I've seen examples of finding the absence of characters in a regular expression, I'm trying to find the absence of words in a regular expression (likely using a negative lookbehind).
I have lines of code like this:
Example One:
protected static readonly string BACKGROUND_MUSIC_NAME = "Music_Mission_Complete_Loop_audio";
And here's another one:
mainWindow.Id = "MainWindow";
Final one:
mainStoLabel.Text = "#stb_entry_clah";
I want to capture only the middle one by finding all strings like these that a.) aren't preceded by a "#" in the actual string between the quotes, and b.) aren't preceded at all by the word "readonly".
My current Regular Expression is this:
.*\W\=\W"[^#].*"
It captures the top two examples. Now I just want to narrow down the top example. How do I capture the absence of (not characters) whole words.
Thanks.
The bug in your negation lookahead assertion is that you didn’t put it together right to suit the general case. You need to make its assertion apply to every character position as you crawl ahead. It only applies to one possible dot the way you’ve written it, whereas you need it to apply to all of them. See below for how you must do this to do it correctly.
Here is a working demo that shows two different approaches:
The first uses a negative lookahead to ensure that the left-hand portion not contain readonly and the right-hand portion not start with a number sign.
The second does a simpler parser, then separately inspects the left- and right-hand sides for the individual constraints that apply to each.
The demo language is Perl, but the same patterns and logic should work virtually everywhere.
#!/usr/bin/perl
while (<DATA>) {
chomp;
#
# First demo: use a complicated regex to get desired part only
#
my($label) = m{
^ # start at the beginning
(?: # noncapture group:
(?! \b readonly \b ) # no "readonly" here
. # now advance one character
) + # repeated 1 or more times
\s* = \s* # skip an equals sign w/optional spaces
" ( [^#"] [^"]* ) " # capture #1: quote-delimited text
# BUT whose first char isn't a "#"
}x;
if (defined $label) {
print "Demo One: found label <$label> at line $.\n";
}
#
# Second demo: This time use simpler patterns, several
#
my($lhs, $rhs) = m{
^ # from the start of line
( [^=]+ ) # capture #1: 1 or more non-equals chars
\s* = \s* # skip an equals sign w/optional spaces
" ( [^"]+ ) " # capture #2: all quote-delimited text
}x;
unless ($lhs =~ /\b readonly \b/x || $rhs =~ /^#/) {
print "Demo Two: found label <$rhs> at line $.\n";
}
}
__END__
protected static readonly string BACKGROUND_MUSIC_NAME = "Music_Mission_Complete_Loop_audio";
mainWindow.Id = "MainWindow";
mainStoLabel.Text = "#stb_entry_clah";
I have two bits of advice. The first is to make very sure you ALWAYS use /x mode so you can produce documented and maintainable regexes. The second is that it is much cleaner doing things a bit at a time as in the second solution rather than all at once as in the first.
I don 't understand your question completely, a negative lookahead would look like this:
(?!.*readonly)(?:.*\s\=\s"[^#].*")
The first part will match if there is not the word "readonly" in the string.
Which language are you using?
What do you want to match, only the second example, did I understand this correct?
^[^"=]*(?<!(^|\s)readonly\s.*)\s*=\s*"[^#].*" seems to fit your needs:
everything before the first equal sign should not contain readonly or quotes
readonly is recognized not with word boundaries but with whitespace (except at beginning of line)
the equal sign can be surrounded by arbitrary whitespace
the equal sign must be followed by a quoted string
the quoted string should not start with #
You can work with lookarounds or capture groups if you only want the strings or quoted strings.
Note: as per your own regex, this discards anything after the last quote (not matching the semi-colon in your examples)
You absolutely need to specify the language. The negative lookahead/lookbehind is the thing you need.
Look at this site for an inventory of how to do that in Delphi, GNU (Linux), Groovy, Java, JavaScript, .NET, PCRE (C/C++), Perl, PHP, POSIX, PowerShell, Python, R, REALbasic, Ruby, Tcl, VBScript, Visual Basic 6, wxWidgets, XML Schema, XQuery & XPath
Related
Problem:
I have thousands of documents which contains a specific character I don't want. E.g. the character a. These documents contain a variety of characters, but the a's I want to replace are inside double quotes or single quotes.
