I'm trying to generate a web service call from my iphone app.
I'm working with web services for the the first time.
I realize that an SOAP request would something like this:
My actual web service is not on local.
POST /MyFirstWebService.asmx HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 Content-Length: length
SOAPAction: "http://tempuri.org/HelloWorld"
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <soap:Envelope
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance>
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body>
<HelloWorld xmlns="http://tempuri.org/" /> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>
I want the string hello world returned from the web service.
What is the best way to do this?
I have also read about a framework called JSON.
Can that be useful here?
This link provides simple explaination of how to consume web service in iphone it also explains simple post simple Get and SOAP
Consuming Web Services in iPhone Applications
Difference Between Soap and REST
SOAP and RESTful web services have a very different philosophy from each other. SOAP is really a protocol for XML-based distributed computing, whereas REST adheres much more closely to a bare metal, web-based design. SOAP by itself is not that complex; it can get complex, however, when it is used with its numerous extensions (guilt by association).
To summarize their strengths and weaknesses:
* SOAP *
Pros:
Langauge, platform, and transport agnostic
Designed to handle distributed computing environments
Is the prevailing standard for web services, and hence has better support from other standards (WSDL, WS-*) and tooling from vendors
Built-in error handling (faults)
Extensibility
Cons:
Conceptually more difficult, more "heavy-weight" than REST
More verbose
Harder to develop, requires tools
* REST *
Pros:
Language and platform agnostic
Much simpler to develop than SOAP
Small learning curve, less reliance on tools
Concise, no need for additional messaging layer
Closer in design and philosophy to the Web
Cons:
Assumes a point-to-point communication model--not usable for distributed computing environment where message may go through one or more intermediaries
Lack of standards support for security, policy, reliable messaging, etc., so services that have more sophisticated requirements are harder to develop ("roll your own")
Tied to the HTTP transport model
Related
I am using a very particular language named “Magik”, I used to use MSXML2 to run web services but in one of my projects I failed to use MSXML, I tried a lot of thing to make it work from changing MSXML.DLL and testing different version of MSXML, using MSXMLHttpServer and all the things you may think of, I somehow ate MSDN website but didn’t find anything helpfull.
Now I am looking for other ways of calling a SOAP webservice, someone said you may post your XML to web method address by parsing and using a query string, But I didn’t succeed to do so.
I can also negotiate via TCP/IP, Can I send my XML to a web service using a TCP/IP connection?
If there is any other way that do the job I really appreciate it.
Currently I am connecting Magik to a Java application and when I need to call a web service I send my request to that Java application (there is a Jar file which creates a data-bus between a Magik session and a Java Application) I have also wrote the Java part using Axis technology. But this is a very hard job and I should change a lot of things to only keep my project up and match with a small change in web service that I consume.
Using MSXML were so easy formerly, sadly it does not work now!
First note that you can not use GET to call SOAP web services only POST will work with SOAP, GET can be used for REST but you mentioned SOAP only.
I can introduce you two method that you may use to call a web service instead of your MSXML which does not work anymore.
Using Test Form (Web Service Test Page)
You may ask your .Net web services provider to create a test form for his own web service and you create a query string which suppose to emulate the data on the form, actually you are using the web services tester page to send your data via query string to it and it will complete the rest for you.
Using TCPIP
use a TCP/IP Connection, in this method you need to create a header above your xml to set the parameters that a web service consumer should fill (remember MSXML and Content-Type, Content-Length, SOAPAction, Host, …….)
then translate your string to a byte vector since all programming language which can create a TCPIP Socket just accept a byte vector while inputing or outputing data to that connection. after translating the string you are ready to send the data to your web services address.
take a look at the following example of how you may create a string to send to a TCPIP socket.
POST /globalweather.asmx HTTP/1.1
Host: www.webservicex.net
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: length
SOAPAction: "http://www.webserviceX.NET/GetCitiesByCountry"
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<soap:Envelope xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body>
<GetCitiesByCountry xmlns="http://www.webserviceX.NET">
<CountryName>Egypt</CountryName>
</GetCitiesByCountry>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
You may send above string to http://www.webservicex.net/globalweather.asmx
You may check to following link if you need detailed information about how to consume a web service using TCPIP
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/312530/Calling-Webservice-Using-TCP-IP-from-any-Programmi
I've started learning about webservices recently. Have few question about that:
For webservice, is it always necessary that source should provide wsdl or any other way possible to consume it without needing wsdl?
