Using the current PHPSDK and API (ie not FBJS or the REST approach) I am trying to work out how to paste to a fanpage wall and struggling to find any hints...
I have successfully (through various attempts)
posted to my wall
posted to a friend's wall
posted to the page's wall (when I like the page before posting)
posted to the page's wall (as the page)
So I am looking to work out what I need to do to access_code/permissions or code to have something like :
$result = $facebook->api(
'/<PAGEID>/feed/',
'post',
array('access_token' => <ACCESSCODE>, 'message' => 'Test message')
);
or
FB.api('/<PAGEID>/feed', 'post', {access_token:<ACCESSCODE>, message:'Test message'},
function(response) {
if (!response || response.error) {
alert(response.error.message);
} else {
}
});
working where a post will appear on the feed of page's wall... However I am currently unable to find a way to post to a page wall for a page that I have not explicitly said I like by using the Graph API in PHP...
I am sure it is possible judging by some of the page walls I have seen.
Searching on google and forums tends to lead to old API implementations (which no longer function) or using methods no longer supported. It seemed that the Templatized function could have been what I was looking for (but again that has been deprecated).
What am I doing wrong?
You have to have one of the page administrators give your app "publish_stream" permission. Something like this:
$session = $facebook->getSession();
$perms = 'publish_stream';
echo '<fb:login-button perms="' . $perms . '"></fb:login-button>';
Once the click the button and approve you, your callback url will get called with their session information.
Once you have that you can post to the wall of any page they administer. Using code like what you show in your question.
Related
The issues are when I am trying to run federated authentication with the help of amplify auth method on the browser it works fine, but when I try to run it on my mobile.
It throws error No user found when I try to use Auth.currentSession() but the same work on the browser.
tried to search about this type of issue but I found related to ionic-cordova-google-plugin not related to AWS Amplify Federated Login Issue.
Updating the question after closing the question with less debugging information without asking for any information.
This is issues raised in git hub with respect to my problem.
Issue No. 5351 amplify js it's still in open state.
https://github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-js/issues/5351
Another issue 3537 which is still in Open
These two issues has the same scenario like me, I hope its enough debugging information, if more required mention comment instead of closing without notification, it's bullying for a beginner not helping
I fixed the above problem by referring a comment or wrapped around fix.
Link that will take to that comment directly link to comment.
First read the above comment as it will give you overall idea of what exactly the issue is instead of directly jumping to the solution.
Once you read the comment you will be little unclear with respect to implementation as he has use capacitor and not every one are using capacitor.
In my implementation I ignore this part as I am not using capacitor.
App.addListener('appUrlOpen')
Now lets go to main step where we are fixing this issue, I am using deep links to redirect to my application
this.platform.ready().then(() => {
this.deeplinks
.route({
"/success.html": "success",
"/logout.html": "logout",
})
.subscribe(
(match: any) => {
const fragment = JSON.stringify(match).split('"fragment":"')[1];
// this link can be your any link based on your requirement,
// what I am doing it I am passing all the data which I get in my fragments.
// fragments consists of id_token, stage, code,response type.
// These need to be passed to Ionic in order for Amplify to run its magic.
document.location.href = `http://192.168.1.162:8100/#${fragment}`;
},
(nomatch) => {
console.log("Got a deeplink that didn't match", nomatch);
}
);
});
I got this idea by referring the issue in which the developer mentioned of sending code and state along with application deep linking URL.
I want to create a simple "sign-in" button of Facebook and Google.
I read the documentation (https://amp.dev/documentation/examples/personalization/oauth2_login/#setup)
and look at the example in the playground section, but my problem is how do I do this part
"facebook-sign-in": "https://ampbyexample.com/oauth/login/facebook",
"google-sign-in": "https://ampbyexample.com/oauth/login/google",
in example of AMP documentation:
<script id="amp-access" type="application/json">
{
"authorization": "https://ampbyexample.com/oauth/status?_=RANDOM",
"noPingback": "true",
"login": {
"facebook-sign-in":"https://ampbyexample.com/oauth/login/facebook",
"google-sign-in":"https://ampbyexample.com/oauth/login/google",
"github-sign-in":"https://ampbyexample.com/oauth/login/github",
"sign-out":"https://ampbyexample.com/oauth/logout"
},
"authorizationFallbackResponse": {
"error": true,
"loggedIn": false
}
}
</script>
What do I do inside of this file https://ampbyexample.com/oauth/login/facebook in my application? what do I need to do it? I'm so confused about this part.
EDIT
I found this example but how make this logic with facebook without open a new pop up inside of amp's popup? (https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-login/web) about this example, my login button just stay inside of amp popup... but my expected result is like this example here
Sign-in with amp-access will always open a new popup. This is to ensure that it's always possible to write first party cookies on your own origin, even if the AMP pages is served from an AMP cache.
I started having a look into Facebook API today. I couldn' say enough how ugly and totally unintuitive it is, at least its Javascript implementation. Anyway, here's the two things I found:
a. I struggled whole day getting 'undefined' messages after properly loggin and getting an access_toekn, now when I tried to write response.first_name after calling FB.api ('/me') I got 'undefined' messages..... Well, I burnt my brain until I got someone here in stackoverflow that said the access token should HAVE to be passed in the call! But you can't find THIS CLEARLY specified in the FB official documentation, it's not even mentioned, not even parameter is shown. So this works:
FB.api('/me', {access_token: taccesstokenvalue}, function(response) {
alert(response.first_name); });
b. now, if I change alert() by document.write() , well, it just does nothing.
c. console.log() never worked out, I Tried on chrome, firefox, opera. Nothing
Why can't I use document.write? I need to verbosely write a lot of things coming out from the API, how can I do it ?
