I have a regex like this
(?<!(\w/))$#Cannot end with a word and slash
I would like to extract the comment from the end. While the example does not reflect this case, there could be a regex with includes regex on hashes.
\##value must be a hash
What would the regex be to extract the comment ensuring it is safe when used against regex which could contain #'s that are not comments.
Here's a .Net flavored Regex for partly parsing .Net flavor patterns, which should get pretty close:
\A
(?>
\\. # Capture an escaped character
| # OR
\[\^? # a character class
(?:\\.|[^\]])* # which may also contain escaped characters
\]
| # OR
\(\?(?# inline comment!)\#
(?<Comment>[^)]*)
\)
| # OR
\#(?<Comment>.*$) # a common comment!
| # OR
[^\[\\#] # capture any regular character - not # or [
)*
\z
Luckily, in .Net each capturing group remembers all of its captures, and not just the last, so we can find all captures of the Comment group in a single parse. The regex pretty much parses regular expression - but hardly fully, it just parses enough to find comments.
Here's how you use the result:
Match parsed = Regex.Match(pattern, pattern,
RegexOptions.IgnorePatternWhitespace |
RegexOptions.Multiline);
if (parsed.Success)
{
foreach (Capture capture in parsed.Groups["Comment"].Captures)
{
Console.WriteLine(capture.Value);
}
}
Working example: http://ideone.com/YP3yt
One last word of caution - this regex assumes the whole pattern is in IgnorePatternWhitespace mode. When it isn't set, all # are matched literally. Keep in mind the flag might change multiple times in a single pattern. In (?-x)#(?x)#comment, for example, regardless of IgnorePatternWhitespace, the first # is matched literally, (?x) turns the IgnorePatternWhitespace flag back on, and the second # is ignored.
If you want a robust solution you can use a regex-language parser.
You can probably adapt the .Net source code and extract a parser:
Reference Source - RegexParser.cs
GitHub - RegexParser.cs
Something like this should work (if you run it separately on each line of the regex). The comment itself (if it exists) will be in the third capturing group.
/^((\\.)|[^\\\#])*\#(.*)/
(\\.) matches an escaped character, [^\#] matches any non-slash non-hash characters, together with the * quantifier they match the entire line before the comment. Then the rest of the regex detects the comment marker and extracts the text.
One of the overlooked options in regex parsing is the RightToLeft mode.
extract the comment from the end.
One can simply the pattern if we work our way from the end of the line to the beginning. Such as
^
.+? # Workable regex
(?<Comment> # Comment group
(?<!\\) # Not a comment if escaped.
\# # Anchor for actual comment
[^#]+ # The actual commented text to stop at #
)? # We may not have a comment
$
Use the above pattern in C# with these options RegexOptions.RightToLeft | RegexOptions.IgnorePatternWhitespace | RegexOptions.Multiline
there could be a regex with includes regex on hashes
This line (?<!\\) # Not a comment if escaped. handles that situation by saying if there is a proceeding \, we do not have a comment.
Related
Have a string that starts with a # symbol and would like to add the same # symbol.
The string could contain any type of lower/upper, numbers, comas, periods, etc. Each string is a single separate line.
Here is what I have tried with no success:
Find: (?=#)([\S\s]+) # www.admitme.app
Find: (?=#\B)([\S\s]+) # Carlo Baxter
Find: (?=#\B)([A-Za-z0-9]+) # resumes in 15 minutes
Replace: $1 # # resumes in 15 minutes #
Yes I'm a noob with regex...
Thanks in advance
Hank K
The following pattern is working in your demo:
(?=#\B)(.*)
This works in multiline mode, because then the .* will not match across newlines. You were using [\s\S]*, which will match across newlines, even in multiline mode. Here is the updated demo.
You can do the same replacement without lookarounds or capture groups using one of these patterns. The point is to match any character without newlines using .* (And not have a flag set to have the dot matches newlines)
#\B.*
# .*
In the replacement use the matched text followed by a space and #
$0 #
See a regex demo.
