alternative without using regex (albeit a brute force way):
>>> def matcher(x):
total = ["".join(p) for p in itertools.product(('a','b','c'),repeat=3)]
for i in x.split(','):
if i not in total:
return False
return True
>>> matcher("abc,bca,aaa")
True
>>> matcher("abc,bca,xyz")
False
>>> matcher("abc,aaa,bb")
False
If your aim is to validate a string as being composed of triplet of letters a,b,and c:
for ss in ("abc,bbc,abb,baa,bbb",
"acc",
"abc,bbc,abb,bXa,bbb",
"abc,bbc,ab,baa,bbb"):
print ss,' ',bool(re.match('([abc]{3},?)+\Z',ss))
result
abc,bbc,abb,baa,bbb True
acc True
abc,bbc,abb,bXa,bbb False
abc,bbc,ab,baa,bbb False
\Z means: the end of the string. Its presence obliges the match to be until the very end of the string
By the way, I like the form of Sonya too, in a way it is clearer:
bool(re.match('([abc]{3},)*[abc]{3}\Z',ss))
To just repeat a sequence of patterns, you need to use a non-capturing group, a (?:...) like contruct, and apply a quantifier right after the closing parenthesis. The question mark and the colon after the opening parenthesis are the syntax that creates a non-capturing group (SO post).
For example:
(?:abc)+ matches strings like abc, abcabc, abcabcabc, etc.
(?:\d+\.){3} matches strings like 1.12.2., 000.00000.0., etc.
Here, you can use
^[abc]{3}(?:,[abc]{3})*$
^^
Note that using a capturing group is fraught with unwelcome effects in a lot of Python regex methods. See a classical issue described at re.findall behaves weird post, for example, where re.findall and all other regex methods using this function behind the scenes only return captured substrings if there is a capturing group in the pattern.
In Pandas, it is also important to use non-capturing groups when you just need to group a pattern sequence: Series.str.contains will complain that this pattern has match groups. To actually get the groups, use str.extract. and
the Series.str.extract, Series.str.extractall and Series.str.findall will behave as re.findall.
I need to extract a string from an URL. Here are some examples:
Input: https://www.example.net/eur_en/bas-026-009-basic-baby-hat-beige.html – Output: bas-026-009
Input: https://www.example.net/eur_en/aw18-245-b86-big-cherries-snow-jacket-plum-red.html – Output: aw18-245-b86
Input: https://www.example.net/eur_en/ss20-028-e70-hearts-tee-off-white-yellow.html – Output: ss20-028-e70
I want to be able to extract the string that goes from the first character after the "/eur_en/" until the third dash. Can someone help me? Thanks
You're looking for regexp: \/eur_en\/([^-]+-[^-]+-[^-]+)
Play & test it at regex101: https://regex101.com/r/RvGROG/1
You need something like this:
const urls = [
"https://www.example.net/eur_en/bas-026-009-basic-baby-hat-beige.html",
"https://www.example.net/eur_en/aw18-245-b86-big-cherries-snow-jacket-plum-red.html",
"https://www.example.net/eur_en/ss20-028-e70-hearts-tee-off-white-yellow.html",
]
const rg = new RegExp(`\/eur_en\/([^-]+-[^-]+-[^-]+)`)
const strs = urls.map(url => url.match(rg)[1])
console.log(strs)
// Output:
// [
// "bas-026-009",
// "aw18-245-b86",
// "ss20-028-e70"
// ]
Of course, it's a simple example. In real cases don't forget to check that .match returned array with length greater than 1.
So, the first element is full captured string and the second (as third and next) it's a sub-strings, which is captured by parentheses.
We can improve and complicate our regex like so:
\/((?:[^-\/]+-){2}[^-\/]+)
It'll allow us to not to use a specific anchor /eur_en/ and control the number of dash divided parts.
The expression you're looking for is the following:
/(?<=eur_en\/)[^-]*-[^-]*-[^-]*/
Here is how it works:
(?<=eur_en\/): will look behind for eur_env/ but will not use it in the output
[^-]*: it will match any character that is not a dash. So it will get everything up to the first dash (not including the dash)
[^-]*: it will match any character that is not a dash. So it will get everything up to the second dash (not including the dash)
[^-]*: it will match any character that is not a dash. So it will get everything up to the third dash (not including the dash).
/(?<=\/eur_en\/)\w+-\w+-\w+/g
Tolkens
Description
(?<=\/eur_en\/)
Look behind - If /eur_en/ is found, match whatever proceeds it.
\w+-\w+-\w+
One or more Word character = [A-Za-z0-9] and a literal hyphen three consecutive times.
Review: https://regex101.com/r/Ge0zA3/1
Let us say we have the word residence. It could be matched by the following regular expression in js:
residence.match( new RegExp(/[residence]{4,9}/, 'i' ) )
This is fine, but there is a problem for me:
All the letters are interchangeable. This expression could match also:
ceresiden, denceresid, ence etc...
I would like to have the order of the characters preserved. The regex should match strings like:
resid sidence ience rednce etc..