I would like to find and replace them, and I thought using Regex would be needed. I am using VSCode, but I'm open to any suggestions.
My attempt:
I was able to find the following regex to match for a specific string containing the values inside the ().
".*?(r).*?"
However, this only highlights the entire quote. I want to highlight the character only.
Any solution, perhaps outside of regex, is welcome.
Example outcomes:
Given, the character is a, find replace to b
Somebody once told me "apples" are good for you => Somebody once told me "bpples" are good for you
"Aardvarks" make good kebabs => "Abrdvbrks" make good kebabs
The boy said "aaah!" when his mom told him he was eating aardvark => The boy said "bbbh!" when his mom told him he was eating aardvark
Visual Studio Code
VS Code uses JavaScript RegEx engine for its find / replace functionality. This means you are very limited in working with regex in comparison to other flavors like .NET or PCRE.
Lucky enough that this flavor supports lookaheads and with lookaheads you are able to look for but not consume character. So one way to ensure that we are within a quoted string is to look for number of quotes down to bottom of file / subject string to be odd after matching an a:
a(?=[^"]*"[^"]*(?:"[^"]*"[^"]*)*$)
Live demo
This looks for as in a double quoted string, to have it for single quoted strings substitute all "s with '. You can't have both at a time.
There is a problem with regex above however, that it conflicts with escaped double quotes within double quoted strings. To match them too if it matters you have a long way to go:
a(?=[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*(?:"[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*)*$)
Applying these approaches on large files probably will result in an stack overflow so let's see a better approach.
I am using VSCode, but I'm open to any suggestions.
That's great. Then I'd suggest to use awk or sed or something more programmatic in order to achieve what you are after or if you are able to use Sublime Text a chance exists to work around this problem in a more elegant way.
Sublime Text
This is supposed to work on large files with hundred of thousands of lines but care that it works for a single character (here a) that with some modifications may work for a word or substring too:
Search for:
(?:"|\G(?<!")(?!\A))(?<r>[^a"\\]*+(?>\\.[^a"\\]*)*+)\K(a|"(*SKIP)(*F))(?(?=((?&r)"))\3)
^ ^ ^
Replace it with: WHATEVER\3
Live demo
RegEx Breakdown:
(?: # Beginning of non-capturing group #1
" # Match a `"`
| # Or
\G(?<!")(?!\A) # Continue matching from last successful match
# It shouldn't start right after a `"`
) # End of NCG #1
(?<r> # Start of capturing group `r`
[^a"\\]*+ # Match anything except `a`, `"` or a backslash (possessively)
(?>\\.[^a"\\]*)*+ # Match an escaped character or
# repeat last pattern as much as possible
)\K # End of CG `r`, reset all consumed characters
( # Start of CG #2
a # Match literal `a`
| # Or
"(*SKIP)(*F) # Match a `"` and skip over current match
)
(?(?= # Start a conditional cluster, assuming a positive lookahead
((?&r)") # Start of CG #3, recurs CG `r` and match `"`
) # End of condition
\3 # If conditional passed match CG #3
) # End of conditional
Three-step approach
Last but not least...
Matching a character inside quotation marks is tricky since delimiters are exactly the same so opening and closing marks can not be distinguished from each other without taking a look at adjacent strings. What you can do is change a delimiter to something else so that you can look for it later.
Step 1:
Search for: "[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"
Replace with: $0Я
Step 2:
Search for: a(?=[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"Я)
Replace with whatever you expect.
Step 3:
Search for: "Я
Replace with nothing to revert every thing.
/(["'])(.*?)(a)(.*?\1)/g
With the replace pattern:
$1$2$4
As far as I'm aware, VS Code uses the same regex engine as JavaScript, which is why I've written my example in JS.
The problem with this is that if you have multiple a's in 1 set of quotes, then it will struggle to pull out the right values, so there needs to be some sort of code behind it, or you, hammering the replace button until no more matches are found, to recurse the pattern and get rid of all the a's in between quotes
let regex = /(["'])(.*?)(a)(.*?\1)/g,
subst = `$1$2$4`,
str = `"a"
"helapke"
Not matched - aaaaaaa
"This is the way the world ends"
"Not with fire"
"ABBA"
"abba",
'I can haz cheezburger'
"This is not a match'
`;
// Loop to get rid of multiple a's in quotes
while(str.match(regex)){
str = str.replace(regex, subst);
}
const result = str;
console.log(result);
Firstly a few of considerations:
There could be multiple a characters within a single quote.