Problem:
I have thousands of documents which contains a specific character I don't want. E.g. the character a. These documents contain a variety of characters, but the a's I want to replace are inside double quotes or single quotes.
I would like to find and replace them, and I thought using Regex would be needed. I am using VSCode, but I'm open to any suggestions.
My attempt:
I was able to find the following regex to match for a specific string containing the values inside the ().
".*?(r).*?"
However, this only highlights the entire quote. I want to highlight the character only.
Any solution, perhaps outside of regex, is welcome.
Example outcomes:
Given, the character is a, find replace to b
Somebody once told me "apples" are good for you => Somebody once told me "bpples" are good for you
"Aardvarks" make good kebabs => "Abrdvbrks" make good kebabs
The boy said "aaah!" when his mom told him he was eating aardvark => The boy said "bbbh!" when his mom told him he was eating aardvark
Visual Studio Code
VS Code uses JavaScript RegEx engine for its find / replace functionality. This means you are very limited in working with regex in comparison to other flavors like .NET or PCRE.
Lucky enough that this flavor supports lookaheads and with lookaheads you are able to look for but not consume character. So one way to ensure that we are within a quoted string is to look for number of quotes down to bottom of file / subject string to be odd after matching an a:
a(?=[^"]*"[^"]*(?:"[^"]*"[^"]*)*$)
Live demo
This looks for as in a double quoted string, to have it for single quoted strings substitute all "s with '. You can't have both at a time.
There is a problem with regex above however, that it conflicts with escaped double quotes within double quoted strings. To match them too if it matters you have a long way to go:
a(?=[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*(?:"[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*)*$)
Applying these approaches on large files probably will result in an stack overflow so let's see a better approach.
I am using VSCode, but I'm open to any suggestions.
That's great. Then I'd suggest to use awk or sed or something more programmatic in order to achieve what you are after or if you are able to use Sublime Text a chance exists to work around this problem in a more elegant way.
Sublime Text
This is supposed to work on large files with hundred of thousands of lines but care that it works for a single character (here a) that with some modifications may work for a word or substring too:
Search for:
(?:"|\G(?<!")(?!\A))(?<r>[^a"\\]*+(?>\\.[^a"\\]*)*+)\K(a|"(*SKIP)(*F))(?(?=((?&r)"))\3)
^ ^ ^
Replace it with: WHATEVER\3
Live demo
RegEx Breakdown:
(?: # Beginning of non-capturing group #1
" # Match a `"`
| # Or
\G(?<!")(?!\A) # Continue matching from last successful match
# It shouldn't start right after a `"`
) # End of NCG #1
(?<r> # Start of capturing group `r`
[^a"\\]*+ # Match anything except `a`, `"` or a backslash (possessively)
(?>\\.[^a"\\]*)*+ # Match an escaped character or
# repeat last pattern as much as possible
)\K # End of CG `r`, reset all consumed characters
( # Start of CG #2
a # Match literal `a`
| # Or
"(*SKIP)(*F) # Match a `"` and skip over current match
)
(?(?= # Start a conditional cluster, assuming a positive lookahead
((?&r)") # Start of CG #3, recurs CG `r` and match `"`
) # End of condition
\3 # If conditional passed match CG #3
) # End of conditional
Three-step approach
Last but not least...
Matching a character inside quotation marks is tricky since delimiters are exactly the same so opening and closing marks can not be distinguished from each other without taking a look at adjacent strings. What you can do is change a delimiter to something else so that you can look for it later.
Step 1:
Search for: "[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"
Replace with: $0Я
Step 2:
Search for: a(?=[^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*"Я)
Replace with whatever you expect.
Step 3:
Search for: "Я
Replace with nothing to revert every thing.
/(["'])(.*?)(a)(.*?\1)/g
With the replace pattern:
$1$2$4
As far as I'm aware, VS Code uses the same regex engine as JavaScript, which is why I've written my example in JS.