How can I achieve this?
Thanks!
Use lookahead to test the valid strings and then test the length:
var test = [
'ceresiden',
'denceresid',
'ence',
'res',
'den',
'resid',
'sidence',
'ience',
'rednce',
];
console.log(test.map(function (a) {
return a + ' :' + a.match(/^(?=r?e?s?i?d?e?n?c?e?$).{4,9}$/);
}));
So you want them in the same order, but possibly with any number of characters removed? Then just make each character optional: /(r?e?s?i?d?e?n?c?e?){4,9}/i
Note: this regex, and the one you posted, will not match any of the strings you specified, because of the {4,9} quantifier. A string matching the pattern must including substrings matching the "residence"-optional pattern at least 4 times in a row (without spaces, etc.) for it to match.
I understand the concept of repetition 0 or more times (*) and grouping '()' on there own, but I'm having trouble understanding them given practice examples.
For example, (yes)* contains both the empty set and the word 'yes', but not y or ss. I assume that it doesn't contain those words because of grouping, but would that mean the word 'yesyes' is also valid as the group has been repeated?
In contrast, I assume with the Regular Expression 'yes*', any character can be repeated. For example 'y', 'ye' 'es' 'yes', 'yy'. However the solutions we have been provided with state that the word 'y' isn't contained. I'm confused.
Your understanding of (yes)* is correct ...
(yes)* matches the string "yes" (exactly - no shorter, no longer) 0 or more times - ie the empty string or yes,yesyes, yesyesyesyesyesyes etc
But your understanding of yes* is NOT correct ...
yes* matches the string "ye" followed by 0 or more "s" characters - ie ye,yes,yess,yessssssss
The "zero or more" * modifier applies only to the character or group immediately preceding it.
In the first example, we have the group (yes)* - this will match '', 'yes', 'yesyes', etc.
In the second example, yes*, the modifier applies only to the letter s. It will match 'ye', 'yes', 'yess', etc.
If this is not clear then perhaps you can elaborate a little on the source of your confusion.
Beginner RegExp question. I have lines of JSON in a textfile, each with slightly different Fields, but there are 3 fields I want to extract for each line if it has it, ignoring everything else. How would I use a regex (in editpad or anywhere else) to do this?
Example:
"url":"http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays.htm",
"domain":"netcharles.com",
"title":"Orwell Essays & Journalism Section - Charles' George Orwell Links",
"tags":["orwell","writing","literature","journalism","essays","politics","essay","reference","language","toread"],
"index":2931,
"time_created":1345419323,
"num_saves":24
I want to extract URL,TITLE,TAGS,
/"(url|title|tags)":"((\\"|[^"])*)"/i
I think this is what you're asking for. I'll provide an explanation momentarily. This regular expression (delimited by / - you probably won't have to put those in editpad) matches:
"
A literal ".
(url|title|tags)
Any of the three literal strings "url", "title" or "tags" - in Regular Expressions, by default Parentheses are used to create groups, and the pipe character is used to alternate - like a logical 'or'. To match these literal characters, you'd have to escape them.
":"
Another literal string.
(
The beginning of another group. (Group 2)
(
Another group (3)
\\"
The literal string \" - you have to escape the backslash because otherwise it will be interpreted as escaping the next character, and you never know what that'll do.
|
or...
[^"]
Any single character except a double quote The brackets denote a Character Class/Set, or a list of characters to match. Any given class matches exactly one character in the string. Using a carat (^) at the beginning of a class negates it, causing the matcher to match anything that's not contained in the class.
)
End of group 3...
*
The asterisk causes the previous regular expression (in this case, group 3), to be repeated zero or more times, In this case causing the matcher to match anything that could be inside the double quotes of a JSON string.
)"
The end of group 2, and a literal ".
I've done a few non-obvious things here, that may come in handy:
Group 2 - when dereferenced using Backreferences - will be the actual string assigned to the field. This is useful when getting the actual value.
The i at the end of the expression makes it case insensitive.
Group 1 contains the name of the captured field.
EDIT: So I see that the tags are an array. I'll update the regular expression here in a second when I've had a chance to think about it.
Your new Regex is:
/"(url|title|tags)":("(\\"|[^"])*"|\[("(\\"|[^"])*"(,"(\\"|[^"])*")*)?\])/i
All I've done here is alternate the string regular expression I had been using ("((\\"|[^"])*)"), with a regular expression for finding arrays (\[("(\\"|[^"])*"(,"(\\"|[^"])*")*)?\]). No so easy to Read, is it? Well, substituting our String Regex out for the letter S, we can rewrite it as:
\[(S(,S)*)?\]
Which matches a literal opening bracket (hence the backslashes), optionally followed by a comma separated list of strings, and a closing bracket. The only new concept I've introduced here is the question mark (?), which is itself a type of repetition. Commonly referred to as 'making the previous expression optional', it can also be thought of as exactly 0 or 1 matches.
