I would like to set a break point on file modification for a particular file, or on opening a particular file. This is a file which our software opens and modifies during portions of legacy code. I'm not exactly sure how to approach this problem. One approach I have thought about was to find all of the places where we are opening files, break on all of them, and inspect the file path to determine if it is the path we are concerned with. The other approach I was thinking was to attempt to set a break point in the file system opening code when the path matches what I am concerned with (possibly more difficult, as I am presently running under Windows. This might be an option under Linux but a Visual Studio 2005 solution would be ideal and a Linux solution potentially useful).
Presently, I am using Visual Studio 2005 for my software project in C++. I was not able to find anything online about this as an option or an approach people would like to take.
Normally, I would say that I should just understand where this file is being opened. Unfortunately this section of code is quite difficult to understand and will be re-factored, but for the immediate future this functionality would help me.
Thank you very much for reading my question,
-Brian J. Stinar-
Put conditional breakpoint to kernel32.CreateFileW and check file name.
Then you will get file handle, so you can put conditional breakpoint to kernel32.CreateFileW and check file handle.
Also you can hook CreateFileW and call __debugbreak() in it.
Related
Okay so I just made a C++ program that is basically a notebook,
you write stuff in it and it saves it to a .dat file and then you can
read it later.
I compiled it with Microsoft Visual C++ and now I sent it to a friend and it's
saying that it is a virus? I scan it online and it also says that it's a virus.
I don't know why this is happening, as I literally just used some if/else statements, created some strings and used a couple getlines. (and fstream to create the .dat files).
This is the virus report: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/a1b72280a32915429607fd5abeef1aad4f8310867df1feb7707ea0f7a404026e/analysis/1455735299/
Here is my code. (Its 400+ lines). And I'm almost certain there's nothing wrong
with it. http://pastebin.com/ZwJZrRSu
Any idea why this is happening?
Most probably your PC is already infected by a virus, which adds itself to any executable it can find on your machine. That would easily explain this behavior. Try to compile the same program on PC that is clean for sure and check your PC by antivirus.
I am not sure but I think it because you imported kernel32.dll
Again, it is hard to tell without the source
Also take a look at the file detail in the report
I wrote a lot of code in C++ and save. After that I want only try some example code which I find. So I paste this code in this my project main.cpp file (where I had my code). I try it example code and mistake close this file. After that I open main.cpp file, but I can't undo changes by Ctrl-Z. I wanted only try example code and then I wanted undo changes by Ctrl Z, but my mistake is close file. Is it possible undo changes after close file or restore it?
Your original code is probably gone for good. However, perhaps this is a good time for you to consider adding a version control system to your tool set, which will help you avoid this kind of mistake in future, as well as give you a lot of other benefits.
Also, it is not a wise idea to paste example code over your own work in the way that you've done, for exactly the reason you've discovered. Insert a new file into your project, or create a separate project for testing example code. I have a separate Visual Studio solution specifically for this purpose.
EDIT: I say "probably" because I can't rule out all possibility of recovery based on the information you've supplied (e.g. you might have some kind of scheduled backup which caught your previous version). Also, if the code you pasted over it was shorter than your original code, it's possible that some of it still exists as unused data blocks on your hard drive, and might be recoverable, assuming something else hasn't already overwritten them.
I have preferences file for my application in Qt.
Whenever I launch the application it loads the file & depending the contents creates the widgets accordingly. I have given some customisation option for the user. Now when my application is closed I am checking whether the preferences are changed. If yes then I am opening the preferences file again & then just adding everything again in it. I am not creating a temporary file, I am directly editing the file. Is this method an efficient one? or am I doing it wrong? because I found these threads:
1. What is the best way to edit the middle of an existing flat file?
http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/25924/
Should use I binary file? Currently I am using ASCII file.
Thanks.
UPDATE: In the stackoverflow link above the correct answer has
If you're stuck using flat, then you're stuck using the old fashioned
way of updating them
I meant to ask whether the method I am using is old fashioned & is there a better method used nowadays? & what does flat file mean?