The problem with this is that if you have multiple a's in 1 set of quotes, then it will struggle to pull out the right values, so there needs to be some sort of code behind it, or you, hammering the replace button until no more matches are found, to recurse the pattern and get rid of all the a's in between quotes
let regex = /(["'])(.*?)(a)(.*?\1)/g,
subst = `$1$2$4`,
str = `"a"
"helapke"
Not matched - aaaaaaa
"This is the way the world ends"
"Not with fire"
"ABBA"
"abba",
'I can haz cheezburger'
"This is not a match'
`;
// Loop to get rid of multiple a's in quotes
while(str.match(regex)){
str = str.replace(regex, subst);
}
const result = str;
console.log(result);
Firstly a few of considerations:
There could be multiple a characters within a single quote.
Each quote (using single or double quotation marks) consists of an opening quote character, some text and the same closing quote character. A simple approach is to assume that when the quote characters are counted sequentially, the odd ones are opening quotes and the even ones are closing quotes.
Following point 2, it could be worth some further thought on whether single-quoted strings should be allowed. See the following example: It's a shame 'this quoted text' isn't quoted. Here, the simple approach would think there were two quoted strings: s a shame and isn. Another: This isn't a quote ...'this is' and 'it's unclear where this quote ends'. I've avoided attempting to tackle these complexities and gone with the simple approach below.
The bad news is that point 1 presents a bit of a problem, as a capturing group with a wildcard repeat character after it (e.g. (.*)*) will only capture the last captured "thing". But the good news is there's a way of getting around this within certain limits. Many regex engines will allow up to 99 capturing groups (*). So if we can make the assumption that there will be no more than 99 as in each quote (UPDATE ...or even if we can't - see step 3), we can do the following...
(*) Unfortunately my first port of call, Notepad++ doesn't - it only allows up to 9. Not sure about VS Code. But regex101 (used for the online demos below) does.
TL;DR - What to do?
Search for: "([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*([^a"]*)a*"
Replace with: "\1\2\3\4\5\6\7\8\9\10\11\12\13\14\15\16\17\18\19\20\21\22\23\24\25\26\27\28\29\30\31\32\33\34\35\36\37\38\39\40\41\42\43\44\45\46\47\48\49\50\51\52\53\54\55\56\57\58\59\60\61\62\63\64\65\66\67\68\69\70\71\72\73\74\75\76\77\78\79\80\81\82\83\84\85\86\87\88\89\90\91\92\93\94\95\96\97\98\99"
(Optionally keep repeating steps the previous two steps if there's a possibility of > 99 such characters in a single quote until they've all been replaced).
Repeat step 1 but replacing all " with ' in the regular expression, i.e: '([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*([^a']*)a*'
Repeat steps 2-3.
Online demos
Please see the following regex101 demos, which could actually be used to perform the replacements if you're able to copy the whole text into the contents of "TEST STRING":
Demo for double quotes
Demo for single quotes.
If you can use Visual Studio (instead of Visual Studio Code), it is written in C++ and C# and uses the .NET Framework regular expressions, which means you can use variable length lookbehinds to accomplish this.
(?<="[^"\n]*)a(?=[^"\n]*")
Adding some more logic to the above regular expression, we can tell it to ignore any locations where there are an even amount of " preceding it. This prevents matches for a outside of quotes. Take, for example, the string "a" a "a". Only the first and last a in this string will be matched, but the one in the middle will be ignored.
(?<!^[^"\n]*(?:(?:"[^"\n]*){2})+)(?<="[^"\n]*)a(?=[^"\n]*")
Now the only problem is this will break if we have escaped " within two double quotes such as "a\"" a "a". We need to add more logic to prevent this behaviour. Luckily, this beautiful answer exists for properly matching escaped ". Adding this logic to the regex above, we get the following:
(?<!^[^"\n]*(?:(?:"(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)*){2})+)(?<="[^"\n]*)a(?=[^"\n]*")
I'm not sure which method works best with your strings, but I'll explain this last regex in detail as it also explains the two previous ones.
(?<!^[^"\n]*(?:(?:"(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)*){2})+) Negative lookbehind ensuring what precedes doesn't match the following
^ Assert position at the start of the line
[^"\n]* Match anything except " or \n any number of times
(?:(?:"(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)*){2})+ Match the following one or more times. This ensures if there are any " preceding the match that they are balanced in the sense that there is an opening and closing double quote.