Thanks!!
Well, I found out a solution I think. Hope it helps other people...
I solved it this way:
a. create a form on top of the body area, with hidden field called hAPIresponse and hAccessToken
b. instead of trying to dump the API response right inside the function() as in the code above, fill the hidden fields with what the API returns, concatenating fields one after another if needed, like this:
FB.api('/me', {access_token: taccesstokenvalue}, function(response) {
document.getElementById("hAPIresponse").value="first name:" + response.first_name;
document.getElementById("hAccessToken").value="access token:" + taccesstokenvalue;
});
*here I didn't concatenate anything, just got the first_name property from the API
c. taccesstokenvalue variable comes from previously retrieving it from the URL or you can retrieve it directly through the API. Here comes the manual approach:
function Mid(str, start, len)
{
// Make sure start and len are within proper bounds
if (start < 0 || len < 0) return "";
var iEnd, iLen = String(str).length;
if (start + len > iLen)
iEnd = iLen;
else
iEnd = start + len;
return String(str).substring(start,iEnd);
}
var taccesstoken=window.location.href;
var tvecaux=taccesstoken.split('access_token=');
var taccesstokenvalue=Mid(tvecaux[1],0, tvecaux[1].indexOf('&',0) );
As far as I saw, when you get into the FB.api() call the code CONTINUES TO EXECUTE below the FB.API() call and not through the function(response). This one is triggered asynchronously by its own will, when it thinks it's better to finish :) It seems it's so complicated for FB developers adding a sync=true/false property in the FB.Init() so people used to sync coding won't pull their hairs out of their heads as I did..
Hope it helps somebody, I spent nearly 36 hours trying to do something so simple and stupid like calling an API and retrieving a value from it...
Again, this API couldn't be less intuitive, I can't say it enough. I can't imagine what I will find when trying to pull coments to FB Post replies or even trying to interact with the FB chat
I'm trying to integrate Facebook sharing into a webpage using this code edited from their official developer tutorial, but I'm not having any luck.
function postToFacebook(item_id)
{
FB.api(
'/me/completeset:display',
'post',
{ item: 'http://completeset.us/item/'+item_id },
function(response) {
if (!response || response.error) {
alert('Error occured');
} else {
alert('Share was successful! Action ID: ' + response.id);
}
}); //End api
}
I've got the app set up, with an "item" object and the "defined" action defined. I haven't been able to submit the action yet though, because I haven't been able to post anything with it yet. I've verified that the item_id is being passed in correctly, and I've debugged the url using their debugging tool. When I call this function I'm getting unknown path components/ completeset:display. I haven't been able to find much information on this error, so I'm wondering: what are the causes, and how might I be able to fix it?
The names mismatched. The getCode link for the action on facebook displayed the name of the action as being show_off for some reason. It was the same problem as the linked question. I experimented with the app backend and found that if you create an action with one name and then change the name of it, it will display with the new name but you must still reference it using the old name in the code.
My capstone team has decided to use Qooxdoo as the front end for our project. We're developing apps for OpenFlow controllers using NOX, so we're using the NOX webservices framework. I'm having trouble getting data from the service; I know the service is running because if I go to the URL using Firefox the right data shows up. Here's the relevant portion of my code:
var req = new qx.io.remote.Request("http://localhost/ws.v1/hello/world",
"GET", "text/plain");
req.addListener("complete", function(e) {
this.debug(e.getContent());
});
var get = new qx.ui.form.Button("get");
get.addListener("execute", function() {
alert("The button has been pressed");
req.send();
}, this);
form.addButton(get);
In the firebug console I get this message after I click through the alert:
008402 qx.io.remote.Exchange: Unknown status code: 0 (4)
And if I press the Get button again I get this error:
027033 qx.io.remote.transport.XmlHttp[56]: Failed with exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80070057 (NS_ERROR_ILLEGAL_VALUE) [nsIXMLHttpRequest.open]" nsresult: "0x80070057 (NS_ERROR_ILLEGAL_VALUE)" location: "JS frame :: file:///home/user/qooxdoo-1.0-sdk/framework/source/class/qx/io/remote/transport/XmlHttp.js :: anonymous :: line 279" data: no]
I've also looked at the Twitter Client tutorial, however the "dataChange" event I set up in place of the "tweetsChanged" event never fired. Any help is appreciated, thank you.
This sound like a cross domain request issue. qx.io.remote.Request uses XHR for transporting the data which may not work in every case due to the browser restriction. Switching the crossDomain flag on the request to true will change from XHR to a dynamically inserted script tag doesn't have the cross domain restriction (but other restrictions).
req.setCrossDomain(true);
Maybe that solves your problem.
Additionally, you can take a look at the documentation of the remote package to get some further details on cross domain requests:
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/current/apiviewer/#qx.io.remote
Also take care not to use a request object twice. The only work once.