Don't try to edit the file. Rewrite the whole thing
Rewrite by using a temporary file. i.e. write the current state of preferences into temp file. And then move/rename the file to your actual preference file after making sure the temp file has been written successfully. This helps in case there is a crash when you rewriting the file. If you rewrite it directly, you will be left with neither the old one nor a good new one. In case you do it through a temp file, then do it this way ensures that in case of a crash, you atleast have a good preferences file(though it contains the old preferences).
Text/Binary doesn't make much difference unless it's a really huge file. Text will help to hand edit it if required.
That's a perfectly fine way of doing it. Since you already seem to have all of the preferences loaded into memory and you have edited them there, you don't need to bother with a temporary file (unless you want to ensure safety if your program fails during writing). Just write all of the preferences back into the original file.
Whether you choose a binary file or text file is up to you. Preferences tend to be text files because they have the added benefit of being human readable with just a text editor, rather than some specialised software for viewing them. A binary file may, however, have slightly better performance due to simpler decoding.
I would like my Browser Helper Object which is simply a .dll, to be able to read a text file. I have tried using a pointer to a FILE, as well as ifstream in("file name goes here"). Before implementing these two methods of reading files into the BHO, I tested them individually, and made sure each example dealt with similar data types and locations. Both of them worked without a problem, yet testing the BHO reveals that the file cant even be opened. I have searched google for an alternative method, and after exhausting all other options, I'm hoping that someone would be able to provide me with some guidance/resource. Anything is appreciated; I will keep trying to find a solution and will post what I can in the event that someone else may have the same problem.
Are you providing an absolute path to the file? If you're just using a relative path you may not be in the same working directory while running IE.
I think you might be a victim of the IE protected mode.
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/vista-security/PMSurvivalGuide.aspx
Under protected mode your addin might not have access to registry and file system as you might like.
I have a solution with 21 C++ projects and 1 VB.NET project.
The IDE responds very slowly when I simply move the carret in a file or try to open the menu. The process seems to take 50% of CPU for each movement.
It only happens with this solution and only on my machine.
The solution has total of 2380 source and header files, of which 1280 are header files.
I tried to remove all connection to the source control (Perforce) but it didn't help.
Also, I have Visual Assist installed but even after removing it (uninstall), the same behavior continued.
Any idea?
Deactivate intellisense.
Link
Intellisense parses the whole project and slows down the IDE drastically. If you use Visual Assist then you won't really need it. Visual Assist is less resource hungry and scans in the background, intellisense steals too many resources during its parsing.
Could this apply in your case?
http://coolthingoftheday.blogspot.com/2008/03/visual-basic-2008-hotfix-to-fix-slow.html
Note that disabling Intellisense may also break stuff like the Class Wizard (at least I'm pretty sure it does in VS2005). As already suggested it's a good idea to get rid of all the temporary files like .ncb regularly, because they can get huge and will slow down the IDE.
Also, if you're using Visual Assist, try rebuilding the database, disabling it or installing a different version.
I have a few solutions with over 100 projects, so I know exactly how you feel. Solutions containing some managed projects are especially bad. Disabling Intellisense helps a lot. I've never seen such problems from Visual Assist (or other similar refactoring tools), and that fills in a lot of the missing functionality from losing Intellisense.
I've also encountered some projects that had code that would cause the Intellisense thread to endlessly loop and never finish parsing the code. Most of those times we were never able to pin down the exact bit of code that caused the problem. Certain heavy use of templates and nested macros were often high on the suspicion list.
The only good way to be sure that Intellisense is disabled is to create a directory with the same name as the ncb file. Go to your solution directory, delete the ncb, and create a directory named your_solution_name.ncb. Because it can't recreate the ncb file, you'll get an error box to click through every time you open the solution, but that's a small price to pay.
Simply deleting the ncb will mean that VS will just create it again. The methods that I've seen from inside the VS options will turn off some of the features but will not prevent it from trying to parse all your code.