(?:"(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)*){2} Match the following exactly twice
" Match this literally
(?:[^"\\\n]|\\.)* Match either of the following any number of times
[^"\\\n] Match anything except ", \ and \n
\\. Matches \ followed by any character
(?<="[^"\n]*) Positive lookbehind ensuring what precedes matches the following
" Match this literally
[^"\n]* Match anything except " or \n any number of times
a Match this literally
(?=[^"\n]*") Positive lookahead ensuring what follows matches the following
[^"\n]* Match anything except " or \n any number of times
" Match this literally
You can drop the \n from the above pattern as the following suggests. I added it just in case there's some sort of special cases I'm not considering (i.e. comments) that could break this regex within your text. The \A also forces the regex to match from the start of the string (or file) instead of the start of the line.
(?<!\A[^"]*(?:(?:"(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*){2})+)(?<="[^"]*)a(?=[^"]*")
You can test this regex here
This is what it looks like in Visual Studio:
I am using VSCode, but I'm open to any suggestions.
If you want to stay in an Editor environment, you could use
Visual Studio (>= 2012) or even notepad++ for quick fixup.
This avoids having to use a spurious script environment.
Both of these engines (Dot-Net and boost, respectively) use the \G construct.
Which is start the next match at the position where the last one left off.
Again, this is just a suggestion.
This regex doesn't check the validity of balanced quotes within the entire
string ahead of time (but it could with the addition of a single line).
It is all about knowing where the inside and outside of quotes are.
I've commented the regex, but if you need more info let me know.
Again this is just a suggestion (I know your editor uses ECMAScript).
Find (?s)(?:^([^"]*(?:"[^"a]*(?=")"[^"]*(?="))*"[^"a]*)|(?!^)\G)a([^"a]*(?:(?=a.*?")|(?:"[^"]*$|"[^"]*(?=")(?:"[^"a]*(?=")"[^"]*(?="))*"[^"a]*)))
Replace $1b$2
That's all there is to it.
https://regex101.com/r/loLFYH/1
Comments
(?s) # Dot-all inine modifier
(?:
^ # BOS
( # (1 start), Find first quote from BOS (written back)
[^"]*
(?: # --- Cluster
" [^"a]* # Inside quotes with no 'a'
(?= " )
" [^"]* # Between quotes, get up to next quote
(?= " )
)* # --- End cluster, 0 to many times
" [^"a]* # Inside quotes, will be an 'a' ahead of here
# to be sucked up by this match
) # (1 end)
| # OR,
(?! ^ ) # Not-BOS
\G # Continue where left off from last match.
# Must be an 'a' at this point
)
a # The 'a' to be replaced
( # (2 start), Up to the next 'a' (to be written back)
[^"a]*
(?: # --------------------
(?= a .*? " ) # If stopped before 'a', must be a quote ahead
| # or,
(?: # --------------------
" [^"]* $ # If stopped at a quote, check for EOS
| # or,
" [^"]* # Between quotes, get up to next quote
(?= " )
(?: # --- Cluster
" [^"a]* # Inside quotes with no 'a'
(?= " )
" [^"]* # Between quotes
(?= " )
)* # --- End cluster, 0 to many times
" [^"a]* # Inside quotes, will be an 'a' ahead of here
# to be sucked up on the next match
) # --------------------
) # --------------------
) # (2 end)
"Inside double quotes" is rather tricky, because there are may complicating scenarios to consider to fully automate this.
What are your precise rules for "enclosed by quotes"? Do you need to consider multi-line quotes? Do you have quoted strings containing escaped quotes or quotes used other than starting/ending string quotation?
However there may be a fairly simple expression to do much of what you want.
Search expression: ("[^a"]*)a
Replacement expression: $1b
This doesn't consider inside or outside of quotes - you have do that visually. But it highlights text from the quote to the matching character, so you can quickly decide if this is inside or not.
If you can live with the visual inspection, then we can build up this pattern to include different quote types and upper and lower case.