With our same S Notation, here's the whole dirty Regular Expression:
/"(url|title|tags)":(S|\[(S(,S)*)?\])/i
If it helps to see it in action, here's a view of it in action.
This question is a bit older, but I have had browsed a bit on my PC and found that expression. I passed him as GIST, could be useful to others.
EDIT:
# Expression was tested with PHP and Ruby
# This regular expression finds a key-value pair in JSON formatted strings
# Match 1: Key
# Match 2: Value
# https://regex101.com/r/zR2vU9/4
# http://rubular.com/r/KpF3suIL10
(?:\"|\')(?<key>[^"]*)(?:\"|\')(?=:)(?:\:\s*)(?:\"|\')?(?<value>true|false|[0-9a-zA-Z\+\-\,\.\$]*)
# test document
[
{
"_id": "56af331efbeca6240c61b2ca",
"index": 120000,
"guid": "bedb2018-c017-429E-b520-696ea3666692",
"isActive": false,
"balance": "$2,202,350",
"object": {
"name": "am",
"lastname": "lang"
}
}
]
the json string you'd like to extract field value from
{"fid":"321","otherAttribute":"value"}
the following regex expression extract exactly the "fid" field value "321"
(?<=\"fid\":\")[^\"]*
Please try below expression:
/"(url|title|tags)":("([^""]+)"|\[[^[]+])/gm
Explanation:
1st Capturing Group (url|title|tags): This is alternatively capturing the characters 'url','title' and 'tags' literally (case sensitive).
2nd Capturing Group ("([^""]+)"|[[^[]+]):
1st Alternative "([^""]+)" is matches all words within " and " including " and "
2nd Alternative [[^[]+] is matches all words within [ and ] including [ and ]
I have tested here
I adapted regex to work with JSON in my own library. I've detailed algorithm behavior below.
First, stringify the JSON object. Then, you need to store the starts and lengths of the matched substrings. For example:
"matched".search("ch") // yields 3
For a JSON string, this works exactly the same (unless you are searching explicitly for commas and curly brackets in which case I'd recommend some prior transform of your JSON object before performing regex (i.e. think :, {, }).
Next, you need to reconstruct the JSON object. The algorithm I authored does this by detecting JSON syntax by recursively going backwards from the match index. For instance, the pseudo code might look as follows:
find the next key preceding the match index, call this theKey
then find the number of all occurrences of this key preceding theKey, call this theNumber
using the number of occurrences of all keys with same name as theKey up to position of theKey, traverse the object until keys named theKey has been discovered theNumber times
return this object called parentChain
With this information, it is possible to use regex to filter a JSON object to return the key, the value, and the parent object chain.
You can see the library and code I authored at http://json.spiritway.co/
if your json is
{"key1":"abc","key2":"xyz"}
then below regex will extract key1 or key2 based on a key that you pass in regex
"key2(.*?)(?=,|}|$)
you can verify it here - regex101.com
Why does it have to be a Regular Expression object?
Here we can just use a Hash object first and then go search it.
mh = {"url":"http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays.htm","domain":"netcharles.com","title":"Orwell Essays & Journalism Section - Charles' George Orwell Links","tags":["orwell","writing","literature","journalism","essays","politics","essay","reference","language","toread"],"index":2931,"time_created":1345419323,"num_saves":24}
The output of which would be
=> {:url=>"http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays.htm", :domain=>"netcharles.com", :title=>"Orwell Essays & Journalism Section - Charles' George Orwell Links", :tags=>["orwell", "writing", "literature", "journalism", "essays", "politics", "essay", "reference", "language", "toread"], :index=>2931, :time_created=>1345419323, :num_saves=>24}
Not that I want to avoid using Regexp but don't you think it would be easier to take it a step at a time until your getting the data you want to further search through? Just MHO.
mh.values_at(:url, :title, :tags)
The output:
["http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays.htm", "Orwell Essays & Journalism Section - Charles' George Orwell Links", ["orwell", "writing", "literature", "journalism", "essays", "politics", "essay", "reference", "language", "toread"]]
Taking the pattern that FrankieTheKneeman gave you:
pattern = /"(url|title|tags)":"((\\"|[^"])*)"/i
we can search the mh hash by converting it to a json object.
/#{pattern}/.match(mh.to_json)
The output:
=> #<MatchData "\"url\":\"http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays.htm\"" 1:"url" 2:"http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/essays.htm" 3:"m">
Of course this is all done in Ruby which is not a tag that you have but relates I hope.
But oops! Looks like we can't do all three at once with that pattern so I will do them one at a time just for sake.
pattern = /"(title)":"((\\"|[^"])*)"/i
/#{pattern}/.match(mh.to_json)
#<MatchData "\"title\":\"Orwell Essays & Journalism Section - Charles' George Orwell Links\"" 1:"title" 2:"Orwell Essays & Journalism Section - Charles' George Orwell Links" 3:"s">
pattern = /"(tags)":"((\\"|[^"])*)"/i
/#{pattern}/.match(mh.to_json)
=> nil
Sorry about that last one. It will have to be handled differently.