Each quote (using single or double quotation marks) consists of an opening quote character, some text and the same closing quote character. A simple approach is to assume that when the quote characters are counted sequentially, the odd ones are opening quotes and the even ones are closing quotes.
Following point 2, it could be worth some further thought on whether single-quoted strings should be allowed. See the following example: It's a shame 'this quoted text' isn't quoted. Here, the simple approach would think there were two quoted strings: s a shame and isn. Another: This isn't a quote ...'this is' and 'it's unclear where this quote ends'. I've avoided attempting to tackle these complexities and gone with the simple approach below.
The bad news is that point 1 presents a bit of a problem, as a capturing group with a wildcard repeat character after it (e.g. (.*)*) will only capture the last captured "thing". But the good news is there's a way of getting around this within certain limits. Many regex engines will allow up to 99 capturing groups (*). So if we can make the assumption that there will be no more than 99 as in each quote (UPDATE ...or even if we can't - see step 3), we can do the following...
(*) Unfortunately my first port of call, Notepad++ doesn't - it only allows up to 9. Not sure about VS Code. But regex101 (used for the online demos below) does.
TL;DR - What to do?
Search for: "([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*"
Replace with: "\1\2\3\4\5\6\7\8\9\10\11\12\13\14\15\16\17\18\19\20\21\22\23\24\25\26\27\28\29\30\31\32\33\34\35\36\37\38\39\40\41\42\43\44\45\46\47\48\49\50\51\52\53\54\55\56\57\58\59\60\61\62\63\64\65\66\67\68\69\70\71\72\73\74\75\76\77\78\79\80\81\82\83\84\85\86\87\88\89\90\91\92\93\94\95\96\97\98\99"
(Optionally keep repeating steps the previous two steps if there's a possibility of > 99 such characters in a single quote until they've all been replaced).
Repeat step 1 but replacing all " with ' in the regular expression, i.e: '([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*'
Repeat steps 2-3.
Online demos
Please see the following regex101 demos, which could actually be used to perform the replacements if you're able to copy the whole text into the contents of "TEST STRING":
Demo for double quotes
Demo for single quotes.
If you can use Visual Studio (instead of Visual Studio Code), it is written in C++ and C# and uses the .NET Framework regular expressions, which means you can use variable length lookbehinds to accomplish this.
(?<="[^"\n]*)a(?=[^"\n]*")
Adding some more logic to the above regular expression, we can tell it to ignore any locations where there are an even amount of " preceding it. This prevents matches for a outside of quotes. Take, for example, the string "a" a "a". Only the first and last a in this string will be matched, but the one in the middle will be ignored.
(?<!^[^"\n]*(?:(?:"[^"\n]*){2})+)(?<="[^"\n]*)a(?=[^"\n]*")
Now the only problem is this will break if we have escaped " within two double quotes such as "a\"" a "a". We need to add more logic to prevent this behaviour. Luckily, this beautiful answer exists for properly matching escaped ". Adding this logic to the regex above, we get the following:
(?<!^[^"\n]*(?:(?:"(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)*){2})+)(?<="[^"\n]*)a(?=[^"\n]*")
I'm not sure which method works best with your strings, but I'll explain this last regex in detail as it also explains the two previous ones.
(?<!^[^"\n]*(?:(?:"(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)*){2})+) Negative lookbehind ensuring what precedes doesn't match the following
^ Assert position at the start of the line
[^"\n]* Match anything except " or \n any number of times
(?:(?:"(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)*){2})+ Match the following one or more times. This ensures if there are any " preceding the match that they are balanced in the sense that there is an opening and closing double quote.
