I am trying to find a good way to determine what module at link time is causing a certain library to get processed as a "/DEFAULTLIB" as seen in the verbose linker output from Visual Studio.
Here is my situation, I have several static library pre-requisites and each has a release and a debug version (BlahD.lib and Blah.lib). For some reason at link time all of the *D.lib's are processed as default libraries even though I am building a release with the non-debug libs specified as "Additional Dependencies". If I never build the debug versions of the static libraries those *D files wouldn't exist and there would be a linker error (can't open file).
I can get my project to build successfully by specifying /NODEFAULTLIB for all of these offending .lib files. All the release libraries link up and everyone is happy. But I want to understand what is going on here. What is causing these *D.lib files to be processed by the linker? Is my only hope to write some kind of script that dumpbins everything in this massive project and its dependant projects (microsoft support)? Even then I don't understand what to look for in the dumpbin output, does this apply to the .lib files as well the .obj files?
I had a similar problem. I was only able to solve it by analyzing the *.obj files as you suggested. To do it, I ran the following command via the Visual Studio command prompt (in the temp folder of the project, where *.obj files are generated):
for /R %1 in (*.obj) do #dumpbin /directives /section:.drectve "%1" > "%1".directives.txt
Then I used Notepad++ to search for the name of the offending library in all of these *.directives.txt files. This revealed which project was referencing the wrong lib.
Note: you may want to modify this to include any 3rd-party *.lib files your project may use, and not just *.obj files. "/DEFAULTLIB" directives may also come from them.
Note: you may need to use *.o instead of *.obj
Look for #pragma comment(lib) in the source. See if it perhaps is dependent on a #define - This is a common way for a SDK to ensure that the right libs are linked, and you may need to define THESDK_DEBUG or THESDK_RELEASE for the logic to work out.
Additional information:
I discovered in Visual Studio 2008 that even commenting out the statement from the *.idl file does not work, as in:
//cpp_quote("#pragma comment( lib, \"MYLIB.lib\")")
The compiler still adds MYLIB.lib as a DEFAULTLIB, and it winds up in the *.obj file. Make sure you remove the line completely from the code!
Link with the /verbose option and search the output for the name of the library in question. This will tell you which object file dragged the library into the link.
Related
Situation
I learned a lot over the last year, but this is something I just could not wrap my head around. Project is C++. CMake 1.15.2. Visual Studio 2015.
I converted a whole Solution *.sln file with cmake-converter and wrote FindXXX.cmake Modules for all external *.libs defined in the *.vcxproj files.
Everytime I encountered an error: unresolved external I added the corresponding Target Sometarget::somecomponent to the target_link_libraries(ConsumingTarget ... ) call.
Now I have a build that works and produces no errors. Some executables say something along the lines of:
"Execution of code cannot be continued because somecomponent.dll is not found..."
I have
An original .sln file that produces executables only requiring .lib files
A CMake generated .sln file that produces executables requiring .dll files
Working FindXXX.cmake files which add_library(XXX::yyy UNKNOWN IMPORTED)
They find the headers and the .lib files (.dll files are not existing/intended/needed in the original VS .sln)
They create the corresponding Targets for all .lib files
Consuming Targets which target_link_libraries(ConsumingTarget PRIVATE XXX::yyy)
"A working build"
An error "before starting the main function".
What I have tried
I have tried defining an OBJECT Library and adding this to the sources of ConsumingTarget and removing Sometarget::somecomponent from the target_link_libraries call. CMake Doc on Object Libraries
I have tried reading and understanding the difference between module and library. Even the CMake documentation on imported Libraries couldn't help me understand my problem.
I have tried reading and understanding the difference between linking a static and shared library.
My Assumptions
Adding the imported library is done wrong by me.
Reason: DependenciesGui.exe shows different dependencies for the cmake-generated-executable and the original-sln-executable but the linker calls (shown in VisualStudio 2015) seem to be the same.
Whole Program Optimization in the CMake File does not work the same way it does in the original .sln file although the Flags are activated at all levels described in this answer.
Reason: compiling with the original file I noticed warning C4505: 'foobar': unreferenced local function has been removed - I don't seem to get those warnings with the cmake-generated build.
subassumption: Functions which won't be called are optimized away, thus removing the necessity for the .dll file.
I expect/hope for
ConsumingTarget.exe to run without asking for somecomponent.dll
another explanation on imported targets and how to link libraries where .dlls should not be necessary.
an explanation on how to analyze/compare the two binaries regarding their symbols(?) and map the seen information to CMake commands. (I am using DependenciesGui.exe to look for dependencies in the .exe file)
Possible reason for failure
One executable had no /DELAYLOAD... directive after conversion with cmake-converter. Opened Issue. Question Title still holds.
Edits:
1: Added possible reason for failure
I am trying to create a C++ project in Visual Studio 2013 that has CGAL and Boost (and a couple of other libraries) as dependencies. I preferably like to link to these libraries dynamically. Also, I'd like to link to the "Release" versions of these libraries for performance reasons (not the "Debug" versions).
Starting from an empty C++ project, I added the path to header files of the aforementioned libraries as shown in the image below:
Inside the linker options, I then added the directories that contain the DLL and lib files of the external libraries. (CGAL directory contains CGAL's compiled DLL files along with lib files).
At this point, I have not added a single "lib" file "Additional Dependencies" dialog:
Now something weird is going on and I cannot explain why. If I try to build the project as-is (under the "Debug" configuration), I get a LNK1104 error about the linker not being able to find CGAL-vc120-mt-gd-4.7.lib. I know that the error means I should add the lib file in "Additional Dependencies" dialog...
But wait... WHAT...?!!
How does Visual Studio know how to automatically link against this lib file?! Worse yet, how does it know it needs the "debug" version of the library? (With the gd suffix). Also, how does it know I compiled CGAL with VS2013!!??
