is it possible to create a GLSL shader to get any object to be surrounded by a glowing effect?
Let's say i have a 3d cube and if it's selected the cube should be surrounded by a blue glowing effect. Any hints?
Well there are several ways of doing this. If each object is also represented in a winged edge format then it is trivial to calculate the silhouette and then extrude it to generate a glow. This however is, very much, a CPU method.
For a GPU method you could try rendering to an offscreen buffer with the stencil set to increment. If you then perform a blur on the image (though only writing to pixels where the stencil is non zero) you will get a blur around the edge of the image which can then be drawn into the main scene with alpha blending. This is more a blur than a glow but it would be relatively easy to re-jig the brightness so that it renders a glow.
There are plenty of other methods too ... here are a couple of links for you to look through:
http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems/gpugems_ch21.html
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/directx/stencilbufferglowspart1.aspx?display=Mobile
Have a hunt round on google because there is lots of information :)
Related
Setting the scene:
I am rendering a height map (vast non-transparent surface) with a large amount of billboards on it (typically grass, flowers and so on).
The billboards thus have a mostly transparent color map applied, with only a few pixels colored to produce the grass or leaf shapes and such. Note that the edges of those shapes use a bit of transparency gradient to make them look smoother, but I have also tried with basic, binary color/transparent textures.
Pseudo rendering code goes like so:
map->render();
glEnable(GL_BLEND);
glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
wildGrass->render();
glDisable(GL_BLEND);
Where the wildGrass render instruction renders multiple billboards at various locations in a single OGL call.
The issue I am experiencing has to do with transparency and the fact that billboards apparently hide each-other, even on their transparent area. However the height-map solid background is correctly displayed on those transparent parts.
Here's the glitch:
Left is with an explicit fragment shader discard on fully transparent pixels
Right is without the discard, clearly showing the billboard's flat quad
Based on my understanding of OGL blending and some reading, it seems that the solution is to have a controlled order of rendering, starting from the most distant objects to the closest, so that the color buffer is filled properly in the end.
I am desperately hoping that there is another way... The ordering here would typically vary depending on the point of view, which means it has to be applied in-real-time for each frame. Plus the nature of those particular billboards is to be produced in a -very large- number... Performance alert!
Any suggestions or is my approach of blending wrong?
Did not work for me:
#httpdigest's suggestion to disable depth buffer writing:
It worked essentially for billboards with the same texture (and possibly a specific type of texture, like wild grass for instance), because the depth inconsistencies are not visually noticeable - however introducing another texture, say a flower with drastically different colours, will immediately highlights those mistakes.
Solution:
#Rabbid76's suggestion to use not-semi-transparent textures with multi-sampling & anti-aliasing: I believe this is the way to go for best visual effect with reasonably low cost on performance.
Alternative solution:
I found an intermediary solution which is probably the cheapest in performance to the expense of quality. I still use textures with gradient transparent edges, but instead of discarding fully transparent pixels, I introduced a degree of tolerance, for example any pixel with alpha < 0.6 is discarded - the value is found experimentally to find the right balance.
With this approach:
I still perform depth tests, so output is correct
Textures quality is degraded/look less smooth - but reasonably so
The glitches on semi-transparent pixels still appear - but are nearly not noticeable
See capture below
So to conclude:
My solution is a cheap and simple approximation giving less smooth visual result
Best result can be obtained by rendering all the billboards to a multi-sampled texture resolve with anti-aliasing and finally output the result in a full screen quad. There are probably to ways to do this:
Either rendering the map first and use the resulting depth buffer when rendering the billboards
Or render both the map and billboards on the multi-sampled texture
Note that the above approaches are both meant to avoid having to distance-base sort a large number of billboards - but this remains a valid option and I have read about storing billboard locations in a quad tree for quick access.
I started learning shaders, playing around on ShaderToy.com. For a project I want to make, I need to create an arbitrary glow filter on WebGL (not Bloom). I want to calculate alpha that I can then use to draw a color glow or use for some animated texture like fire etc.