(?:"(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)*){2} Match the following exactly twice
" Match this literally
(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)* Match either of the following any number of times
[^"\\\n] Match anything except ", \ and \n
\\. Matches \ followed by any character
(?<="[^"\n]*) Positive lookbehind ensuring what precedes matches the following
" Match this literally
[^"\n]* Match anything except " or \n any number of times
a Match this literally
(?=[^"\n]*") Positive lookahead ensuring what follows matches the following
[^"\n]* Match anything except " or \n any number of times
" Match this literally
You can drop the \n from the above pattern as the following suggests. I added it just in case there's some sort of special cases I'm not considering (i.e. comments) that could break this regex within your text. The \A also forces the regex to match from the start of the string (or file) instead of the start of the line.
(?<!\A[^"]*(?:(?:"(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*){2})+)(?<="[^"]*)a(?=[^"]*")
You can test this regex here
This is what it looks like in Visual Studio:
I am using VSCode, but I'm open to any suggestions.
If you want to stay in an Editor environment, you could use
Visual Studio (>= 2012) or even notepad++ for quick fixup.
This avoids having to use a spurious script environment.
Both of these engines (Dot-Net and boost, respectively) use the \G construct.
Which is start the next match at the position where the last one left off.
Again, this is just a suggestion.
This regex doesn't check the validity of balanced quotes within the entire
string ahead of time (but it could with the addition of a single line).
It is all about knowing where the inside and outside of quotes are.
I've commented the regex, but if you need more info let me know.
Again this is just a suggestion (I know your editor uses ECMAScript).
Find (?s)(?:^([^"]*(?:"[^"a]*(?=")"[^"]*(?="))*"[^"a]*)|(?!^)\G)a([^"a]*(?:(?=a.*?")|(?:"[^"]*$|"[^"]*(?=")(?:"[^"a]*(?=")"[^"]*(?="))*"[^"a]*)))
Replace $1b$2
That's all there is to it.
https://regex101.com/r/loLFYH/1
Comments
(?s) # Dot-all inine modifier
(?:
^ # BOS
( # (1 start), Find first quote from BOS (written back)
[^"]*
(?: # --- Cluster
" [^"a]* # Inside quotes with no 'a'
(?= " )
" [^"]* # Between quotes, get up to next quote
(?= " )
)* # --- End cluster, 0 to many times
" [^"a]* # Inside quotes, will be an 'a' ahead of here
# to be sucked up by this match
) # (1 end)
| # OR,
(?! ^ ) # Not-BOS
\G # Continue where left off from last match.
# Must be an 'a' at this point
)
a # The 'a' to be replaced
( # (2 start), Up to the next 'a' (to be written back)
[^"a]*
(?: # --------------------
(?= a .*? " ) # If stopped before 'a', must be a quote ahead
| # or,
(?: # --------------------
" [^"]* $ # If stopped at a quote, check for EOS
| # or,
" [^"]* # Between quotes, get up to next quote
(?= " )
(?: # --- Cluster
" [^"a]* # Inside quotes with no 'a'
(?= " )
" [^"]* # Between quotes
(?= " )
)* # --- End cluster, 0 to many times
" [^"a]* # Inside quotes, will be an 'a' ahead of here
# to be sucked up on the next match
) # --------------------
) # --------------------
) # (2 end)
"Inside double quotes" is rather tricky, because there are may complicating scenarios to consider to fully automate this.
What are your precise rules for "enclosed by quotes"? Do you need to consider multi-line quotes? Do you have quoted strings containing escaped quotes or quotes used other than starting/ending string quotation?
However there may be a fairly simple expression to do much of what you want.
Search expression: ("[^a"]*)a
Replacement expression: $1b
This doesn't consider inside or outside of quotes - you have do that visually. But it highlights text from the quote to the matching character, so you can quickly decide if this is inside or not.
If you can live with the visual inspection, then we can build up this pattern to include different quote types and upper and lower case.
I have the following Perl strings. The lengths and the patterns are different. The file is always named *log.999
my $file1 = '/user/mike/desktop/sys/syslog.1';
my $file2 = '/user/mike/desktop/movie/dnslog.2';
my $file3 = '/haselog.3';
my $file4 = '/user/mike/desktop/movie/dns-sys.log'
I need to extract the words before log. In this case, sys, dns, hase and dns-sys.
How can I write a regular expression to extract them?
\w+(?=log\b)
matches one or more alphanumeric characters that are followed by log (but not logging etc.)