Till a while ago, I was doing server side XMLhttp post in classic ASP to do modifications in external application & to push data in my application from external application. I'm confused - is that very different from webservice or can be called a sort of webservice(ofcourse without based on SOAP). Any major difference or it is just protocol difference bw webservice and server side XMLhttp post?
Web services can be made asynchronous?(Something like AJAX call through javascript)
Are there any different types of webservices ? (for e.g is there difference bw, webservice providing stock quotes and webservice provided by google)
1.For webservice, is it always necessary that source should provide wsdl or any other way possible to consume it without needing wsdl?
WSDL is a document that publishes an interface. As long as a client complies to the inteface, it is guaranteed to be able to "talk" to the web service. Having said that WSDL is a formal way for a specification when there are many stakeholders. You can proceed without one, as long as you somehow know what the web service expects. Just wrap the application data in a SOAP envelope and send it to the web service. As long as you send what the web service expects (in the SOAP envelope or the application data) and in the way they are expected e.g. transport HTTP etc. it does not matter for the WS if you have used a WSDL or not.
2.Till a while ago, I was doing server side XMLhttp post in classic ASP to do modifications in external application & to push data in my
application from external application. I'm confused - is that very
different from webservice or can be called a sort of
webservice(ofcourse without based on SOAP). Any major difference or it
is just protocol difference bw webservice and server side XMLhttp
post?
In very simple terms web service is XML over some application protocol (usually HTTP). Could be SOAP based or REST. To understand more on this you should read about Service Oriented Applications
3.Web services can be made asynchronous?(Something like AJAX call through javascript)
They could but it is more complicated than that.
4.Are there any different types of webservices ? (for e.g is there difference bw, webservice providing stock quotes and webservice
provided by google)
Not sure what you ask here. Each web service offers something.
I will try to be very simple here:
The W3C defines a "Web service" as "a software system designed to
support interoperable machine-to-machine interaction over a network".
That means first requisite for any software to be web-service is that it should not depend upon platform or software i.e a web service made on java stack can be consumed by client in .net stack on windows or java stack on android.
If your server side implementation XMLhttp post suffice this ,its a
web service.
Types of Web services
Actually, there is no overall and clear categorization on types of web services. But two most popular are :
SOAP based web services. :It use XML messages that follow the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) standard, an XML language defining a message architecture and message formats(WSDL).
REST based web services. With evolution of WEb 2.0 emphasis has been moving away from SOAP based services towards representational state transfer (REST) based communications.[3] REST services do not require XML, SOAP, or WSDL service-API definitions.Read here to get a easy explanation of REST
Need of WSDL to consume SOAP web services?
To consume a SOAP service we only require SOAP endpoint and XML message format. WSDL is a pre-requisite for automatic client side code generation through Java and .NET SOAP frameworks.
Asynchronous web services
Making web services asynchronous is possible.But complexity depends upon frameworks used, for example AXIS2 in JAVA has easy implementation of this.
Are all web services through HTTP and not SOAP automagically restful web services?
I have been hearing the term "Restful web services" everywhere.. but ain't it simply a plain old "web service that uses http".
I have a url at A.php and clients request data from me like this: A.php?parameters_supplied_here_etc_etc
And since the url has a length limit, for longer messages they will send a POST request with the parameters to A.php
Basically if anyone wants to talk to my server/database, it goes through the page at A.php
So can I say that it's a restful web service??
There are at least two types of web services around:
SOAP web services - using XML Schema to strictly define XML messages, typically, but not necessarily using HTTP as a transport protocol. Reliable and standardized, they've been around for quite some time, although sometimes considered heavyweight.
RESTful web services - less rigid, using plain HTTP protocol, taking advantage of built-in GET/POST/PUT/DELETE methods to perform CRUD operation on resources. Content negotiation (typically XML or JSON), redirects (Location header) and user-friendly URLs make RESTful web serives getting more attention.
These are two different communication protocols, you can migrate one into another, but no automatic conversion ever happens.
No, because to be a REST service, it needs to fulfil certain criteria. See wikipedia
There is a quote there which might answer your question better than I can:
SOAP RPC contrast
SOAP RPC over HTTP, on the other hand, encourages each application designer to define a new and arbitrary vocabulary of nouns and verbs (for example getUsers(), savePurchaseOrder(...)), usually overlaid onto the HTTP POST verb. This disregards many of HTTP's existing capabilities such as authentication, caching and content type negotiation, and may leave the application designer re-inventing many of these features within the new vocabulary.[8] Examples of doing so may include the addition of methods such as getNewUsersSince(Date date), savePurchaseOrder(string customerLogon, string password, ...).