So far I thought of a few ideas:
Averaging alpha across some area near each pixel - obviously slow
Going in circle around each pixel in one loop then over distance in another to calculate alpha based on how close the shape is to this pixel - probably just as slow
Blur entire shape - sounds like an overkill since I just need the alpha
Are there other ideas for approaching this? All I can find are gaussian blur techniques from bloom-like filters.
Please find this nvidia document for the simple glow effect.
The basic idea is to
render the scene in the back buffer
activate the effect
render some elements of the scene in a FBO
compute the Glow effect
bind the final FBO as a texture and blend this effect with the previously rendered scene in the backbuffer
the last few days i was reading a lot articles about post-processing with bloom etc. and i was able to implement a render to texture functionality with this texture running through a sperate shader.
Now i have some questions regarding the whole thing.
Do i have to render both? The Scene and the Texture put on a full-screen quad?
How does Bloom, or any other Post-Processing (DOF, Blur) with this render to texture functionality work? Or is this something completly different?
I dont really understand the concept of the Back and Front-Buffer and how to make use of this for post processing.
I have read something about the volumetric light rendering where they render the scene like 6 times with different color settings. Isnt this quite inefficient? Or was my understanding there just incorrect?
Thanks for anyone care to explain this things to me ;)
Let me try to answer some of your questions
Yes, you have to render both
DOF is typically implemented by rendering a "blurriness" factor into an offscreen buffer, where a post-processing filter then uses this factor to blur certain pixels more than others (with some compensation for color-leaking between sharp and blurred objects). So yes, the basic idea is the same, render to a buffer, process it and then display it (with or without blending it on top of the original scene).
The back buffer is what you render stuff to (what the user will see on the next frame). All offscreen rendering is done to other rendertargets that you will create and use.
I don't quite understand what you mean. Please provide a link to what you read so I can try to understand and perhaps explain it.
Suppose that:
you have the "luminance" for each renderer pixel in a single texture
this texture hold floating point values that can be greater that 1.0
Now:
You do a blur pass (possibly a separate blur), only considering pixels
with a value greater than 1.0, and put the blur result in another
texture.
Finally:
In a last shader you do the final presentation to screen. You sample
from both the "luminance" (clamped to 1.0) and the "blurred excess luminance"
and add them, obtaining the so-called bloom effect.
I want to make a game with Worms-like destructible terrain in 2D, using OpenGL.
What is the best approach for this?
Draw pixel per pixel? (Uh, not good?)
Have the world as a texture and manipulate it (is that possible?)
Thanks in advance
Thinking about the way Worms terrain looked, I came up with this idea. But I'm not sure how you would implement it in OpenGL. It's more of a layered 2D drawing approach. I'm posting the idea anyway. I've emulated the approach using Paint.NET.
First, you have a background sky layer.
And you have a terrain layer.
The terrain layer is masked so the top portion isn't drawn. Draw the terrain layer on top of the sky layer to form the scene.
Now for the main idea. Any time there is an explosion or other terrain-deforming event, you draw a circle or other shape on the terrain layer, using the terrain layer itself as a drawing mask (so only the part of the circle that overlaps existing terrain is drawn), to wipe out part of the terrain. Use a transparent/mask-color brush for the fill and some color similar to the terrain for the thick pen.
You can repeat this process to add more deformations. You could keep this layer in memory and add deformations as they occur or you could even render them in memory each frame if there aren't too many deformations to render.
I guess you'd better use texture-filled polygons with the correct mapping (a linear one that doesn't stretch the texture to use all the texels, but leaves the cropped areas out), and then reshape them as they get destroyed.
I'm assuming your problem will be to implement the collision between characters/weapons/terrain.
As long as you aren't doing this on opengl es, you might be able to get away with using the stencil buffer to do per-pixel collision detection and have your terrain be a single modifyable texture.