If the filename format is fixed, you can make the regex more reliable by using
\w+(?=log\.\d+\/$)
The main property of shown strings is that the *log* phrase is last.
Then anchor the pattern, so we wouldn't match a log somewhere in the middle
my ($name) = $string =~ /(\w+)log\.[0-9]+$/;
while if .N extension is optional
my ($name) = $string =~ /(\w+)log(?:\.[0-9]+)?$/;
The above uses the \w+ pattern to capture the text preceding log. But that text may also contain non-word characters (-, ., etc), in which case we would use [^/]+ to capture everything after the last /, as pointed out in Abigail's answer. With .N optional, per question in the comments
my ($name) = $string =~ m{ ([^/]+) log (?: \.[0-9]+ )? $}x;
where I added the }x modifier, with which spaces inside are ignored, what can aid readibility.
I use a set of delimiters other than / to be able to use / inside without escaping it, and then the m is compulsory. The [^...] is a negated character class, matching any character not listed inside. So [^/]+log matches all successive characters which are not /, coming before log.
The non capturing group (?: ... ) groups patterns inside, so that ? applies to the whole group, but doesn't needlessly capture them.
The (?:\.[0-9]+)? pattern was written specifically so to disallow things like log. (nothing after dot) and log5. But if these are acceptable, change it to the simpler \.?[0-9]*
Update Corrected a typo in code: for optional .N there is +, not *
I would highly appreciate if somebody could help me understand the following.
=~/(?<![\w.])($val)(?![\w.])/gi)
This what i picked up but i dont understand this.
Lookaround: (?=a) for a lookahead, ?! for negative lookahead, or ?<= and ?<! for lookbehinds (positive and negative, respectively).
The regex seems to search for $val (i.e. string that matches the contents of the variable $val) not surrounded by word characters or dots.
Putting $val into parentheses remembers the corresponding matched part in $1.
See perlre for details.
Note that =~ is not part of the regex, it's the "binding operator".
Similarly, gi) is part of something bigger. g means the matching happens globally, which has different effects based on the context the matching occurs in, and i makes the match case insensitive (which could only influence $val here). The whole expression was in parentheses, probably, but we can't see the opening one.
Read (?<!PAT) as "not immediately preceded by text matching PAT".
Read (?!PAT) as "not immediately followed by text matching PAT".
I use these sites to help with testing and learning and decoding regex:
https://regex101.com/: This one dissects and explains the expression the best IMO.
http://www.regexr.com/
define $val then watch the regex engine work with rxrx - command-line REPL and wrapper for Regexp::Debugger
it shows output like this but in color
Matched
|
VVV
/(?<![\w.])(dog)(?![\w.])/
|
V
'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog'
^^^
[Visual of regex at 'rxrx' line 0] [step: 189]
It also gives descriptions like this
(?<! # Match negative lookbehind
[\w.] # Match any of the listed characters
) # The end of negative lookbehind
( # The start of a capturing block ($1)
dog # Match a literal sequence ("dog")
) # The end of $1
(?! # Match negative lookahead
[\w.] # Match any of the listed characters
) # The end of negative lookahead
I have a string 1/temperatoA,2/CelcieusB!23/33/44,55/66/77 and I would like to extract the words temperatoA and CelcieusB.
I have this regular expression (\d+/(\w+),?)*! but I only get the match 1/temperatoA,2/CelcieusB!
Why?
Your whole match evaluates to '1/temperatoA,2/CelcieusB' because that matches the following expression:
qr{ ( # begin group
\d+ # at least one digit
/ # followed by a slash
(\w+) # followed by at least one word characters
,? # maybe a comma
)* # ANY number of repetitions of this pattern.
}x;
'1/temperatoA,' fulfills capture #1 first, but since you are asking the engine to capture as many of those as it can it goes back and finds that the pattern is repeated in '2/CelcieusB' (the comma not being necessary). So the whole match is what you said it is, but what you probably weren't expecting is that '2/CelcieusB' replaces '1/temperatoA,' as $1, so $1 reads '2/CelcieusB'.
Anytime you want to capture anything that fits a certain pattern in a certain string it is always best to use the global flag and assign the captures into an array. Since an array is not a single scalar like $1, it can hold all the values that were captured for capture #1.