I have a function, translate(), takes multiple parameters. The first param is the only required and is a string, that I always wrap in single quotes, like this:
translate('hello world');
The other params are optional, but could be included like this:
translate('hello world', true, 1, 'foobar', 'etc');
And the string itself could contain escaped single quotes, like this:
translate('hello\'s world');
To the point, I now want to search through all code files for all instances of this function call, and extract just the string. To do so I've come up with the following grep, which returns everything between translate(' and either ') or ',. Almost perfect:
grep -RoPh "(?<=translate\(').*?(?='\)|'\,)" .
The problem with this though, is that if the call is something like this:
translate('hello \'world\', you\'re great!');
My grep would only return this:
hello \'world\
So I'm looking to modify this so that the part that currently looks for ') or ', instead looks for the first occurrence of ' that hasn't been escaped, i.e. doesn't immediately follow a \
Hopefully I'm making sense. Any suggestions please?
You can use this grep with PCRE regex:
grep -RoPh "\btranslate\(\s*\K'(?:[^'\\\\]*)(?:\\\\.[^'\\\\]*)*'" .
Here is a regex demo
RegEx Breakup:
\b # word boundary
translate # match literal translate
\( # match a (
\s* # match 0 or more whitespace
\K # reset the matched information
' # match starting single quote
(?: # start non-capturing group
[^'\\\\]* # match 0 or more chars that are not a backslash or single quote
) # end non-capturing group
(?: # start non-capturing group
\\\\. # match a backslash followed by char that is "escaped"
[^'\\\\]* # match 0 or more chars that are not a backslash or single quote
)* # end non-capturing group
' # match ending single quote
Here is a version without \K using look-arounds:
grep -oPhR "(?<=\btranslate\(')(?:[^'\\\\]*)(?:\\\\.[^'\\\\]*)*(?=')" .
RegEx Demo 2
I think the problem is the .*? part: the ? makes it a non-greedy pattern, meaning it'll take the shortest string that matches the pattern. In effect, you're saying, "give me the shortest string that's followed by quote+close-paren or quote+comma". In your example, "world\" is followed by a single quote and a comma, so it matches your pattern.
In these cases, I like to use something like the following reasoning:
A string is a quote, zero or more characters, and a quote: '.*'
A character is anything that isn't a quote (because a quote terminates the string): '[^']*'
Except that you can put a quote in a string by escaping it with a backslash, so a character is either "backslash followed by a quote" or, failing that, "not a quote": '(\\'|[^'])*'
Put it all together and you get
grep -RoPh "(?<=translate\(')(\\'|[^'])*(?='\)|'\,)" .
So I've this regex (from https://github.com/savetheinternet/Tinyboard/blob/master/inc/functions.php#L1620)
((?:https?:\/\/|ftp:\/\/|irc:\/\/)[^\s<>()"]+?(?:\([^\s<>()"]*?\)[^\s<>()"]*?)*)((?:\s|<|>|"|\.|\]|!|\?|,|,|")*(?:[\s<>()"]|$))
it works for matching links like: http://stackoverflow.com/ etc..
question is, how I can exclude these kind of markup matches (mainly the url ja img parts):
[url]http://stackoverflow.com/[/url]
[url=http://stackoverflow.com/]http://stackoverflow.com/[/url]
[img]http://cdn.sstatic.net/stackoverflow/img/sprites.png[/img]
[img=http://cdn.sstatic.net/stackoverflow/img/sprites.png]
To exclude this you can add at the begining of your expression this subpattern:
(?:\[(url|img)](?>[^[]++|[(?!\/\g{-1}))*+\[\/\g{-1}]|\[(?:url|img)=[^]]*+])(*SKIP)(*FAIL)|your pattern here
The goal of this is to try to match the parts you don't want before and forces the regex engine to fail with the backtracking control verb (*FAIL). The (*SKIP) verb forces the regex engine to not retry the substring matched before when the subpattern fails after.
You can find more informations about these features here.