The acronym REST stands for Representational State Transfer, this basically means that each unique URL is a representation of some object. Other (such as SOAP) are more RPC-like. SOAP refers to Simple Object Access Protocol and is usually overlaid onto the HTTP POST. SOAP has recently been stretched in some REST-like directions.
One of the cornerstones of "REST" architectural style is using HTTP to its full potential (GET, HEAD, PUT, POST, DELETE, content-type, etags, cache control, etc) instead of as a tunnel. If you do just that, you already win a lot, and I think you should feel entitled to call your service "REST Inspired" or something. From there you can use all the existing building blocks of HTTP infrastructure to your advantage, instead of having to work against them.
It's often tempting to come up with your own RPC or CRUD protocol over HTTP, and reinvent the wheel. The result is usually quite contrary to REST principles.
Are all web services automagically restful web services?
No there is no magic. You have SOAP and other protocols which are not RESTful.
If all your request go through the same URI then this is a clear sign that you're not using URIs to identify the individual resources of your system, so - no.
That being said; there are more constraints such as uniform interfaces, or hypermedia-driven.
If I need a web service to pass back and forth a complex object, is there a reason I should prefer SOAP over REST? Here is an example of the possible SOAP message:
<soap:Envelope>
<soap:Header>
<Credentials>
<User>Joe</User>
<Password>abc123</Password>
</Credentials>
</soap:Header>
<soap:Body>
<MyComplexBusinessObject>
<Search>
<First>Joe</First>
<Last>Smith</Last>
</Search>
...
...
</MyComplexBusinessObject>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
Using REST, I would be asking the client to POST the following xml and authenticate using Basic Authentication:
<MyComplexBusinessObject>
<Search>
<First>Joe</First>
<Last>Smith</Last>
</Search>
...
...
</MyComplexBusinessObject>
The SOAP message is slightly more complicated, but not by much. They are still both XML, but SOAP comes with a WSDL and most programming environments will generate proxy classes for you. However, most people I talk to say I should use REST instead because it's easier to use. But I don't see how SOAP is any harder to use.
Am I missing something?
Your first requirement of "passing back and forth a complex object" constrains your architecture to eliminate many of the benefits of REST. SOAP is designed for accessing remote objects, REST is not. REST supports passing media-types as simple as text/plain, which is far more primitive than dealing with an object.
If you haven't seen it already, this question and its answers cover most of the REST vs SOAP issues.
One major benefit of REST is that all you need to call and use it is a browser and a HTTP stack - pretty much every device and machine has that. So if ease of use and reach are you main goal - use REST.
One of the major benefits of SOAP is that you have a WSDL service description and you can pretty much discover the service automatically, and generate a useable client proxy from that service description (generate the service calls, the necessary data types for the methods and so forth).
So if discoverability and a strict, formal service description are more important to you, use SOAP (with the downside that you need a full-fledged SOAP client to call your service - your web browser won't be sufficient).
SOAP isn't harder to use - but it's just not quite as "pervasive" in terms of being available - any browser can call a REST service and get an answer - but then it needs to parse and interpret that response. SOAP gets nice data structure, but you need a SOAP client for this.
I view SOAP and REST as orthogonal APIs, designed to do different things.
SOAP is basically a fancy RPC, so if you want to send a computation request over to the server and get the result back, you use SOAP. If it would be local, it would be a method call to an object instance.
REST is a way to create, retrieve, update and delete remote objects, not in the sense of POO, using a uniform API. If it would be local, it would be like working with a file.
So they actually respond to different needs. You can bastardize one to do the work of the other, but you mangle the meanings.
If you develop both the service and the client, using SOAP is as easy as REST (actually easier).
You may prefer SOAP over REST if these conditions meet:
The entire service API is complex, not just one object.
The service is used within a relatively small network, and performance is not an important requirement.
You decide to spend the minimum amount of time to develop both the service and the API documentation.
What is WSDL? How is it related to SOAP? Where does REST fit in all of that?
A WSDL is an XML document that describes a web service. It actually stands for Web Services Description Language.
SOAP is an XML-based protocol that lets you exchange info over a particular protocol (can be HTTP or SMTP, for example) between applications. It stands for Simple Object Access Protocol and uses XML for its messaging format to relay the information.
REST is an architectural style of networked systems and stands for Representational State Transfer. It's not a standard itself, but does use standards such as HTTP, URL, XML, etc.
Example: In a simple terms if you have a web service of calculator.
WSDL: WSDL tells about the functions that you can implement or exposed to the client. For example: add, delete, subtract and so on.