This page will give an idea:
http://kometbomb.net/2007/07/11/hardware-accelerated-2d-collision-detection-in-opengl/
The way I imagine it is this:
a plane with the texture applied
a path( a vector of points/segments ) used for ground collisions.
When something explodes, you do a boolean operation (rectangle-circle) for the texture(revealing the background) and for the 'walkable' path.
What I'm trying to say is you do a geometric boolean operation and you use the result to update the texture(with an alpha mask or something) and update the data structure you use to keep track of the walkable area(which ever that might be).
Split things up, instead of relying only on gl draw methods
I think I would start by drawing the foreground into the stencil buffer so the stencil buffer is set to 1 bits anywhere there's foreground, and 0 elsewhere (where you want your sky to show).
Then to draw a frame, you draw your sky, enable the stencil buffer, and draw the foreground. For the initial frame (before any explosion has destroyed part of the foreground) the stencil buffer won't really be doing anything.
When you do have an explosion, however, you draw it to the stencil buffer (clearing the stencil buffer for that circle). Then you re-draw your data as before: draw the sky, enable the stencil buffer, and draw the foreground.
This lets you get the effect you want (the foreground disappears where desired) without having to modify the foreground texture at all. If you prefer not to use the stencil buffer, the alternative that seems obvious to me would be to enable blending, and just manipulate the alpha channel of your foreground texture -- set the alpha to 0 (transparent) where it's been affected by an explosion. IMO, the stencil buffer is a bit cleaner approach, but manipulating the alpha channel is pretty simple as well.
I think, but this is just a quick idea, that a good way might be to draw a Very Large Number of Lines.
I'm thinking that you represent the landscape as a bunch of line segments, for each column of the screen you have 0..n vertical lines, that make up the ground:
12 789
0123 6789
0123456789
0123456789
In the above awesomeness, the column of "0":s makes up a single line, and so on. I didn't try to illustrate the case where a single pixel column has more than one line, since it's a bit hard in this coarse format.
I'm not sure this will be efficient, but it at least makes some sense since lines are an OpenGL primitive.
You can color and texture the lines by enabling texture-mapping and specifying the desired texture coordinates for each line segment.
Typically the way I have seen it done is to have each entity be a textured quad, then update the texture for animation. For a destructible terrain it might be best to break the train into tiles then you only have to update the ones that have changed. Don't use GLdrawpixels it is probably the slowest approach possible (outside of reloading textures from disk every frame though it would be close.)
I'm using OpenGL and drawing polygons in a 2D view. How could I blur a polygon, without using glsl, and only things like stencil buffer and stuff. Thanks
The normal method uses the accumulation buffer instead of the stencil buffer. You basically re-draw your polygon(s) a number of times, but change the viewing perspective slightly each time. Exactly what you change determines the style of blur you get. For example, if you want an effect like zooming a camera lens, you can change the view frustum slightly between frames. If you want motion blur, you change the camera view angle instead. With some extra work, you can do some slightly odd-looking effects, such as moving your viewpoint forward, and zooming back at the same time, so (most of) the scene remains roughly the same size, but the perspective you're viewing it from constantly changes.
There are two quick and dirty ways. GLSL or Cg is by far your best solution, especially if you need any decent blur (Gaussian, box, motion, etc). However, you can:
Render the image at a lower resolution, usually to a texture, then render that texture to the screen at high-res. It will blur the image, but you need to use trilinear or anistropic filtering for it to look good. Usually it still won't, but those help.
Render the image to a texture, render once to screen with full opacity, then turn on blending, turn down alpha, and render the image shifted left a bit, right a bit, up a bit, down a bit... etc. You need low opacity for the in-front renders, but they will effectively blur the scene. You may also want to play with blending modes, SrcColor/InvSrcColor or DstColor/InvDstColor may be helpful.
There are a few ways to do this without shaders, but none of them are optimal.