At first, I though the project was inheriting properties from some preset property sheets somewhere in my system. But I am certain that's not the case as this behavior shows even with a project created from scratch.
My main question is, how would you force Visual Studio to link against the "Release" version of this library? (eg. CGAL-vc120-mt-4.7.lib)
Side question but related: Am I even linking against the DLL files? How can I be certain that I am in deed doing dynamic linking and not static linking?
This is probably happening due to the #pragma comment(lib) mechanism - eg see What does "#pragma comment" mean?
This is a way of the compiler emitting instructions for the linker so that it can decide between multiple versions of a library depending on the compiler version. In this case it means that it can automatically pick up the correct version of the library (debug vs release, vs2013 vs vs2015, MT vs MD, etc). When you added the explicit reference to the library in Additional Dependencies then it is now trying to look for two files.
So, to fix the problem, remove it from Additional Dependencies and let VS pick the right library. If you are getting the LNK1104 error then it suggests that either the link library path isn't set up correctly, or you don't have the CGAL library file it's looking for. You can increase the verbosity settings for the linker in the Project Options to get more detail about what's happening.
I implemented the SFML library nightly build to my Visual Studio 2013, because the original one is not compatibile with this VS version. I done everything what is needed (added directory to include folder in both Debug and Release, added directory to .dll files), but it can't find the files in program. What else should be done to make this library work? Or should i consider changing Visual Studio to 2010?
You haven't given really to much information so I am just really guessing as to what the problem is.
added directory to .dll files
But that sounds like your problem right there. You don't add the directory that the .dll files are in to your project. The only directories you need to add to the project are the include directory and the library directory.
But anyways I am assuming you are using dynamic linking since otherwise you wouldn't be dealing with .dlls. Now different IDE's require that you place the .dlls in different spots but since you are dealing with VS2013 you need to copy whatever .dlls that you are using into the same folder where your program's compiled executable is (The .exe file).
Another option is to link statically instead of dynamically which I generally prefer to do on small projects but it is really up to the developer which he prefers.
When you link statically you don't need to include any .dlls. What you will need to do is recompile SFML's sources and make sure to build the library so it produces the static library files (They should be named something like sfml-graphics-s-d.lib for debug and sfml-graphics-s-d.lib for release).
Add that library directory which contains the static library files to your project and then link to them .lib files in VS's input window (Remember that -d is for the debug build).
Next you will need to add SFML_STATIC to your preprocessor options on both the release and debug build.
After that you are good to go and don't need to include the .dll files with your project. And again whether you choose to link dynamically or statically is really up to you and the project you are working on but for small projects I would suggest linking statically.
Need quick help from win developers. Please correct me where I got it wrong. Thank you!
I built a C++ library from the source code and got the following files:
*.dll. These go into a folder listed in the PATH environment variable.
*.lib. These go into a folder where Visual Studio searches for libraries.
*.pdb. These are needed for debugging. Copy them alongside DLL files or
LIB files?
*.exp. No clue what do to with these ones.
If you're going to debug the library on the same computer where you built it, you don't need to move .pdb files at all. Otherwise put them along with the .dll. You might also need to strip the full paths to pdb from the dll using the /PDBALTPATH option.
You probably won't need the .exp files at all, since you're using a third-party library that probably does not import from your project.
We have a large project using VS2008 and boost 1_42. I'm trying to upgrade to VS2010 and boost 1_44. I installed VS2010 and boost 1_44 and converted the project. Now I am trying to build, and everything compiles, but fails when linking:
LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libboost_thread-vc90-mt-1_42.lib'
I have changed the include and lib directories to point to the new boost 1_44 files and I have renamed the old boost 1_42 directory.
Why is the linker still looking for a vc90-1_42 file, when it is only using 1_44 headers? Is there a way that I can determine WHY the linker wants this file? The linker obviously thinks it needs the file, but why?
I have cleaned the project and I am re-building to ensure any old build files are erased.
I've run into exactly this problem a couple of times too. It's usually been some old temporary files but like in your case cleaning didn't always do the trick straight away. Does your project include any static libs that might have been built with 1.42?
Something you can try which may or may not be helpful in tracking down your issue:
Rename the old boost directory back to it's original name
Clean the solution
Under C/C++->Command Line->Additional Options add "/showIncludes"
Under Linker->Command Line->Additional Options add "/verbose:lib"
Rebuild all
Then when you build you'll be able to see at which point 1.42 headers are included, etc. in the output window. Somehow doing this helped me in tracking down where the problem was.
Along with changing the lib directory, you need to change the name of the boost library. That's in the Linker | Input section of the project settings.
Your added comment makes it clear that the dependency on the Boost 1.42 library was being created indirectly by another library that hadn't been rebuilt.
For this you basically have two choices: either add that library as a project to your main solution, and make sure it has enough dependency information that it'll be re-built when you upgrade Boost, or use the /Zl compiler switch when you build your library. This tells the compiler you're building a library so you do not want to embed library dependencies like this.
Boost uses
#pragma comment(lib)
command to inform the linker of libraries it needs to link with. It is not an error. If Boost says you need it, it's likely you do.
On How can I find out why the linker wants this file?
There are programs which will go through your app and dlls/libs and report the content of manifests and what the binaries report they depend on. You could then scan the report for the unexpected libraries being included. We used this mainly to find libs including the previous version of the VC runtime.
Have not used the one we had in about 5 years though, now if only I could remember the name of the app!
DependancyWalker (depends.exe) will allow you to see dependancies of dll/exe but not static libs.
You could open each binary as a 'file' in MSVS and look at the manifest content by hand, but I imaging this would be a bit painful. I've not tried this with a static lib.