When I do this:
my $str = '1/temperatoA,2/CelcieusB!23/33/44,55/66/77';
my $regex = qr{(\d+/(\w+))};
if ( my #matches = $str =~ /$regex/g ) {
print Dumper( \#matches );
}
I get this:
$VAR1 = [
'1/temperatoA',
'temperatoA',
'2/CelcieusB',
'CelcieusB',
'23/33',
'33',
'55/66',
'66'
];
Now, I figure that's probably not what you expected. But '3' and '6' are word characters, and so--coming after a slash--they comply with the expression.
So, if this is an issue, you can change your regex to the equivalent: qr{(\d+/(\p{Alpha}\w*))}, specifying that the first character must be an alpha followed by any number of word characters. Then the dump looks like this:
$VAR1 = [
'1/temperatoA',
'temperatoA',
'2/CelcieusB',
'CelcieusB'
];
And if you only want 'temperatoA' or 'CelcieusB', then you're capturing more than you need to and you'll want your regex to be qr{\d+/(\p{Alpha}\w*)}.
However, the secret to capturing more than one chunk in a capture expression is to assign the match to an array, you can then sort through the array to see if it contains the data you want.
The question here is: why are you using a regular expression that’s so obviously wrong? How did you get it?
The expression you want is simply as follows:
(\w+)
With a Perl-compatible regex engine you can search for
(?<=\d/)\w+(?=.*!)
(?<=\d/) asserts that there is a digit and a slash before the start of the match
\w+ matches the identifier. This allows for letters, digits and underscore. If you only want to allow letters, use [A-Za-z]+ instead.
(?=.*!) asserts that there is a ! ahead in the string - i. e. the regex will fail once we have passed the !.
Depending on the language you're using, you might need to escape some of the characters in the regex.
E. g., for use in C (with the PCRE library), you need to escape the backslashes:
myregexp = pcre_compile("(?<=\\d/)\\w+(?=.*!)", 0, &error, &erroroffset, NULL);
Will this work?
/([[:alpha:]]\w+)\b(?=.*!)
I made the following assumptions...
A word begins with an alphabetic character.
A word always immediately follows a slash. No intervening spaces, no words in the middle.
Words after the exclamation point are ignored.
You have some sort of loop to capture more than one word. I'm not familiar enough with the C library to give an example.
[[:alpha:]] matches any alphabetic character.
The \b matches a word boundary.
And the (?=.*!) came from Tim Pietzcker's post.
I have a value like this:
"Foo Bar" "Another Value" something else
What regex will return the values enclosed in the quotation marks (e.g. Foo Bar and Another Value)?
In general, the following regular expression fragment is what you are looking for:
"(.*?)"
This uses the non-greedy *? operator to capture everything up to but not including the next double quote. Then, you use a language-specific mechanism to extract the matched text.
In Python, you could do:
>>> import re
>>> string = '"Foo Bar" "Another Value"'
>>> print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"', string)
['Foo Bar', 'Another Value']
I've been using the following with great success:
(["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1
It supports nested quotes as well.
For those who want a deeper explanation of how this works, here's an explanation from user ephemient:
([""']) match a quote; ((?=(\\?))\2.) if backslash exists, gobble it, and whether or not that happens, match a character; *? match many times (non-greedily, as to not eat the closing quote); \1 match the same quote that was use for opening.
I would go for:
"([^"]*)"
The [^"] is regex for any character except '"'
The reason I use this over the non greedy many operator is that I have to keep looking that up just to make sure I get it correct.
Lets see two efficient ways that deal with escaped quotes. These patterns are not designed to be concise nor aesthetic, but to be efficient.
These ways use the first character discrimination to quickly find quotes in the string without the cost of an alternation. (The idea is to discard quickly characters that are not quotes without to test the two branches of the alternation.)
Content between quotes is described with an unrolled loop (instead of a repeated alternation) to be more efficient too: [^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*
Obviously to deal with strings that haven't balanced quotes, you can use possessive quantifiers instead: [^"\\]*+(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*+ or a workaround to emulate them, to prevent too much backtracking. You can choose too that a quoted part can be an opening quote until the next (non-escaped) quote or the end of the string. In this case there is no need to use possessive quantifiers, you only need to make the last quote optional.
