I'm considering refactoring a large part of my rendering code and one question popped to mind:
Is it possible to render to both the screen and to a texture using multiple color attachments in a Frame Buffer Object? I cannot find any information if this should be possible or not even though it has many useful applications. I guess it should be enough to bind my texture as color attachment0 and renderbuffer 0 to attachment1?
For example I want to make an interactive application where you can "draw" on a 3D model. I resolve where the user draws by rendering the UV-coordinates to a texture so I can look up at the mouse-coordinates where to modify the texture. In my case it would be fastest to have a shader that both draws the UV's to the texture and the actual texture to the screen in one pass.
Are there better ways to do this or am I on the right track?
There is no such thing as "default renderbuffer" in OpenGL. There is the window system provided default frame buffer with reserved name zero, but that basically means "no FBO enabled". So no, unfortunately normal OpenGL provides no method to somehow use its color buffer as a color attachment to any other FBO. I'm not aware of any extensions that could possible provide this feature.
With render buffers there is also the reserved name zero, but it's only a special "none" variable and allows unbinding render buffers.
Related
Why exactly does it not work to use a renderbuffer on a layered framebuffer?
I read that if you want to have the depth values you have to use extra textures.
Is that so? Or is there another option to use a renderbuffer?
Yes, that is so. Why? Well, the simple answer is that it's defined that way. From the OpenGL spec document, section "Whole Framebuffer Completeness":
If any framebuffer attachment is layered, all populated attachments must be layered. Additionally, all populated color attachments must be from textures of the same target (three-dimensional, one- or two-dimensional array, cube map, or cube map array textures).
Since there are no layered renderbuffers, you can't use them for layered rendering.
I've been learning a bit of OpenGL lately, and I just got to the Framebuffers.
So by my current understanding, if you have a framebuffer of your own, and you want to draw the color buffer onto the window, you'll need to first draw a quad, and then wrap the texture over it? Is that right? Or is there something like glDrawArrays(), glDrawElements() version for framebuffers?
It seems a bit... Odd (clunky? Hackish?) to me that you have to wrap a texture over a quad in order to draw the framebuffer. This doesn't have to be done with the default framebuffer. Or is that done behind your back?
Well. The main point of framebuffer objects is to render scenes to buffers that will not get displayed but rather reused somewhere, as a source of data for some other operation (shadow maps, High dynamic range processing, reflections, portals...).
If you want to display it, why do you use a custom framebuffer in the first place?
Now, as #CoffeeandCode comments, there is indeed a glBlitFramebuffer call to allow transfering pixels from one framebuffer to another. But before you go ahead and use that call, ask yourself why you need that extra step. It's not a free operation...
Can the same texture be bound to more than one framebuffer object?
I need to write on some texture in a multi target rendering pass with a certain fbo, and later to add some blending to just one of those texture, so I need a second framebuffer object with that texture bound to.
I have no idea why you would think that you can't attach a texture to multiple FBOs. So yes, you can.
However, you shouldn't need to for your purposes. You don't have to write to all of the images attached to an FBO. You control what images get written to with glDrawBuffers. You can even selectively enable and disable blending to certain draw buffers, if you need to write to multiple buffers but only blend with certain ones.
So yes you can, but you shouldn't bother. Just switch your draw buffers, unless you need a new depth buffer or something.
To clarify, when I say 'default framebuffer' I mean the one provided by the windowing system and what ends up on your monitor.
To improve my rendering speeds for a CAD app, I've managed to separate out the 3D elements from the Qt-handled 2D ones, and they now each render into their own FBO. When the time comes to get them onto the screen, I blit the 3D FBO onto the default FB, and then I want to blend my 2D FBO on top of it.
I've gotten to the blitting part fine, but I can't see how to blend my 2D FBO onto it? Both FBOs are identical in size and format, and they are both the same as the default FB.
I'm sure it's a simple operation, but I can't find anything on the net - presumably I'm missing the right term for what I am trying to do. Although I'm using Qt, I can use native OpenGL commands without issue.
A blit operation is ultimately a pixel copy operation. If you want to layer one image on top of another, you can't blit it. You must instead render a full-screen quad as a texture and use the proper blending parameters for your blending operation.
You can use GL_EXT_framebuffer_blit to blit contents of the framebuffer object to the application framebuffer (or to any other). Although, as the spec states, it is not possible to use blending:
The pixel copy bypasses the fragment pipeline. The only fragment
operations which affect the blit are the pixel ownership test and
the scissor test.
So any blending means to use fragment shader as suggested. One fullscreen pass with blending should be pretty cheap, I believe there is nothing to worry about.
use shader to read back from frame buffer. this is OpenGL ES extension, not support by all hardware.
https://www.khronos.org/registry/gles/extensions/EXT/EXT_shader_framebuffer_fetch.txt
Lets say i have an application ( the details of the application should be irrelevent for solving the problem ). Instead of rendering to the screen, i am somehow able to force the application to render to a framebuffer object instead of rendering to the screen ( messing with glew or intercepting a call in a dll ).
Once the application has rendered its content to the FBO is it possible to apply a shader to the contents of the FB? My knowledge is limited here, so from what i understand at this stage all information about vertices is no longer available and all the necessary tests have been applied, so whats left in the buffer is just pixel data. Is this correct?
If it is possible to apply a shader to the FBO, is is possible to get a fisheye affect? ( like this for example: http://idea.hosting.lv/a/gfx/quakeshots.html )
The technique used in the linke above is to create 6 different viewports and render each viewport to a cubemap face and then apply the texture to a mesh.
Thanks
A framebuffer object encapsulates several other buffers, specifically those that are implicitly indexed by fragment location. So a single framebuffer object may bundle together a colour buffer, a depth buffer, a stencil buffer and a bunch of others. The individual buffers are known as renderbuffers.
You're right — there's no geometry in there. For the purposes of reading back the scene you get only final fragment values, which if you're highjacking an existing app will probably be a 2d pixel image of the frame and some other things that you don't care about.
If your GPU has render-to-texture support (originally an extension circa OpenGL 1.3 but you'd be hard pressed to find a GPU without it nowadays, even in mobile phones) then you can link a texture as a renderbuffer within a framebuffer. So the rendering code is exactly as it would be normally but ends up writing the results to a texture that you can then use as a source for drawing.
Fragment shaders can programmatically decide which location of a texture map to sample in order to create their output. So you can write a fragment shader that applies a fisheye lens, though you're restricted to the field of view rendered in the original texture, obviously. Which would probably be what you'd get in your Quake example if you had just one of the sides of the cube available rather than six.
In summary: the answer is 'yes' to all of your questions. There's a brief introduction to framebuffer objects here.
Look here for some relevant info:
http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Framebuffer_Object
The short, simple explanation is that a FBO is the 3D equivalent of a software frame buffer. You have direct access to individual pixels, instead of having to modify a texture and upload it. You can get shaders to point to an FBO. The link above gives an overview of the procedure.