SOAP: Where as using SOAP you actually perform actions like doDelete(), doSubtract(), doAdd(). So SOAP and WSDL are apples and oranges. We should not compare them. They both have their own different functionality.
Why we use SOAP and WSDL: For platform independent data exchange.
EDIT: In a normal day to day life example:
WSDL: When we go to a restaurant we see the Menu Items, those are the WSDL's.
Proxy Classes: Now after seeing the Menu Items we make up our Mind (Process our mind on what to order): So, basically we make Proxy classes based on WSDL Document.
SOAP: Then when we actually order the food based on the Menu's: Meaning we use proxy classes to call upon the service methods which is done using SOAP. :)
Every time someone mentions SOAP/WSDL, I think of objects and classes defined in xml...
"You use SOAP just the same way that you would any PHP class. However, in this case the class does not exist in the local applications file system, but at a remote site accessed over http."
...
"If we think of using a SOAP service as just another PHP class then the WSDL document is a list of all the available class methods and properties. "
http://www.doublehops.com/2009/07/07/quick-tutorial-on-getting-started-with-soap-in-php/comment-page-1/
..and whenever someone talks about REST I think of HTTP's commands (request methods) like POST, GET and DELETE
SOAP -> SOAP(Simple object access protocal) is the application level protocal created for machine to machine interaction. Protocol defines standard rules. All the parties who are using the particular protocol should adhere to the protocol rules. Like TCP, It unwinds at transport layer, The SOAP protocol will be understood by Application layer( any application which supports SOAP - Axis2, .Net).
WSDL -> SOAP message consist of SoapEnevelope->SoapHeader and SoapBody. It doesn't define what would be message format? what are all the transports(HTTP,JMS) it supports? without this info, It is hard for any client who wants to consume the particular web service to construct the SOAP message. Even if they do, they won't be sure, it'll work all the time. WSDL is the rescue. WSDL (Web Service description Language) defines the operations, message formats and transport details for the SOAP message.
REST -> REST(Representational state transfer) is based on the Transport. Unlike SOAP which targets the actions, REST concerns more on the resources. REST locates the resources by using URL (example -http://{serverAddress}/employees/employeeNumber/12345) and it depends on the transport protocol( with HTTP - GET,POST, PUT, DELETE,...) for the actions to be performed on the resources. The REST service locates the resource based on the URL and perform the action based on the transport action verb. It is more of architectural style and conventions based.
You're not going to "simply" understand something complex.
WSDL is an XML-based language for describing a web service. It describes the messages, operations, and network transport information used by the service. These web services usually use SOAP, but may use other protocols.
A WSDL is readable by a program, and so may be used to generate all, or part of the client code necessary to call the web service. This is what it means to call SOAP-based web services "self-describing".
REST is not related to WSDL at all.
SOAP stands for Simple (sic) Object Access Protocol. It was intended to be a way to do Remote Procedure Calls to remote objects by sending XML over HTTP.
WSDL is Web Service Description Language. A request ending in '.wsdl' to an endpoint will result in an XML message describing request and response that a use can expect. It descibes the contract between service & client.
REST uses HTTP to send messages to services.
SOAP is a spec, REST is a style.
Wikipedia says "The Web Services Description Language is an XML-based language that provides a model for describing Web services". Put another way, WSDL is to a web service, as javadoc is to a java library.
The really sweet thing about WSDL, though, is that software can generate a client and server using WSDL.
Some clear explanations (for SOAP and WSDL) can be found here as well.
Difference between a SOAP message and a WSDL?
REST is light-weight in terms of encoding, much more useful for light weight devices i.e. non strict APIs.
REST is format independent. XML, HTML, JSON all options are available.
REST provides abilities for on 2 point message transfer (not surprising since REST stands for REpresentational State Transfer) where WSDL/SOAP interaction is multiple point message interaction.
REST does not require a new extension for XML messages, where in WSDL/SOAP this is the case.
WSDL/SOAP uses multiple transport protocols, REST relies on only HTTP. Therefore WSDL/SOAP can be used like a RESTful way, however simple requests can be overly complicated/heavy weighted.
A simple analogy: REST is like a motoboy delivers your food easy and quick. XML extended WSDL/SOAP more like UPS delivery, more structured and serious stuff but comes with a cost.
A WSDL document describes a webservice. It specifies the location of the service and the methods of the service using these major elements:
data types using in webservice
data elements for each operation
describe the operations that can be performed and the messages envolved
SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) is a messaging protocol that allows programs that run on disparate operating systems to communicate using http and xml.