Notice: sometimes quotes are not escaped with a backslash but by repeating the quote. In this case the content subpattern looks like this: [^"]*(?:""[^"]*)*
The patterns avoid the use of a capture group and a backreference (I mean something like (["']).....\1) and use a simple alternation but with ["'] at the beginning, in factor.
Perl like:
["'](?:(?<=")[^"\\]*(?s:\\.[^"\\]*)*"|(?<=')[^'\\]*(?s:\\.[^'\\]*)*')
(note that (?s:...) is a syntactic sugar to switch on the dotall/singleline mode inside the non-capturing group. If this syntax is not supported you can easily switch this mode on for all the pattern or replace the dot with [\s\S])
(The way this pattern is written is totally "hand-driven" and doesn't take account of eventual engine internal optimizations)
ECMA script:
(?=["'])(?:"[^"\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^'\\]*)*')
POSIX extended:
"[^"\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^'\\]*)*'
or simply:
"([^"\\]|\\.|\\\n)*"|'([^'\\]|\\.|\\\n)*'
Peculiarly, none of these answers produce a regex where the returned match is the text inside the quotes, which is what is asked for. MA-Madden tries but only gets the inside match as a captured group rather than the whole match. One way to actually do it would be :
(?<=(["']\b))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)
Examples for this can be seen in this demo https://regex101.com/r/Hbj8aP/1
The key here is the the positive lookbehind at the start (the ?<= ) and the positive lookahead at the end (the ?=). The lookbehind is looking behind the current character to check for a quote, if found then start from there and then the lookahead is checking the character ahead for a quote and if found stop on that character. The lookbehind group (the ["']) is wrapped in brackets to create a group for whichever quote was found at the start, this is then used at the end lookahead (?=\1) to make sure it only stops when it finds the corresponding quote.
The only other complication is that because the lookahead doesn't actually consume the end quote, it will be found again by the starting lookbehind which causes text between ending and starting quotes on the same line to be matched. Putting a word boundary on the opening quote (["']\b) helps with this, though ideally I'd like to move past the lookahead but I don't think that is possible. The bit allowing escaped characters in the middle I've taken directly from Adam's answer.
The RegEx of accepted answer returns the values including their sourrounding quotation marks: "Foo Bar" and "Another Value" as matches.
Here are RegEx which return only the values between quotation marks (as the questioner was asking for):
Double quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
"(.*?[^\\])"
Single quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
'(.*?[^\\])'
Both (use value of capture group #2):
(["'])(.*?[^\\])\1
-
All support escaped and nested quotes.
I liked Eugen Mihailescu's solution to match the content between quotes whilst allowing to escape quotes. However, I discovered some problems with escaping and came up with the following regex to fix them:
(['"])(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*\1
It does the trick and is still pretty simple and easy to maintain.
Demo (with some more test-cases; feel free to use it and expand on it).
PS: If you just want the content between quotes in the full match ($0), and are not afraid of the performance penalty use:
(?<=(['"])\b)(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*(?=\1)
Unfortunately, without the quotes as anchors, I had to add a boundary \b which does not play well with spaces and non-word boundary characters after the starting quote.
Alternatively, modify the initial version by simply adding a group and extract the string form $2:
(['"])((?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*)\1
PPS: If your focus is solely on efficiency, go with Casimir et Hippolyte's solution; it's a good one.
A very late answer, but like to answer
(\"[\w\s]+\")
http://regex101.com/r/cB0kB8/1
The pattern (["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1 above does the job but I am concerned of its performances (it's not bad but could be better). Mine below it's ~20% faster.
The pattern "(.*?)" is just incomplete. My advice for everyone reading this is just DON'T USE IT!!!
For instance it cannot capture many strings (if needed I can provide an exhaustive test-case) like the one below:
$string = 'How are you? I\'m fine, thank you';
The rest of them are just as "good" as the one above.
If you really care both about performance and precision then start with the one below:
/(['"])((\\\1|.)*?)\1/gm
In my tests it covered every string I met but if you find something that doesn't work I would gladly update it for you.
Check my pattern in an online regex tester.