Notice: assuming that you are using PHP for this pattern, you can improve a little bit this very long pattern by replacing the default delimiter / by ~ to avoid to escape all / in the pattern and by using the verbose mode (x modifier) with a Nowdoc syntax. Like this you can comment it, make it more readable and easily improve the pattern
Example:
$pattern = <<<'EOF'
~
### skipping url and img bbcodes ###
(?:
\[(url|img)] # opening bbcode tag
(?>[^[]++|[(?!/\g{-1}))*+ # possible content between tags
\[/\g{-1}] # closing bbcode tag
|
\[(?:url|img)= [^]]*+ ] # self closing bbcode tags
)(*SKIP)(*FAIL) # forces to fail and skip
| # OR
### a link ###
(
(?:https?|ftp|irc):// # protocol
[^\s<>()"]+?
(?:
\( [^\s<>()"]*? \) # part between parenthesis
[^\s<>()"]*?
)*
)
(
(?:[]\s<>".!?,]|,|")*
(?:[\s<>()"]|$)
)
~x
EOF;
You could solve it with negative look-behind assertion.
(?<!pattern)
In your case, you can check if there is no ] or = character just before the matching link.
Below regex will make sure that exactly this doesn't happen:
(?<!(?:\=|\]))((?:https?:\/\/|ftp:\/\/|irc:\/\/)[^\s<>()"]+?(?:\([^\s<>()"]*?\)[^\s<>()"]*?)*)((?:\s|<|>|"|\.|\]|!|\?|,|,|")*(?:[\s<>()"]|$))
Note that the only part added is (?<!(?:\=|\])) right in the beginning and that it will not match a link in something like <a href=http://example.com> but your question does not specify this... so impove the question if that's expected behaviour or work it out yourself using negative look behind.
I'm parsing through code using a Perl-REGEX parsing engine in my IDE and I want to grab any variables that look like
$hash->{ hash_key04}
and nuke the rest of the code..
So far my very basic REGEX doesnt do what I expected
(.*)(\$hash\-\>\{[\w\s]+\})(.*)
(
\$
hash
\-\>
\{
[\w\s]+
\}
)
I know to use replace for this ($1,$2,etc), but match (.*) before and after the target string doesnt seem to capture all the rest of the code!
UPADTED:
tried matching null but of course thats too greedy.
([^\0]*)
What expression in regex should i use to look only for the string pattern and remove the rest?
The problem is I want to be left with the list of $hash->{} strings after the replace runs in the IDE.
This is better approached from the other direction. Instead of trying to delete everything you don't want, what about extracting everything you do want?
my #vars = $src_text =~ /(\$hash->\{[\w\s]+\})/g;
Breaking down the regex:
/( # start of capture group
\$hash-> # prefix string with $ escaped
\{ # opening escaped delimiter
[\w\s]+ # any word characters or space
\} # closing escaped delimiter
)/g; # match repeatedly returning a list of captures
Here is another way that might fit within your IDE better:
s/(\$hash->\{[\w\s]+\})|./$1/gs;
This regex tries to match one of your hash variables at each location, and if it fails, it deletes the next character and then tries again, which after running over the whole file will have deleted everything you don't want.
Depends on your coding language. What you want is group 2 (The second set of characters in parenthesis). In perl that would be $2, in VIM it would be \2, etc ...
It depends on the platform, but generally, replace the pattern with an empty string.
In javascript,
// prints "the la in ing"
console.log('the latest in testing'.replace(/test/g, ''));
In bash
$ echo 'the latest in testing' | sed 's/test//g'
the la in ing
In C#
Console.WriteLine(Regex.Replace("the latest in testing", "test", ""));
etc
By default the wildcard . won't match newlines. You can enable newlines in its matching set using a flag depending on what regex standard you're using and under what language/api. Or you can add them explicitly yourself by defining a character set:
[.\n\r]* <- Matches any character including newline, carriage return.
Combine this with capture groups to grab desired variables from your code and skip over lines which contain no capture group.
If you want help constructing the proper regex for your context you'll need to paste some input text and specify what the output should be.
I think you want to add a ^ to the beginning of the regex s/^.(PATTERN)(.)$/$1/ so that it starts at the beginning of the line and goes to the end, removing anything except that pattern.