This version
accounts for escaped quotes
controls backtracking
/(["'])((?:(?!\1)[^\\]|(?:\\\\)*\\[^\\])*)\1/
MORE ANSWERS! Here is the solution i used
\"([^\"]*?icon[^\"]*?)\"
TLDR;
replace the word icon with what your looking for in said quotes and voila!
The way this works is it looks for the keyword and doesn't care what else in between the quotes.
EG:
id="fb-icon"
id="icon-close"
id="large-icon-close"
the regex looks for a quote mark "
then it looks for any possible group of letters thats not "
until it finds icon
and any possible group of letters that is not "
it then looks for a closing "
I liked Axeman's more expansive version, but had some trouble with it (it didn't match for example
foo "string \\ string" bar
or
foo "string1" bar "string2"
correctly, so I tried to fix it:
# opening quote
(["'])
(
# repeat (non-greedy, so we don't span multiple strings)
(?:
# anything, except not the opening quote, and not
# a backslash, which are handled separately.
(?!\1)[^\\]
|
# consume any double backslash (unnecessary?)
(?:\\\\)*
|
# Allow backslash to escape characters
\\.
)*?
)
# same character as opening quote
\1
string = "\" foo bar\" \"loloo\""
print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"',string)
just try this out , works like a charm !!!
\ indicates skip character
My solution to this is below
(["']).*\1(?![^\s])
Demo link : https://regex101.com/r/jlhQhV/1
Explanation:
(["'])-> Matches to either ' or " and store it in the backreference \1 once the match found
.* -> Greedy approach to continue matching everything zero or more times until it encounters ' or " at end of the string. After encountering such state, regex engine backtrack to previous matching character and here regex is over and will move to next regex.
\1 -> Matches to the character or string that have been matched earlier with the first capture group.
(?![^\s]) -> Negative lookahead to ensure there should not any non space character after the previous match
Unlike Adam's answer, I have a simple but worked one:
(["'])(?:\\\1|.)*?\1
And just add parenthesis if you want to get content in quotes like this:
(["'])((?:\\\1|.)*?)\1
Then $1 matches quote char and $2 matches content string.
All the answer above are good.... except they DOES NOT support all the unicode characters! at ECMA Script (Javascript)
If you are a Node users, you might want the the modified version of accepted answer that support all unicode characters :
/(?<=((?<=[\s,.:;"']|^)["']))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)/gmu
Try here.
echo 'junk "Foo Bar" not empty one "" this "but this" and this neither' | sed 's/[^\"]*\"\([^\"]*\)\"[^\"]*/>\1</g'
This will result in: >Foo Bar<><>but this<
Here I showed the result string between ><'s for clarity, also using the non-greedy version with this sed command we first throw out the junk before and after that ""'s and then replace this with the part between the ""'s and surround this by ><'s.
From Greg H. I was able to create this regex to suit my needs.
I needed to match a specific value that was qualified by being inside quotes. It must be a full match, no partial matching could should trigger a hit
e.g. "test" could not match for "test2".
reg = r"""(['"])(%s)\1"""
if re.search(reg%(needle), haystack, re.IGNORECASE):
print "winning..."
Hunter
If you're trying to find strings that only have a certain suffix, such as dot syntax, you can try this:
\"([^\"]*?[^\"]*?)\".localized
Where .localized is the suffix.
Example:
print("this is something I need to return".localized + "so is this".localized + "but this is not")
It will capture "this is something I need to return".localized and "so is this".localized but not "but this is not".
A supplementary answer for the subset of Microsoft VBA coders only one uses the library Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5 and this gives the following code
Sub TestRegularExpression()
Dim oRE As VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp '* Tools->References: Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5
Set oRE = New VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp
oRE.Pattern = """([^""]*)"""
oRE.Global = True
Dim sTest As String
sTest = """Foo Bar"" ""Another Value"" something else"
Debug.Assert oRE.test(sTest)
Dim oMatchCol As VBScript_RegExp_55.MatchCollection
Set oMatchCol = oRE.Execute(sTest)
Debug.Assert oMatchCol.Count = 2
Dim oMatch As Match
For Each oMatch In oMatchCol
Debug.Print oMatch.SubMatches(0)
Next oMatch
End Sub